Top 100 Contractors in NAICS 541715: Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology), FY2024
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 44% of FY2024 NAICS 541715 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $44,153,897,559 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded NAICS 541715
- Contractors
- 4,223 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Lockheed Martin Corporation $4.99 billion, 11.1% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $4,987,403,386 | |||
| 2 | $3,467,756,217 | |||
| 3 | $2,233,436,222 | |||
| 4 | $2,171,484,710 | |||
| 5 | $1,526,397,655 | |||
| 6 | $1,372,205,667 | |||
| 7 | $1,340,307,654 | |||
| 8 | $1,057,559,767 | |||
| 9 | $982,922,879 | |||
| 10 | $694,058,750 | |||
| 11 | $689,990,785 | |||
| 12 | $647,767,236 | |||
| 13 | $622,285,424 | |||
| 14 | $484,344,302 | |||
| 15 | $479,479,833 | |||
| 16 |
RTX Corporation
|
$462,592,097 | ||
| 17 | $459,983,613 | |||
| 18 | $450,841,936 | |||
| 19 | $349,774,300 | |||
| 20 | $337,478,868 | |||
| 21 | $337,107,618 | |||
| 22 | $324,180,294 | |||
| 23 | $294,544,752 | |||
| 24 | $285,452,036 | |||
| 25 | $278,585,044 | |||
| 26 | $274,938,153 | |||
| 27 | $270,718,831 | |||
| 28 |
Jacobs Government Services Company
|
$269,627,011 | ||
| 29 |
Caci Technologies LLC
|
$251,741,310 | ||
| 30 | $169,413,851 | |||
| 31 | $162,892,399 | |||
| 32 | $155,678,461 | |||
| 33 | $142,908,833 | |||
| 34 | $131,220,590 | |||
| 35 | $129,946,021 | |||
| 36 | $129,729,843 | |||
| 37 | $128,281,658 | |||
| 38 | $125,314,492 | |||
| 39 | $124,461,713 | |||
| 40 | $119,715,659 | |||
| 41 | $116,922,164 | |||
| 42 | $116,500,988 | |||
| 43 | $109,903,424 | |||
| 44 |
Prescient Edge Corporation
Top agencies
|
$108,978,726 | ||
| 45 | $107,052,499 | |||
| 46 | $105,421,801 | |||
| 47 | $101,244,456 | |||
| 48 | $99,445,289 | |||
| 49 | $95,262,564 | |||
| 50 |
CQ JV, LLC
Top agencies
|
$94,816,345 | ||
| 51 | $91,812,037 | |||
| 52 | $91,230,175 | |||
| 53 | $89,161,732 | |||
| 54 |
American Electronic Warfare Associates Incorporated
Top agencies
|
$88,245,496 | ||
| 55 | $87,666,336 | |||
| 56 | $84,661,519 | |||
| 57 | $82,345,455 | |||
| 58 | $82,117,935 | |||
| 59 |
MP Solutions, LLC
Top agencies
|
$81,014,893 | ||
| 60 | $80,654,206 | |||
| 61 |
General Atomic Technologies Corporation
|
$79,146,375 | ||
| 62 | $78,983,057 | |||
| 63 | $78,158,007 | |||
| 64 | $78,061,746 | |||
| 65 |
Innovative Defense Technologies LLC
|
$77,114,001 | ||
| 66 |
Assurance Technology Corp
Top agencies
|
$73,192,167 | ||
| 67 | $72,389,662 | |||
| 68 | $71,107,227 | |||
| 69 | $69,527,087 | |||
| 70 |
JJR Solutions LLC
|
$68,891,977 | ||
| 71 | $68,520,238 | |||
| 72 | $68,492,045 | |||
| 73 | $68,281,196 | |||
| 74 | $66,778,575 | |||
| 75 | $64,301,300 | |||
| 76 |
Anduril Industries Inc.
|
$64,202,097 | ||
| 77 |
Range Generation Next LLC
Top agencies
|
$64,113,555 | ||
| 78 | $61,301,538 | |||
| 79 | $60,643,583 | |||
| 80 | $59,303,795 | |||
| 81 | $57,333,229 | |||
| 82 | $56,571,425 | |||
| 83 | $55,438,042 | |||
| 84 | $55,276,581 | |||
| 85 | $55,172,936 | |||
| 86 | $55,079,775 | |||
| 87 |
Diazyme Laboratories Inc.
|
$53,448,949 | ||
| 88 | $52,783,665 | |||
| 89 | $51,116,531 | |||
| 90 |
Ntsi LLC
Top agencies
|
$50,239,211 | ||
| 91 | $49,274,162 | |||
| 92 |
Neany Inc.
Top agencies
|
$48,850,110 | ||
| 93 | $48,365,147 | |||
| 94 | $48,340,071 | |||
| 95 | $48,315,608 | |||
| 96 |
J.f. Taylor, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$46,985,487 | ||
| 97 | $46,218,062 | |||
| 98 | $46,084,121 | |||
| 99 | $45,490,960 | |||
| 100 |
Axient LLC
Top agencies
|
$45,399,927 |
Show 75 more
100 of 4,223 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $45 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2024 ran Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2023. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2023 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 NAICS 541715 contractors in FY2024?
1. Lockheed Martin Corporation ($4.99B), 2. Fluor Corporation ($3.47B), 3. California Institute of Technology ($2.23B), 4. Northrop Grumman Corporation ($2.17B), 5. Leidos Holdings, Inc. ($1.53B), 6. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC ($1.37B), 7. The Aerospace Corporation ($1.34B), 8. The Mitre Corporation ($1.06B), 9. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation ($983M), 10. CACI International Inc. ($694M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work