A.2.11.3 W9128A22R0016 Am-0003 Specifications.pdf

CUI

C

FY22 Multi-Domain Task Force #3 Building 300

Helemano Military Reservation, Oahu, Hawaii

Specifications

Volume 1 of 2

RTA Design Submittal

Contract No.: W9128A-19-D-0011

Task Order No.: W9128A21F0031

15 March 2022

Design Analysis

USACE Honolulu District

Controlled by: CEPOH

Controlled by: CEPOH

CUI Category(ies): DEFENSE

Limited Dissemination Control: FEDCON

POC: CEPOH, (808) 835-4629

Distribution authorized to Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only; Vulnerability Information. Other requests for this document shall be referred to CEPOH, Bldg 127 Krukowski Road, Honolulu, HI 96819-1557

July 2022

Amendment 3 -

J. Uno & Associates, Inc. Page 9

SCHEDULING

PHASING OF WORK

The work will be divided into two sequential, continuous phases by the same Prime and Subcontractors. No demobilization and remobilization are anticipated between Phase 1 and Phase 2.

1. Phase 1: Middle Wing, East Wing, and majority of sitework

2. Phase 2: Main Building

PROJECT SCHEDULE

The following are estimated project dates (provided by government):

Bid Date: June 1, 2022

Contract Award Date: September 30, 2022

Construction Start Date, Phase 1: October 1, 2022

Construction Completion Date, Phase 1: October 1, 2023

Construction Start Date, Phase 2: October 1, 2023

Construction Completion Date, Phase 2: March 1, 2025

PROJECT DURATION

The estimated contract duration is:

Award to Construction End Date 912 calendar days

Note from DOR: This is a draft schedule discussed with the Government during the design phase and produced as a basis of the cost estimate.

Actual schedule assumptions and adjustments are to be made by the contractors prior to the construction commencement.

Follow instructions and directions from the Government regarding the project scheduling, phasing and duration.

YIS

Text Box Amendment 3

YIS

Text Box Section 01 32 00 Attachment

DESIGN PHASE

COMMISSIONING PLAN

Contract No.: W9128A-19-D-0011

Task Order No.: W9128A21F0031

4 March 2022

Controlled by: CEPOH Controlled by: CEPOH CUI Category(ies): DEFENSE Limited Dissemination Control: FEDCON

POC: CEPOH, (808) 835-4629

Distribution authorized to Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only; Vulnerability Information. Other requests for this document shall be referred to CEPOH, Bldg 127 Krukowski Road, Honolulu, HI 96819-1557

YIS

Text Box Section 01 91 00.15 10_Attachment

YIS

Text Box Amendment 3

- CUI - Commissioning Plan

Page 2 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

Table of Contents

1 REVIEW AND APPROVAL

2 REVISION HISTORY

3 OVERVIEW

3.1 Purpose of the Commissioning Plan

3.2 Codes and Standards

3.3 Commissioning Scope

3.4 Integrated Process

4 COMMISSIONED SYSTEMS

4.1 Mechanical Systems

4.2 Plumbing Systems

4.3 Electrical Systems

4.4 Specialty Systems

5 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS

5.1 Abbreviations

5.2 Definitions

6 COMMISSIONING TEAM

6.1 Team Structure

6.2 Roles and Responsibilities

6.2.1 Owner / Owner Representative

6.2.2 Designers of Record

6.2.3 Commissioning Authority

7 DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING

7.1 Design Phase Overview

7.2 Design Phase Commissioning Activities

7.2.1 Review Owners Project Requirements

7.2.2 Develop Commissioning Plan

7.2.3 Establish Issues Log Procedures

7.2.4 Develop Commissioning Specifications

7.2.5 Review Basis of Design

7.2.6 Perform Focused Review of Contract Documents

7.2.7 Identify Training Requirements

7.2.8 Pre-Bid Meeting

7.3 Design Phase Acceptance Requirements

7.4 Design Phase Documentation

END OF TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 3 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

1 REVIEW AND APPROVAL

The Commissioning Plan was developed specifically for this project using approved engineering specifications and drawings as the basis for verification that the owner’s project requirements are met.

Function Organization Name Signature Date

Written By

Cx Authority Jacobs

Design Team Jacobs

Approved By

Cx Authority

AMEL

Technologies, Inc.

Melek Yalcintas

2 REVISION HISTORY

The Commissioning Plan is considered a “living” document that may be updated throughout the project duration by the Cx Authority as applicable. When updates are completed, copies of the revised Plan will be submitted to the Commissioning Team Members.

Summarized here are the Plan updates along with revision dates:

Rev # Date Description

00 09/08/21 Draft – Issued for Project Team’s Review

01 01/24/22 Revised Draft – Final Submission

02 03/04/22 Final Submission

Roman Roman 3/15/2022

3/15/2022

Roman Roman

Su-Hyun Yi

03/15, 202203/15, 2022

Roman Roman

Page 4 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

3 OVERVIEW

3.1 Purpose of the Commissioning Plan

The USACE Honolulu District has committed to implement the Commissioning Process for the FY22 MDTF #3 Renovate Building 300 Helemano Military Reservation, to verify that all systems reflect the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) design philosophy and criteria, that systems are complete and functioning properly, that systems integrate with existing control systems where appropriate, and that Facility Operations has adequate system documentation and training.

The purpose of the Commissioning Process is to provide the Owner / Operators of the facility with a high level of assurance that the commissioned systems have been installed in the prescribed manner and operate within the performance guidelines set forth in the Basis of Design. The Commissioning Authority will provide the Owner with an unbiased, objective view of the system’s installation, operation, and performance. This process is not to take away or reduce the responsibility of the Design Professionals or installing Contractors to provide a finished product.

Commissioning is intended to enhance the quality of a system start-up and aid in the orderly transfer of systems to beneficial use by the Owner. The Cx Authority is a member of the Commissioning Team, who is responsible for coordinating all commissioning activities with the Owner, Design Professionals, Construction Manager, Contractors, Subcontractors, Manufacturers and Equipment Suppliers.

This Commissioning Plan is to be used as a Guide by all Project Team Members throughout the duration of this Project. This Plan is written to provide detailed information about the many activities that make up the Commissioning Process.

3.2 Codes and Standards

This project will adhere to the following for the commissioning process:

- UFC 1-200-02, High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements, December 2020

- Guiding Principles for Sustainable Federal Buildings (Guiding Principles), 2020

- Army’s Sustainable Design and Development Policy, 16 Dec. 2013

- ER 1110-345-723 Total Building Commissioning Procedures, 31 March 2017

3.3 Commissioning Scope

The Commissioning Process includes all the parties directly involved in the design and construction process, as well as representatives of the Directorate of Public Works, USACE Honolulu District, Jacobs, and the Commissioning Authority. Commissioning takes place continuously during the project and touches all parties involved in design, construction, start-up, testing, operation and maintenance.

Building 300 is an existing three-story barracks and dining facility (DFAC) originally constructed between 1951 - 1957. B300 is composed of three separate volumes: Main Building, Middle Wing, and East Wing. The building has undergone several renovations and is currently being utilized as an administrative facility for the 307th Expeditionary Signal Battalion (ESB). Upon completion of the renovation, 307th ESB—the existing tenant—will be relocated within B300 and co-exist with MDTF #3—the new tenant—after the renovation.

The three-story Main Building serves as administrative spaces for the two occupying tenants and includes private and shared offices, conferences rooms, training rooms, break rooms, arms rooms, Page 5 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300 and storage. Secure areas (Secret Collateral) include several offices, conference rooms, training rooms, and SIPR café. The Main Building will be outfitted with a new ramp and elevator to provide accessible access to the facility. A new bridge will be constructed to provide accessible access to the second floor of the East Wing.

The one-story Middle Wing and two-story East Wing will be solely occupied by MDTF #3 and constructed as ‘Controlled Areas’ which provide protection for higher classification levels. Program elements include an Operations Center (ADOC), office spaces, DCO & RF labs, conference rooms, and security office.

Utility spaces are provided throughout the compound for mechanical rooms, elevator machine room, fire protection room, electrical rooms, uninterruptible power supply (UPS) rooms, and telecommunication equipment rooms.

The envelope work consists of new windows & doors and new concrete shear walls for the Main Building and new doors, concrete shear walls and infill metal stud walls with DEFS exterior finish for the Middle Wing & East Wing (Controlled Areas). New roof insulation will be installed to the underside of the existing concrete roof slab.

The mechanical work will include a new chilled water plant to service the new fan coil units and dedicated outside air system (DOAS) in the Main Building and East Wing, and the Variable Air Volume (VAV) air handling units for the Middle Wing. All units will be controllable through a new BAS network. Plumbing work involves installation of all new equipment and systems for Domestic Water and Sanitary service. Life safety systems include new wet sprinkler coverage and fire alarm control panels (FACP) to monitor and control fire alarm and mass notification systems. Power systems will include new panelboards and distribution, new service to HVAC, life safety, and lighting equipment, and uninterruptible power supply (UPS) serving the Controlled Areas. Lighting will be new LED fixtures and battery powered emergency fixtures.

3.4 Integrated Process

A collaborative, integrated planning and design process has been incorporated in all phases of the project’s planning and delivery. This process includes the commissioning to help successful turnover from the construction to operations and expected to be carried out during the maintenance of the facility.

Evaluation of the Site

The project satisfies the provisions of UFC 1-200-02 High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements by integrating the following key sustainable planning principles for optimizing use of limited resources and creating compact, sustainable development while addressing security and safety concerns during the site selection/evaluation process, design, and construction:

Sustainable Landscape Elements and Water Conservation: Ground cover consisting of ‘El Toro’ Zoysia turf has been selected as the project’s exclusive natural landscaping element due to its suitability for local climate conditions (heat resistance) and drought tolerance, which reduces water and maintenance requirements by eliminating the requirement for an automatic irrigation system.

Low Impact Development and Stormwater Management: Engineered small-scale hydrologic controls to replicate the project site’s existing hydrology through infiltrating, filtering, storing, evaporating, and detaining runoff close to its source will be achieved by the emplacement of

Page 6 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300 bioretention basins outside the TSVA to the maximum extent technically feasible in accordance with UFC 3-210-10 Low Impact Development. These shallow depressions will be located between the TSVA and existing POV parking lot for efficient utilization of available land area.

Site Integration and Design of the Building

The project avoids development of environmentally sensitive lands and reduces the environmental impact from the building location on the site.

Compliance with the 1-4 Critical Landscape Design requirements of UFC 3-201-02 Landscape Architecture will be met by stipulating in the contract documents the provisions for warranty, periodic inspections, and maintenance during the planting and irrigation establishment period for the turf areas. The Contractor will be required to conduct weekly inspections during the groundcover establishment period and perform regular and prompt maintenance activities such as mowing, removal of excess clippings, weed eradication, watering, aeration, fertilizing and other operations necessary to promote the proper health, growth, natural color, and manicured appearance of the turf installation.

Other Sustainability Guiding Principles

Following sustainability guiding principles apply to this project and to be considered during the commissioning phase:

Optimize Energy Performance: A minimum 30 percent reduction in energy usage over ASHRAE

90.1 (2013) and includes utility metering

Protect and Conserve Water: No permanent irrigation system, Water efficient plumbing fixtures and indoor/outdoor water meters. Meet the requirements of International Green Construction Code 601.3.2 Building Water Use. Achieve a water use savings of at least 20% over LEED®v4 baseline rates.

Stormwater Management: LID features, A site-specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and implement appropriate BMPs

Indoor Environmental Quality: Smoking is prohibited within the facility or within 25 feet of any entrance, air quality management plan during the construction

Reduce Environmental Impact of Materials: Comply EPA’s recommendation and environmentally preferable products

Address Climate Change Risk: Implement appropriate BMPs

Page 7 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

4 COMMISSIONED SYSTEMS

To be verified during the Cx Meeting after Intermediate Submittal

4.1 Mechanical Systems

Air Handling Units/Fan Coil Units 100% FCUs 25 per floor Chillers/Pumps 100% Exhaust Fans/Ventilation 50% Building Automation System (BAS) 100% HVAC Controls Per Equip.

4.2 Plumbing Systems

Domestic Water Heaters 100% Recirc. Pump 100% Thermostatic Mixing Valves 100%

4.3 Electrical Systems

4.4 Specialty Systems

Building Envelope Cx Scope Control Systems Integration (UMCS) 100%

Lighting Controls / Occupancy Sensors 50% Emergency Lighting Systems 100% Emergency Power System 100% Electrical Metering 100%

Water Metering 100%

Page 8 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

5 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS

5.1 Abbreviations

The following are common abbreviations used throughout the Commissioning Process:

A/E Architect / Engineer PFC Pre-Functional Checklist

CxA Commissioning Authority PM Project Manager

CM Construction Manager RFP Request for Proposal

Cx Commissioning SC Subcontractor

EC Electrical Contractor SI Systems Integrator

FPT Functional Performance Test TAB Test and Balance Contractor

GC General Contractor TCC Temperature Control Contractor

MC Mechanical Contractor USACE US Army Corps of Engineers

5.2 Definitions

Basis of Design Document: A document that records the concepts, calculations, decisions, and product selections used to meet the Owner’s Project Requirements and to satisfy applicable regulatory requirements, standards, and guidelines. The document includes both narrative descriptions and lists of individual items that support the design process.

Commissioning Authority: An entity identified by the Owner who plans, schedules, and coordinates the Commissioning Team to implement the Commissioning Process.

Commissioning Plan: A document that outlines the organization, allocation of resources, and documentation requirements of the Commissioning Process.

Commissioning Process: A quality-focused process for enhancing the delivery of a project. The Process focuses on verifying and documenting that the facility and all of its systems and assemblies are planned, designed, installed, tested, operated, and maintained to meet the Owner’s Project Requirements.

Commissioning Team: The individuals who through coordinated actions are responsible for implementing the Commissioning Process.

Pre-Functional Checklist: A form used by the Contractor to verify that appropriate components are on-site, correctly installed, functional and ready for Functional Performance Testing.

Corrective Issue Report: A report generated by the Cx Authority during Functional Performance Testing documenting issues found during the testing procedures that require follow-up corrective action.

Functional Performance Testing: The process by which specific documents, components, equipment, assemblies, systems, and interfaces among systems are confirmed to comply with the criteria described in the Owner’s Project Requirements.

Owners Project Requirements: A written document that details the functional requirements of the project and the expectations of how the building will be used and operated. This includes project

Page 9 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300 and design goals, measurable performance criteria, budgets, schedules, success criteria, and supporting information.

Systems Manuals: The Systems Manuals include information related to the systems, assemblies and the Commissioning Process, incorporated into a usable information resource, with indexes and cross references. Information included in the Systems Manuals: Owner’s Project Requirements, Basis of Design Document, Commissioning Plan, Commissioning Process Progress Reports, manufacturer Installation Manuals, manufacturer Operation and Maintenance Manuals, Test Reports and Record Drawings.

Page 10 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

6 COMMISSIONING TEAM

6.1 Team Structure

The Commissioning Team shall consist of representatives from each of the following parties involved in the design, construction and operation of this facility: 1) Owner, Facilities Operations & Users; 2) Architect & Design Professionals; 3) Construction Manager; 4) Contractor, Subcontractors & Equipment Suppliers; and 5) the Commissioning Authority. The time at which individual members join the team and the level of their participation during the different phases of the project will vary from member to member.

Figure 4-1: Commissioning Team Organization Chart

Following are the Commissioning Team Members and Contact Information:

Team Member Organization Role Phone Email

Owner/User

USAG HI

Owner’s Representative CxG Amel Technology

DOR

Architect/Engineer

Jacobs-AHL JV

Design Phase Commissioning Authority

Jacobs-AHL JV

Contract Formal Comm.

Formal Communications

Informal Communications

Page 11 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

6.2 Roles and Responsibilities

6.2.1 Owner / Owner Representative

The Owner (USAG) and Owner’s Representatives (USACE) play an important role in the Commissioning Process throughout the duration of this Project. The Owner facilitates and supports the Cx Authority and is the party who provides final acceptance of the Commissioning Process.

Following is an outlined summary of responsibilities for the representatives of the USAG and USACE:

Provide the Owner’s Project Requirements documented for the project in the form of project

RFP.

Attend Design & Construction Phase meetings and provide input to design discussions and construction activities.

Review and approve any changes made to the Basis of Design.

Assign operations and maintenance personnel and schedule them to participate in the various progress meetings, training sessions, and observations & inspections.

Review RFI’s and submittals.

Attend Commissioning Team meetings as scheduled by the Commissioning Authority.

6.2.2 Designers of Record

The various disciplines of the Design Team will collaborate closely with the Commissioning Authority to ensure the design is clear and when complete meets the Owner’s Project Requirements, as well as address issues raised during the design of the project. The following is an outlined summary of responsibilities for the Designers of Record:

Review the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR)

Develop of the Basis of Design Document (Design Analysis).

Prepare Contract Documents, including the integration of the Commissioning Process requirements and activities.

Attend the Pre-Design and Design Phase coordination and review meetings.

Attend the Construction Phase Pre-Bid and Pre-Construction Meetings.

Attend the Commissioning Team Meetings.

Review and incorporate, as appropriate, the Commissioning Authority’s comments from their design reviews.

Participate in the initial operation and maintenance personnel and occupant training session by presenting the project Basis of Design.

Specify and verify that adequate training requirements are provided in the Contract Documents.

6.2.3 Commissioning Authority

The Commissioning Authority will organize and lead the Commissioning Team.

Review the Owner’s Project Requirements.

Page 12 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

Verify the Commissioning Process activities are clearly identified in the Contract Documents.

Integrate the Commissioning Process activities into the proposed project schedule.

Prepare a Commissioning Plan that describes the extent of the Commissioning Process to accomplish the Owner’s Project Requirements. Update the Cx Plan throughout the project to incorporate changes and additional information.

Review the Contract Documents with respect to completeness in all areas relating to the Commissioning Process. This includes verifying that the Owner’s Project Requirements have been achieved, and that there are adequate devices included in the design to properly test the systems and assemblies and document proper performance.

Develop preliminary pre-functional checklists. These preliminary checklists will be updated by the construction phase CxA with submitted equipment information at the appropriate time.

Develop preliminary pre-verification tests and functional test procedures. These preliminary test procedures will be updated by the construction phase CxA once the final equipment selections and sequences of operation are approved.

Develop the Issues Log to be used throughout the duration of the project.

Coordinate Contractor training specification requirements

Page 13 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

7 DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING

7.1 Design Phase Overview

During the Design Phase of the project delivery process, the Owner’s Project Requirements are translated into construction documents.

The Cx Authority provides focused reviews of the Contract Documents at the various stages of completion to ensure the Cx Process requirements are incorporated into the Contract Documents.

The Cx Authority reviews the Basis of Design Document. The intent of the Basis of Design is to clearly convey the assumptions made in developing a design solution that fulfills the intent and criteria in the Owner’s Project Requirements. Narrative descriptions of facility systems and assemblies are developed and included.

7.2 Design Phase Commissioning Activities

7.2.1 Review Owners Project Requirements

The Owner’s Project Requirements form the basis from which all design, construction, acceptance, and operational decisions are made. An effective Commissioning Process depends on a clear, concise and comprehensive Owner’s Project Requirements document.

The Owner’s Project Requirements is a written document that details the functional requirements of the facility and the expectations of how it will be used and operated. This document includes project and design goals, budgets, Owner directives, schedules, and supporting information. It also includes information necessary for all disciplines to properly plan, design, construct, operate and maintain systems and assemblies.

The Commissioning Authority shall review the Owner’s Project Requirements. Input and drafts will be gathered from all Team members. A valuable source of information that contributes to the development of the OPR is the Primary Project Description developed by the Architect and Engineers during this phase of the project. The Owner and AE will work closely with the CxA to incorporate information from Preliminary Project Descriptions into the OPR. Since there is a large amount of information generated in the design phase, only the concepts most important to the Owner will be included. Information extraneous to the actual design, such as justification for the facility, permitting details, history or policy issues, etc., are not part of the Owner’s Project Requirements.

The Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) is a document that evolves through each project phase. It is the intention that as decisions are made during the Design, Construction, and Operations / Occupancy Phases, that this document be updated to reflect the current project requirements of the Owner. It is the primary tool for benchmarking success and quality at all phases of the project delivery and throughout the life of the facility.

7.2.2 Develop Commissioning Plan

The commissioning plan identifies processes and procedures necessary for a successful commissioning process. The commissioning plan addresses the Owner’s Project Requirements and reflects the defined scope and budget for the Commissioning Process. Also included in the Commissioning Plan is the Commissioning Team structure along with a description of each Team Member’s roles and responsibilities.

Page 14 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

The commissioning plan will develop further during the construction phase to include the commissioning process procedures for the duration of the project. This plan can then be used by all project team members as a reference guide or handbook for the commissioning process.

7.2.3 Establish Issues Log Procedures

The project issues log contains detailed descriptions of design, installation, or performance issues that are discovered through the commissioning process. The Cx Authority will prepare and update the log. The Cx Authority will track Issues as they are encountered during the design, construction, and operation phases of the project. The Cx Authority will maintain the log with the status of all current and resolved Issues.

On a periodic basis the Cx Authority will generate a written narrative report describing the outstanding Issues and the status of each issue. Copies of these reports will be forwarded to the commissioning team members for review. Outstanding issues will be discussed, and a completion plan will be implemented.

7.2.4 Develop Commissioning Specifications

The Cx Authority will develop a project specific commissioning specification section to be included in the project specifications. This specification section will be numbered 01 91 10.00 15. Being included in Division 01, this specification section outlines the administrative requirements of the Cx Process and the Cx Authority involvement with the Contractor.

The commissioning process integrates with many other administrative procedures. The Cx Authority will review the complete set of specifications to ensure proper cross references are made to all related sections. These review comments will be issued to the Architect and USACE for review and consideration for inclusion into the Contract Documents. The Cx Authority issues the comments to the Architect, and it is the Architect’s responsibility to perform any editing to the specifications.

7.2.5 Review Basis of Design

The Basis of Design is developed by the design team and reviewed by the Cx Authority. This document details all assumptions made during the design phase. These assumptions (codes, standards, occupant load, noise criteria, etc.) are typically recorded in the designer’s files but never transmitted to the Owner. By documenting the basis of design in a consistent format, the information is captured and stays with the facility for its life. This simplifies future troubleshooting and modification of the facility and its systems.

7.2.6 Perform Focused Review of Contract Documents

When the contract documents are issued for review to the project team at the various milestone levels, the Cx Authority will also perform a focused review of the issued documents.

The general quality of the documents is evaluated by checking for consistent layout and legibility of the Contract Documents. Compliance with the Owner’s Project Requirements along with ease of use and clarity are the major issues reviewed. Any previous issues or items of concern identified during previous reviews will be examined to ensure these issues have been properly included.

Sample areas of the facility are reviewed in detail to evaluate the coordination accomplished within and among disciplines. This includes reviewing for constructability and interfaces among disciplines. The intent of this review is to determine if there are systematic errors, not to fully check the design accuracy of the Design Team.

Page 15 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

Finally, the plans are reviewed from the perspective of facilities management. The Cx Authority offers comments on the design plans to improve accessibility for equipment and component maintenance and access. In addition, the Cx Authority will comment on the ability to replace equipment at the end of its useful life.

7.2.7 Identify Training Requirements

During the Design Phase the training requirements of the operation and maintenance personnel and occupants are identified relative to the systems and assemblies to be installed in the facility. It is critical that the operations and maintenance personnel have the knowledge and skills required to operate the facility and maintain the operations in an energy efficient and cost effective manner.

The goal of the Cx Process is to identify in the specifications the time requirements for each type of system and assembly that requires demonstration and training. Also include the expected experience and knowledge of the trainer, the number of unique training sessions, repeating of training for multiple shifts, and commissioning procedures for submittal of training plan, handouts, record of training, and follow-up evaluation feedback from the attendees.

One additional step the Cx Authority performs is the follow-up evaluation from each of the training session attendees. When the training has been completed, the Cx Authority will issue an evaluation form to each of the attendees. The feedback will be reviewed with the Owner, Architect and Contractor to ensure the objectives of the training session have been met.

7.2.8 Pre-Bid Meeting

During the pre-bid phase, the Commissioning Authority shall review all commissioning related RFI’s in order to clearly define the unique requirements of the commissioning process to the prospective bidders. The CxA shall provide responses that specifically address commissioning process issues.

7.3 Design Phase Acceptance Requirements

When the Contract Documents are Issued for Bid, the Cx Authority will submit the design phase commissioning documents to the commissioning team members for review and acceptance.

The updated Basis of Design document will be issued to the bidders as information only. This will provide the bidders with the detailed information and assumptions made by the design team in developing the contract documents.

The commissioning plan will be updated to include a draft of all information for the project through construction and operation / occupancy phases and issued to the bidders as information only. The commissioning plan will be updated throughout the construction phase by the construction phase CxA to meet the specific requirements of the project as it develops.

Specific performance requirements that will be reviewed during this process include:

1) Energy efficiency is achieved by the adequacy of the building architectural design, component selection and layout, and efficiency of system types and components for HVAC systems and lighting systems.

2) Control system & control strategies for the HVAC, electrical, domestic hot water, and life safety strategies and sequences of operation meet the Owner Project Requirements.

3) Concept and design systems meet the Owner Project Requirements and Basis of Design;

make recommendations on opportunities for enhancements.

4) The design systems achieve the functional needs of the occupants.

Page 16 - CUI - MDTF #3 RENOVATE BUILDING 300

5) Indoor environmental quality systems relating to thermal, air quality, air distribution, ventilation and other building components are in accordance with the Owner Project Requirements, Operational Intent, and Basis of Design.

7.4 Design Phase Documentation

Documentation delivered at the conclusion of the Design Phase includes:

Design Review Comments

Commissioning Specifications

Commissioning Plan

C

Specifications

Volume 2 of 2

RTA Design Submittal

Contract No.: W9128A-19-D-0011

Task Order No.: W9128A21F0031

15 March 2022

Design Analysis

USACE Honolulu District

Controlled by: CEPOH

Controlled by: CEPOH

CUI Category(ies): DEFENSE

Limited Dissemination Control: FEDCON

POC: CEPOH, (808) 835-4629

Distribution authorized to Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only; Vulnerability Information. Other requests for this document shall be referred to CEPOH, Bldg 127 Krukowski Road, Honolulu, HI 96819-1557

July 2022

Amendment 3 -