3._Optimization_Benefit_Template_190520_MD_190710.docx

DOCX document 37 KB Posted

Attached to
Optimized Remediation Contract for Hill AFB, UT Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W91238-19-R-0050
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Sacramento

About this file

This document contains a draft performance work statement and sources sought synopsis for an optimized remediation contract at Hill Air Force Base in Utah. The Army Corps of Engineers is seeking information from businesses interested in a potential ten-year firm-fixed-price contract to conduct environmental remediation activities at 23 Installation Restoration Program sites and two Military Munitions Response Program sites. Services will include environmental services, minor construction, and architecture and engineering. Responses are requested by March 29, 2019 to provide company information, capability statements, and example project details. The resulting contract is expected to be awarded using best value tradeoff procedures.

3. Optimization Benefit Template_190520_MD_190710

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Optimized Remediation Contract for Hill AFB, UT, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 2B GFI List Hill AFB_20200113.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W923819R0050 Am 0005.pdf PDF
EPA Comments OU 15 2016-2017 letter work plan.pdf PDF
EPA Comments OU6memotofile.pdf PDF
SF33 Attachment B-1 Hill AFB_Sub-CLIN Structure_20191213.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Hill AFB_PWS_REV_20191213.pdf PDF
SF33 Attachment L-1 Labor Category Qualifications REV 16 Dec 2019.pdf PDF
SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 2B GFI List Hill AFB_20191219.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W9123819R0050 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Am02 REV SF33 Attachment C-1 Hill AFB_PWS Enclosure 2B GFI List Hill AFB_20191031.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Am02 REV SF33 Attachment L-2 Past Performance Quality Questionaire.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_Phase_Site_Visit_Attendees_16-17_Oct_2019.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_ORC_Existing_QandA_(PreRFP)_20191101.pdf PDF
SF33_Attachment_B-1_Hill_AFB_Sub-CLIN_Structure_REV1_20191101.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W9123819R0050_Hill_ORC_Sol_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_Optimized_Remediation_Site_Visit_Attendees_16-17_October_2019.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_ORC_Solicitation_Package_W9123819R0050.zip ZIP file
Hill_AFB_PWS_V9_20191016.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_Sub-CLIN_Structure_20191016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF33_Attachment_L-2_Past_Performance_Quality_Questionaire.docx DOCX document
SF33_Attachment_L-1_Labor_Category_Qualifications_16_Oct_2019.docx DOCX document
7._QASP_Template_v1_20190913_FINAL.DOCX DOCX document
4._AFGM2019-32-01,_AFFF_Related_Waste_Mgmt_Implementation_Guidance.pdf PDF
6._Interim_Guidance_on_1-4_Dioxane,_Environmental_Restoration_Program.pdf PDF
1._ORC_PMP_Guidance_v1.0_20190920.docx DOCX document
5._Ensuring_Chemistry_Data_Fact_Sheet_April_2013.pdf PDF
2._CPSMR_template-_25Aug2019.docx DOCX document
W9123819R0050_Hill_AFB_ORC_DRAFT_Solicitation_SF33.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_PWS_V8_Updated_20191009.pdf PDF
Itinerary_HAFB_ORC_Pre-Solicitation_Tour_16-17_Oct.pdf PDF
A01.12_Hill_AFB_PWS_V8_20190918.pdf PDF
Hill_ORC_RFIs_w_Responses_20190919.pdf PDF
8560-0006_HillAFB_OU_9_GCA_Bioreactor_OM_Manual_Final_6SEP19.pdf PDF
8560-0006_HillAFB_OU_10_SS109_PMR4_Draft_9MAY19.pdf PDF
Hill_ORC_Docs_10_Sep_2019.zip ZIP file
HillAFB_OU_15_ZZ113_ROD_Draft_2NOV17.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_ORC_QandA_19_Aug_2019.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_PWS_20190726.pdf PDF
Sampling_Transition_Table_HillAFB_20190701.docx DOCX document
Hill_AFB_PWS_Enclosure_2.1_List_of_Available_GFI.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Hill_AFB__PWS_Enclosure_2.2_List_of_Available_GFI_in_HAFB_Administrative_Record.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Hill_AFB_PWS_Enclosure_1_Acronyms_and_Definitions.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_PWS_Enclosure_3_List_of_Available_GFP.PDF PDF
Hill_AFB_PWS_Enclosure_4_OPSEC_Addendum.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_PWS_20190603.pdf PDF
Hill_AFB_CLIN-SubCLIN_Structure.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Itinerary_HAFB_ORC_Pre-Solicitation_Tour_26-27June.pdf PDF
Bldg383_Directions2019-06-14.pdf PDF
Draft_PWS_Hill_AFB_ORC__26Feb2019_(Amendment_1).pdf PDF
Draft_PWS_for_Hill_AFB_6Mar2019.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Optimized Remediation Contract for Hill AFB, UT has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OPTIMIZATION EXAMPLES

AFIID_SITEID_CPSMR##_OB##-MMMYYYY

(e.g., MOODY_OT012_CPSMR12_OB01-DEC2020) Installation Name: (e.g., Moody AFB) Site ID: (e.g., OT012) Reporting Period: (e.g., 1 May 2020 – 30 April 2021)

Site Performance Objective at the Time of Contract Award:

Reduce LCC & RA-O
☐Reduce LCC & LTM
☐OES
☐Alternate Objective
☐Other Site Categories
☐

Optimization activities are defined as any remedial activities and performance monitoring above and beyond what is required to maintain compliance in accordance with an approved decision document. Comment by Sam Yoon: Peaches will find O&M language from PWS.

Optimization Activities Implemented:

1. Describe specific details of optimization activities (see Key Optimization Elements)

Optimization Outcome(s):

1. Results in: a) reduction in contaminant mass, b) reduction in contaminant concentrations,

c) reduction in LCC, or d) any combination of any activities prompting acceleration to RC.

2. Provide supporting information for optimization activities using tables, plots or figures, and/or photos.

3. Identify the need for changes to decision document (e.g., Explanation of Significant Differences [ESD], ROD Amendment [RODA]) to improve the remedy efficiency and/or shorten remedy duration to achieve endpoint.

Issues/Obstacles Encountered:

1. Describe issues that could impact schedule.

Planned Optimization Activities for Next Reporting Period (including Potential Issues):

1. Describe planned optimization activities (see Key Optimization Elements)

2. Identify activities that would shorten restoration life cycle.

Key Optimization Elements:

· Site Understanding – Updating conceptual site model (CSM) to better understand site conditions

· Design Optimization Review – Reviewing design of selected remedies to effectively target contaminant source(s) and contaminant plume based on site conditions

· Remedy Process Optimization – Enhancing remedy effectiveness or efficiency to accelerate remediation timeline; i.e., Operations & Maintenance

· Monitoring Optimization – Optimizing number and location of monitoring wells and/or minimizing sampling frequency

OPTIMIZATION EXAMPLES

Site Understanding:

· Identify data gaps

· Use real-time measurements

· Sequence activities focusing on source control first

· Conduct strategic sampling

Design Optimization Review

· Conduct design optimization reviews to evaluate remedy selected and ensure streamlined remedial action operations

· Address challenges associated with source uncertainties and/or plume uncertainties by the selected remedy as designed

· Add new nested wells with shortened well screens

Remedial Process Optimization

Operations
In Situ Treatments (e.g., Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination [ERD], Monitored Natural Attenuation [MNA], Permeable Reactive Barrier [PRB], In Situ Chemical Oxidation [ISCO])

· Contaminant footprint reductions

· Recirculation of treated extracted groundwater through in situ bioreactors with treated water

· Application of phytoremediation where appropriate (regulatory agency approval is required for new remedial alternative(s))

Ex Situ Treatments (e.g., Pump and Treat [P&T], Air Sparging [AS], Soil Vapor Extraction [SVE])

· >90% uptime with 99.99% off-gas treatment before discharge to the atmosphere

· Change from energy-intensive thermal/catalytic converter to carbon adsorption to treat off-gas

· Transition of low mass recovery for an existing P&T system to passive management systems (regulatory agency approval is required for new remedial alternative[s])

Ex Situ Treatment (e.g., Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid [LNAPL] Recovery)

· Evaluation for point-of-termination for product recovery when reaching to asymptotic recovery

· Use of LNAPL transmissivity data to evaluate LNAPL recoverability

· Evaluation of Natural Source Zone depletion (NSZD) rates

Maintenance
In Situ Treatments (e.g., ERD, MNA, PRB, ISCO)

· Few optimization opportunities

Ex Situ Treatments (e.g., P&T, AS, SVE)

· Appropriate process monitoring (e.g., pressure, flowrates, O2/CO2, energy consumptions) to minimize downtimes and prevent system failure

· Maintain uninterrupted system operation

· Maintain and replace aging infrastructure to improve remedy efficiency, avoiding well fouling, pump and filter replacements as appropriate

· Modification of extraction operations from steady rates to pulsed operation or variable frequency/adjustable speed driver use Ex Situ Treatment (e.g., LNAPL Recovery)

· Maintain aging infrastructure to improve remedy efficiency, avoiding well fouling, pump and filter replacements as appropriate

· Review process monitoring (operation) performance and identify the source that is less efficient

· Make necessary changes, as appropriate and required, to overcome site-specific conditions that affected performance

Monitoring Optimization

Performance Monitoring
· Use decision logic and decision support tools to manage and track remedy progress (e.g., Monitoring and Remediation Optimization System [MAROS])

· Progress may be on track, but evaluate chlorinated compound degradation pathways or Edible Vegetable Oil partitioning by Compound-specific Isotope Analysis

· Progress may be on track, but evaluate a potential contaminant rebound after injectant is depleted

· Review performance monitoring data to evaluate the effectiveness and appropriateness of key performance metrics/standards

· Change from active remediation to natural attenuation

Compliance
· Document decision to comply with alternative performance expectations and goals, if all remedial alternatives fail to achieve performance expectations and if remedial technologies are more harmful than the site conditions

· Revisit Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs), Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs), and the selected remedy in the context of updated information and performance monitoring data

Data Management
· Improved data management including improving data management planning, data acquisition, data processing, data analysis (using 3-D visualization analysis), data preservation and storage, and data publication and sharing.

References AFCEC. 2014. Optimizing Remedies with Performance-Based Contracts. Presented by. Dr. Kent Glover. AFCEC/CZTE. Presented at FRTR Meeting. November.

ITRC. 2004. Remediation Process Optimization: Identifying Opportunities for Enhanced and More Efficient Site Remediation NAVFAC. 2017. Portfolio Optimization (P-OPT) Review of the Navy’s IRP Site- Phase I Overview and Findings. Open Environmental Restoration Resource (OER2) Webinar. Presented by NAVFAC Environmental Restoration Program. August 23.

U.S. EPA. 2017. Superfund Optimization Progress Report 2011-2015. Office of Land and Emergency Management. EPA-542-R-17-002. June.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .