Attachment 4 - RTOP W900KK-23-R-TS01 Unrestricted Lot Amendment 0001 signed.pdf
PDF 210 KB Posted
- Attached to
- U. S. Army Training Support Center (ATSC), Training Support Systems Enterprise (TSS-E) Contract
- Solicitation number
- W900KK22F0016
About this file
This amendment to a request for task order proposals modifies the page limits, evaluation criteria, and pricing instructions for a training support services contract opportunity. The U.S. Army Contracting Command in Orlando seeks to procure mission support and integrated training area management services to be performed at government facilities and contractor sites in the continental United States, its territories, and overseas. Offerors must submit a technical volume not exceeding 35 pages describing their staffing plan and rationale for meeting throughput requirements. Pricing shall be submitted using the provided worksheet and must correlate to the staffing plan. Proposals will be evaluated for technical approach, price reasonableness, and balance. The closing date for receipt of proposals is not specified in this amendment.
View the file
Other files
Show all 36
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W900KK-22-R-0016
Lot 1 Unrestricted
RTOP W900KK-23-R-TS01
Amendment 0001
REQUEST FOR TASK ORDER PROPOSAL (RTOP) – W900KK-23-R-TS01
TRAINING SUPPORT SYSTEMS (TSS) ENTERPRISE
AMENDMENT 0001
Date of Issue: November 1, 2022
Description of Services: Mission Support Services Contract, Integrated Training Area Management (ITAM) Support
Location of Services: Fort Bragg, NC
Request for Site Visit Due Date/Time: Due to the coronavirus pandemic, this Task Order proposal request does not provide for a Site Visit.
Procurement History: Current requirement under TSSE Contract/Task Order W911S018D0001/W911S018F0263
Amendment 0001 makes the following changes:
1. Amends Section 2.11 Technical page limit
2. Amends Section 3.2 Price Attach 4.3
3. Amends Section 3.2 – Attachment 1 to 4.1
4. Amends RTOP Section 3.3 - M.14. Volume VI: Cost/Price.
5. Amends RTOP Section 3.3 Price Volume, Proposal Instructions and
Evaluation Criteria Attachment 3 to 4.3
6. Adds Revised Attachment 4.6: Answers to Industry Questions
7. Amends Section 5. Post Award-Notices and Debriefings
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
2.11. Volumes and number of copies each are identified below. The evaluators will read only up to the maximum number of pages specified. Type shall be no smaller than a font size of ten (10) and shall be at least single spaced. Narrative page size shall not exceed 8.5" x 11”. Pages with graphs or charts shall not exceed 11” x 17” and count as one (1) page. Font shall be Times New Roman and/or Arial. Margins shall be at least 1” for the Technical Volume and Cover Letter Volume only.
Volume Document File Name Limitations RTOP Para #
Cover Letter Cover Letter COVER_COMPANY 3 Page Limit 3.1.
NAME.pdf
Technical Technical TECHNICAL_COMPANY NAME.pdf
35 Page Limit 3.2.
Price Price Attch 4.3
PRICE_COMPANY
NAME.xlsx
Limited to XLSX
File
3.3.
3.2. The Offeror’s Technical Volume submitted in response to this RTOP will be evaluated by the Government. The Government will develop a written consensus evaluation and the Offeror’s Technical Volume will be assigned an adjectival rating based on the definitions provided shown below.
Technical Ratings Adjectival Rating Definition
Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements.
The Offeror shall follow the proposal instructions below when developing its Technical Volume:
TECHNICAL VOLUME
PROPOSAL INTRUCTIONS EVALUATION CRITERIA
The Offeror shall provide its Staffing Plan (In Contractor Format) to meet the throughput requirements. The Offeror shall provide detailed rationale to support its staffing plan. The Offeror's rationale shall demonstrate how they will meet or exceed the throughput requirements identified in the PWS.
The Government will evaluate the adequacy of the Offeror's Staffing Plan (labor category, hours per labor category, and qualifications) to meet requirements and ensure it meets the throughput requirements in accordance with the Attachment 4.1 – PWS.
3.3. The Offeror’s Price Volume submitted in response to this RTOP will be evaluated for completeness and to ensure there is no unbalanced pricing. Pricing for this RTOP will be evaluated by the Government IAW Section M.13. Volume VI: Cost/Price.
The Offeror shall follow the proposal instructions below when developing their Price Volume:
PRICE VOLUME
PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS EVALUATION CRITERIA
The Offeror shall submit their completed Attachment 4.3 - Pricing Worksheet. The Offeror shall follow the instructions listed in the Attachment. The Offeror’s Pricing Worksheet shall be directly traceable/correlate to the Offeror's Staffing Plan.
The Government will evaluate the Offeror's Attachment 4.3 - Pricing Worksheet to determine if the Offeror’s total proposed price is complete and balanced, fair and reasonable.
5. POST AWARD-NOTICES AND DEBRIEFINGS:
Post-award notices and debriefings will be conducted in accordance with (IAW) the MAIDIQ Section L.1.12 - The Contracting Officer will promptly notify Offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, whereupon the offeror may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. The Contracting Officer will notify unsuccessful Offerors who were included in the competitive range, but not selected for award in accordance with FAR 15.503(b). Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.
We look forward to receiving your respective TOPs.
Thank you for your interest.
MICHAEL SON
Contracting Officer U.S. Army Contracting Command (ACC) - Orlando
| 2022-11-01T12:32:35-0400 | |
| SON.MICHAEL.A.1289641935 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .