W9123819R0050 Amendment 0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment 0004 is:

a. Revise section L to clarify certain aspects due to RFIs.

b. Incorporate revised PWS, subCLIN structure, GFI List and SF33 Attachment L-1 Labor Category Qualif ications.

c. Extend suspense date for proposals to 17 January 2020.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 34

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Dec-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9123819R0050

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Oct-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Dec-2019

CODE

USACE SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

ATTN: CONTRACTING DIVISION

1325 J STREET

SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922

W91238 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9123819R0050

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 03-Jan-2020 04:00 PM to 17-Jan-2020 04:00 PM.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Attachments:

1. SF33 Attachment B-1 Hill AFB_Sub-CLIN Structure_20191213

2. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS_REV_20191213

3. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 1 Acronyms and Definitions

4. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 2A_Administrative Record Metadata_20190813

5. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 2B GFI List Hill AFB_20191219

6. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 2C Alternate Objective Site Consideration Summaries_20190830

7. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 2C Alternate Objective Site Consideration Summaries_20190830

8. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 4 OPSEC Addendum 20190607

9. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Attachment 1. ORC PMP Guidance v1.0_20190920

10. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Attachment 2. CPSMR template- 25Aug2019

11. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Attachment 3. Optimization Benefit Template_190520_MD_190710

12. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Attachment 4. AFGM2019-32-01, AFFF Related Waste Mgmt Implementation Guidance

13. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Attachment 5. Ensuring Chemistry Data Fact Sheet April 2013

14. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Attachment 6. Interim Guidance on 1-4 Dioxane, Environmental Restoration Program

15. SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Attachment 7. QASP Template v1

20191019_FINAL

16. SF33 Attachment J-1 SCA Wage Determination Davis-Weber Counties, UT

17. SF33 Attachment J-2 DBA Wage Determination Davis County, UT

18. SF33 Attachment J-3 DBA Wage Determination Weber County, UT

19. SF33 Attachment L-1 Labor Category Qualifications REV 16 DEC 2019

20. SF33 Attachment L-2 Past Performance Quality Questionnaire

21. SF33 Attachment L-3 ORC PMP Guidance v1.0_20190920 [Same as C-1 Attachment 1]

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

SECTION L ADDENDUM

SECTION L (HAFB ORC)

Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents Addendum

INFORMATION TO OFFERORS (ITO) AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPOSAL

PREPARATION

PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES

This requirement is for a competitive, Firm-Fixed Price Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) for environmental remediation services and related activities, as identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), utilizing the tradeoff process permitted by FAR Part 15, Subpart 15.1, 15.101-1, and the source selection policies and procedures under FAR Subpart 15.3. This effort is being solicited under North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 562910, Environmental Remediation Services.

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

a) The Offeror's proposal (prime contractor’s or JV’s, not sub-contractor proposals) must include all data and information requested by this ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the PWS and its Attachments and Enclosures. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in this ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

b) The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather shall provide detailed rationale for the Offeror’s approach and address how the Offeror intends to meet and achieve these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the Offerors’ facilities, capabilities and experience, and that the Government will base its evaluation exclusively on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal; however the Government reserves the right to utilize information obtained internally or from other sources such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) during the past performance factor evaluation.

c) Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

d) The proposal acceptance period is specified in the Validity Statement subsection, see below, of this section (Section L Addendum). The Offeror shall make a clear statement in Volume I of the proposal that the proposal is valid through this date.

e) In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the Offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of unsuccessful proposals.

2.0 General Information

2.1 Point of Contact

The Contracting Officer (KO) and Contract Specialist (CS) are the sole points of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the KO. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the KO at the address located below. The KO for this acquisition is as follows:

Contracting Officer:

Daniel E. Czech Phone (916) 557-7012 Email: Daniel.E.Czech@usace.army.mil

Contract Specialist:

Donald C Sumner III Phone: (916) 557-6752 Email: Donald.C.Sumner@usace.army.mil

2.2 Debriefings

The KO will promptly notify Offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range as required by FAR 15.503; whereupon excluded Offerors may request and elect to receive a pre-award or post-award debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a preaward debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a postaward debriefing. However, Offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The KO will notify unsuccessful Offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.503. Upon such notification, unsuccessful Offerors may request and receive a post-award debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.506. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable. The Government reserves the right to provide written debriefings in lieu of oral debriefings.

2.3 Discrepancies

If an Offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately notify the KO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the Offeror is asking the KO to consider as related to the omission or error. The Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based mailto:Daniel.E.Czech@usace.army.mil mailto:Donald.C.Sumner@usace.army.mil on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions. This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.

2.4 Discussions

The Government intends to evaluate proposals, and make the award of this contract, without discussions with the offerors, unless discussions are determined to be necessary.

2.5 Electronic Reference Documents

Government Furnished Information (GFI) documents will be available on the U.S. Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) Administrative Record website at http://afcec.publicadmin-record.us.af.mil/. All other referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website at http://www.fedbizopps.gov or from the USACE Sacramento District Office. Potential Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

Additional GFI documents too large for FedBizOpps may be made available to all Offerors on compact disc (CD) or through other means.

2.6 Oral Presentations

Oral presentations will not be used for this requirement.

2.7 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits

The Offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table (Table 2.7 below). The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified in Table 2.7. The attachments identified in the table shall be separately bound in three-ring, loose-leaf binders, as necessary. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the ITO paragraph as noted in Table 2.7 below (NO Hard Copies required; CDs only):

Table 2.7 Proposal Organization

Volume

ITO

Paragraph Number

Title Page Limit Original Unbound

Hard Copies

CD

Copies

I

3 VOLUME I -

CONTRACT

DOCUMENTATION

3.1 Volume Organization-

follow this proposal organizational structure for this volume

Unlimited 1 2 2

3.2 Contact Information

3.3 Executive Summary

3.4 Standard Proposal

Information

3.5 Validity Statement

3.6 Organizational

Conflict of Interest http://afcec.publicadmin-record.us.af.mil/ http://afcec.publicadmin-record.us.af.mil/ http://www.fedbizopps.gov/

Analysis and Mitigation Plan

3.7 Construction Bonding

3.8 Exceptions to

Solicitation Requirements

II

4 VOLUME II –

TECHNICAL 110 PAGES TOTAL

4.1 Volume Organization-

follow this proposal organizational structure for this volume

EXCLUDED FROM

VOLUME II PAGE COUNT

1 6 3

4.2 Standard Proposal

Information

4.3 General Guidance

50 pages (excludes 11 X 17 inch single-sided pages for

Summary Table)

4.4 Technical Factor 1-

Technical/Risk Approach

4.5 Technical Factor 2 –

Corporate Experience 10

4.6 Technical Factor 3 -

Management Approach

Resumes of Key Personnel: 3 pages each (21 pages total).

Other Required Information:

5 pages Total: 26 pages Professional registration certificates excluded from page limit.

III

5 VOLUME III – –

FACTOR 4 – PAST

PERFORMANCE

5.1 Volume Organization

Unlimited

1 2 2

5.2 Standard Proposal

Information

5.3 Past Performance

Summary 5

5.4 Organizational

Structure Change History

Unlimited

5.5 [DELETED] Past Performance Information Sheets

No more than 10 (2 pages per project)

5.6 Past Performance

Questionnaires (PPQs)

Up to 5 completed PPQs 4 pages each plus up to 2 page narrative each. Recognition documents excluded.

30 pages total.

5.7 Consent Letters Unlimited

5.8 Client Authorization

Letters

5.9 [DELETED] Specific Content

IV

6 VOLUME IV –

FACTOR 5 –

PRICE: SUBMIT IN

A SEPARATE

VOLUME FROM

THE TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL

6.1 Volume Organization

Unlimited 1 2 2

6.2 Standard Proposal

Information

6.3 General Instructions

6.4 Completed Schedule B

6.5 Milestone Payment

Schedule (MPS) with price

6.6 Professional

Compensation Plan

(FAR 52.222-46)

2.8 Proposal Format

a) This section of the ITO provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal.

b) The Offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by the ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions.

c) All the requirements specified in this solicitation are mandatory.

d) The Offeror is representing its firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation by submitting a proposal.

e) These instructions are intended to elicit brief and specific responses. However, simply stating that the Offeror understands and intends to comply with this effort or paraphrasing statements in the solicitation is inadequate.

f) The Offer shall comply with the requirements as stated in the solicitation.

2.9 Sufficient Detail

a) The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims (e.g., demonstrated success of proposed technology through quantitative results and regulatory approval).

b) The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet these requirements.

2.10 Price Information

a) All pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Price Proposal Volume (Volume IV). The electronic version of Schedule B shall be in both Microsoft Excel, Word and a pdf. Electronic version of the Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS) shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel and pdf. Prices shall be provided in whole-dollar amounts in both the hardcopy and electronic version of Schedule B of the RFP and in the MPS. The Offeror shall provide the proposed total amount of construction for each Sub-Contract Line Item Number (sub-CLIN) and include a milestone for the construction bonding fee. Sub- CLIN construction amounts and bonding fee amounts shall be totaled and provided for evaluation of bonding requirements.

2.11 No Cross-Referencing

a) Each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

b) Information required for proposal evaluation, which is not found in its designated volume, will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

c) Each response to each Factor shall be self-contained. No cross-referencing between

Factor responses is allowed.

2.12 Tab Indexing

a) Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections within each volume.

b) Tabs for items identified in the Title column of Table 2.7 Proposal Organization shall be utilized.

c) Tabs do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

d) Note: DO NOT include proposal information on tabs.

2.13 Table of Contents

a) Table of Contents.

i. Each volume shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the sub-sections within that volume.

b) Master Table of Contents.

i. Volume I, Contracting Documentation, shall contain a consolidation of the individual Tables of Contents for all Volumes (I through IV).

ii. A separate e-file of the Master Table of Contents shall be provided in accordance with Electronic Copy requirements in paragraph 2.3.9.3.

c) The Table of Contents will not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

2.14 List of Tables and Figures

a) Each volume shall contain a list of all tables and figures within that volume.

b) The List of Tables and Figures will not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

2.15 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

a) Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

b) One glossary may be developed for the entire proposal and provided in each volume.

c) Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

2.16 Proposal Copies

a) All copies of an Offeror’s proposal must be submitted together.

b) All Prime and Team Member(s’) including subcontractors’ information must be incorporated into one coherent submittal.

c) Staples shall not be used.

d) Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on disclosure and use of data, and FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.

2.17 “Original” Unbound Proposal One hardcopy of each volume shall be clearly identified as “Original”. The “Original” shall be formatted as follows:

a) Clearly marked as “Original”

b) Unbound

c) Hole-punched with a standard 2-hole punch at the top of each page

d) Printed head-to-foot so that each page can be read when placed in a standard 2-hole file folder

e) Each volume shall have a cover sheet, clearly marked as volume number, “ORIGINAL”, Offeror's name, solicitation title, and solicitation number.

2.18 Hard Copies

a) Each hard copy volume of the proposal shall be separately bound in a three-ring loose-leaf binder, which shall permit the volume to lie flat when open.

b) A cover sheet shall be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, copy number, Offeror's name, solicitation title, and solicitation number.

c) A Label shall be placed in the front cover of each binder clearly identifying volume number, copy number, Offeror's name, solicitation title, and solicitation number.

d) A Label shall be placed in the spine of each binder clearly identifying volume number, copy number, Offeror's name, solicitation title, and solicitation number.

e) All unclassified document binders shall have a color other than red or other applicable security designation colors.

f) The Technical Summary Table shall be submitted on 11 x 17 inch single sided pages.

g) The IMS shall be provided in hardcopy no larger than 11 x 17 inch single sided pages.

2.19 Compact Disc (CD) Copies

General requirements

a) The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. For electronic copies, indicate on each CD the Offeror’s name, volume number, and solicitation number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including Factors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. All electronic copies shall be submitted on CD-ROM in a flexible plastic protective sleeve. Protective sleeves shall be hole-punched with a standard 2-hole punch at the top of each sleeve.

i. Electronic file directory titles and organization shall reflect the titles and organization of these instructions.

https://cs.eis.af.mil/airforcecontracting/knowledge_center/Documents/AFFARS_Library/5315/templates/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/FAR52.215.doc#b522151 https://cs.eis.af.mil/airforcecontracting/knowledge_center/Documents/AFFARS_Library/5315/templates/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/FAR03.DOC#b31044

ii. Each directory shall contain a Microsoft Word file with the Master Table of Contents for that directory.

iii. The CD-ROMs will be used for proposal evaluation. The Government will not perform a word-by-word check of the “Original” vs. the PDF version. However, if discrepancies are identified between the electronic proposal and the “Original” paper proposal, the paper proposal shall prevail.

iv. Offerors shall ensure electronic copies on CD-ROM are virus free.

v. Electronic copies of each volume shall be compatible with the following available

Government equipment and software products:

Windows compatible PCs Adobe Acrobat Reader 9.0 Microsoft Office 2007 Microsoft Project 2007

vi. Sound or video (e.g. MPEG) files shall not be embedded into the proposal files.

vii. A separate CD-ROM shall be used for each volume.

b) Master copy CD-ROM requirements

i. Complete electronic copies of all volumes shall be submitted in Adobe Acrobat

Portable Document File (PDF) searchable and selectable text format.

ii. A separate CD-ROM shall be used for each volume.

iii. Each CD-ROM and protective sleeve shall be clearly marked as to volume number, Offeror's name, solicitation title, and solicitation number.

Page Format Restrictions and Limitations

2.20 Page Format

a) Unless otherwise specified, all pages shall be printed double-sided on recycled paper as much as practical. For example, original letters are exempted from the double-sided requirement.

b) Unless otherwise specified, pages shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts.

c) Text pages shall be portrait oriented. Graphics and tables may be landscape oriented if required to properly present the information.

d) Pages shall be typed with single line spacing.

e) No condensed fonts allowed. Times New Roman, Arial, or similar font preferred. The font size used shall be no less than 10 point except the IMS, WBS, MPS, tables, captions, graphics and Pricing volume submissions may be 8 point font and 0.5” margins.

f) Margins on all four edges of each sheet will be at least one inch.

g) Proprietary statements, security markings, and page numbers can fall within the defined margin area.

h) Except for the Price Volume, each required section within a volume shall be numbered consecutively. The following items MUST have page numbers: Volume II Factors 1-3 consecutively from start to finish with the exception of "other required information" in Factor 3 (excluded from page limit). Start with Factor 1 and go through Factor 3 with a single numbering sequence.

i) These page format restrictions shall apply to responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs).

2.21 Foldouts

a) Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics.

b) Foldout pages may not be used for pages of text.

c) Legible tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, schematics and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, design drawings, plans, etc.

d) These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size.

e) All information (except documentation numbers, classification markings, and page numbers) shall be contained within an image area of 9 x 15-1/2 inches.

f) Foldout pages shall fold so that the Government can read and evaluate them without removal from proposal binder.

g) Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume.

2.22 Page Limitations

a) Page limitations shall be treated as maximums.

b) Each side of each 8 ½ x 11 inch sheet that displays printed material shall be counted as one (1) page for page limitation purposes.

c) Each side of each 11 x 17 inch sheet that displays printed material shall be counted as two (2) pages for page limitation purposes.

d) Compliance with page count limits shall be verified via the hardcopy.

e) If page limits are exceeded, the excess pages (a) will be destroyed; and (b) will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal.

f) Page limitations shall be placed on responses to ENs. The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the Offeror(s).

2.23 Technical Summary Table

The Technical Summary Table shall be submitted on 11 x 17 inch single-sided pages. Though these pages (Summary Table) are part of the Technical Approach they will not be counted against the number of pages allocated for the technical volume. The Summary Table shall also be provided electronically via CD or DVD in MicrosoftTM Excel compatible format. The spreadsheet shall not contain any hard-pressed numbers or locked cells or formulas.

2.24 Project Summary

Project summaries submitted for Factor 2, Corporate Experience, shall be submitted under the Technical Volume on up to ten, double-sided 8.5 X 11 inch pages. Each project must be contained on two (2) pages or less. Each side of a page used equals one page towards the page count.

2.25 Pages Counted

Each page shall be counted except the following:

a) Volume I – Contract Documentation

b) Volume IV – Pricing

c) Executive Summary

d) Cover pages

e) Table of Contents

f) List of tables and figures

g) Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations

h) Tabs

i) Dividers

j) Blank pages

k) Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

l) Resumes

m) Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS)

n) Technical Summary Table

o) Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

3.0 VOLUME I - CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION

3.1 Volume Organization

a) Contact Information

b) Executive Summary

c) Standard Proposal Information

d) Validity Statement

e) Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Analysis and Mitigation Plan

f) Construction Bonding including Proof of Bonding Capacity

g) Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements including Terms and Conditions

h) Teaming Arrangements and/or Letters of Intent

i) Representations and Certifications. See SF33 Section K.

j) Master Table of Contents

k) Table of Contents

l) List of Tables and Figures

m) Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

n) Teaming Arrangements and/or Letters of Intent

o) Exceptions to Terms and Conditions

p) Representations and Certifications

q) Proof of Bonding Capacity

3.2 Contact Information

The Offeror shall identify the point of contact (POC) in the cover letter [name, phone number, and e-mail address] for any questions regarding the submitted proposal and the POC shall have authority to negotiate and bind the company.

3.3 Executive Summary

a) The Executive Summary is a concise narrative summary of the entire proposal, excluding price.

(i) The summary shall include key mission capability features describing key technical, performance, and management features of the Offeror as outlined in the solicitation.

(ii) The summary shall also include key contract features describing subcontractors, or TAs, delivery schedules for the period of performance including schedules for the basic and all options.

b) The key mission capability features and key contract features shall tie in with Section M evaluation criteria.

c) Any summary material presented here shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any portions of other volumes of the proposal.

3.4 Standard Proposal Information

a) Provide a Master Table of Contents for the entire proposal (all volumes).

b) Provide a Table of Contents for Volume I per ITO paragraph 2.13.

c) Provide a List of Tables and Figures for Volume I per ITO paragraph 2.14.

d) Provide a Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms for Volume I per ITO paragraph

2.15.

3.5 Validity Statement

a) The cover letter shall include the Offeror’s ability to provide bonding for the proposed construction costs and confirm proposal validity for 180 days after the suspense date for proposals.

b) The proposal acceptance period is specified in the SF 33, Page 1, Block 12 of the solicitation.

3.6 Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Analysis and Mitigation Plan

a) If the Offeror (including Teaming Partners, subcontractors, subsidiaries, and legacy companies) performed any cleanup related work in the past/present at sites identified in as part of this requirement, the Offeror shall submit identifying information – scope, applicable sites, specific document titles and descriptions, and contract or task order number in Volume 1, Contract Documentation. The Offeror shall identify any potential OCI issues or appearance of any potential OCI the Offeror, (including all Teaming Partners, subcontractors, subsidiaries, and legacy companies) may have with respect to the scope of effort as outlined in the PWS. OCIs may exist at least in the following three ways:

• Unequal access to information- access to non-public information that gives a contractor an unfair competitive advantage.

• Biased ground rules- when a contractor has in some sense set the ground rules for another procurement action creating the potential that the contractor may have tilted the playing field in the new competition (usually toward its own strengths and away from its weaknesses).

• Impaired objectivity - when the contract requires exercise of judgment and the independence of its judgment may be affected (e.g., when the contractor may be required to evaluate its own work in a way that could be adverse to its economic interests).

b) If the Offeror (including all Teaming Partners, subcontractors, subsidiaries, and legacy companies) performed past/present cleanup related work at the sites for this ORC, a mitigation plan shall be submitted in Volume I, Contract Documentation Volume to show how the Offeror will either satisfactorily mitigate or eliminate any potential OCI issues or appearance of any potential OCI. If the Offeror, including all Teaming Partners, subcontractors, subsidiaries, and legacy companies, has not performed any work on the sites included as part of this requirement, then the Offeror must so state.

c) Any submitted OCI analysis and plan will not be evaluated unless the Offeror is considered the Apparent Successful Offeror under the evaluation Factors listed in this RFP. If the OCI analysis and plan needs to be evaluated, the Government will determine if an OCI exists and whether adequate mitigation is proposed. If adequate mitigation is not proposed, the Government may engage in exchanges with the Apparent Successful Offeror to determine if the problems with the mitigation plan may be resolved. If an OCI exists that cannot be adequately mitigated, the Government may seek waiver of the OCI issue or may award to another Offeror who does not have an OCI, or who has an OCI and has submitted a mitigation plan that is adequate or may be made so after exchanges between the Government and the Offeror.

3.7 Construction Bonding

a) Provide the total proposed amount for construction efforts by Sub-CLIN and total contract. Provide a construction amount for each fiscal year of the POP (i.e. Fiscal Year 1, Fiscal Year 2, Fiscal Year 3, etc. based on chronological milestone payment date).

Provide the bonding fee total and the bonding fee by year.

b) Provide assertion that the Prime Contractor can meet the bonding requirements of the contract (100% performance and payment bond) with respect to the proposed totals for construction by year. Provide proof of excess bonding capacity commensurate with the proposed amount for construction with bonding capability letters from an approved surety listed with the Department of Treasury. Letters must be notarized and signed by an authorized representative of the surety. Letters signed by agents are unacceptable unless accompanied by a Power of Attorney granting proper authority to the agent.

Bonding capability must be for the Prime only (stacking of Teaming Partners/subcontractor bonds will not be accepted).

3.8 Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements

a) Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including all terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement or taking exception to a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors shall clearly identify any exceptions to Terms and Conditions of the solicitation. Exceptions are strongly discouraged. Failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the Offeror being removed from consideration for award.

b) Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken.

c) Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation.

d) This information shall be provided in the format and content of Table 3.8. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the Offeror being removed from consideration for award.

Table 3.8 – Solicitation Exceptions

Solicitation Document

Paragraph/Page Requirement/Portion Rationale

Contract clause, solicitation paragraph, model contract, ITO, etc.

Applicable page and paragraph numbers

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Justify why the requirement will not be met

4.0 VOLUME II – FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL

4.1 Volume Organization

The Technical volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

a) Executive Summary (duplication of executive summary in Volume I, Contract

Documentation)

b) Table of Contents

c) List of Table and Figures

d) Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations

e) Factor 1 – Technical/Risk Approach

f) Factor 2 – Corporate Experience

g) Factor 3 – Management Approach

4.2 Standard Proposal Information

a) Provide a duplicate copy of the Executive Summary narrative as required in Volume I, Contract Documentation, ITO paragraph 3.3.

b) Provide a Table of Contents for Volume II per ITO paragraph 2.1.

c) Provide a List of Tables and Figures for Volume II per ITO paragraph 2.14.

d) Provide a Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms for Volume II per ITO paragraph 2.15.

4.3 General Guidance

The Technical Volume shall be specific and complete. In the Technical Volume, address the proposed approach to meeting the performance or capability requirements of each technical Factor.

a) Marketing presentations are not wanted and will not be evaluated. Offerors must demonstrate capabilities required for all evaluation factors.

b) Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important.

c) Responses will be evaluated against Section M, Evaluation Factors.

d) Provide as specifically as possible, the actual methodology for accomplishing and satisfying the requirements.

e) All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By proposal submission, Offeror is representing the Team will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.

f) Technical Factors.

a) Include capabilities of Prime and Team Members.

b) Describe the Offeror’s proposed strategic approach to meeting the requirements of each

Technical Factor.

4.4 Factor 1: Technical/Risk Approach:

The Offeror shall submit a comprehensive technical approach that demonstrates achievement of the Performance Objectives in the Performance Period specified for each site in PWS Table 1:

Performance Table. The comprehensive technical approach shall describe how all of the Performance Objectives in the PWS and other applicable agreements will be met or exceeded, as well as identify and assess all risks of the proposed comprehensive technical approach and mitigation strategies and/or contingency plans. Risks include, but are not limited to, the potential for disruption of schedule, increased costs, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. Classify each risk in accordance with DoD Source Selection Procedures Table 1, Technical Risk Rating.

Provide the rationale for each risk and its rating, including quantitative estimates of the impact on cost, schedule, and performance. Describe the impact of each identified risk in terms of its potential to interfere with or prevent the successful accomplishment of other contract requirements (for example: PWS or specification requirements), whether or not those requirements are identified as Factors. Propose realistic risk mitigations strategies and contingency plans that will eliminate or reduce risk(s) to an acceptable level. The risk evaluation shall include the decision logic, identified thresholds, and timing for implementation a mitigation strategy and/or contingency plan if the proposed approach proves incapable of meeting the Performance Objectives within the Performance Periods.

• Summary Table: The Offeror shall provide a summary table including the following information for each site listed in the PWS: Site ID, Performance Objective, Performance Period, Date of Achieving Performance Objective, Brief Description of the Technical Approach. Site IDs should be copied from the PWS Table 1: Performance Table. For proposal purposes, the Offeror may choose to group sites for which the Offeror is proposing the same technical approach. However, where the Offeror chooses to do group sites with regards to same technical approaches, the Offeror may NOT group pricing information on the MPS for those or any other sites. The price information shall be provided on a per site basis only.

• Offeror's proposal shall also include a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and a Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS) (without price information):

o The WBS shall demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the ORC process and work required to achieve each PO; this would be demonstrated by a thorough work decomposition of each task and effective application of a WBS structure.

The WBS shall align with the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN)/Sub-CLIN Structure provided with the RFP, consistent with the Offeror’s proposed approach, and in accordance with the requirements in PWS Section 4.2 and supplemental guidance.

o The IMS shall be built from the WBS above. At a minimum, the offeror’s IMS shall:

Present a realistic sequence and timing of all activities and documents necessary to demonstrate achievement of the PO within the PP.

Demonstrate logical incorporation of realistic Government and Regulatory review periods as defined in the PWS.

Identify timing of decision points addressing risk mitigation and/or contingency strategies.

o The MPS (without price information) shall be built from the WBS above, consistent with the Offeror’s proposed approach and the IMS, and in accordance with the requirements in PWS Section 4.3. At a minimum, the offeror’s MPS (without price information) shall:

Present appropriate milestone payments considered integral and necessary to the achievement of the POs.

0Include a reasonable number of milestone payments per CLIN/Sub-CLIN based on the scope and anticipated duration to achieve CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective and/or PO.

Excludes unacceptable milestone payments representing a “progress” payment or a monthly payment for level of effort expended as well as management or overhead type costs.

Include final CLIN/Sub-CLIN milestone payments demonstrating achievement of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective which is a minimum of 20% of the total CLIN/Sub-CLIN value.

4.5 Factor 2: Corporate Experience

The Offeror shall submit a maximum of five (5) contract/task order (TO) summaries (narratives) demonstrating examples of relevant experience as it relates to the requirements of the PWS and this ORC. The Government will not consider experience on a contract/TO that concluded more than five (5) years prior to the date of this solicitation. For contracts/TOs that are actively being performed, performance must be substantially complete (minimum 50% complete as of the date of solicitation) to be evaluated under this Factor 2. Contracts/TOs submitted by the Offeror should be the most relevant in demonstrating their experience and capability to perform the proposed effort. At least three (3) of the five (5) example projects must be from the Prime Contractor. The Offeror shall also include the exact same contract/TO summaries in the volume for Factor 4, Past Performance.

Contract/TO Summary Submissions shall include the following:

• The individual task order or stand-alone contract number.

• Title of the project and a brief description of the effort including the characteristics or aspects of the project that the Government will consider in determining relevance. Focus on the PWS aspects identified in the Technical/Risk Factor.

• Number of environmental sites.

• Type of contract/pricing arrangement, i.e. Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Time and Materials

(T&M), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), etc.

• Original award amount and final total dollar amount (or estimate at completion) including modifications and options (with reasons for any changes in dollar amounts). If the project is currently ongoing, provide the percent complete (must be greater than or equal to 50%) at the time of proposal submission.

• Original and final period of performance (start and end dates).

• Current contract points of contact (POCs). Provide a current e-mail address and phone number. Provide a minimum of two Government POCs. Whenever possible, provide one from the technical or program management community and one from the contracting community. For commercial efforts, provide similar points of contact.

• Whether the project was completed on-time, within budget and whether or not the Offeror encountered any performance issues or challenges. If performance issues or challenges did arise in meeting the requirements, provide information on how they were addressed by the Offeror.

4.6 Factor 3: Management Approach

Offeror shall submit a detailed management plan describing how the Offeror will manage performance of the contract in order to achieve the Performance Objectives within the Performance Periods and ensure quality services and deliverables. The detailed management plan shall include the following information:

• A description of a qualified field and management team, including key personnel, subcontractors, and other relevant team members with identification of roles, responsibilities, and communication strategies demonstrating efficient and effective management of the contract performance.

• An organizational chart.

• Key personnel meeting the requirements identified in Attachment L-1. The following key personnel must be fulfilled by the Prime Contractor: Program Manager, Senior Project Manager, Contracts Manager, Program QA/QC, and Program Health and Safety Manager. The remaining key personnel may be fulfilled by a teaming partner or a specialized consultant/Subcontractor; however, they shall not be a second- or third-tier Subcontractor: Program Chemist and Public Affairs Officer.

• A description of how the Offeror successfully implemented the proposed remediation technologies on similar projects/sites submitted for Factors 2 and 4 of this soliciation.

• A description of the Offeror’s procedures/processes to ensure high-quality services and deliverables. At a minimum, the Offeror shall include procedures/processes that address the following:

o change management o prime and subcontractor staffing management o sampling and analysis o health and safety

• A description of how communication between stakeholders (Air Force, USACE, Offeror, Regulators, and Community) will be maintained.

• Identification of risks to management approach success, and how Offeror will monitor and eliminate or mitigate risks.

Key Personnel Qualifications: The Offeror shall submit resumes and evidence of relevant professional certifications of no more than three (3) pages each not including evidence of relevant professional registration(s) for the following key personnel:

• Program Manager

• Senior Project Manager

• Contracts Manager

• Program QA/QC

• Program Health and Safety Manager

• Program Chemist

• Public Affairs Officer

5.0 VOLUME III PAST PERFORMANCE (FACTOR 4)

5.1 Volume organization

a) [DELETED] Executive Summary (duplication of executive summary in Volume I, Contract

Documentation)

b) Table of Contents

c) List of Tables and Figures

d) Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

e) [DELETED] Teaming Arrangements and/or Letters of Intent

f) Present/Past Performance Summary

g) Organization Structure Change History

h) [DELETED] Past Performance Information Sheet

i) Present/Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment L-2)

j) Consent Letter(s)

k) Client Authorization Letter(s)

5.2 Standard Proposal Information

a) Provide a Table of Contents for Volume III per ITO paragraph 2.13.

b) Provide a List of Tables and Figures for Volume III per ITO paragraph 2.14.

c) Provide a Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms for Volume III per ITO paragraph 2.15.

5.3 Past Performance Summary

a) Describe the role of the Prime and each team member that will perform the requirements of the HAFB ORC requirements and identify the percentage of the proposed effort each will perform.

b) Discuss how the summaries/projects submitted for evaluation under Factor 2 demonstrate the Offeror’s ability to meet the Technical Sub-factors.

Factor 1: Technical/Risk Approach Factor 2: Corporate Experience Factor 3: Management Approach

c) This information is to assist the evaluators in determining the relevance of projects submitted for past performance evaluation by confirming the role of the team member compared to the scope of the projects submitted for evaluation.

5.4 Organizational Structure Change History

Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant past efforts or between conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, include in this proposal volume a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of the Offeror (including Prime Contractor and all teaming partners).

A pamphlet or other commercial document describing such reorganizations may suffice. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts submitted for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment.

5.5 [DELETED] Past Performance Information Sheets The Offeror shall provide copies of the project summaries submitted under Factor 2 Corporate Experience as a part of the submission for this Factor 4. Projects must demonstrate relevant experience in that projects submitted are of a nature similar to the efforts addressed under this solicitation in terms of size, scope, and technical and regulatory complexity in accordance with the requirements outlined in the PWS. The Government will not consider performance on a project that concluded more than five (5) years prior to the date of the solicitation. For projects that are actively being performed, performance must be substantially complete (minimum 50% complete as of the date of solicitation). Information provided in the Past Performance Information (PPI) Sheets will assist the Government in determining both the relevance and confidence ratings for past performance.

5.6 Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs)

a) Each Offeror is requested to submit the information shown in the project summaries for each relevant project identified in Factor 2 – Corporate Experience and in accordance with (IAW) Section 5.6. The responsibility to track and ensure the completion/submission of the PPQ rests solely with the Offeror. Offerors shall ensure that the information is submitted directly to the Past Performance Evaluation Chair, Donald Sumner, Donald.C.Sumner@usace.army.mil either in the proposal or directly from the client. The PPQ form is included as Attachment L-2 to this solicitation.

b) Even though the assessment of Past Performance is separate and distinct from Determination of Responsibility required by FAR 9, past performance information contained herein may be used to support the Determination of Responsibility for the successful Offeror.

c) Information provided on PPQs assist the Government in determining both the relevance and confidence ratings for past performance.

5.7 Consent Letters

The Offeror shall provide original consent letters from each team member and/or joint venture partner. This letter allows the release of team member adverse present/past performance information to the Offeror so the Offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a non-federal Government customer, the Offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter (see below), authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the Offeror's performance. Offerors are advised that the Government will use data provided by each Offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance.

mailto:Donald.C.Sumner@usace.army.mil

5.8 Client Authorization Letters

a) The Offeror shall provide original client authorization letters for…