Attach 8 - Past Present Performance Questionnaire (PPPQ).pdf

Attachment 8

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for the McConnell AFB Multiple Award

Construction Contract (MACC) 2022.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact the contract administrator, Christina Muth, at christina.muth.1@us.af.mil. I can be contacted at christina.muth.1@us.af.mil.

Please send the completed attachment to the Contract Administrator. We may also contact you for additional questions and information. Thank you for your assistance.

X Derek Owen, GS-13, DAF

Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_629 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5837 mailto:christina.muth.1@us.af.mil mailto:christina.muth.1@us.af.mil

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg. 2

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division): ______________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _______________________

C. Contract Number: _______________________

D. Contract Type (e.g., IDIQ, FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.): _______________________

E. Program Title: ______________________________________________

F. Brief Program Description: _______________________________________________________________

G. Period of Performance

1.Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _______________________ through _______________________

2.Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _______________________ through _______________________

3.Reason for difference (if applicable): ________________________________________________________

H. # of Options exercised to date:_______________

I. Contract Dollar Value

1.Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $_____________

2.Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $_____________

3.Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg. 3

J. Description of work performed: ____________________________________________________________

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name: ___________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): ___________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other

Commands): _________________________________________________________________________

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Respondent’s title: _______________________

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address: __________________________________

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.): _____________________________

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role: _____________________________________________________________

F. Other suggested points of contact: ______________________________________________________

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg. 4

Section 4: Performance Information In the questions below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by marking the appropriate selection under each question. Provide supporting information for each sections response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Performance Rating

EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

A. Quality Control

1. Was the quality of the workmanship sufficient?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

2. Were the as-built drawings accurate and submitted timely?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

3. Was identification/correction of deficient work accomplished timely?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg. 5

B. Timely Performance

1. Were submittals provided on time?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

2. Did the submittals clearly identify the proposed item?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

3. Were progress schedules realistic (i.e., amount of time per item, sequence/order of items, etc)?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

4. Project completed on time/per the agreed upon schedule or negotiated revised schedule?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

5. Work performed as planned per the approved progress schedule?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________

C. Management Effectiveness

1. General Business Practices

a. Were experienced managers/supervisors provided who possessed the technical and administrative abilities necessary to manage the project and meet contractual requirements?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

b. Were experienced subcontractors hired?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

c. Were subcontractors/suppliers paid timely?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

d. Was all contract work completed prior to requesting a final inspection, with no major deficiencies?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg. 6

e. Were timely and satisfactory responses to warranty issues provided after project completion?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

f. Did the contractor cooperate to resolve problems, attend meetings (as applicable) and maintain effective communication to ensure satisfactory resolution?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________

2. Pricing

a. Were price proposals submitted timely?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

b. Did price proposals accurately represent the required work?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

c. Was accurate, complete and reasonable supporting pricing information provided for modifications/change orders?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

d. Were price proposals consistently overinflated or underinflated?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________

3. Site Management/Superintendence

a. Did the Site Manager/Superintendent have sufficient authority to make decisions or take action during project performance?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

b. Was the Superintendent regularly on site while work was being performed?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg. 7

c. Did the Superintendent ensure compliance with contract and safety requirements?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

d. Did the Superintendent address contractual and safety requirements before customer/government involvement?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

e. Did the Superintendent take prompt actions to resolve problems with work quality?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

f. Did the contractor produce sound quality and safety plans for the project without substantial involvement from the customer/government?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

g. Did the contractor follow the quality and safety plans for the project?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

h. Were there excessive quality issues noted by the customer (i.e., customer performing contractors quality control functions)?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________

D. Compliance with Labor Standards

1. Were payrolls submitted timely?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

2. Were payrolls complete and accurate?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

3. Was the contractor compliant with all labors laws and regulations, with specific attention to the requirements of the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg. 8

E. Compliance with Safety Regulations

1. Were workplace safety standards and regulations (OSHA, Federal, State, Local, and Agency) met?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

2. Did the contractor submit and implement/enforce an adequate health and safety plan?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________

F. Compliance with Environmental and Other Standards

1. Did the contractor submit and implement an adequate environmental pollution control plan?

(Including, but not limited to recycle and disposal of waste material, hazardous waste management and/or sediment and erosion control.)

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

2. Did the contractor submit and implement/enforce an adequate health and safety plan?

☐ Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsat ☐ N/A

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________

G. Other Past Performance Considerations

1. Assessment of liquidated damages (frequency, circumstances, severity of problem etc.)

☐ Yes ☐ No

2. Was the contractor cooperative in negotiating modifications so that they would result in fair and reasonable cost adjustments to the contract?

☐ Yes ☐ No

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg. 9

3. The contractor provided all deliverables (including documentation) in a timely and accurate manner.

☐ Yes ☐ No

4. Have there been any labor disputes or violations of public law?

☐ Yes ☐ No

5. Have there been any indicators that the contractor has had any financial difficulties?

☐ Yes ☐ No

6. Contractor submitted modifications and other required proposals in a timely manner.

☐ Yes ☐ No

7. Was the contractor ever issued a Cure or Show Cause Notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Additional Comments”

☐ Yes ☐ No

Please include any additional comments as appropriate: ___________________________________________

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐Yes ☐Default ☐Convenience ☐Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules): __________________

McConnell AFB Multiple Award Constrution Contract (MACC) 2022

FA4621-22-R-0002

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION pg.

Section 5: General Comments

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I would / would not award to him today given that I had a choice.

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired. ________

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-mail to: christina.muth.1@us.af.mil and derek.owen.1@us.af.mil

Mailing Address:

22d Contracting Squadron

Attn: Christina Muth

53384 Kansas Street Suite 118

McConnell AFB, KS 67221-3702 mailto:derek.owen.1@us.af.mil