ATTACHMENT 07 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Facilities Maintenance and Repair, Base Maintenance Services for US Army Garrison Rheinland Pfalz, Germany
- Solicitation number
- W564KV20R2000
About this file
This document is a past performance evaluation questionnaire form to be completed for a federal facilities maintenance and repair contract opportunity with the U.S. Army in Germany. The incumbent contractor will have its past performance evaluated on quality, schedule, cost control, management, and regulatory compliance for relevant prior contracts from the past five years. References may also be contacted for other performance information. The questionnaire requests contract details, ratings and explanations in specific categories. It should be returned by email to the contracting officer by the stated due date. Offerors for Solicitation W564KV20R2000 must provide a CAGE code and POC in an email to request technical exhibits pertaining to installation maps. Questions are due by March 23rd and the opportunity is for base maintenance services at U.S. Army Garrison Rheinland Pfalz in Germany.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 304 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________
| POC:________________________ | Title:________________________ | |
| (Name) | (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) |
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past five years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. A serious problem with contractor performance was experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Quality
· Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Very Good
· Satisfactory
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Schedule
· Satisfactory
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
C. Cost Control
· Satisfactory
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
D. Management
· Satisfactory
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
E. Regulatory Compliance
· Satisfactory
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Signature | Date |
Typed or Printed Name
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .