W912QR24R0034_KC-46A_Plans-0006.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See Amendment 0006 Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 29

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912QR24R0034

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Sep-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Apr-2025

CODE

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE

600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE

ROOM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239

W912QR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912QR24R0034_KC-46A_Plans-0006

W912QR24R0034

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0006 CONTINUATION

Solicitation W912QR24R0034 for the Construction of a KC-46 Two-Bay Maintenance/Fuel Cell Hangar at March ARB, CA is hereby modified as follows:

1. The following Evaluation Criteria have been revised and replaced due to clerical errors:

Changes are noted by bold, italicized font within the sections noted below.

Risk Management Plan: 6.1.1 Note has been revised from:

“There is a page limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides for the Risk Management Plan factor.”

To

“There is a page limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides for the narrative portion of this factor.

Information submitted that exceeds the specified limit shall not be evaluated.

There is a separate page limit of two (2) 11” x 17” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides, for the organizational chart portion of this factor.”

Schedule Narrative: 7.1 Submission Requirements have been revised from:

“Pre-Construction Submittals and Government Review Submission of Initial Project Schedule Workforce Mobilization Activities Long Lead Items Mandatory Construction Tasks as outlined in the project specifications Key Permits as outlined in the project specifications SWPP and Site Work Commissioning Activities and Critical Submittals (Including, but not limited to, the high

Expansion Foam Suppression System requirements, Concrete Paving for Airfields and other Heavy-Duty pavements)

Project Closeout Planning and Coordination (including Red Zone Meeting) As-Builts”

To “Pre-Construction Submittals and Government Review Period Submission of Initial Project Schedule Workforce Mobilization Activities Long Lead Items Key Permits as outlined in the project specifications Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Site Work Commissioning Activities (Including identifying a commissioning agent) and Critical Submittals

(Including, but not limited to, Concrete Paving for Airfields and other Heavy-Duty pavements, and Life Safety)

Project Closeout Planning and Coordination (including Red Zone Meeting) As-Builts (quarterly and final updates) O&M Manuals, and staff training.”

2. The PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE has been replaced in its entirety:

3. The following PLAN SHEETS have been revised and replaced in their entirety:

KC-46A Two Bay Hangar P2- 505421/ P2#509757: Mooring Points & Restriping

VOLUME I

A-301 BUILDING SECTIONS

A-302 BUILDING SECTIONS

A-303 BUILDING SECTIONS

A-304 BUILDING SECTIONS

A-311 WALL SECTIONS

A-313 WALL SECTIONS

4. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 17-Apr-2025 04:00 PM to 29-Apr-2025 04:00 PM.

The number of offeror copies required 1 has been added.

The following have been modified:

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE

Amendment 0006

Project:

KC-46A Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar (PN PDPG 221012) KC-46A Fuselage Trainer (PN PDPG 221014) KC-46A Mooring Points & Restriping (PN PDPG 221021)

Location: March Air Reserve Base, California

Proposer's Name:

Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

BASE PROPOSAL

0001 Primary Facility – KC- 46A Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar

1 Job N/A $

0002 Primary Facility – KC- 46A Fuselage Trainer

1 Job N/A $

0003 CMU Wall Crack Repair

– Fuselage Trainer

240 LF $ $

0004 Sitework – KC-46A Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar

1 Job N/A $

0005 Sitework – KC-46A Fuselage Trainer

1 Job N/A $

0006 B1246 Demolition 1 Job N/A $

0007 Western Municipal Water District - Water 1 Job N/A $ 91,965.00 Inspection Fee

0008 Western Municipal Water District – Sewer 1 Job N/A $ 70,965.00 Inspection Fee

0009 Contaminated Soil Removal and Disposal

50 CY $ $

0010 Contaminated Water Removal

30 Days $ $

TOTAL BASE PROPOSAL $

Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price

Amount

OPTIONS

0011A Option A – 5 Coat Floor Finish for Hangar Bays

1 Job N/A $

0011B Option B – Shake-on Floor Hardener for Hangar Bays

1 Job N/A $

0012 Option C – One 400 Hz Convertor

1 Job N/A $

0013 Option D – One 400 Hz Convertor

1 Job N/A $

0014 Option E – Breathing Compressor, Purifier, Receiver Tank

1 Job N/A $

0015 Option F – Flooded Screw Air Compressor

1 Job N/A $

0016 Option G – Reciprocating Air Compressor, Dryer, Receiver Tank

1 Job N/A $

0017 Option H – Aircraft Fall Protection System

1 Job N/A $

0018 Option I – Aircraft Wash System

1 Job N/A $

0019 Option J – Painting of Structural Building Steel

1 Job N/A $

0020 Option K – Furnishings - Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar

1 Job N/A $

0021 Option L – Furnishings – Fuselage Trainer

1 Job N/A $

0022 Option M – Bird Netting

- Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar

1 Job N/A $

0023 Option N – Bird Netting for Canopy Structure – Fuselage Trainer

1 Job $ $

0024 Option O – Exterior Insulated Metal Panel – Fuselage Trainer

1 Job $ $

Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price

Amount

0025 Option P – Generator - Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar

1 Job N/A $

0026 Option Q - Contaminated Soil Removal and Disposal

50 CY $ $

0027 Option R – Contaminated Water Removal

30 Days $ $

0028 Option S - Airfield Striping and Mooring Points

1 Job N/A $

TOTAL OPTIONS $

TOTAL BASE PROPOSAL AND ALL $

OPTIONS

Description of Base Bid Proposal Items

a) Item No. 0001 "Primary Facility – KC-46A Hangar" includes all Base Proposal work required within a line five feet outside of the new KC-46A Hangar.

b) Item No. 0002 "Primary Facility – KC-46A Fuselage Trainer" includes all Base Proposal work required within a line five feet outside of the new KC-46A Fuselage Trainer.

c) Item No. 0003 " CMU Wall Crack Repair – Fuselage Trainer" includes all Base Proposal work required for repair of cracks within the existing CMU Wall. Cracks are to be cleaned and sealed with epoxy resin per manufactures recommendations for an existing wall.

d) Item No. 0004 "Sitework - KC-46A Hangar " includes all Base Proposal work required for demolition (exclusive of that work covered under Item No. 0006 B1246 Demolition), site clearing, grading and drainage, utilities, paving, landscaping, permits, and other construction work required beyond a line five feet outside of the new KC-46A Hangar.

e) Item No. 0005 "Sitework - KC-46A Fuselage Trainer " includes all Base Proposal work required for demolition (exclusive of that work covered under Item No. 0006 B1246 Demolition), site clearing, grading and drainage, utilities, paving, landscaping, permits, and other construction work required beyond a line five feet outside of the new KC-46A Hangar.

f) Item No. 0006 "B1246 Demolition" includes all Base Proposal work associated with the demolition and removal of the existing hangar (Building 1246), to include all work required for removal of the complete building and foundations systems.

g) Item No. 0007 " Western Municipal Water District - Water Inspection Fee " includes the inspection fee required to be paid to Western Municipal District during construction.

h) Item No. 0008 " Western Municipal Sewer District - Water Inspection Fee " includes the inspection fee required to be paid to Western Municipal District during construction.

i) Item No. 0009 “Contaminated Soil Removal and Disposal” includes the work shall include removal and disposal of contaminated soil associated with construction on this project. Costs for this item shall include excavation, laboratory analytical testing, characterization, manifesting, confirmation sampling, containerization, transportation, and off-site disposal. Cost should also be included if Contractor determined additional fill is required to replace the off-site disposal amount. For estimating purposes any waste encountered would be classified as industrial waste and not Hazardous waste.

j) Item No. 0010 “Contaminated Water Removal” includes all work, materials, and labor required to remove contaminated groundwater from site. This includes the required equipment for dewatering and treating the ground water as described within the drawings and specifications. Quantity is estimated and is subject to the requirements of FAR 51.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantity. Variations in the actual quantities encountered will be the subject of a contract modification as provided in Clause 52.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantities.

Description of Option Bid Items

k) Item No. 0011A “Option A – 5 Coat Floor Finish for Hangar Bays” includes all additional work required to provide and install the 5-coat floor coating system for both Hangar Bays, in lieu of the sealed concrete pavement and other items included in the Base Proposal. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

NOTE: This option cannot be awarded if “Option B – Shake-on Floor Hardener for both Hangar Bays” is awarded.

***This option may be exercised within 180 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

l) Item No. 0011B “Option B – Shake-on Floor Hardener for Hangar Bays” includes all additional work required to provide and install the shake on floor hardener system for both Hangar Bays, in lieu of the sealed concrete pavement and other items included in the Base Proposal. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

NOTE: This option cannot be awarded if “Option A – 5 Coat Floor Finish for both Hangar Bays” is awarded.

*** This option may be exercised within 180 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

****AMENDMENT #006************************************************************************

m) Item No. 0012 “Option C – One 400 Hz Convertor” includes all work required to provide and install of one 400Hz Conver10tor and 400Hz Cable Assembly. All 480V/60Hz electrical distribution to the convertor shall be included in the Base Proposal.

*** This option may be exercised within 270 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

n) Item No. 0013 “Option D – One 400 Hz Convertor” includes all work required to provide and install of one 400Hz Convertor and 400Hz Cable Assembly. All 480V/60Hz electrical distribution to the convertor shall be included in the Base Proposal.

*** This option may be exercised within 270 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

***********************************************************************AMENDMENT #006****

o) Item No. 0014 “Option E – Breathing Compressor, Purifier, Receiver Tank” includes all work required to provide and install of the breathing air compressor (AC-103), breathing air receiver tank (AR-102), and breathing air purifier (PUR-101). All breathing air distribution piping and accessories downstream of the purifier shall be included in the Base Proposal.

*** This option may be exercised within 540 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

p) Item No. 0015 “Option F – Flooded Screw Air Compressor” includes all work required to provide and install the oil flooded screw air compressor (AC-101), as shown in the schedule. All compressed air distribution piping downstream shall be included in the Base Proposal. The Base Proposal includes all compressed air distribution piping downstream as shown on the drawings.

*** This option may be exercised within 540 days after Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

q) Item No. 0016 “Option G – Reciprocating Air Compressor, Dryer, Receiver Tank” includes all work required to provide and install of the reciprocating air compressor (AC-102), thermal mass compressed air dryer (RAD-101), and compressed air receiver tank (AR-101). The Base Proposal includes all compressed air distribution piping and accessories downstream of the compressed air dryer.

*** This option may be exercised within 540 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

r) Item No. 0017 “Option H – Aircraft Fall Protection System” includes all work required to provide and install an aircraft fall protection system (including fall protection track, self-retracting lanyards, harnesses, and miscellaneous bracing/supports for the fall protection track) in both bays of the new KC-46A Hangar. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

*** This option may be exercised within 540 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

s) Item No. 0018 “Option I – Aircraft Wash System” includes all work required to provide and installation of the aircraft wash booster pump. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

*** This option may be exercised within 540 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

t) Item No. 0019 “Option J – Painting of Structural Building Steel” includes all work and materials required to paint all exposed steel within both bays of the new KC-46A Hangar. See specifications for further information.

*** This option may be exercised within 30 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

u) Item No. 0020 “Option K – Furnishings – Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar” includes all work required to provide and installation of the furnishings for the facility. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

*** This option may be exercised within 540 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

v) Item No. 0021 “Option L – Furnishings – Fuselage Trainer” includes all work required to provide and installation of the furnishings for the facility. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

*** This option may be exercised within 540 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

w) Item No. 0022 “Option M – Bird Netting – Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar” includes all work, materials, and labor required to install bird netting in the hangar bays. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

*** This option may be exercised within 90 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

x) Item No. 0023 “Option N – Bird Netting for Canopy Structure – Fuselage Trainer” includes all work, materials, and labor required to install bird netting in the hangar bays. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

*** This option may be exercised within 90 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued.

y) Item No. 0024 “Option O – Exterior Insulated Metal Panels – Fuselage Trainer” includes all work required to demolish existing metal siding, provide and installation of the insulated metal panels for the facility. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

*** This option may be exercised within 90 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued.

z) Item No. 0025 “Option P – Generator – Two-Bay Maintenance Hangar” includes all work required to purchase and install the Generator as noted on ES101. The generator will be O&M Funded. See drawings and specifications for further definition.

*** This Option will be awarded at the time of Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

aa) Item No. 0025 “Option Q – Contaminated Soil Removal and Disposal” includes the work shall include removal and disposal of contaminated soil associated with construction on this project. Costs for this item shall include excavation, laboratory analytical testing, characterization, manifesting, confirmation sampling, containerization, transportation, and off-site disposal. Cost should also be included if Contractor determined additional fill is required to replace the off-site disposal amount. For estimating purposes any waste encountered would be classified as industrial waste and not Hazardous waste.

*** This option may be exercised within 360 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

bb) Item No. 0026 “Option R – Contaminated Water Removal” includes all work, materials, and labor required to remove contaminated groundwater from site. This includes the required equipment for dewatering and treating the ground water as described within the drawings and specifications.

Quantity is estimated and is subject to the requirements of FAR 51.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantity. Variations in the actual quantities encountered will be the subject of a contract modification as provided in Clause 52.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantities.

***This option may be exercised within 365 calendar days after issuance of the Administrative Notice to Proceed and does not extend the period of performance.

cc) Item No. 0027 "Airfield Restriping and Mooring Points” includes all work, materials, and labor required for restriping and installation of mooring points in the existing apron. This work is as described on drawings CD120, CD127, CD128, CD129, CS103, CS104, CS105, CS106, and CS108.

*** This option may be exercised within 90 days after Administrative Notice-To-Proceed (NTP) is issued and does not extend the period of performance.

- END OF PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE -

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

PROJNET INSTRUCTIONS

OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.ProjNet.org/ProjNet. As noted below, offerors shall not submit their proposals via ProjNet.

Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the provisions stated in the solicitation.

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or selfregister into system.

The Solicitation Number is: W912QR24R0034 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 6C7HIN-X3EUB5

Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

5. Select Continue. A page will then open stating a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

7. Select Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be emailed any type of password. You will utilize your Secret

Question and Secret Answer to log in.

2. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

3. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

4. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

5. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.

6. Select Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your SecretQuestion.

7. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.

From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety and to review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

NOTES:

1. Offerors shall not submit their proposals via ProjNet, but in accordance with the provisions stated in the solicitation. Any questions regarding acceptable means of submitting offers shall be made directly to the Contract Specialist identified in the solicitation.

2. Government responses to technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds that are submitted to ProjNet in accordance with the procedures above are not binding on the Government unless an amendment is issued on Standard Form 30. In the case of any conflicts, the solicitation governs.

Any changes or revisions to the solicitation will be made by formal amendment. Government responses will be limited to: (a) Notice that an amendment will be issued; (b) Reference to an existing requirement contained in the solicitation; or (c) Notice that a response is not necessary.

3. The ability to enter technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds is due No Later than (NTL) 4:00 PM ET 21 April 2025. No Government responses will be entered into the ProjNet system after 24 April 2025.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been added by full text:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. Overview.

1.1 The intent of this solicitation is to select one contractor for the Construction of a KC-46 Two-Bay

Maintenance/Fuel Cell Hangar. The project includes an addition/alteration to Bldg. 1244 for Fuselage Trainer (FUT) and Cargo Pallet Staging. Additionally, the project will involve the repair of ramp mooring points & re-striping. Construction includes personnel support areas and storage areas for hazardous materials, tools, supplies and equipment. Hangar area will provide fire suppression and a fall protection system. Construction will also include, but is not limited to, all associated utilities, site work, communication support, parking areas, secure airfield fencing, exterior lighting, landscaping and ramp pavement transitions. Construction contract will also include the demolition of an existing hangar located on the site. Antiterrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) and physical security measures will be incorporated into the design including maximum standoff distances from roads, parking areas and vehicle unloading areas. Sustainability/Energy measures will be provided. Facilities will be designed to a minimum life of 40 years in accordance with DoD's Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 1-200-02) including energy efficiencies, building envelope and integrated building systems performance.

The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

1.2 The basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off Process. The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible offeror whom the Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, all factors considered. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers.

1.3 The target ceiling for contract award is $180 Million. Offerors are under no obligation to approach this ceiling.

2. Submittal of offers.

2.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror’s capability for successfully completing the solicited project. Requirements stated in this Request for Proposal (RFP) are minimums. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the RFP. Information provided out of sequence may not be evaluated and may result in the offeror’s disqualification from award.

2.2 All submissions to this proposal announcement shall be submitted electronically through the Procurement

Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442. Please refer to and follow the instructions specified in the Electronic Proposal Submission Instructions, attached herein.

2.3 Offerors are required to submit a proposal electronically consisting of the information identified in paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5 below. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified herein.

2.4 Volume I shall be submitted electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission Instructions in Section 00 21 00 and include the following information:

Volume I – Factor I: Past Performance

Volume I – Factor II: Risk Management Plan

Volume I – Factor III: Schedule Narrative

Volume I – Factor IV: Small Business Participation Plan

*NOTE: Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate section may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information. Any specified page limits will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted that exceeds the specified limit will not be evaluated.

2.5 Volume II shall be submitted electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission Instructions in

Section 00 21 00 and include the following information:

Volume II – Tab A: Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Volume II – Tab B: Joint Venture Agreements Volume II – Tab C: Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability Volume II – Tab D: Pre-Award Information Volume II – Tab E: Subcontracting Plan

3. Proposal Evaluation Process.

3.1. A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers and

User/Customer will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Technical proposals will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of offerors are not revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors. Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is a Best Value Trade-Off, as stated above.

3.2 The evaluation process essentially consists of four parts: proposal compliance review and responsibility review, technical evaluation, price evaluation, and price/technical trade-off analysis.

3.2.1 Proposal Compliance and Responsibility Review: Upon receipt of proposals the Government will conduct an initial screening to ascertain that each offeror has submitted all of the required information, including electronic media, in the quantities and format specified in the RFP. Followed by a review to determine that the offeror is financially capable of sustaining performance under the contract and is able to obtain the required level of performance and payment bonds from an acceptable surety.

3.2.2 Technical Evaluation: The Government will evaluate and rate the Volume I proposals against the RFP requirements. Factor I – Past Performance will be rated using Tables 1 and 2 below. The rating will be based on overall confidence in performance, with the final confidence assessment rating based on the extent of recent, relevant past experience and the quality of the offeror’s performance. Factor II – Risk Management Plan and Factor III – Schedule Narrative will be rated using Table 3 below. Factor IV – Small Business Participation Plan will be rated using Table 4 below.

3.2.3 Source Selection Advisory Council (SSAC) Review: The Government will review the evaluation results to ensure the evaluation process follows the evaluation criteria, and the ratings are appropriately and consistently applied. The Government will consolidate their advice and recommendations into a written comparative analysis and recommendation for use in selecting the offeror who represents the best value to the Government.

3.2.4 Price Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price proposals independent of the non-price evaluation.

The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.

3.2.5 Price/Technical Trade-off Analysis: After all above evaluations are complete, the Contracting Officer/SSA will compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of technical proposals and compare prices. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will then consider all factors to select the proposal offering the best value to the Government.

4. Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors.

4.1 Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors below, listed in relative order of importance. All non-price factors, when combined, are considered approximately equal to price. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

Volume/Factor Relative Order of Importance

Volume I – Factor I – Past Performance 1st

Volume I – Factor II – Risk Management Plan 2nd

Volume I – Factor III – Schedule Narrative 3rd

Volume I – Factor IV – Small Business Participation Plan 4th

Volume II - Price and Pro Forma Information

Tab A - Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Not Rated

Tab B - Joint Venture Agreement Not Rated

Tab C - Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Not Rated Proof of Financial Ability

Tab D - Pre-Award Information Not Rated

Tab E - Subcontracting Plan Acceptable / Unacceptable

4.2 Ratings

Evaluators will apply the adjectival rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

TABLE 1

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Description Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude eof effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

TABLE 2

Performance Confidence Assessments

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

TABLE 3

Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description Outstanding Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

TABLE 4

Small Business Ratings

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

4.3 Definitions

1. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

2. Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

3. Significant Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

4. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See

FAR 15.001.

5. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

6. Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

7. Clarifications. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.306(a)(1).

8. Adverse Past Performance. Past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating from sources where the information is from other than formal rating systems such as “PPIRS” or “FAPIIS.”

9. Discussion. Negotiations that take place after the competitive range is established during a competitive acquisition. The contracting officer conducts discussions with each offeror within the competitive range, and they are tailored to each offeror's proposal.

5.0 Volume I – Factor I: Past Performance

5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.1.1 Provide descriptions of up to three (3) projects substantially complete or completed by the Prime

Contractor within the last five (5) years (from the solicitation issue date) that are similar to this project in size and scope. Projects completed more than five (5) years before the solicitation issue date may be considered for evaluation purposes but may lessen the overall relevancy rating for that project. Submitted projects must be 85% completed to be considered substantially complete. Additionally, project descriptions must exhibit that enough work has been performed such that it demonstrates the ability to successfully complete all phases of the project, can be used for its intended purposes, and can be verified through the project details and references provided. An Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract may be submitted only if a single task order could be considered similar to this project. Task orders may not be combined in order for the project to be considered similar.

5.1.2 Projects considered similar in size to this requirement shall include: A minimum of 100,000 SF of new construction and/or renovation inclusive of aircraft maintenance hangars and associated administrative spaces.

5.1.3 Projects considered similar in scope to this project shall include: New construction and/or renovation of large-frame, high-bay aircraft maintenance hangars (such as for C-17, KC-135, KC-46 or KC-10 aircraft) that include new construction and/or renovation of administrative areas (such as office space, briefing rooms, classrooms, communication rooms and restrooms/shower facilities) and associated features such as parking areas, utilities and civil site work.

5.1.4 The prime contractor must have self-performed at least 15 percent of the direct contract labor (including testing and layout personnel), exclusive of other general conditions or field overhead personnel, material, equipment, or subcontractors to be considered similar.

5.1.5 Additional consideration may be given for individual projects submitted that contain the following features:

a) Previous experience with USACE, Air Force, Air Force Reserve Command, or DoD

b) Aircraft Hangars with a clear span of 400’-0” or above

c) Previous experience with Total Building Commissioning for a Maintenance/Fuel Cell Hangar (including HVAC systems, breathing air systems, and power generation)

d) Previous experience with USACE Transportation Center (TSC) coordination in obtaining approvals for and installation of airfield pavement

e) Previous experience with dewatering and/ or disposing of contaminated water (to include PFAS/PFOA) for a Federal agency

5.1.6 The following information shall be provided for each project:

a) Project Title, Location, and Contract Number/Unique Identifier

b) Current percentage of construction complete and the date it was or will be complete

a. For projects that are not yet complete, provide description of work remaining to be completed.

c) Scope of the project, to include purpose/use of facility

d) Size of the project, differentiate square footage of new construction versus renovation if the project includes both

e) Role of firm: Provide a description of the type of work performed and the percentage of work that was self-performed

f) Dollar value of the project

g) Customer primary point of contact (POC) and alternate POC (name, relationship to project, agency/firm affiliation, city, state, current and correct phone number, and current and correct email address)

5.1.7 For projects submitted under this factor, offerors must include any ratings (including Contractor

Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) database ratings for federal projects submitted), letters, awards, etc. that support past performance on these projects. Any of this information that is submitted shall clearly identify to which of the submitted projects it pertains. A sample Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) is attached for your convenience and is only required if a CPARS evaluation is not available for the submitted project. If used, the Past Performance Questionnaire must be submitted by the offeror with the proposal submission and not sent directly to the agency from the reference. If providing a CPARS database rating, offerors are required to provide the complete CPARS evaluation, which includes the individual categorical ratings in addition to the supporting rating narratives. For each project, the offeror may provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror’s respective corrective action.

NOTE: For purposes of evaluating past performance, the Prime Contractor is defined as the contractor identified in Block 14 of the Standard Form 1442. Projects performed by contractors other than the offeror, including, but not limited to, teaming partners, subcontractors, sister or parent companies, and affiliates will not be evaluated for past performance, unless those other contractors are part of a joint venture offeror as demonstrated by a signed joint venture agreement. If more than one contractor is listed in Block 14, then a signed joint venture must be submitted with the proposal and the joint venture shall be registered as such in the System for Award Management (SAM). However, each party of the Joint Venture (JV) must submit their own Unique Entity Identifier Number with the JV proposal. Projects performed by other contractors than the offeror, such as teaming partners or subcontractors, will not be evaluated for past performance, unless those other contractors are part of a JV offeror as demonstrated by a signed JV agreement. If the offeror represents the combining of two or more companies as a JV for the purpose of this RFP, each company in the JV may submit project examples, but the total submitted by the JV will not exceed three (3).

5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1 The Government will first evaluate the relevancy of recent past performance identified in the proposal in response to paragraph 5.1 above. By using the criteria identified above, the Government will determine how relevant a past project is when compared to the scope complexities, size, and magnitude of effort of the solicited project. For the purposes of this evaluation factor, “scope complexities” can be described as the technical performance characteristics which define the work completed on the project, and “magnitude of effort” can be described as the amount of self-performance effort expended to successfully perform the project. Additionally, in the computation of the individual project relevancy rating, the Government will consider any applicable additional consideration elements referenced in paragraph 5.1.5 above. A relevancy rating will be assigned to each submitted project using the Past Performance Relevancy Ratings table above.

5.2.2 The Government will next evaluate how well the offeror performed on those projects. The Government reserves the right to check any or all cited references to verify supplied information and to assess owner satisfaction. The Government also reserves the right to not contact the provided references. In addition to the information submitted by the offeror, the Government reserves the right to review any other sources of relevant information for evaluating past performance, including projects other than those submitted by the offeror. The Government will, at a minimum, review ALL past performance information retrieved through the CPARS database, using all CAGE/Unique Entity Identifier numbers. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved from inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System

(eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

5.2.3 The Government will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the offeror’s performance (including any letters, awards, etc. provided), general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate this information into the performance confidence assessment. The Government will assign a final, overall Performance Confidence rating, using the ratings in the Performance Confidence Assessment table above, based on the Government’s assessment of (1) the degree of the offeror’s recent, relevant experience, and (2) how well the offeror performed that experience.

6.0 Volume I – Factor II: Risk Management Plan

6.1.1 Submission Requirements:

Provide a risk management plan narrative for the project that describes how your labor, resources, designers, subcontractors, and material suppliers will be managed, supervised, coordinated, and used to ensure successful completion of the project. The Risk Management Plan, at a minimum, shall include the following information:

Identify significant areas of risk and provide your plan for mitigating risk during contract performance.

Describe your process for managing, coordinating, and tracking changes that arise during construction.

Describe how you will manage, supervise and coordinate the subcontractors’ work and who in the organization will be responsible for this management and coordinate.

Describe your process for construction quality control and managing quality control during construction.

Describe the duties of the key project delivery staff (e.g., PM, Superintendent, CQCSM, SSHO) and how this team will work together to deliver the project.

Describe your process for commissioning including commissioning services or activities to be performed, commissioning documents to be provided, as well as your plan to mitigate risk associated with commissioning activities on the solicited project.

Provide an organizational chart for this project showing home office support, on-site management, and the responsible chain of command. JV offerors must show the respective areas of responsibility for each partner. Clearly delineate on-site from off-site personnel on the organizational chart. On-site Superintendent, Quality Control and Safety shall be included in the chart.

NOTE: There is a page limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides for the narrative portion of this factor. Information submitted that exceeds the specified limit will not be evaluated.

There is a separate page limit of two (2) 11” x 17” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides, for the organizational chart portion of this factor.

6.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

Risk Management Plan narratives will be evaluated based on the level of understanding of the work and the involvement the contractor will have in the management, oversight, control, and coordination of the work performed during construction of the project.

The offeror’s organizational chart will be evaluated based on the clarity, adequacy, and capabilities for…