EPA Comments OU6memotofile.pdf
PDF 135 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Optimized Remediation Contract for Hill AFB, UT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91238-19-R-0050
About this file
This document contains a sources sought synopsis and draft performance work statement for an optimized remediation contract at Hill Air Force Base in Utah. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is seeking information from small and other than small businesses to execute environmental remediation activities including services, minor construction, and architecture and engineering services at 23 Installation Restoration Program sites and two Military Munitions Response Program sites over a ten-year period. The resulting firm-fixed price contract will require at least 50% of contract performance costs be expended on prime contractor employees. Interested firms should respond by March 29, 2019 with their capability statements, example projects demonstrating experience on multi-site remediation and projects similar to those described, and business classification. The response should be no more than ten pages. The sources sought synopsis will be followed by a request for proposal solicitation issued on www.fbo.gov.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Optimized Remediation Contract for Hill AFB, UT has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EPA TECHNICAL COMMENTS ON THE
OPERABLE UNIT 6-SITE OT026 MEMORANDUM TO FILE FOR ATTAINMENT OF
REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES FOR SOIL AND SEEPS, SPRINGS AND COOLEY’S
POND, AUGUST 2019
January 13, 2020
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. The Introduction section of the Operable Unit 6-Site OT-026 Memorandum to File For Attainment of
Remedial Action Objectives for Soil and Seeps, Springs and Cooley’s Pond states that Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) was prepared in 2007 and 2015 to document changes implemented to the remedy presented in the Record of Decision (ROD). For completeness, please provide a brief summary of what changes where implemented to the remedy.
SPECIFIC COMMENTS
1. Section 2.0 Summary of Site History, Site Conditions, and Selected Remedy, Page 2-2
The fifth paragraph on this page states that” Currently, only two off-base extraction wells are in operation. Please clarify which two extraction wells are referred to in this paragraph and modify the text appropriately.
2. Table 3-1 -Historical TCE Concentrations. This table provides a summary of analytical results for
TCE from Cooley’s Garage Spring (U6-303), Cooley’s Seep (U6-305), Cooley’s Pond (U6-406) and Spring (U6-606). It was noted that the frequency of sampling varied each year. For example, for Cooley’s Garage Spring (U6-303), the following frequencies were observed: 1 in 1997, 5in 1998, 6 in 1999, 5 in 2008 etc. Please explain the rationale for the sampling strategy/frequency.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .