Attachment_M-USAACE_Form_1152-E.pdf

Instructor Evaluation Form

Instructor’s Name (Last, First, MI): Rank/Grade:

Course Title: Lesson Title:

Organization/Unit: Date:

Start Time: End Time:

Evaluation Type: (Check all that apply) Technical/Tactical Technique Certification (Check One) Quarterly Senior Instructor Master Instructor

Qualification Other (Specify) :

Section 1 – Score items as Go, No Go, N/A (Not Applicable) or N/O (Not Observed) Setting Go NoGo N/A N/O

Instructor Records available and maintained *Visitor’s area prepared IAW regulation Instructor placards (name/class title) present Training aids present and operable Training schedule and ISAP present

Verbal Go NoGo N/A N/O

*Motivator gained students attention *Explained all 3 parts of the TLO Stated Safety and Environmental Conditions Stated Risk Level Stated Evaluation Requirements

The instructor must receive a “GO” rating for ALL instructor actions identified by an asterisk (*) and no more than three

(3) “No-Go’s” for the remaining above items.

Section 2 - INSTRUCTOR QUALITIES Score Remarks

a. Projected confidence level

4 3 2 1

b. Enthusiasm and originality

4 3 2 1

c. Communication

4 3 2 1

d. Platform technique & poise

4 3 2 1

e. Interaction and class involvement

4 3 2 1

f. Vocabulary

4 3 2 1

g. Subject knowledge

4 3 2 1

h. Appearance

4 3 2 1 Section 2 Score

Max possible = 40

5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point

Standard of Excellence

Meets or exceeds descriptions below without exception.

Exceeds the Standard

Meets descriptions below with very few exceptions.

Meets the Standard

Meets descriptions below with a number of exceptions.

Marginal Performance

Meets description below with notable exceptions.

Fails the Standard

Does not meet descriptions below with few exceptions.

a. Projected confidence level Confident, prepared and evidence of rehearsal (flow/timing). Absence of overt nervousness. Fluent presentation and able to entertain questions and think on his/her feet.

b. Enthusiasm and originality Overall enthusiastic presentation and conveys to audience the importance and relevance of the class topic. Shares or solicits relevant personal experiences and/or lessons learned.

c. Communication Clear, organized articulation. Good projection/inflection and delivery rate. Makes eye contact with the class. Appropriate non-verbal cue. Uses proper pronunciations. Encourages dialogue with and among the students. Exhibits spontaneity where appropriate.

d. Platform techniques & poise Displayed no distracting mannerisms. Always acknowledges student and responds in a tactful manner. Comfortable, not leaning on podium or sitting for lengthy periods of time. Movement in front of audience poised and engaged most of the room. Good posture.

e. Interaction & class involvement

Consistently verified students were engaged and understood the material through the use of questioning. Consistently questioned volunteers and non-volunteers to explore clarity, relevance and/or significance of material and student comments. Used appropriate questioning technique for the situation (i.e., Ask-Pause-Call-Explain, Think-Pair-Share, etc.). Engaged students in dialogue through the use of exploratory questions when wrong answers were given.

f. Vocabulary Use of appropriate terms and technical jargon for the industry. Use of appropriate pauses rather than “uhs” and “ums.” A minimum of crutch words used. Avoids profanity.

g. Subject knowledge Explained teaching points and elaborated on some points. Facilitated students’ understanding with use of analogies or examples relevant to the topic. Demonstrated knowledge and mastery of the presented subject.

h. Appearance Appropriate professional attire (business casual or range/flight line appropriate), appearance is clean, bearing and demeanor such as for presenting an information briefing.

USAACE (DOTD) FORM 1152-E, AUG 2016 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE

Instructor Evaluation Form - continued

Section 3 - PRESENTATION Score Remarks

a. Stated purpose 5 4 3 2 1

b. Organization and coherence 5 4 3 2 1

c. Coverage 5 4 3 2 1

d. Transitions 5 4 3 2 1

e. Facilitation 5 4 3 2 1

f. Supporting examples and documentation 5 4 3 2 1

g. Training aids 5 4 3 2 1

h. Technical accuracy 5 4 3 2 1

i. Research 5 4 3 2 1

j. Attitude 5 4 3 2 1

k. Summary and conclusion 5 4 3 2 1

l. Time management 5 4 3 2 1

Section 3 Score Max possible = 60

5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point

Standard of Excellence Insightful and comprehensive grasp of the subject and source literature. Sound, critical evaluation of material.

Original thought displayed.

Excellent organization, analysis, synthesis and integration of ideas and concepts.

Constantly involves students and maintains an extremely positive attitude. Summary included excellent Review, Questions, and Transition.

Time frame was within 5 minutes of target time.

Exceeds the Standard Comprehensive grasp of the subject. Sound understanding and application of relevant literature, procedures and techniques. Good capacity for creative, analytical thinking.

Very good organization, analysis and integration of ideas and concepts. Consistently involves students and maintains a very positive attitude.

Summary sufficiently addressed all three elements Time frame was within 7 minutes of target time.

Meets the Standard Acceptable knowledge of subject. Good understanding of relevant literature, procedures and techniques. Some demonstration of creative, analytical thinking; average organization and analysis.

Involves some students and generally maintains a positive attitude. Summary was weak but did wrap up and review main points with student interaction.

Time frame was within 8 minutes of target time.

Marginal Performance Some familiarity with the subject.

Some understanding of relevant literature, procedures, and techniques. Fairly successful attempts to present moderately difficult subject matter. Very few students involved and occasionally displays a poor or negative attitude. Inadequately addressed one or more elements of the Summary (Review, Questions, Transition). Time frame was within 10 minutes of target time.

Fails the Standard Does not meet descriptions below with few exceptions.

Instruction was degraded due to poor performance of required factors.

Good opening statement/motivator. Conveyed presentation objective(s) and purpose/importance of the presentation topic.

Smooth flow throughout presentation. Good transitions from subject to subject. Instruction/Facilitation follows the lesson plan.

Thorough and balanced treatment of the topic (or sub-topic), with due consideration of the time available. NOTE: An instructor may use a different methodology than is shown in the LP; however, if the teaching points are covered then it is appropriate coverage.

Clear evidence of rehearsal and content knowledge. No staring at slides or hesitation before speaking as if seeing for first time.

Stated objectives of the cooperative learning activity or practical exercise/hands-on instruction; provided clear instructions; facilitated learning through developmental feedback; observed students’ progress; consistently measured class progress towards the objective and elicited students’ discoveries.

Uses relevant examples, personal experience, lessons learned and appropriate references that apply to the subject. Explains source materials, as appropriate.

Instruction was enhanced through imaginative and/or innovative use of training materials. Effectively uses available job aids/training aids and technology that enhance learning and demonstrate key points (PPT, white-board, chart paper, regs/pubs, etc).

Absence of factual errors in presentation according to the lesson plan/training materials.

Identifies and analyzes pertinent subject material to present a practical application of the subject that adds beneficial value to the class.

Establishes a mutually respectful and positive environment. Maintains a professional instructor-student relationship.

Identifies major learning points (takeaways) that the audience should leave with.

Remains within the time limit established without rushing. Pace is adjusted based on class participation.

USAACE (DOTD) FORM 1152-E, AUG 2016

a. Stated purpose

c. Coverage

d. Transitions

e. Facilitation

f. Supporting examples and documentation

g. Training Aids

h. Technical accuracy

i. Research

j. Attitude

k. Summary and conclusion

l. Time management

b. Organization and coherence

USAACE (DOTD) FORM 1152-E, AUG 2016

Instructor Evaluation Form – continued

Additional Comments:

Section 1: Section 2: Section 3:

(Will be Go or No Go)

Total Score:

GO = Basic Instructor: 60 points and above; meeting all required actions in Section 1.

NO GO = 59 points or below; having a NO GO on a required action or more than 3 NO GO’s in Section 1.

Exceptional GO = Senior/Master Level Instructor requirement 80 points and above; meeting all required actions in Section 1.

Evaluator's Name, Rank, Organization (Printed):

Evaluator's Signature:

Instructor Comments: I have been debriefed on this evaluation and have the following comments.

Instructor Signature: Date:

0: Off