70B01C21R00000007 IT Maintenance Contractor Questions Resp 03292021.pdf

70B01C21R00000007 - (TI) Maintenance for Big Bend Sector and El Paso Sector in Texas

Contractor Questions Government Response

1 Line item Summary, Tab El Paso, Item No.25, Maintenance of existing V-ditch at

West of Columbus POE:

We received on site visit, the direction to open a new v-ditch, not to clean as proposed here, please clarify which way to estimate.

Also, if we are installing a new V-ditch, can we spread excavation spoils, or will they require haul-off?

Modified Notional Work Plan

2 At attachment #2, Contractor Unit Pricing, on Tab El Paso Labor, New Mexico labor, Big Bend Labor:

CLIN 1 Fences and Gates requesting for 2 Electricians, should this be welder and welder helper?

CLIN 3 Drainage and Grates requesting for 2 Electricians, should this be operator and laborers?

Labor categories have been updated to include all labor categories for each sector and state .

3 For attachment 2, must we use the shown crew composition in the labor categories, or can that be manipulated with our(estimate) required labor force to complete the tasks?

Use the corrected labor categories which have been updated in the unit bid sheet. All labor categories for each sector and state have been updated for each CLIN/category.

4 Reference: SF-1449, RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Instructions to Offerors, para IV.17. #2 The proposal due date and time is unclear, Block 8 of the SF-1449 indicates that the offer due date/local time is 4/19/2021 at 1200. The proposal due date/time listed in paragraph IV.17, #2 indicates that proposal are due by 14 April 2021 (4:00 PM Eastern Time). Please clarify the time and date that proposals are due for this solicitation?

Due date is April 19th.

5 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Attachment 6 The original solicitation included Davis-Bacon Building and Highway wage determinations for El Paso and Presidio as well as Service Contract Act determination for El Paso. During the site visit we learned that 85% of the work to be performed on this program is to occur in New Mexico. Will the government provide the appropriate wage determinations for the locations in New Mexico where work is anticipated to be performed?

Yes, appropriate wage determinations will be included at the order level.

6 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Attachment 5 , Attachment 2 Contractor Unit Pricing Sheet Final The instructions for this attachment are unclear. At the top of the F&G tab it states “Notional Work Plan; Use Work Order Form to Complete Cost. Tab 10 in the Attachment 2 Contractor Unit Pricing Sheet Final is a Work Order Form.”

Attachment 4 revision & Attachment 8 added.

• Are offerors to complete an individual Work Order Form for each of the Notional Work Order Plan items listed in Attachment 5?

• If so, what sections of the Work Order Form are offerors to complete?

• And, how are offerors to submit this information? Because these are not presently identified as submittals for this solicitation page counts are not allocated to these items.

If we are required to submit this information can we submit these in an appendix to Volume I and not include them in current page count limitations?

7 Reference: Attachment 1 Statement of Work EPT BBT North TI Maintenance IDIQ 12012020 3-4-2021SOW, and Attachment 7 (Contained within the SOW) ATTACHMENT 7: Work Plan Development Process (contained within Attachment 1 – Statement of Work) is blurry and difficult to read. We request that the Government provide a legible version of the flow chart so that we can adequately understand and address the requirements of the solicitation.

Legible version will be provided

8 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, para IV.17.6.A (pg. 74) The columns showing the volumes indicate that Factor V: Price is in Volume II.

Should this be Volume III?

Yes

9 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, para IV.17.6.D (pg.74) Since Resumes are not included in the page count for Technical Capabilities, is it acceptable to put them in an appendix?

Yes

10 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, para IV.17.6.D.4; Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire The instructions indicate that offerors or to submit 3 past performance questionnaires. However, the Attachment 5 provided in the Solicitation is the CBP Notional Work Plan Spreadsheet. Will CBP provide the Past Performance Questionnaires.

PPQ included

11 Reference: Site Visit Are there any restrictions on roadway use to field locations, or just pre-approved roadways?

just pre-approved roadways

12 Reference: Site Visit Are there any Government restrictions pertaining to NO off asphalt prior to sun up, and back on asphalt prior to sun down?

No

13 Reference: Site Visit Are there any additional security requirements for afterhours access?

No

14 Reference: Site Visit Is the Government going to supply any stored materials for the project, especially for urgent responses?

All contractors are responsible for providing their own materials.

15 Reference: Site Visit All Apply

TIDS Version 1 is included with the RFP information. Please clarify whether repair and maintenance should be performed based on TIDS V1 standards, or if they need to meet current TIDS (i.e. Version 5)

16 Reference: Site Visit Based on the inclement weather as related to dust storms witnessed on the site walk, are there any restrictions other than standard EM385 guidelines that would stop work?

No

17 Reference: Site Visit Based on the inclement weather as related to dust storms witnessed on the site walk, are there any additional security measures to implement due to low visibility conditions?

Meet standard EM385 guidelines

18 Reference: Site Visit How often can work stoppages be expected at ranches and livestock yards like the delay encountered on the site visit on 3-16? Will a schedule be determined with these entities to perform uninterrupted work?

Minimal, yes will be coordinated.

19 Reference: Site Visit Will a schedule be determined to perform uninterrupted gate maintenance at Santa Teresa, or will traffic control and work stoppages to allow trucks to pass be anticipated?

Have to allow traffic passage.

20 Reference: Site Visit Will there be FOB’s or yards available to stage materials and equipment?

Contractors responsibilities to stage equipment. Most all areas will accommodate this effort. Coordination with the COR required.

21 Reference: Site Visit Confirm that the slide gate at K1-B is an example of a completed retrofit top rail as described in Unscheduled work, Fences and Gates, Line 3.

Yes

22 Reference: Site Visit American Brick Bridge was not seen during the site visit. Specify hardware sizes, type, and frequency for additional hardware for Unscheduled work, Fences and Gates, Line 11.

Reference Unit materials bid sheet

23 Reference: Site Visit; RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 Confirm that RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 Fence & Gates No. 1 and 2 apply to wire mesh repairs only and not to bollard wall panels.

Updated Attachment 2 Line Item summary included with latest Amendment.

24 Reference: Site Visit; RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 Roads and Bridges No.

32: Provide coordinates or more specific locations for Boot Heel Roads

Updated Attachment 2 Line Item summary included with latest Amendment.

25 Reference: Site Visit; RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 Roads and Bridges No.

33: Provide coordinates or more specific location for Whitewater Area

Updated Attachment 2 Line Item summary included with latest Amendment.

26 Reference: Site Visit; RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 Updated Attachment 2 Line Item summary included with latest Amendment.

RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 Do the BSI numbers cross reference or coincide with coordinates that can be found via Google Earth?

27 Reference: Site Visit; RFP 70B01C21R00000007 Line Item Summary 01212021 Please provide brand and description of the light fixtures in the El Paso AoR to be maintained expected for the scheduled lighting inspections.

Updated Attachment 2 Line Item summary included with latest Amendment.

28 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Section II, Federal Acquisition Regulations (Page 5, number 55) - FAR 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds – Construction (Jun 2020) Should any of the pricing being submitted in Attachment 2 include the cost of Performance and Payment bonds?

No. Bond pricing may be required at unscheduled maintenance order level.

29 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Section I – Item 1.4 CONTRACT LINE

ITEMS:

This paragraph states: “See Attachments 2 “Line Item Summary” and 3 “Unit Bid Sheet”. The Offeror shall complete Attachment 2 “Line Item Summary” and Attachment 3 “Unit Bid Sheet” as part of their price proposal” The Gov’t appears to have provided two pricing excel files:

• Attachment+2+Contractor+Unit+Pricing+Sheet+final

• RFP+70B01C21R00000007+Line+Item+Summary+01212021 Attachment 3 was a PDF labeled: Attachment+3+Inventory+Asset+List+12-08- 2020+(003). This does not appear to be a pricing file.

Please clarify the bid pricing requirements.

Attachment 2 & 3 revisions included with amendment.

30 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Line Item Summary 01212021, Attachment 2 Contractor Unit Pricing Sheet Final, and Attachment 5 Notional Work Plan – MS Excel Spreadsheet file corrections are required.

The following MS Excel files require corrections to formulas as specified below:

• RFP+70B01C21R00000007+Line+Item+Summary+01212021: It appears that all the pricing tabs except for the “Base Period” tab are missing a column for “Other” Direct Costs.

• Attachment+2+Contractor+Unit+Pricing+Sheet+final: Please either eliminate the links or provide the linked files.

• Attachment+5+Notional+Work+Plan: Please either correct the formula in cell L3 on the L&E tab to eliminate the circular reference.

Corrections made.

31 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Attachment+2+Contractor+Unit+Pricing+Sheet+final:

Given the pricing requirement in Attachment 2 to provide Labor Rates in New Mexico and the “List” tab providing locations in New Mexico for CLIN’s 1 thru 6 work scopes, please provide the appropriate Service Contract Act and Davis Bacon Wage Determinations for applicable counties in New Mexico.

Attachment revision included with amendment.

32 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Attachment+2+Contractor+Unit+Pricing+Sheet+final – “List” tab.

The list tab reflects Native American and one of the Stakeholders. Please identify all Native American Stakeholders, areas of impact, and any related requirements

None

33 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Section II, Federal Acquisition Regulations (Page 5, number 56) - FAR 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds – Construction (Oct 2010) Should any of the pricings being submitted in Attachments 2 or 3 include the cost of Performance and Payment bonds at the time of the RFP response?

No. Bond pricing may be required at unscheduled maintenance order level.

34 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Section II – 128 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee Please confirm a bid guarantee is required for the Bid Submittal.

If yes, please also stipulate if the bid bond amount should be sufficient for the total pricing amounts when combining both Scheduled and Unscheduled Maintenance in both El Paso and BBTN. Please also indicate if a bid guarantee is required for just the Base Period and all four Option Periods.

Not required

35 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21- Page 76 – Volume 3 III, Factor V – Pricing Proposal, Coefficient Mark-up.

Why is the Gov’t causing additional unnecessary costs and risks to each Offeror’s proposal and the resulting program by defining that the cost of social security contributions, worker’s compensation insurance, state unemployment insurance, federal unemployment insurance be added to the cost of Materials?

Reference RFP 70B01C21R00000007 - Page 76 – Volume 3 III, Factor V – Pricing Proposal states that the Offeror’s price coefficient must contain all additional applicable costs including, but not limited to:

• Davis-Bacon Act requirements, social security contributions, worker’s compensation, insurance, state unemployment insurance, federal unemployment insurance.

A more effective pricing approach that would serve the government and better define costs would be to have four separate Coefficient Mark-ups, one for Labor, one for Materials, one for Equipment Costs, and one for Subcontractor and Other Direct Costs.

This would eliminate the need for an Offeror to factor in unnecessary costs into a Coefficient Mark-up that would apply to all four categories of cost when the actual drivers of indirect costs are different for each.

RFP revised.

36 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21- Page 76 – Volume 3 III, Factor V – Pricing Proposal, Coefficient Mark-up.

Why is the Gov’t causing additional unnecessary costs and risks to each Offeror’s proposal and the resulting program by defining that costs that would normally be

RFP Revised. Revised coefficient definition can be found in the

SOW.

Task Specific Direct costs be included into a Coefficient Mark-up? This has other tasks pricings bear the cost of direct costs from different tasks.

Reference RFP 70B01C21R00000007 - Page 76 – Volume 3 III, Factor V – Pricing Proposal states that the Offeror’s price coefficient must contain all additional applicable costs including, but not limited to:

• All daily and final site cleanup (On-site clean up to a task order requirement is a task specific direct cost)

• Permits (Construction permits and other task specific permits is a task specific direct cost)

• Utility scoping (On-site utility scoping is a task specific direct cost)

• Material and equipment delivery (Task specific material and equipment delivery are task specific direct costs)

• Any required storage facilities (the cost of job specific staging areas are task specific direct costs)

• Mobilization for each task order (Mobilization of manpower and equipment to a task order requirement is a task specific direct cost)

• Job Site Supervision (On-site construction supervision is a task specific direct cost)

• Taxes (New Mexico Gross Receipts taxes, any state applicable sales taxes are task specific direct costs. Payroll related taxes should be included in a labor specific coefficient markup as referenced in the preceding question. Any Federal, State, or Local income taxes, jurisdictional property taxes, and any other form of taxes levied on the Contractor would be an appropriate inclusion into an overall coefficient markup.

37 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Page 76 – Volume 3 III, Factor V – Price Proposal Given the wide range of percentage cost of Davis Bacon fringe relative to the various applicable labor categories (example: the DB Fringe on a El Paso County electrician is approximately 37.5% of the direct labor rate and the DB Fringe on an Operator: Grader/Blade in El Paso County is approximately 5.38% of the direct labor rate). Given this wide range of cost, please confirm that Davis Bacon fringe (which by definition is only applicable to on-site field labor activity) will be considered a direct cost and not part of a flat co-efficient mark-up.

New coefficient definition included in SOW revision.

38 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Page 76 – Volume 3 III, Factor V – Price Proposal and Statement of Work paragraph C.5.4.

There are inconsistencies in the make-up of the co-efficient “mark-up” in these two sections:

The following is a list of what the RFP includes and the SOW does not:

See RFP revision

• Davis-Bacon Act requirements, social security contributions, worker’s compensation insurance, state unemployment insurance, federal unemployment insurance

• All daily and final site cleanup

• Material and equipment delivery

• Any required storage facilities

• Mobilization for each task order Subject to the responses to questions 31-33 (above) regarding Direct Costs not being included in the co-efficient “mark-up”, please correct/update these two sections to eliminate inconsistences.

39 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007 3-4-21, Page 76 – Volume 3 III, Factor V – Price Proposal.

This section of the RFP states “the Offeror’s price coefficient must contain all additional applicable costs including, but not limited to:”

Please either provide a comprehensive list of all applicable costs that should be included in the Offeror’s price coefficient - OR - provide a statement that all Project/Task Order specific costs to and from the site and on-site are Direct Costs and not part of the Offeror’s price coefficient.

RFP Revised. Revised coefficient definition can be found in the

SOW.

40 Reference: Statement of Work, paragraph 9.0, Special Conditions.

This section of the SOW states. “The COR may provide approved locations for mobilization and material laydown yards for maintenance execution” In any of the areas covered by this RFP, are there any locations for mobilization and material laydown that have been already approved and/or used previously?

Please specify locations and cost, if any.

All areas used are within our cleared footprint.

NM Roosevelt is 60ft from Border.

TX areas vary upon location All areas must be approved by COR.

41 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007, 3-4-21, Page 76 – Volume 3 III, Factor V – Price Proposal This section of the RFP states:

Submission Requirements: Complete Attachment 2 “Line Item Summary” and attachment 3 “Unit Price Sheet”. Offerors shall provide their proposed coefficient for the Indefinite Quantity (IQ) work on attachment 2 “Line Item Summary”.

There is not a “Line Item Summary” in Attachment 2 to provide the proposed coefficient.

In the excel file RFP+70B01C21R00000007+Line+Item+Summary+01212021, there is a “Summary” tab and the “Instructions” tab provides the instruction to “…In addition, the offeror shall propose its coefficient for the unscheduled maintenance work by completing Cell B20 in the Summary sheet.” Cell B20 is an unlabeled cell five rows below the Total Contract Value row (excel row 15) The “Instructions” tab goes on to state: “After entering the proposed prices and the coefficient, the amounts will transfer automatically to the summary sheet to give the total evaluated price.”

Attachment 2 & 3 revisions included with Amendment.

There does not appear to be this functionality in this excel file, nor does it appear to be labeled as such.

Please clarify and update the excel pricing files as needed.

42 Reference: RFP 70B01C21R00000007, 3-4-21, Page 53 – IV.10 52.222-23 NOTICE

OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

The Goals for Minority Participation lists two percentages. 57.8% and 49%. Please clarify.

57.8%

43 Who is the incumbent contractor and what is the total contract value awarded? DEL-JEN, INC., $43.4M 44 Reference: SOW – Section C.4.2, Unscheduled Maintenance.

Section C.4.2 of the SOW states: “…Overtime approval process and 40-hour work week. Example (Overtime hours will be in support of unscheduled maintenance only and must be approved by the COR in advance. Fence breach repairs will be performed seven (7) days a week. Contractor shall not exceed 40-hour work weeks unless approved by the COR in advance.”

Is the COR familiar with overtime requirements promulgated by the U.S.

Department of Labor, to include but not be limited to travel time, and will this contract follow those requirements?

Yes

45 The SF1449 states a due date of 4/19/21 at 4 PM Eastern. Page 73 of the SF1449 continuation sheet states that proposals are due by 14 April 2021. Please clarify the due date.

April 19th.

46 Submission requirements for Volume II, Factor IV, Subfactor 1, Past Performance state: “Offeror shall submit up to three (3) past performance questionnaires (Attachment 5)”. Attachment 5 is not provided on beta.SAM. Please provide this document.

Attachment 5 is included

47 Submission requirements for Volume 1, Factor 1, Subfactor 2, Work Plan Development state: “Offeror shall develop a Notional Work Plan utilizing the template and instructions listed in the RFP (Attachment 4).” This factor is limited to 20 pages. The work plan tables themselves take 10 pages or more. Can the government increase the number of pages allowed for Factor 1?

The unit bid sheet is not included in the count so 20 pages is sufficient – 1 page per task – Work Order Form

48 Section II.128, page 39 states that a Bid guarantee is required at 20% or $3 million whichever is less. This contract is for both Firm Fixed Price Services and for task order work. The Fixed Price services are for one year with option years. Is the Bid Bond for the first-year amount of the Firm Fixed services? If not, how would the government like us to determine the value of the bid bond to provide to our bonding company? Since this will be a single contract, can we assume that bid bonds will not be required for task orders?

Not required

49 2) Section III, page 48 lists 9 attachments or exhibits as follows:

(1) STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

Corrected

(2) LINE ITEM SUMMARY –

(3) UNIT BID SHEET –

(4) NOTIONAL WORK PLAN

(5) PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY

(6) WAGE DETERMINATIONS BY COUNTY

(7) WORK ORDER FORM

(8) ESTIMATE FORM

(9) PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

Several of the items above appear to be missing, misnumbered, or had name changes in the beta.Sam.gov announcement. Several are called out throughout the instructions to offerors by the name above and not the actual document name. We have the following questions:

2.a Attachment 2 in beta.Sam is Contractor Unit Pricing. This appears to be the RFP’s Attachment 3 Unit Bid Sheet. Is the beta.Sam Contractor Unit Pricing document the same document as the RFP’s Attachment 3 Unit Bid Sheet?

2.b Attachment 4 in the RFP is the Notional Work Plan, Attachment 4 in the Beta.Sam announcement includes 6 separate design standards files. Attachment 5 on the beta.Sam Announcement is called the Notional Work Plan. Is it correct to assume that the beta.Sam Attachment 5 is the document intended as the RFP’s Attachment 4?

2.c The RFP Attachment 5 lists a Past Performance Information Survey. There is no such document listed as an Attachment on the beta.Sam announcement.

Would the government please provide a Past Performance Information Survey? If possible, would the government please provide the survey in a Word document so that we can easily complete and send to our clients?

2.d Attachments 7-9 listed in the RFP are not provided as Attachments in the beta.Sam announcement. Please provide these attachments.

50 The Size Standard listed for NAICS 237990 is shown as $36 million on the SF 1449 and as $30 Million in Section IV.1, Page 49 of the continuation document. Please confirm the size standard is $36 million.

Corrected

51 The Representations appear to begin on page 49 Section IV.1 and end on page 72, Section IV.16. Is this correct? Are contractors required to include completed sections IV1-IV16 in their proposals? If not, would the government please provide a list of the sections, if any that are to be completed and included? Should these be included in Volume III Price?

Complete in accordance with instructions and may be included with Volume III.

52 Section IV.6 and IV. 17.1 require conformance with FAR 52.212-1 as well as the RFP. The first clause of FAR 52.212-1 “the Government reserves the right to inspect or test any supplies and services that have been tendered for

Contractor need to price out supplied unit bid sheet.

acceptance… The Government may require repair or replacement of nonconforming supplies.” This clause covers QC for performance and materials.

While QC for performance is self-explanatory, please provide specifications for materials/items that would or could be inspected by the Government so that contractors may ensure that our prices reflect items conforming to Government expectations.

53 Section IV 17, specific proposal instructions state font shall be no less than 12 pitch. A 12-Pitch font is approximately equal to 10-point font. Please confirm that the government the government’s intent for contractors to use 10-point fonts.

No - its 12 font

54 Paragraph 6.C. Instructions to Offerors. Is there a specific file naming convention for the files, or a specific subject line on the email submissions for proposal submission?

No

55 Volume III submission is listed as the Completed Line-Item Summary and Unit Bid Sheet. Assuming these are to be submitted as Excel spreadsheets, should they be submitted as separate documents or should we provide a volume III PDF file with all documents for Volume III in one PDF and the individual spreadsheets in native format? Should we provide a separate Volume III email?

See RFP instructions

56 Technical Volume 1, Factor I, Subfactor 2, states Offeror shall develop a Notional Work Plan utilizing the template and instructions listed in the RFP (Attachment 4).

The Notional Work Plan instructions state “Use Work Form to complete costs.”

There does not appear to be additional instructions. Please provide instructions.

There is not a template, per se in the Notional Work Plan attachment, simply tasks, locations, and number of occurrences in separate worksheets. Is it the government’s intent for the contractor to use the tasks listed in each worksheet of the Notional Work plan to develop our proposal work plan? If not, is it the Government’s intent that we submit an Excel Spreadsheet?

Vendor needs to use the Estimate Form (attachment 8) for each task, they will submit a Estimate Form (without prices) – Updated Notional work plan attached

57 Volume I, Factor II, Subfactor 2 requires: Offeror shall provide resumes for Key Personnel in accordance with section C.6.2 of the SOW. C6.2 lists technical and managerial personnel as potentially key and states that QC/Safety may be the same person. Specific requirements for Key Personnel are included only for the Program Manager and the QC/Safety Personnel. Please confirm that contractors are only required to include two resumes.

Resumes for any key personnel stated in the RFP are required

58 Volume II, Factor IV Subfactor 1 Past Performance states: Offeror shall submit up to three (3) past performance questionnaires.” Are the Past Performance Surveys or Questionnaires (when provided in an Amendment) to be completed by references and sent directly to the government? Or are they to be sent to the contractor? If they are to be sent to the Government, should contractors include only the contract information pages from the questionnaires or the entire questionnaires in Volume II?

See attachment 5 instructions.

59 Is this project subject to Texas and New Mexico sales tax? NM only 60 Self-Performance. The NAICS code for this solicitation is 237990, which is a construction NAICS. Since this is a Construction NAICS with a large size standard, can we assume that the limitations on subcontracting as shown on page 23 is 85% as per section II.102 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting, Paragraph (e) (3) General Construction or 75% as per Paragraph (e) 4 Construction by specialty trade contractors)?

85%

61 What is the anticipated value and or number of task orders to be issued in the first year?

Will be determined quarterly

62 Will the site visit attendee list be released/posted on beta.SAM.gov? Yes – provided list of attendees to procurement 63 Is there a bonding requirement for this project? If so, how much? No 64 What contract similar to this announcement has been performed in the past 3 years?

CTIMR

65 What are the expected Work orders? Historically, what have they been in the past 3 years?

Will be determined quarterly

66 Please provide list of all subcontractors providing support to the incumbent? Up to contractor to find any supporting personnel and contractors 67 Does the current contractor utilize the NCMMS/CMMS data base? If so, who NO, WMS is our approved data base 68 Is the contractor responsible for any licenses, software or training for the work order system.

Government will provide training for WMS data base systems

69 Is the contractor responsible for any licenses, software or training for the work order system.

WMS – Gov’t will provide access

70 Is there storage space provided by gov't at all buildings for the contractors equipment and materials?

No

71 Please confirm total miles to be maintianed per sector. Reference Inventory list provide in Beta Sam 72 How many 8(a) vendors were at of the walk thru? List of Attendees included.