Presentation3.ppt
PPT presentation 448 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Alaska National Guard Multiple Award Task Order Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91ZRU10R0004
About this file
Attachment 3 - Preproposal Slides
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Multiple Award Task Order Contract for Construction Services
PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE
7 June 2010
MATOC
Competitive
Multiple Award
Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)
Length of Time
| 5 years |
| Base – 2 years |
| Option 1 – 1 year |
| Option 2 – 1 year |
| Option 3 – 1 year |
Scope
| Covers a broad range of |
| Maintenance |
| Repair |
| Construction services |
| Optional design-build services |
Locations
| Anywhere in the State of Alaska |
| Anchorage Area only |
| Fairbanks Area Only |
| Or Any Combination of the Above |
Dollar Limits
| $30,000,000.00 aggregate per contract |
| $3,000,000.00 per task order |
| In rare cases over $3M |
| $200 minimum order |
Awards
| Total Small Business Set-aside |
| Minimum of seven awards |
Best Value
| Award based on the greatest overall benefit to the Government in response to the requirement. |
| Past performance and technical combined are significantly important than price. |
Master Specs Establishes an industrial and/or commercial standard for maintenance and repair of Gov’t facilities If SOW does not address a specification (prototypical project) for an element of work, the master specification applies.
Amendment forthcoming to add master specs
Proposal
| Disclaimer: |
| The following is a brief overview of the proposal requirements. Offerors are cautioned to carefully read the requirements of the solicitation and comply. |
Proposal con’t
| Section 00110 details the required information and format for the proposal |
| 3 volumes required |
| Volume 1 – Price/Cost and Pro forma documents |
| Volume 2 – Past Performance Requirements |
| Volume 3 – Technical Requirements |
Volume 1 (2.1)
| SF 1442 – Offeror portion and original signature |
| Areas of Consideration |
| Location |
| Price |
| DB option |
| Reps and Certs – Section 00600 & ORCA (online) |
| Exhibit E and E-1 |
| Price proposal for prototypical project |
| Self-performance |
Volume 2 (2.2)
| Past Performance |
| Six general construction and two design-build (optional) |
| Currency and relevancy |
| Within 5 years |
| Similar location |
| Exhibit A |
| References required |
| References must return NLT close of business 24 June 2010 |
Volume 3 (2.3)
| Technical Information |
| Exhibit D |
| Must meet minimum requirements |
| Section 00120 |
| Sections 00800 – 01700 |
| Section 0800, SC-20 – 15% must be self-performed |
Evaluation
| Detailed in Section 00120 |
| Carefully review sections 00100, 00110, & 00120 |
| Comply w/section 00100 & 00110 requirements |
| Inquire if you have questions |
Evaluation con’t
| Failure to furnish a complete proposal may result in elimination |
| Evaluation of the DB is separate from the basic MATOC |
| A MATOC award may be with or without the DB option |
Section 00800
| Special contract provisions |
| Offerors should carefully read Sections 00800- 01700 BEFORE preparing proposal |
| Basic contract requirements |
| Contract conditions |
Fair Opportunity
Every Contractor awarded a MATOC contract must be given a Fair Opportunity to compete for projects
Fair Opportunity con’t
| Fair opportunity disregarded for: |
| Urgent or emergency requirements |
| Services are unique or highly specialized |
| Interest of economy and efficiency |
| Satisfy the minimum guarantee |
These are the Exceptions to fair opportunity to compete found in FAR Part 16.505 and detailed in Section 00800 SC4 Ordering in the solicitation (FAR LANGUAGE FOLLOWS-GIVE ENTIRE EXCEPTION WHEN STATING)
(i) The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays;
(ii) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized;
(iii) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency as a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order; or
(iv) It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee
Not Given Opportunity
| CO determination to limit competition or exclude a contractor for the following reasons: |
| SATISFY AGENCY SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM GOALS- Projects will be set-aside for 8(a) MATOC Contractors and/or HUB Zone MATOC Contractors |
| NOTE: If project is not set aside, all categories of MATOC contractors may submit a proposal. |
| Failure to perform the work diligently on a current task order |
| Order not within your areas of consideration |
| Projects under $30,000.00 are set aside for Emerging Small Businesses |
| Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(ii) the Contracting Officer will exercise broad discretion in determining if a contractor is eligible for the award of a project. To determine eligibility the Contracting Officer will consider the areas of consideration applicable to each individual MATOC award. The Contracting Officer may consider such factors that the Contracting Officer, in the exercise of sound business judgment, believes are relevant to the placement of orders. To satisfy the contracting agency’s Small Business Administration contracting goals/targets, the Contracting Officer may consider such factors as achievement of Section 8(a) and HUB Zone goals/targets, and the emerging small business (ESB) reserve amount, currently $25,000. Projects with an estimated values equal to, or less than the ESB reserve amount will be offered only to ESB contractors UNDER $25,00 IS SET-ASIDE FOR EMERGING SMALL BUINESS IAW COMPETIVENESS DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM |
| Additional factors on prior Task Orders under the MATOC contract, such as past performance, quality, timeliness, special expertise or other factors the Contracting Officer determines are relevant to award of a particular Task Order may be considered. Timely performance by a TOC contractor is very important. Failure to prosecute the work diligently, on a currently awarded task order, will be cause for the Contracting Officer not to include the contractor in the competitive fair-opportunity pool for future task orders. When the contractor’s delinquency has been cured, they will be considered for competition in future task orders. |
Emergencies
| Contractors must be able to respond within 120 minutes in the event of an emergency to view site and possibly give a price. |
| Normal response time is 1-2 days for site visit and 3-30 days for proposal depending on complexity |
Davis Bacon and Bonds
| Most current Davis Bacon wage rates will apply to each MATOC RFP |
| Link to Web site will be provided- Note the most current wage determination at time of award of Task Order applies to the Task Order. |
| Performance and payment bonds are established by each task order |
| Payment Bond – TO > $25K |
| Performance Bond – TO > $100K |
Due Date
| 1:00PM on 24 June 2010 |
| Do not forget to have references sent in by this time and date |
| All proposal documents shall be delivered to Fort Richardson, Alaska (see Block 8 of solicitation) |
Reminder
| Award is intended to be made without discussions |
| DO NOT anticipate a chance to make corrections or changes |
| Your first proposal will probably be your only proposal! |
| Read the solicitation requirements carefully |
Another Reminder
| All amendments will be issued via the solicitation website (www.fbo.gov) |
| Check site regularly for changes and refresh page |
| After closing, no information will be available until award |
| Awards will be posted to the web |
Questions
| Questions must be submitted in writing via e-mail to both: |
| Nicole.rahmer@us.army.mil |
| Jaime.k.kunde@us.army.mil |
| Submit questions NLT COB 17 June 2010 |
| Questions and answers will be posted to www.fbo.gov |
Questions for Us?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .