W9128F25R0014 Amendment 08 - 05.16.2025.pdf

W9128F25R0014

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of the amenmdment is as follow s: 1. Extend the proposal due date to 2PM Central on 3 July 2025. 2. Correct the "file names" in para 1.4.1 of Section 00 21 00. 3. Remove Tab D "Pre-Aw ard Survey" requirement including the attachment from Section 00 22 00. 4.

Change references in Section 00 22 00 from W9128F23R0019 to W9128F25R0014. 5. Incorporate updates included in the continuation pages.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 41

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-May-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9128F25R0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Nov-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-May-2025

CODE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DIST

CONTRACTING OFFICE

1616 CAPITOL AVENUE

OMAHA NE 68102-4901

W9128F 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMD 8 - SUMMARY OF CHANGES

16 MAY 2025

Solicitation No. W9128F25R0014

Date of Issue: 22 NOV 2024 [New] Date of Receiving Proposals: 3 July 2025

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0008 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Construction of

USDA DAIRY FORAGE RESEARCH CENTER

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages or sections as noted below. The substituted pages or sections are revised and reissued with this amendment. For convenience, on the revised specification pages, changes have been identified by “[*Am-8]” (underlining of added text and/or strikeout of deleted text).

Pages or Sections Deleted Pages or Sections Substituted or Added 00 01 15 00 01 15* 01 78 24.00 10 01 78 24.00 10*

10 14 00.10AT 10 14 00.10AT*

10 14 00.20AT 10 14 00.20AT*

13 21 10 13 21 10*

b. Drawings (Reissued). The following drawings are revised with latest revision date indicated on each sheet and reissued with this amendment.

(1) Sheet S-001-B12.2, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA

B12.2 - CONNECTOR AND SORTING

(2) Sheet S-001-B113, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B13 -

MILK HOUSE

(3) Sheet A-001-B1, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B1 -

METABOLIC CHAMBERS

(4) Sheet A-101-B1, ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN - AREA B1 -

(5) Sheet A-102-B1, ROOF AREA PLAN - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

CHAMBERS

(6) Sheet A-103-B1, REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - AREA B1 -

(7) Sheet A-201-B1, NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS - AREA B1 -

(8) Sheet A-201-B2, NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS - AREA B2 -

ADVANCED ANIMAL NUTRITION

(9) Sheet A-202-B1, EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS - AREA B1 -

(10) Sheet A-203-B1, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(11) Sheet A-301-B1, BUILDING CROSS SECTION - AREA B1 -

(12) Sheet A-310-B1, SECTION DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(13) Sheet A-401-B1, ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(14) Sheet A-501-B1, ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(15) Sheet A-601-B1, DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS - AREA B1 -

(16) Sheet A-602-B1, DOOR DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC CHAMBERS

(17) Sheet AG-100, WAYFINDING EXTERIOR SITE PLAN

(18) Sheet AG-101-B1, WAYFINDING PLAN - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(19) Sheet AG-601, WAYFINDING EXTERIOR SIGN ELEVATIONS

(20) Sheet B-100, SOIL BORINGS

(21) Sheet B-113, OVEREXCAVATION PLAN

(22) Sheet C-100, ONSITE SURVEY CONTROL

(23) Sheet C-103, SITE LAYOUT PLAN

(24) Sheet C-105, SITE ROAD PLAN SHEET 1

(25) Sheet C-106, SITE ROAD PLAN SHEET 2

(26) Sheet C-107, SITE ROAD PLAN SHEET 3

(27) Sheet C-108, SITE ROAD PLAN SHEET 4

(28) Sheet C-236, GRADING SECTIONS

(29) Sheet C-237, GRADING SECTIONS

(30) Sheet E-001-B1, ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS LIST, AND

ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC CHAMBERS

(31) Sheet E-002-B1, ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS LIST - AREA B1 -

(32) Sheet E-101-B1, ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(33) Sheet E-102-B1, ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - AREA B1 -

(34) Sheet E-501-B1, ELECTRICAL DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(35) Sheet E-601-B1, ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(36) Sheet E-602-B1, ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(37) Sheet E-603-B1, ELECTRICAL DIAGRAMS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(38) Sheet FA-101-B1, FIRE ALARM PLAN -AREA B1 -METABOLIC

CHAMBERS 2

(39) Sheet FA-601, FIRE ALARM SITE NETWORK

(40) Sheet G-002.2, SHEET INDEX

(41) Sheet G-003.1, AREA DIAGRAMS

(42) Sheet G-003.2, AREA DIAGRAMS

(43) Sheet G-003.3, AREA DIAGRAMS

(44) Sheet G-003-A, AREA DIAGRAMS - AREA A

(45) Sheet G-003-B, AREA DIAGRAMS - AREA B

(46) Sheet G-003-C, AREA DIAGRAMS - AREA C

(47) Sheet G-010-A, AREA A, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B12, & B13 -

LAB & ADMIN, RESEARCH, AND COW AREAS

(48) Sheet G-010-B, AREA B, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B12, & B13, LAB & ADMIN, RESEARCH AND COW AREAS

(49) Sheet G-101-B1, LIFE SAFETY PLAN -AREA B1 -METABOLIC

CHAMBERS 2

(50) Sheet I-101-B1, ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE- AREA B1- METABOLIC

(51) Sheet M-101-B1, MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(52) Sheet M-102-B1, MECHANICAL PLAN 2 - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(53) Sheet M-501-B1, MECHANICAL DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(54) Sheet M-601-B1, MECHANICAL SCHEDULES - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(55) Sheet P-101-B1, SANITARY PLUMBING PLAN - AREA B1 -

(56) Sheet P-501-B1, PLUMBING DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(57) Sheet P-502-B1, PLUMBING DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(58) Sheet P-601-B1, PLUMBING SCHEDULES - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(59) Sheet PS-101, PLUMBING SITE PLAN - NATURAL GAS

(60) Sheet Q-101-B1, EQUIPMENT FLOOR PLAN - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(61) Sheet Q-501-B1, EQUIPMENT DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(62) Sheet Q-601-B1, EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(63) Sheet S-001-B1, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B1 -

(64) Sheet S-001-B2, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B2 -

ADVANCED ANIMAL NUTRITION

(65) Sheet S-001-B3, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B3 -

CONVENTIONAL FREESTALL AREA & DRY COW

(66) Sheet S-001-B4, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B4 -

MILKING PARLOR

(67) Sheet S-001-B5, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B5 -

SPECIAL NEEDS AND MATERNITY

(68) Sheet S-001-B6, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B6 -

ROBOTIC MILKING FREESTALL AREA

(69) Sheet S-001-B7, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B7 -

CALF BARN

(70) Sheet S-001-B8, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B8 –

AGRONOMY

(71) Sheet S-001-B9, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B9 -

FEED MIXING CENTER

(72) Sheet S-001-B11, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B11 -

MACHINE STORAGE & SHOP & PESTICIDE

(73) Sheet S-001-B12.1, SYMBOLS LEGEND AND NOTES - AREA B12.1 -

CONNECTOR

(74) Sheet S-001-B12.2, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA

B12.2 - CONNECTOR & SORTING

(75) Sheet S-001-B13, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS - AREA B13 -

MILK HOUSE

(76) Sheet S-101-B1, STURCTURAL FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN -

AREA B1 - METABOLIC CHAMBERS

(77) Sheet S-102-B1, STRUCTURAL CONCRETE PLAN - AREA B1 -

(78) Sheet S-301-B1, FOUNDATION SECTIONS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(79) Sheet S-302-B1, FOUNDATION SECTIONS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(80) Sheet S-303-B1, FOUNDATION SECTIONS - LONGITUDINAL - AREA

B1 - METABOLIC CHAMBERS

(81) Sheet S-401-B1, ENLARGED STRUCTURAL PLANS - AREA B1 -

(82) Sheet S-501-B1, STRUCTURAL DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(83) Sheet S-502-B1, STRUCTURAL DETAILS - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

(84) Sheet T-100.1, TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE PLAN – WEST

(85) Sheet T-100.2, TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE PLAN – EAST

(86) Sheet T-100, TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE PLAN

(87) Sheet T-101-B1, TELECOMMUNICATIONS FLOOR PLAN - AREA B1 -

(88) Sheet TY-100, SECURITY SITE PLAN

(89) Sheet TY-101-B1, SECURITY FLOOR PLAN - AREA B1 - METABOLIC

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged.

3. Electronic Proposal/Email. See section 00 22 00 for how to submit electronic proposals.

4. Electric Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m., local time at place of receiving proposals, 3 July 5. In 2025, as stated in the Request for Proposal.

Attachments:

Spec Pages listed in 1.a. above Dwgs. listed in 1.b. above

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

16 MAY 2025

jmh/2181

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

The required response date/time has changed from 27-May-2025 02:00 PM to 03-Jul-2025 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (RFP)

1. SOLICITATION RESTRUCTIONS

1.1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR

This Solicitation is Unrestricted.

1.2. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST

The estimated construction cost of this project is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

1.3 SUBMISSION, MODIFICATION, REVISION, AND WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS

See FAR 52.215-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMPETITIVE ACQUISTION, subparagraph

"(c) Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals."

Offers must be submitted electronically. Offerors may utilize email or coordinate with the Contracting Officer a different method of dropping off files. The burden for timely submission rests with the offeror, and no part of this solicitation allows for the acceptance of untimely submissions.

Please send proposals to the Contract Specialist, Nicole Parker, at nicole.l.parker@usace.army.mil and to the Contracting Officer, Jeffrey Wyant, at jeffrey.w.wyant@usace.army.mil.

1.4 SUBMISSION DEADLINE

Offers shall be submitted at the location stated and by the time and date as specified in Block 13 of the Standard Form (SF) 1442, Page 1.

Submit proposals via the instructions below and in Section 00 22 00.

1.4.1 FILE DESCRIPTION

Include a "File Description" for each file(s) you upload. The "File Description" will be included in the email notice to each of the recipients you choose to have access your file(s). Do NOT enter Privacy Act Data (Personal Identification Information (PII)) in the File Description.) Offerors shall use the following example for file descriptions:

Volume I, Technical Proposal, shall be submitted as the following separate files:

W9128F25R0014_FIRMNAME_REQD_DOCS

W9128F25R0014_FIRMNAME_FACTORS1_thru_4

Volume II, Price Proposal, shall be submitted as the following separate files:

W9128F25R0014_FIRMNAME_FACTOR5

W9128F25R0014_FIRMNAME_PRICE

(Note: Company name may be abbreviated) Proposal Format Reference Section 00 22 00 EVALUATION CRITERIA for page limitations and format.

1.4.2 RETURN ADDRESS REQUIREMENTS

Offeror(s) must ensure that ALL mail sent to the Omaha District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box, etc. ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including but not limited to bids, modifications to bids, proposals, revised proposals, bid guarantees, bonds, correspondence, etc., will be REJECTED by the US Army Corps of Engineers mail room facility located at 1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901 if it does not contain a return mailing address. THERE WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS.

2. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENT AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and amendments are available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All solicitation documents will be posted to the U.S. General Services Administration website at: https://sam.gov/.

It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to check the website for any amendments. The offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation. A list of interested vendors (potential offerors and subcontractors) is available on the sam.gov website listed above (registration required).

3. OFFEROR’S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via Bidder Inquiry as indicated below. Question and/or comments relative to these bidding (proposal) documents that is proprietary in nature or if Bidder Inquiry system (See Below) is out of service should be submitted to the Contract Specialist:

Contract Specialist – Primary POC: Nicole Parker Nicole.l.parker@usace.army.mil 402-995-2210

3.1. BIDDER INQUIRY

Technical inquiries and questions relating to technical requirements, proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at: https://www.projnet.org/projenet/ no later than 5:00PM (CST) on 29 April 2025, in order that they may be given consideration or actions taken prior to receipt of offers.

The Bidder Inquiry system is to be used to ask and receive answer to all non-proprietary questions.

To submit and review inquiry items, prospective vendors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below. A prospective vendor who submits a comment /question will receive an acknowledgement of their comment/question via email, followed by an answer to the comment/question after it has been processed by our technical team.

All timely questions and approved answers will be made available through ProjNet.

The Solicitation Number is: W9128F25R0014 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: ZIXVB2-FYHF6E

3.1.1. BIDDER INQUIRIES INSTRUCTIONS

a) Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety.

b) Offerors are requested to review submitted bidder system for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

c) The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago).

The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

d) Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

3.1.2. REGISTRATION FOR PROJNET BIDDER INQUIRY ACCESS

If you are already registered, go to Entering Bidder Inquiries in ProjNet Bidder Inquiry System below.

a) From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

b) Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

c) Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

d) Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

e) Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

f) Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

g) Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

3.1.3. ENTERING BIDDER INQUIRIES IN PROJNET BIDDER INQUIRY SYSTEM

(a) For future access to ProjNet, you will not be emailed any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.

(b) From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

(c) Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

(d) Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

(e) Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.

(f) Click Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.

(g) Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.

(h) Follow online screen instructions to enter specific bidder inquiries for the project.

4. PLAN HOLDERS LIST

For viewing a list of interested vendors (i.e. Plan Holders List) and receiving notifications or email of changes regarding a solicitation, U.S. General Services Administration has these features available (https://sam.gov/). For this solicitation, go to https://sam.gov/ and register as a vendor or enter username and password to login. If you wish for General Contractors, Subcontractors, Suppliers, Plan Rooms, or Print Shops to have the ability to contact you, click on "Add me to Interested Vendors" for the solicitation.

5. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

See Section 00 22 00 Evaluation Criteria.

6. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD

The Contracting Officer has established a Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) to conduct an evaluation of each proposal received in response to this solicitation. The evaluation will be based exclusively on the merits and content of the proposal and any subsequent discussion required. The identities of the SSEB personnel are confidential, and any attempt by the proposers to contact these individuals is prohibited.

7. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL TAXES, AND OTHER TAXES

It is the Contractor's responsibility to investigate applicable federal, state, and local taxes as well as any specific exemptions that may exist. This includes any applicable Value-Added Taxes (VAT), sales, use, and excise taxes. See General Conditions (Contract Clause) 52.229-3 FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL

TAXES.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

SUBMISSION/EVALUATION CRITERIA

SECTION 00 22 00

EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK

Construct a new Dairy Forage Research Center (DFRC) at the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) site in Prairie du Sac, Wisconsin. This project will be executed using a design-bid-build (DBB) project delivery method, which will require the contractor to provide the government with a complete facility and warranty based on the Request for Proposal (RFP).

In accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 236.204(ii), the Government currently estimates the magnitude of construction for this project to be between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

The USDA DFRC will be located on an approximately 75-acre site on the recently acquired Badger Army Ammunition Plant (BAAP) in Prairie Du Sac, Wisconsin. The Center includes 18 buildings and support structures interconnected by manure collection, transport, and digester system; the approximate combined gross square footage of construction is 642,000 Gross Square Foot (GSF).

Construction of approximately 254,003 Building Gross Square Foot (BGSF) of new production, research, operations, and maintenance facilities and supporting infrastructure. Most of the center's construction will be comprised of pre-framed, pre-engineered metal buildings supported on concrete spread footings with the exception of the Lab and Administration Building which will have a laminated wood building structure supported on spread footings with preformed metal panel exterior enclosure.

The overall facility will accommodate up to 452 lactating cows (maximum), 144 calves, 1300 acres of crops production, 900 acres of pasture and perennials, 12 permanent researchers and staff, up to 12 operations and maintenance personnel, and up to 10 student researchers.

Competition for this contract will be full and open competition. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction) with a corresponding small business size standard of $45M.

THE OFFEROR SHOULD BE REGISTERED IN SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

WEBSITE (SAM.GOV) FOR NAICS CODE 236220 PRIOR TO THE DATE PROPOSALS ARE DUE.

2. SOLICITATION SELECTION PROCEDURES

The acquisition approach for this project will be a Best Value Tradeoff RFP following FAR Part 15 procedures. This process provides the 100% ready to advertise design. Upon receipt of proposals, the SSEB will evaluate proposals against the requirements stated in the RFP and prepare and SSEB Report with their findings. Once the report has been received, the analysis of the price and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) review of the Best Value Tradeoff will then commence.

Offerors must submit Volume I (Technical) and Volume II (Pricing) proposal as described below.

Offerors shall assume that revisions to Volume I (Technical) proposals will not be allowed, accepted, or evaluated after formal Volume I submission on the requested date – unless requested by the Government by amendment or other formal correspondence.

The Government reserves the right to award a contract without discussions in accordance with (IAW) FAR 52.215-1. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a technical and cost/price standpoint. Offerors shall organize their proposals as described herein. Proposals may be determined non-compliant for failure to follow this format and may be rejected from further consideration.

3. TECHNICAL RATINGS

The evaluation ratings for Technical Factors 2, 3, and 4 will be on an adjectival basis in conjunction with a narrative composed of the discussion of the particular strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies of the proposal. The Source Selection Team (SST) will use a combined technical/risk rating system that includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in Table 1. The Combined technical/risk ratings will be used to evaluate Factor 2 Key Personnel, Factor 3 Project Management and Quality Control Plan, and Factor 4 Schedule and Milestones. The evaluation rating that will be used for Factor 1 Past Performance and Factor 5 Small Business Participation Plan are described below.

Table 1: Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

RATING DEFINITIONS

Strength: is an aspect of an offeror's proposal with merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Significant Strength: an aspect of an Offeror's proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Weakness: a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness: a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency: A material failure of proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

4. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING

The Past Performance evaluation factor assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an Offeror’s ability to supply products and services that meet users’ needs, based on a demonstrated record of performance. The Past Performance evaluation results in an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The Past Performance evaluation considers each Offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract’s requirements. One performance confidence assessment rating is assigned for each Offeror after evaluating the Offeror's recent Past Performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the contract requirements. There are three aspects of the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy ( including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information). All three aspects must be considered for each of the contracts or requirements evaluated.

4.1 Recency. The first aspect is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance.

Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. The criteria to establish what prior performance is recent shall be unique to each source selection and shall be stated in the solicitation. The recency timeframe established should be based on the acquisition and the market/industry. For example, some efforts would require longer recency periods to avoid restricting competition simply due to the lack of item production.

4.2 Relevance. The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. The criteria to establish what prior performance is relevant shall be unique to each source selection and shall be stated in the solicitation. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to those aspects of an offeror’s history of contract (or subcontract) performance that would provide the most context and give the greatest ability to measure whether the offeror will successfully satisfy the current requirement. Common aspects of relevancy include, but are not limited to: similarity of product/service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, use of key personnel (for services), and extent of subcontracting/teaming.

There are four levels of relevancy, as shown in Table 2. When source selections require a greater level of discrimination within the past performance evaluation, the SST shall use all four of the relevancy ratings identified in Table 2. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Table 2: Past Performance Relevancy Rating

Adjectival Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

4.3 Quality of Performance. The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance (see FAR 15.304[c][2]). The past performance evaluation conducted in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts. Requirements for considering history of small business utilization are outlined at FAR 15.304(c)(3)(ii) and DFARS 215.305(a)(2). The Past Performance Evaluation Team will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the offeror’s performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate these into the performance confidence assessment. A separate quality assessment rating is not required;

rather, the past performance rating, whether using the confidence assessment rating or Acceptable/Unacceptable, is based on the offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance.

After evaluating recency, relevancy and contractor performance, a Performance Confidence Assessment rating will be determined. In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each Offeror shall be assigned one of the following ratings:

Table 3: Performance Confidence Assessment Rating

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

5. SMALL BUSINESS RATING METHOD

The small business evaluation for Factor 5 will utilize the following ratings as stated in the below table for this solicitation.

Table 4: Small Business Rating Method Color Rating

Adjectival Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Green Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

6. PAST PERFORMANCE RECORDS

Past performance records may be obtainable by Offerors using one of the following methods:

(1) Accessing Past Performance information directly from Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) website at https://www.cpars.gov/ for CCASS completed before 27 June 2014 and for merged CPARS completed after 1 July 2014. CPARS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems and can be accessed at the aforementioned website.

All Department of Defense (DoD) employees (military and civilian), including DoD Contractors that are working on site (military/government facilities) or contractors working offsite using Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) are required to use certificates from DoD Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to access CPARS. If the contractor doesn't work on site or with GFE they are encouraged to obtain and use a certificate from an External Certificate Authority (ECA). For DoD users, the use of PKI Login is Mandatory. Federal and Contractor users can use the PKI login category if they have

PKI.

External Certificate Authority External Certificate Authorities (ECAs) and Interim External Certificate Authorities (IECAs) provide digital certificates to the DoD's private industry partners, contractors using their own equipment or working in non-government facilities, allied partners, and other agencies.

Additional information about the PKI certificate is at https://www.cpars.gov/pki_info.htm web page.

You will also need your Unique Entity ID (UEI) and Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) to log onto CPARS. The MPIN number was selected by whoever registered your company in the System for Award Management (SAM) Registry at https://sam.gov/. If you do not know your MPIN number, you will need to contact the SAM help desk by emailing them from the email link on the SAM web page. Please be aware that they will only release the MPIN number to the person who originally registered your company. Additional instructions on locating your MPIN is located in the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) section under the Help tab, or -

(2) Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) may be used to provide or supplement a firm’s past performance with other than U.S. Governmental clients (see Attachment 2). Contact your client point of contact (POC) for the project you need a past performance record and request the POC to complete the PPQ. The PPQ included in this solicitation is provided for the Offeror to submit to the client for each project the Offeror may need a past performance record for to meet the requirements in this synopsis. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client POC. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). It is the Offeror’s responsibility to follow-up with client POCs to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Nicole Parker, Contract Specialist, via email at nicole.l.parker@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs; this does not preclude an Offeror submitting a previously completed PPQ as long as the full PPQ is submitted and completed in its entirety. This also does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If a PPQ is to be submitted for a project, the complete PPQ shall be submitted (either by the client POC or the Offeror) prior to proposal closing date.

7. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATION FACTORS

Evaluation factors are listed below in descending order of importance:

Table 5: Volume I Required Submittals (Not Rated)

Location Description Descending Order of Importance

TAB A SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments Not Rated

TAB B Representations & Certifications Not Rated

TAB C JV Agreement or Teaming Agreement (if applicable). Not Rated

Table 6: Volume I Evaluation Factors

Location Description Descending Order of Importance

TAB D Factor 1 – Past Performance 1st Most Important Factor

TAB E Factor 2 – Key Personnel 2nd Most Important Factor

TAB F Factor 3 – Project Management & QC Plan 3rd Most Important Factor

TAB G Factor 4 – Schedule and Milestones 4th Most Important Factor

Table 7: Volume II Evaluation Factors

Location Volume II Factors Descending Order of Importance

TAB A Factor 5 – Small Business Participation 5th Most Important Factor

TAB B Factor 6 – Section 00 10 00, Pricing Schedule

All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price.

TAB C

Small Business Subcontracting Plan, if applicable.

(See Factor 5 requirements in Para 13.1.1)

Acceptable/Unacceptable

8. BASIS OF AWARD & DEBRIEFING OFFERORS

The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria described within the solicitation and will award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the best value to the Government utilizing the best value tradeoff process as described in FAR 15.101-1.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contracts without conducting discussions with Offerors. However, in the event the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) concludes conducting discussions is in the best interest of the Government, the PCO will document the rationale for the competitive range determination, in which the Source Selection Authority (SSA) will review and approve the PCO’s determination. If the PCO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the PCO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

Offerors may request a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505 Preaward Debriefing of Offerors or FAR 15.506 Post award Debriefing of Offerors.

9. PROPOSAL CHARACTERISTICS

9.1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION, PAGE LIMITATIONS, AND FORMAT

Proposals shall be submitted by the time and date as specified in Block 13 of the SF 1442, Page 1.

All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) applied to all documents that will enable word searches to be conducted using Adobe-compatible PDF software. The two (2) volumes listed below shall be submitted as “SEPARATE” files described below. Offers must be submitted electronically. Offerors may utilize email or coordinate with the Contracting Officer a different method of dropping off files. The burden for timely submission rests with the offeror, and no part of this solicitation allows for the acceptance of untimely submissions.

Please send proposals to Contract Specialist, Nicole Parker, at nicole.l.parker@usace.army.mil and to Contracting Officer, Jeffrey Wyant, at jeffrey.w.wyant@usace.army.mil.

Receipt of Submissions for the purposes of establishing whether a proposal submission is considered timely, the Government considers the date and time the submission is time stamped as arrived to the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer email inbox. For proposals that require multiple submissions, the Government will evaluate what it received by the deadline. The Government will not evaluate any part of a late submission. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous. It can take several minutes or even hours in some cases. The Government will not be responsible for submissions delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the designated recipient. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received in accordance with the instructions provided.

Page limitations for Volumes I & II, Technical Proposal (Evaluation Factors 1 through 5) are shown in the table below. Title Sheets, Tables of Content, Dividers, and blank pages are not included the page limitations below and should not be numbered. Do not submit cover letters for any file submitted, however, a title sheet is recommended as the first page of each file identifying your firm’s name and the file’s title. Any extraneous information or cover letters that provides additional information about your firm that is not requested by this solicitation will not be reviewed or evaluated.

Pages for each factor should be separately and sequentially numbered (i.e., the first page submitted for evaluation for each factor should be “1”). All text shall be at least 10 pt. font and easily read (Arial, Times New Roman, or Calibri). All text shall be typed and single-spaced. Each page shall be 8-1/2” x 11” (organizational chart, risk assessment and project schedule are the only documents that may be submitted on an 11” x 17”). Margins should be no less than 1” (right, left, top, and bottom).

Pages that exceed the page limitations for any factor will not be reviewed and the information contained on those pages will not be considered for evaluation. Page limitations are per factor, i.e., an Offeror may not reduce the page count for one factor to submit additional pages for another factor.

Table 9: Page Count Information

Volume I, Technical Proposal Evaluation

Factor Title Page Limitation

Past Performance 11 Pages Max (3 pages per project example plus a 2-page teaming narrative); no page limit on CPARS/PPQs

2 Key Personnel 2 Pages Per Resume (10 Pages Max) 3 Project Management & QC Plan 20 pages total 4 Schedule and Milestones No Limit

Volume II, SB Participation Plan and Price Proposal

5 Small Business Participation Plan No Limit 6 Price No Limit

Volume I, Technical Proposal, shall be submitted as the following separate files:

Offerors must submit the following within the file titled W9128F25R0014_FIRMNAME_REQD_DOCS in the sequence listed below (No Page Limit):

Title Sheet Table of Contents Tab A – SF1442, Acknowledgement of Amendments - Acknowledgement of amendment(s) on SF30s is acceptable as well, but not required if the offeror acknowledged amendments on the SF 1442.

Tab B – Representations & Certifications Tab C – JV Agreement or Teaming Agreement (If Applicable)

Offerors must submit the following within the file titled W9128F23R0019_FIRMNAME_FACTORS1_thru_4 in the sequence listed below:

Tab D - Factor 1 – Past Performance Tab E - Factor 2 – Key Personnel Tab F - Factor 3 – Project Management & QC Plan Tab G - Factor 4 – Schedule and Milestones

Volume II, Small Business Participation Plan and Price Proposal, shall be submitted as the following separate files:

W9128F25R0014_FIRMNAME_FACTOR5

W9128F25R0014_FIRMNAME_PRICE

9.2 COMPONENT REQUIREMENTS

a. Title Sheet: The title sheet shall contain:

Solicitation number Name, title, address, email, and telephone number of the Offeror.

Offeror’s tax identification number (TIN) Names, titles, emails, and telephone numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this RFP.

Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal.

A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions and provisions included in the RFP.

b. SF 1442: The SF 1442 shall be completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror. Include the UEI number and CAGE code in Block 14 of the SF1442 along with the Offeror’s name and address.

c. Representation & Certifications. Representations and Certifications (other than those completed online through https://www.sam.gov).

d. Contractor Team Arrangement Requirements: For Contractor Team Arrangements, including Joint Ventures, submit the information required by “Contractor Team Arrangements” paragraph, below.

10. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Reference Section 00 21 00 Instructions to Offerors.

11. CONTRACTOR TEAM ARRANGEMENTS

11.1 CONTRACTOR TEAM ARRANGMENTS OTHER THAN JOINT VENTURE/ MENTOR-

PROTÉGÉ

All Offerors proposing a team arrangement other than a Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé, shall submit the following information in the Required Documents file:

a. A listing of each team arrangement member’s corporate name (no abbreviations), address, point of contact, phone number, UEI Number, and CAGE Code.

b. A copy of the signed team arrangement agreement or binding letter of commitment between each team member. All team arrangement agreements and letters of commitment shall:

(1) Clearly identify the expected relationship, role and responsibility between the firms, Prime Contractor, and of the subcontractor or other entity (type and proportion of work to be performed); and

(2) Be signed by the appropriate individual(s) of each company.

11.2 JOINT VENTURE TEAM ARRANGEMENTS (INCLUDING MENTOR-PROTÉGÉS)

No contract may be awarded to a Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé that is not registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. The Joint Venture/Mentor- Protégé must have its own registered Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number. Any Joint Venture/Mentor- Protégé agreement that is required to be approved by the Small Business Administration (SBA) shall be approved in accordance to the applicable Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). If the applicable requirements are not met prior to the due date for proposals, the proposal will be rendered unawardable.

a. In the cover letter of your proposal, provide the complete names, addresses, and phone number of the firms comprising the Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé.

b. A copy of the Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé agreement.

c. Signature requirements: SF 1442, SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD, Block 20, requires that the name and title of a person authorized to sign the offer for the Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé be provided. In the case of a Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé, subject Standard Form shall be signed by the principal representative of the Joint Venture/ Mentor-Protégé (or the alternate principal representative, if the principal representative is unavailable).

d. In addition to the requirements stated above, and to assure a single point of contact for resolution of contractual matters and payments, the Offeror shall submit a certificate signed by each participant in the Joint Venture containing the following statement:

“The parties hereto expressly understand and agree as follows:

1. (Name, title, and company) is the principal representative of the Joint Venture. As such, all communications regarding the administration of the contract and the performance of the work thereunder may be directed to him or her. In the absence of (same name, title, and company), (enter name, title, and company of alternate) is the alternate principal representative of the Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé. These individuals have authority to sign on behalf of the Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé.

2. Direction, approvals, required notices, and all other communications from the Government to the Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé, including transmittal of payments by the Government, shall be directed to (enter name, title, and company of principal), principal representative of the Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé.”

NOTE: Provide telephone numbers and email addresses for the points of contact listed in the above statement.

e. A small business joint venture offeror must submit, with its offer, the representation required in paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations, in accordance with 52.204-8(d) and 52.212-3(b) for the following categories:

(A) Small business;

(B) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business;

(C) Women-owned small business (WOSB) under the WOSB Program;

(D) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business under the WOSB Program;

or

(E) Historically underutilized business zone small business.

11.3 INTEGRITY AND VALIDITY OF CONTRACTOR TEAM ARRANGEMENTS

The Contracting Officer will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements;

provided that the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed and validation of formal agreements and relationships (i.e., Mentor-Protégé agreements, Joint Ventures, partnerships, etc.) are provided in the offer and submitted with the proposal responding to the solicitation. Nothing in the solicitation authorizes contractor team arrangements in violation of antitrust statutes or limits the Government’s rights to:

a. Require consent to subcontracts (see FAR Subpart 44.2);

b. Determine, based on the stated contractor team arrangement, the responsibilities of the

Prime Contractor (see FAR Subpart 9.1);

c. Provide to the Prime Contractor data rights owned or controlled by the Government;

d.…