23. Past Performance Survey.doc

DOC document 63 KB Posted

Attached to
General Construction Multiple Award IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
6973GH-23-R-00020
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Franchise Acquisition Services

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to General Construction Multiple Award IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 16-37.pdf PDF
Addendum 2 specifications.pdf PDF
18. Schedule B Task Requirement, Revision 1 dated 3-23-23.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 26 21-017375 Addendum 1.pdf PDF
List of Attendees for Site Visit.pdf PDF
Attachment 25 AMP400 OC Construction contractors combined.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 24 EOSH documents.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 5 through 15.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 with attachments.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
6. WD_2.10.23.pdf PDF
20. 21-017375 CAI B50 - Specifications for Bid.pdf PDF
13. SOW Appendix F EXCAVATION PERMIT v1.pdf PDF
11. SOW Appendix D Installed Equipment Data sheet.pdf PDF
3. Contractor's Release.pdf PDF
1. Specification 01010, Statement of Work.pdf PDF
8. SOW Appendix A Submittal form.pdf PDF
22.. Past Performance Information Form.doc DOC document
15. Division 27 Communications.pdf PDF
10. SOW Appendix C AMKFM-224001 Division 27 Revision 16.pdf PDF
14. Division 26 Elecrical Requirements.pdf PDF
4. SF25 Performance Bond.pdf PDF
6973GH-23-R-00020 3-1-23.pdf PDF
21. Client Auth. Letter.pdf PDF
19. 21-017375 CAI B50 - All Drawings for Bid.pdf PDF
2. Chapter_33_Construction_Safety.pdf PDF
12. SOW Appendix E Construction waste management.pdf PDF
17. 21-017375 Task Requirement SOW.pdf PDF
7. Specification Table of Contents 01.10.2023.pdf PDF
18. Schedule B Task Requirement.pdf PDF
9. SOW Appendix B Substitution form.pdf PDF
16. Division 28 Electronic Safety and Security.pdf PDF
5. SF25A Payment Bond.pdf PDF
Show all 35

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ATTACHMENT 6

SIR/RFO 6973GH-22-R-00065

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS

1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

a. Handwritten responses are acceptable.

b. Indicate, based on the ratings below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only performance for which contractor is/was responsible. The following is a definition of the rating levels:

RATING

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

4 EXCELLENT: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

3 GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

2 SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factors contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

1 MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

0 POOR: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and corrections are not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

c. Please circle a “Number” or “Yes” / “No” corresponding to your rating or “N/A” if you are unable to provide a rating for an area.

d. PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR ANY MARGINAL, POOR OR “YES” RATINGS. SPACE FOR YOUR NARRATIVE REMARKS IS PROVIDED ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, USE THE BACK OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE.

e. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has contracts with this offeror.

2.

Please return completed questionnaire via e-mail to the following:

Ms. Cynthia Cooper, Contracting Officer, AAQ-730

E-mail: cynthia.cooper@faa.gov

Due Date: March 23, 2023

PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION

The company who provided this questionnaire is proposing on a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Multiple Award GeneralConstruction Services contract at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center (MMAC), in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Past performance is of considerable importance to this Source Selection. Therefore, input from current or previous customers of the offeror is very important.

A. CONTRACTOR:

POINT OF CONTACT:

TITLE:

TELEPHONE NO.:

E-MAIL:

B. CONTRACT NUMBER:

CONTRACT TYPE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

APPROXIMATE DOLLAR VALUE:

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:

PART THREE: QUESTIONS

The numbers 0 to 4 correspond with the following descriptive values provided on the questionnaire cover page:

Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent

Quality/Timeliness of Service

1.
How would you rate the contractor's general overall compliance with contract requirements?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
2.
How would you rate the timeliness of the Contractor's service - delivered submittals on time and adhering to the required schedule?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
3.
How well did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to meet contract requirements?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
4.
How well did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to solve problems?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
5.
How would you rate the contractor on the timeliness of its responses to inquiries or other administrative matters?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A

Cost Control

6.
If applicable, how well did the contractor meet the proposed cost estimates?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A

Business Relations – Effective Management

7.
If applicable, how well did the contractor meet the proposed cost estimates?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
8.
How well did the contractor display initiative in meeting contract requirements?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
9.
How well was the contractor's selection of personnel and how well was it appropriate for the performance of this contract?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
10.
How effective was the contractor in interfacing with the Government's (or other) staff?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
11.
How would you rate the contractor’s overall management of this contract?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
12.
How would you rate the performance of the contractor's key personnel?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A

Customer Satisfaction

13.
How well did the contractor provide timely assistance, when responding to problems?
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
14.
Has a Deficiency Notice been issued in association with contract performance for this contract?

a. If so, please explain? ___________________________

Yes or No

15.
Has Cure Notice been issued in association with the performance of this contract?

a. If so, please explain? ___________________________

Yes or No

16.
Has Show Cause Notice been issued in association with the performance of this contract?

a. If so, please explain? ___________________________

Yes or No

17.
Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default, or is a termination pending?

a. If so, please explain? ___________________________

Yes or No

18.
Would you award future contracts to this contractor?

a. If no, please explain? ___________________________

Yes or No

Integrity

15.
Did you experience any integrity problems with this Contractor?

a. If so, please explain? ___________________________

Yes or No

16.
Did the contractor maintain integrity during contract performance? If not, please provide reason.

a. If so, please explain? ___________________________

Yes or No

17. Please provide any other comments you may have

PART FOUR: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

The following information will assist in the analysis of the data provided. Information will be kept CONFIDENTIAL:

NAME OF RESPONDENT: _____________________________________

POSITION TITLE: ____________________________________________

ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________

TELEPHONE NO.: ____________________________________________

LENGTH OF INVOLVEMENT IN PROGRAM/CONTRACT: ______________

DATE QUESTIONNAIRE COMPLETED: ____________________________

THANK YOU!

PAGE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .