Attachment 41 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Patent Data and Document Management
- Solicitation number
- ACQ-20-0057
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information on a related federal contract opportunity for patent data and document management services. The past performance questionnaire is a reference form for offerors to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office solicitation for patent data and document management support services. It requests information on the offeror's previous contracts such as description of services, period of performance, and performance ratings in areas like quality, timeliness, cost controls, and responsiveness. The related federal contract opportunity is for indexing and scanning paper patent documents, converting electronic patent application data, composing files for publication and issuance, and other activities supporting the patent examination process. Services will be provided to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and are to include functions such as front-end processing, pre-grant publication, post-allowance processing, and post-issuance activities. The solicitation number is ACQ-20-0057 and responses are due based on schedules provided in the forthcoming request for proposals.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 118 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Solicitation #: 1333BJ20R00151004
Brief Description of Work Being Procured: The U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is seeking highly qualified contract staff with applicable skills, to team with federal staff carrying out patent data and document management services. The offeror shall provide patent data and document management support services to the USPTO.
In order to assess potential offerors under the USPTO solicitation number 1333BJ20R00151004, the USPTO contracting office is obtaining past performance information with respect to each offeror in the performance of the work described above. As a reference for work performed by the firm identified below of this questionnaire, your candid response will assist in the evaluation process. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible.
Please complete and sign. References are to submit fully completed questionnaires to Contracting Specialist Mark Motta and Contracting Officer Heather Watroba via email at mark.motta@uspto.gov and heather.watroba@uspto.gov no later than the Solicitation Phase I submission due date of 2:00 PM (EST) on March 31, 2020. The email message shall originate from the reference's government or commercial e-mail system. If you have questions, please contact Contract Specialist, Mark Motta, at (571) 270-0828.
I. Contract Information
a. Company Being Evaluated:
b. Address:
c. Contract Number:
d. Contract Type:
e. Period of Performance (including options):
f. Total Contract Value:
g. Award Information:
Competitive: ( ) Yes ( ) No Basis of Selection: ( ) Technical ( ) Cost/Price ( ) Other (specify):
II. Description of Contract (Briefly describe the services provided under this contract):
III. Under the aforementioned contract, this firm was:
( ) Prime Contractor ( ) Subcontractor ( ) Team Member
IV. Does a corporate or business relationship exist between the firm being evaluated and your organization? If yes, please explain.
( ) Yes ( ) No
V. Evaluator Information
a. Name:
b. Title:
c. Agency/Company:
d. Phone:
e. Role in Program Contract:
f. Length of Involvement in this Program/Contract:
VI. Performance Survey The following are the definitions for the rating system being used:
Excellent (E); Very Good (VG); Good (G); Fair (F); Pass (P); Not Required (NR)
| NO |
| PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS |
| RATING (Please Circle) |
| 1. |
| Overall performance in planning and controlling the program |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 2. |
| Quality of services and support provided |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 3. |
| Compliance with technical requirements and performance standards |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 4. |
| Content, accuracy, quality, and timeliness of technical reports and deliverables |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 5. |
| Ability to design and/or deliver a product that meets or exceeds performance requirements within costs and schedule |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 6. |
| Timely identification and mitigation of risks |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 7. |
| Contractor's ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 8. |
| Compliance with technical process and control requirements (quality assurance, configuration management, etc.) |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 9. |
| Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner. |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 10. |
| Ability to handle fluctuating workloads |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 11. |
| Demonstrated understanding and compliance with mission safety requirements |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 12. |
| Communicating and interfacing with Government |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 13. |
| Ability to effectively manage subcontractor performance |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 14. |
| Ability to build effective working relationships with associate contractors, subcontractors and the Government in a team environment. |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 15. |
| Adequacy of Contractor's system(s) for processing task orders and/or changes. |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 16. |
| Overall responsiveness to Government requests |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 17. |
| Ability to establish realistic cost estimates |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 18. |
| Ability to establish realistic schedule estimates |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 19. |
| lf performance based, how successful was the Contractor in meeting the contract metrics? |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 20. |
| Adherence to estimated costs and contract cost targets |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 21. |
| Ability to anticipate, identify and control cost growth. |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 22. |
| Timeliness, quality, and accuracy of financial reporting |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
| 23. |
| Overall evaluation of cost performance |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| N/R |
VII. Overall Contract Performance Rating Based on the scoring above:
( ) Excellent ( ) Very Good ( ) Good ( ) Fair ( ) Poor
VIII. Would you select this contractor again?
( ) Yes ( ) No
IX. Please add any other comments you may feel are pertinent.
Rater’s Signature Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .