W519TC26RA056 AMD 0002 SF 30.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date

14 Oct 2026 27 Oct 2026

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified from:

SECTION A

THIS RFP WILL BE COMPETED AMONGST ONLY THOSE OFFERORS THAT HOLD AN

ENHANCED ARMY GLOBAL LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (EAGLE) BASIC ORDERING

AGREEMENT (BOA) BY THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS RFP. THIS ACQUISITION IS A 100%

SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE ACQUISITION AND ONLY BOA HOLDERS WHO CAN CERTIFY

PARTICIPATION IN THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (SBA) UNDER NORTH

AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS) CODE 561210 BY THE CLOSING

DATE OF THIS RFP WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

A.1 The U.S. Army Fort Stewart, GA (FSGA) has a requirement for logistics support services, including maintenance, supply, and transportation support.

A.2 This is an official RFP and supporting documentation for the FSGA requirement.

A.3 This RFP is a small business set aside acquisition and will be competed among those Offerors that hold an EAGLE Program BOA who can certify small business status under NAICS Code 561210 by the closing date of this RFP.

This RFP will result in a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (Firm Fixed Price Transition In and PMO) task order with 1, 12 month base period, to include a 60 day transition in period, 4, 1-year options, and 1, 6-month option period in accordance with (IAW) Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO FAR) 52.217-8 for a total of 5 years and 6 months if all options are exercised. The evaluated option periods, which will be awarded at the Government's sole discretion, will be based on need and performance of contractors.

W519TC26RA0560002

A.4 The period of performance for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) from Notice to Proceed (NTP) through 1826 Days after NTP is identified below:

CLIN SERVICE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

Base Year (includes 60 day Transition In): CLIN 0001 through 0010 NTP to 365 days after NTP, Option Year 1: CLINs 1002 through 1010, 366 days after NTP to 730 days after NTP

Option Year 2: CLINs 2002 through 2010, 731 days after NTP to 1095 days after NTP

Option Year 3: CLINs 3002 through 3010, 1096 days after NTP to 1461 days after NTP

Option Year 4: CLINs 4002 through 4010, 1462 days after NTP to 1826 days after NTP

Option Period IAW RFO FAR 52.217-8: CLINs 5002 through 5010, 1827 days after NTP to 2008 days after NTP

Transition and Fully Operational Capability (FOC) efforts are part of a single requirement and period of performance. All Transition efforts are still required to be completed within the first 60 days of performance; however, transition to FOC is part of a seamless process. The Contracting Officer may authorize proceeding into FOC as various elements of transition are complete prior to the end of the 60-day Transition period.

A.5 This Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process will include an evaluation of the following three (3) factors: (1) Technical, (2) Past Performance, and (3) Cost /Price. A Task Order award under this EAGLE competition will be made to the Offeror determined to be responsible IAW RFO FAR subpart 9.1 whose proposal conforms to the RFP requirements and is determined to be the lowest evaluated (fair and reasonable) priced proposal that is determined Technically Acceptable with Substantial Confidence in Past Performance.

A.6 The Offeror's proposal shall be valid for 180 days from the closing date of the RFP.

A.7 The incumbent contractor is Akima Facilities Operations, LLC (formerly Sunik, LLC) under contract(s) W52P1J-22-F-0017, W52P1J-18-G-0030.

A.8 NOT APPLICABLE

A.9 Government Furnished Facilities and Equipment are identified in the Exhibits/Attachments in Section J of this RFP and identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

A.10 Please note that this RFP contains a Section B, "Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs";

however, Offerors are required to complete and submit the Cost/Price Matrix identified as Attachment 0005.

A.11 The Government intends to conduct a Post Award Conference with the awardee following Task Order award.

A.12 This RFP should not be discussed with any Government employee except the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Michael D. Thune or Contract Specialist, Brett W. Sutter who may be contacted at Michael.D.Thune2.civ@army.mil and Brett.W.Sutter.civ@army.mil respectfully.

A.13 This RFP and any amendments to this RFP shall be issued electronically. Because of this, the Government is under no obligation to maintain an Offerors mailing list. Any EAGLE BOA holders interested in this requirement must periodically access Contract Opportunities located at https://SAM.gov. Failure to provide proposals in accordance with the instructions/format specified in this RFP shall render the Offerors proposal non-compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award.

A.14 The Government is not obligated to provide responses to any questions submitted by Offerors, but will consider them and incorporate changes into the RFP as deemed necessary.

A.15 The closing date and time for this RFP is identified on page 1 of this RFP, the Local Time is Central Time. All proposal documents are due at the time set forth in this RFP.

A.16 Proposals shall be submitted electronically to Brett.W.Sutter.civ@army.mil and Michael.D.

Thune2.civ@army.mil. Due to file size restrictions, Proposals may be submitted through Department of Defense (DOD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE), https://safe.apps.mil/. Note that only 25 files can be submitted with one upload. Multiple drop-off codes may be requested from the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer, if necessary. Non-CAC users will have to request a drop-off request from the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer. Please visit the website for more details and instructions for its use. Cloud Services and third party drop boxes are not acceptable for proposal submission.

Emailed proposals shall state the following in the subject line: Proposal for solicitation number [W519TC-26-R-A056] - Add company name.

It is highly recommended that the Offeror request a Return Receipt or other form of acknowledgement to verify that the proposal submission was received prior to the closing of the

RFP.

A.17 NOT APPLICABLE

A.18 The Government will compare the Offeror's proposal to Section L in order to perform a strict compliance review. Failure to provide proposals in accordance with the instructions/format specified in this RFP shall render the Offerors proposal noncompliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award. The Government reserves the right to waive the Strict Compliance Review if it is in the Government's best interest.

A.19 NOT APPLICABLE

A.20 The Army Sustainment Command (ASC) may employ the services of a support contractor to assist in the management and oversight of ASC contracts. The contracted support provided by a support contractor is technical in nature, and in no way supplants the Governments exclusive responsibility for the decision making regarding contract management and oversight. The contract with ASC's support contractor prohibits the unauthorized use or disclosure of any of the information and data associated with ASC contracts in support of management and oversight responsibilities.

In the event ASC determines it will use a support contractor for management and oversight assistance, awardees shall work with the Contracting Officer and support contractor to establish appropriate agreements and proper protections (see RFO FAR 9.505-4(b)) allowing permission for the support contractor to have necessary access to information and data to assist ASC in its management and oversight for any associated contracts.

A.21 Organizational conflict of interest (OCI) means a situation in which

(1) A Government contract requires a contractor to exercise judgment to assist the Government in a matter (such as in drafting specifications or assessing another contractor's proposal or performance) and the contractor or its affiliates have financial or other interests at stake in the matter, so that a reasonable person might have concern that when performing work under the contract, the contractor may be improperly influenced by its own interests rather than the best interests of the Government; or

(2) A contractor could have an unfair competitive advantage in an acquisition as a result of having performed work on a Government contract, under circumstances such as those described in paragraph (1) of this definition that put the contractor in a position to influence the acquisition.

(3) If the Contractor identifies an OCI, the Contractor shall make a prompt and full disclosure in writing to the PCO. OCI that arise during performance of the contract, as well as newly discovered conflicts that existed before contract award, shall be disclosed.

A.22 Notice of OCI: ASC's support contractor, and any affiliates, subsidiaries, or subcontractors and any affiliates, subsidiaries, or subcontractors have OCIs, and are precluded from offering a proposal as either a prime or a subcontractor, or from participating as a member of any team competing for this contract and/or any other resultant contracts stemming from this RFP. The Government reserves the right to reject any offer it considers to represent an OCI. Offerors are directed to RFO FAR 9.5 for further information on OCIs for detailed OCI contract restrictions /requirements.

A.23 This is a Requirements Contract IAW RFO FAR 52.216- 21 for the services specified in the PWS and workload data, and effective for the period of performance identified in Paragraph A.4.

A.24 The Estimated Total Contract Value (ETCV) is TBD (at award). The ETCV amount is NOT a ceiling price, but rather an ESTIMATE of the total 5 and a half years of performance under this contract.

A.25 NOT APPLICABLE

A.26 If an Amendment is deemed necessary for this RFP, the Amendment notice will be posted to Contract Opportunities as stated in Section A, Paragraph A.13. Please be advised that when an Amendment is posted to Contract Opportunities it will be listed on the bottom of the RFP notice.

A.27 All clauses and provisions identified within the EAGLE BOA are incorporated by reference to this RFP.

A.28 The Army Contracting Command (ACC) is in the process of deploying the Electronic Cost Reporting and Financial Tracking (eCRAFT) Enterprise tool (E2) to all ACC organizations. E2 is a tool designed to enhance cost reporting and financial tracking utilizing standardized labor categories, authoritative data, and automated reports. E2 is expected to be deployed in Fiscal Year 2026 and its utilization is required for service contracts/orders that contain Cost type Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs). Offeror(s) are required to provide the information listed within Section L of this solicitation.

The eCRAFT CDRL will be a requirement of the resultant contract as stated in Section C of this solicitation and Section J Attachment 0001: PWS.

A.29 Effective 7 July 2026, the Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) has officially superseded the Procurement Automated Data and Document System (PADDS) as the authorized system of record for the generation of Requests for Proposals (RFPs), subsequent contract awards, and all associated administrative contract actions.

Consequently, this system migration requires the issuance of updated solicitation and award identification numbers. To ensure administrative consistency, all references to RFP No. W519TC- 26-R-0013 throughout this solicitation--including all previously incorporated exhibits, attachments, and enclosures--are hereby updated and replaced in their entirety with RFP No. W519TC-26-R- A056.

To:

SECTION A

THIS RFP WILL BE COMPETED AMONGST ONLY THOSE OFFERORS THAT HOLD AN

ENHANCED ARMY GLOBAL LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (EAGLE) BASIC ORDERING

AGREEMENT (BOA) BY THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS RFP. THIS ACQUISITION IS A 100%

SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE ACQUISITION AND ONLY BOA HOLDERS WHO CAN CERTIFY

PARTICIPATION IN THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (SBA) UNDER NORTH

AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS) CODE 561210 BY THE CLOSING

DATE OF THIS RFP WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

A.1 The U.S. Army Fort Stewart, GA (FSGA) has a requirement for logistics support services, including maintenance, supply, and transportation support.

A.2 This is an official RFP and supporting documentation for the FSGA requirement.

A.3 This RFP is a small business set aside acquisition and will be competed among those Offerors that hold an EAGLE Program BOA who can certify small business status under NAICS Code 561210 by the closing date of this RFP.

This RFP will result in a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (Firm Fixed Price Transition In and PMO) task order with 1, 12 month base period, to include a 60 day transition in period, 4, 1-year options, and 1, 6-month option period in accordance with (IAW) Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO FAR) 52.217-8 for a total of 5 years and 6 months if all options are exercised. The evaluated option periods, which will be awarded at the Government's sole discretion, will be based on need and performance of contractors.

A.4 The period of performance for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) from Notice to Proceed (NTP) through 1826 Days after NTP is identified below:

CLIN SERVICE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

Base Year (includes 60 day Transition In): CLIN 0001 through 0010 NTP to 365 days after NTP, Option Year 1: CLINs 1002 through 1010, 366 days after NTP to 730 days after NTP

Option Year 2: CLINs 2002 through 2010, 731 days after NTP to 1095 days after NTP

Option Year 3: CLINs 3002 through 3010, 1096 days after NTP to 1461 days after NTP

Option Year 4: CLINs 4002 through 4010, 1462 days after NTP to 1826 days after NTP

Option Period IAW RFO FAR 52.217-8: CLINs 5002 through 5010, 1827 days after NTP to 2008 days after NTP

Transition and Fully Operational Capability (FOC) efforts are part of a single requirement and period of performance. All Transition efforts are still required to be completed within the first 60 days of performance; however, transition to FOC is part of a seamless process. The Contracting Officer may authorize proceeding into FOC as various elements of transition are complete prior to the end of the 60-day Transition period.

A.5 This Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process will include an evaluation of the following three (3) factors: (1) Technical, (2) Past Performance, and (3) Cost /Price. A Task Order award under this EAGLE competition will be made to the Offeror determined to be responsible IAW RFO FAR subpart 9.1 whose proposal conforms to the RFP requirements and is determined to be the lowest evaluated (fair and reasonable) priced proposal that is determined Technically Acceptable with Substantial Confidence in Past Performance.

A.6 The Offeror's proposal shall be valid for 180 days from the closing date of the RFP.

A.7 The incumbent contractor is Akima Facilities Operations, LLC (formerly Sunik, LLC) under contract(s) W52P1J-22-F-0017, W52P1J-18-G-0030.

A.8 NOT APPLICABLE

A.9 Government Furnished Facilities and Equipment are identified in the Exhibits/Attachments in Section J of this RFP and identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

A.10 Please note that this RFP contains a Section B, "Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs";

however, Offerors are required to complete and submit the Cost/Price Matrix identified as Attachment 0005.

A.11 The Government intends to conduct a Post Award Conference with the awardee following Task Order award.

A.12 This RFP should not be discussed with any Government employee except the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Michael D. Thune or Contract Specialist, Brett W. Sutter who may be contacted at Michael.D.Thune2.civ@army.mil and Brett.W.Sutter.civ@army.mil respectfully.

A.13 This RFP and any amendments to this RFP shall be issued electronically. Because of this, the Government is under no obligation to maintain an Offerors mailing list. Any EAGLE BOA holders interested in this requirement must periodically access Contract Opportunities located at https://SAM.gov. Failure to provide proposals in accordance with the instructions/format specified in this RFP shall render the Offerors proposal non-compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award.

A.14 The Government is not obligated to provide responses to any questions submitted by Offerors, but will consider them and incorporate changes into the RFP as deemed necessary.

A.15 The closing date and time for this RFP is identified on page 1 of this RFP, the Local Time is Central Time. All proposal documents are due at the time set forth in this RFP.

A.16 Proposals shall be submitted electronically to Brett.W.Sutter.civ@army.mil and Michael.D.

Thune2.civ@army.mil. Due to file size restrictions, Proposals may be submitted through Department of Defense (DOD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE), https://safe.apps.mil/. Note that only 25 files can be submitted with one upload. Multiple drop-off codes may be requested from the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer, if necessary. Non-CAC users will have to request a drop-off request from the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer. Please visit the website for more details and instructions for its use. Cloud Services and third party drop boxes are not acceptable for proposal submission.

Emailed proposals shall state the following in the subject line: Proposal for solicitation number [W519TC-26-R-A056] - Add company name.

It is highly recommended that the Offeror request a Return Receipt or other form of acknowledgement to verify that the proposal submission was received prior to the closing of the

RFP.

A.17 NOT APPLICABLE

A.18 The Government will compare the Offeror's proposal to Section L in order to perform a strict compliance review. Failure to provide proposals in accordance with the instructions/format specified in this RFP shall render the Offerors proposal noncompliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award. The Government reserves the right to waive the Strict Compliance Review if it is in the Government's best interest.

A.19 NOT APPLICABLE

A.20 The Army Sustainment Command (ASC) may employ the services of a support contractor to assist in the management and oversight of ASC contracts. The contracted support provided by a support contractor is technical in nature, and in no way supplants the Governments exclusive responsibility for the decision making regarding contract management and oversight. The contract with ASC's support contractor prohibits the unauthorized use or disclosure of any of the information and data associated with ASC contracts in support of management and oversight responsibilities.

In the event ASC determines it will use a support contractor for management and oversight assistance, awardees shall work with the Contracting Officer and support contractor to establish appropriate agreements and proper protections (see RFO FAR 9.505-4(b)) allowing permission for the support contractor to have necessary access to information and data to assist ASC in its management and oversight for any associated contracts.

A.21 Organizational conflict of interest (OCI) means a situation in which

(1) A Government contract requires a contractor to exercise judgment to assist the Government in a matter (such as in drafting specifications or assessing another contractor's proposal or performance) and the contractor or its affiliates have financial or other interests at stake in the matter, so that a reasonable person might have concern that when performing work under the contract, the contractor may be improperly influenced by its own interests rather than the best interests of the Government; or

(2) A contractor could have an unfair competitive advantage in an acquisition as a result of having performed work on a Government contract, under circumstances such as those described in paragraph (1) of this definition that put the contractor in a position to influence the acquisition.

(3) If the Contractor identifies an OCI, the Contractor shall make a prompt and full disclosure in writing to the PCO. OCI that arise during performance of the contract, as well as newly discovered conflicts that existed before contract award, shall be disclosed.

A.22 Notice of OCI: ASC's support contractor, and any affiliates, subsidiaries, or subcontractors and any affiliates, subsidiaries, or subcontractors have OCIs, and are precluded from offering a proposal as either a prime or a subcontractor, or from participating as a member of any team competing for this contract and/or any other resultant contracts stemming from this RFP. The Government reserves the right to reject any offer it considers to represent an OCI. Offerors are directed to RFO FAR 9.5 for further information on OCIs for detailed OCI contract restrictions /requirements.

A.23 This is a Requirements Contract IAW RFO FAR 52.216- 21 for the services specified in the PWS and workload data, and effective for the period of performance identified in Paragraph A.4.

A.24 The Estimated Total Contract Value (ETCV) is TBD (at award). The ETCV amount is NOT a ceiling price, but rather an ESTIMATE of the total 5 and a half years of performance under this contract.

A.25 NOT APPLICABLE

A.26 If an Amendment is deemed necessary for this RFP, the Amendment notice will be posted to Contract Opportunities as stated in Section A, Paragraph A.13. Please be advised that when an Amendment is posted to Contract Opportunities it will be listed on the bottom of the RFP notice.

A.27 All clauses and provisions identified within the EAGLE BOA are incorporated by reference to this RFP.

A.28 Effective 7 July 2026, the Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) has officially superseded the Procurement Automated Data and Document System (PADDS) as the authorized system of record for the generation of Requests for Proposals (RFPs), subsequent contract awards, and all associated administrative contract actions.

Consequently, this system migration requires the issuance of updated solicitation and award identification numbers. To ensure administrative consistency, all references to RFP No. W519TC- 26-R-0013 throughout this solicitation--including all previously incorporated exhibits, attachments, and enclosures--are hereby updated and replaced in their entirety with RFP No. W519TC-26-R- A056.

Miscellaneous text in this section has been added to:

The purpose of Amendment 0002 to Solicitation W519TC-26-R-A056 is to accomplish the following:

1. Revise Section J List of Attachments to incorporate updated attachments based on Questions from industry. The following attachments and exhibits have been revised, added, marked as NOT APPLICABLE, or removed from this RFP:

a. Att 0001 Performance Work Statement dated 24 September 2026 has been revised to update Paragraph 1.2.5 and mark paragraph 5.32 Arrival/Departure Airfield Control Group (A/DACG) as Reserved.

b. Att 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix dated 24 September 2026 has been revised to correct row 29 to Total PMO FTE's.

c. Att 0007 DOL WD 2015-4485 Rev32 dated 27 August 2026 has been revised to the most current version.

d. Att 0008 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) FSGA dated 7 October 2026 has been revised to include the Teamsters CBA.

e. Att 0009 Purchasing and Invoicing Guide dated 18 September 2026 has been revised to correct the flow diagram.

f. Att 0016 CBA-SCA Crosswalk dated 7 October 2026 has been revised to include clarification for wage rates and SCA Job Titles, and include Teamsters CBA.

g. Att 0018 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List dated 24 September 2026 has been revised to update the total estimated hours for Supply, incorporate Property Administration (PWS 5.18 CIPBO), and provide naming convention consistency of the CLINs.

h. Att 0020 TD-04 Hours of Operation dated 24 September 2026 has been revised to include hours for Maintenance.

i. Att 0024 PWS Annex A - Maintenance PRS dated 24 September 2026 has been revised to remove Appendix B-11, paragraphs (a-d).

j. Att 0026 PWS Annex C - Transportation PRS dated 7 October 2026 has been revised to remove

5.32 Arrival/Departure Airfield Control Group (A/DACG).

k. Att 0030 eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook_23JUN2026 dated 23 June 2026 has been marked as NOT APPLICABLE as the eCRAFT requirement has been removed from the Fort Stewart, GA

RFP.

l. Att 0031 eCRAFT_Labor Rate Workbook_MAY2026 dated dated 18 May 2026 has been marked as NOT APPLICABLE as the eCRAFT requirement has been removed from the Fort Stewart, GA

RFP.

m. Att 0033 - FSGA QA Round 1 dated 14 October 2026 has been added to this RFP to provide responses to questions from industry.

n. Exhibit L eCRAFT DD Form 1423_June2026 dated 1 June 2026 has been removed as the eCRAFT requirement has been removed from the Fort Stewart, GA RFP.

o. Exhibit M EC-01 -DID- eCRAFT_DI-SESS-82518_April2026 dated 8 April 2026 has been removed as the eCRAFT requirement has been removed from the Fort Stewart, GA RFP.

2. Revise the following paragraphs in Sections A, C, L and Section M:

a. A.28

FROM: A.28 The Army Contracting Command (ACC) is in the process of deploying the Electronic Cost Reporting and Financial Tracking (eCRAFT) Enterprise tool (E2) to all ACC organizations. E2 is a tool designed to enhance cost reporting and financial tracking utilizing standardized labor categories, authoritative data, and automated reports. E2 is expected to be deployed in Fiscal Year 2026 and its utilization is required for service contracts/orders that contain Cost type Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs). Offeror(s) are required to provide the information listed within Section L of this solicitation.

The eCRAFT CDRL will be a requirement of the resultant contract as stated in Section C of this solicitation and Section J Attachment 0001: PWS.

TO: A.28 Effective 7 July 2026, the Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) has officially superseded the Procurement Automated Data and Document System (PADDS) as the authorized system of record for the generation of Requests for Proposals (RFPs), subsequent contract awards, and all associated administrative contract actions.

Consequently, this system migration requires the issuance of updated solicitation and award identification numbers. To ensure administrative consistency, all references to RFP No. W519TC- 26-R-0013 throughout this solicitation--including all previously incorporated exhibits, attachments, and enclosures--are hereby updated and replaced in their entirety with RFP No. W519TC-26-R- A056.

b. A.29

FROM: A.29 Effective 7 July 2026, the Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) has officially superseded the Procurement Automated Data and Document System (PADDS) as the authorized system of record for the generation of Requests for Proposals (RFPs), subsequent contract awards, and all associated administrative contract actions.

Consequently, this system migration requires the issuance of updated solicitation and award identification numbers. To ensure administrative consistency, all references to RFP No. W519TC- 26-R-0013 throughout this solicitation--including all previously incorporated exhibits, attachments, and enclosures--are hereby updated and replaced in their entirety with RFP No. W519TC-26-R- A056.

TO: DELETED

c. C.8

FROM: C.8 ELECTRONIC COST REPORTING AND FINANCIAL TRACKING (eCRAFT) SYSTEM

REPORTING

a. The Contractor shall submit the Electronic Cost Reporting and Financial Tracking (eCRAFT) Report in accordance with CDRL DI-SESS-82518 Exhibit M, Section J. Compliance with this requirement is a material requirement of this contract. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in contract termination.

b. The eCRAFT Report reports contractor expenditures for labor, materials, travel, subcontractor usage, and other contract charges.

1. Access: eCRAFT: Reports are uploaded through the eCRAFT System Periodic Report Utility (ePRU). The ePRU spreadsheet and user manual can be obtained at:https: //www.navsea.navy.mil /Home/Warfare-Centers/NUWC-Newport/Partnerships/Commercial-Contracts/Information-eCraft-/ under eCRAFT information. The link for eCRAFT report submission is: https://www.pdrep.csd.disa.

mil/pdrepweb/ecraft.

If you have problems uploading reports, please see the eCRAFT Periodic Report Utility (ePRU) User Guide at the site address above.

2. Submission and Acceptance/Rejection: The contractor shall submit their reports on the same day and for the same timeframe the contractor submits an invoice in WAWF. The amounts shall be the same. eCRAFT acceptance/rejection will be indicated by e-mail notification from eCRAFT. The vendor must submit an eCRAFT vendor report with no corresponding WAWF cost voucher submission when a credit payment is submitted directly to the Treasury outside of WAWF (e.g.

Pay.gov website).

TO: DELETED

d. L.5.1.12

FROM: L.5.1.12 Electronic Cost Reporting & Financial Tracking (eCRAFT)

L.5.1.12.1 Offerors shall complete the eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook, Section J attachment 0030 of the solicitation. This workbook provides step-by-step instructions of how to propose labor cost, horizontally, for supporting the eCRAFT reporting requirements.

(**Note Only: The eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook should be utilized. This workbook does NOT incorporate travel, material, or ODCs. THIS IS NOT THE COST VOLUME. The cost volume will support pricing evaluation purposes.)

The eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook provides a crosswalk of all offeror proposed labor categories to corresponding Government Standard eCRAFT Labor Categories and must be completed by the offeror. Offeror shall propose Standard eCRAFT Labor Categories based on the descriptions listed at: http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NUWC-Newport/Partnerships/Commercial- Contracts/Labor-Categories/

For labor categories that provide for various skill levels (I, II, III, IV), the Offeror shall select the skill level that best matches (best fit) the proposed individual and company-specific labor category. For Service Contract Act (SCA) labor categories (if applicable), Offerors may propose an SCA labor category listed in the SCA Directory of Occupations at http://www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts/sca.

htm.

The eCRAFT_Labor Rate Workbook, Section J - attachment 0031, is also required to create the Labor Cost Baseline, for each eCRAFT labor category proposed in support of the eCRAFT platform and its corresponding metrics.

L.5.1.12.1(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_e2Builds

L.5.1.12.1(b) File Format: MS EXCEL

L.5.1.12.1(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.12.1(d) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_e2Rates

L.5.1.12.1(e) File Format: MS EXCEL

L.5.1.12.1(f) Page Limit: None

TO: DELETED

e. M.5.2.8(c)(2)

FROM: M.5.2.8(c)(2) In order to determine if a reference is similar in magnitude and complexity to the FSGA Task Order, the Annual Average Dollar Value (AADV) must meet or exceed the minimum level of relevant experience identified below:

Maintenance: Offeror Reference - $2M average annually; Subcontractor performing 20% or more of the total estimated dollar value, as found in Column F of the Offerors Attachment 0005-Cost Price Matrix, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix - $400k average annually.

Supply: Offeror Reference - $7M average annually; Subcontractor performing 20% or more of the total estimated dollar value, as found in Column F of the Offerors Attachment 0005-Cost Price Matrix, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix - $1.4M average annually.

Transportation: Offeror Reference - $10M average annually; Subcontractor performing 20% or more of the total estimated dollar value, as found in Column F of the Offerors Attachment 0005- Cost Price Matrix, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix - $2M average annually.

Total: Offeror Reference $19M average annually; Subcontractor Reference $3.8M average annually.

TO: M.5.2.8(c)(2) In order to determine if a reference is similar in magnitude and complexity to the FSGA Task Order, the Annual Average Dollar Value (AADV) must meet or exceed the minimum level of relevant experience identified below:

Maintenance: Offeror Reference - $400K average annually; Subcontractor performing 20% or more of the total estimated dollar value, as found in Column F of the Offerors Attachment 0005- Cost Price Matrix, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix - $80K average annually.

Supply: Offeror Reference - $1.4M average annually; Subcontractor performing 20% or more of the total estimated dollar value, as found in Column F of the Offerors Attachment 0005-Cost Price Matrix, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix - $280K average annually.

Transportation: Offeror Reference - $1.9M average annually; Subcontractor performing 20% or more of the total estimated dollar value, as found in Column F of the Offerors Attachment 0005- Cost Price Matrix, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix - $380K average annually.

Total: Offeror Reference $3.7M average annually; Subcontractor Reference $740K average annually.

f. M.5.5

FROM: M.5.5 Electronic Cost Reporting and Financial Tracking (eCRAFT)

M.5.5.1 Offerors that do not propose the required eCRAFT related submissions, as prescribed in Section L, may be regarded as non-compliant and ineligible for award.

TO: DELETED

3. The eCRAFT requirement has been removed from the Fort Stewart, GA RFP. All eCRAFT language in Sections A, C, L, and M have been removed and are no longer applicable. As a result, Section J Attachment 0030 eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook_23JUN2026 and Attachment 0031 eCRAFT_Labor Rate Workbook_MAY2026 have been marked as NOT APPLICABLE, and Exhibit L eCRAFT DD Form 1423_June2026 and Exhibit M EC-01 -DID- eCRAFT_DI-SESS- 82518_April2026 have been removed.

4. Due to the timing of question submissions, not all questions have been incorporated into this amendment. At this time, the USG does not expect to release another Q&A round to address more questions.

5. The proposal submission due date has been extended to 27 October 2026 at 1200 CDT.

6. All other terms and conditions of the RFP remain in full force and effect.

Section C - Description/Specifications/Statement of Work

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified from:

SECTION C

C.1 EAGLE BUSINESS RULES STEP THREE TASK ORDER REQUEST

a. An Offeror must be a qualified BOA holder by the closing date of the RFP. The Government is under no obligation to place an order against an EAGLE BOA.

b. A Task Order becomes a binding contract at the time of the Government's acceptance of a Task Order proposal and award of a Task Order per RFO FAR 16.703-3(b)(4).

c. This Task Order is being competed among EAGLE BOA holders who hold a BOA at the time of the closing date of the RFP. No extensions to the RFP will occur for purposes of allowing interested Offerors additional time to become an EAGLE BOA holder. The Government will confirm that an Offeror is a qualified BOA holder by checking the effective date of an Offeror's BOA. Due to the complexity and the wide range of capabilities required by this Task Order, Joint Ventures (JVs) may be utilized; however, a JV offeror must be an approved BOA holder from Step Two in order to propose as a Prime on this Task Order solicitation, and the JV must comply with the applicable requirements of Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (see Parts 121.103(h), 124.513, 128.402, 126.616, and 127.506).

d. In Step Two (i.e. BOA process), BOA holders were required to demonstrate the capability to perform all three functional areas; that technical capability may have been achieved with or without subcontractors. For this Task Order (Step Three), Offerors are not required to propose those same subcontractors that were used to establish technical capability in Step Two; however, the Offeror must propose itself and any subcontractors that are necessary for it to be able to meet the evaluation criteria and successfully perform the requirements of this Task Order.

e. The contractor shall adhere to the prices proposed and agreed to in this resultant task order issued against its BOA. The contractor is not authorized to begin work on an order issued against the BOA until prices have been established. In the event that the Contracting Officer requires work to begin prior to establishment of pricing, failure to reach agreement on price may be disputed under the Disputes clause.

f. The following sections submitted by the Offeror with its BOA proposal will be carried forward and incorporated by reference into this Step Three EAGLE Task Order contract:

BOA RFP Property Management Plan- Not Applicable

BOA RFP Resource / Task Order Management- Not Applicable

BOA RFP L.5.2.1.1(c) Flexible Staffing Approach

BOA RFP L.5.4.2.7 Transition-in Approach

BOA RFP L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(iii) Identification of an onsite independent quality control

g. Failure to comply with any term of the Task Order, to include meeting small business subcontracting goals, may result in negative past performance that could negatively impact the BOA holder's ability to be successful in future Task Order competitions.

h. The Contractor may be required to enter into an Associate Contractor Agreement (ACA) with another contractor as part of this task order performance.

i. Responsibility determinations will be made at Step Three. An otherwise successful Offeror may not be eligible for award if it cannot be determined responsible for any of the standards in RFO FAR 9.104, including capacity.

j. RESERVED

k. Size Standards. SBA's size eligibility standards are found in Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 121 (13 CFR Part 121). In order to ensure that an Offeror qualifies as an eligible small business, prospective Offerors are encouraged to review this regulation in its entirety. Specifically, 13 CFR 121.103 may assist a prospective offeror in assessing whether affiliation rules could apply. A finding by the SBA of affiliation between entities may result in a determination that the Offeror is "other than small" and therefore ineligible for a Small Business Set-Aside (SBSA) award (if applicable). An offeror with questions regarding size eligibility standards should contact its legal counsel and/or SBA Office of Government Contracting personnel; 8(a) Program participants may consult their cognizant SBA Business Opportunity Specialist.

SBA Authority and RFO Applicability. The SBA is the sole authority for making determinations of small business status for small business programs; such determinations are binding on the Offeror and on the Contracting Officer. In accordance with the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) Part 19 deviations, small business size status is determined at the Master Contract level based on the written self-certification provided with the initial offer. Order-level rerepresentation is not required.

This determination applies to all Task Orders issued under the Master Contract unless a specific triggering event at the Master Contract level (such as an option exercise, novation, merger, or acquisition) requires rerepresentation in accordance with RFO FAR 52.219-28, Post-Award Small Business Program Representation.

Joint Ventures (JV). Entities proposing as a JV are encouraged to specifically review 13 CFR 121.103, "How Does SBA Determine Affiliation?" subparagraph (h) (Affiliation based on joint ventures) prior to submitting a proposal. 13 CFR 121.103 provides several examples that may assist a prospective offeror in assessing whether affiliation could be applied to its JV. Note: In accordance with 13 CFR 121.103, a JV of two (2) or more business concerns may submit an offer as a small business without regard to affiliation so long as each concern is small under the size standard for NAICS 561210. In order for this affiliation exception to apply, however, the following conditions must be met: there must be a written JV agreement, the JV must do business under its own name and be identified in the System for Award Management (SAM), and the JV does not submit additional proposals after a two-year period starting from the date of its first contract award (note: a joint venture may be awarded one or more contracts within that two-year window, and may still receive awards after the two-year period has expired as long as the initial proposal was submitted prior to the end of the two-year period).

Subcontracting and Ostensible Subcontractors. Offerors proposing subcontracting arrangements at this Task Order level (Step Three) are encouraged to specifically review 13 CFR 121.103, "How Does SBA Determine Affiliation?" (subparagraph (h)(3)) prior to submitting a proposal. A finding by the SBA of affiliation between an offeror and its subcontractor(s) may result in a determination that the Offeror is other than a small business and therefore ineligible for the SBSA Task Order award (if applicable). For SBSA solicitations, Offerors proposing subcontracting arrangements at the Task Order level (Step Three) may be required to explain which of its subcontractors are similarly situated subcontractors pursuant to the definition provided in 13 CFR 125.1 for purposes of determining whether the arrangement includes the use of any ostensible subcontractors and unduly reliant joint venture partners.

l. NOT APPLICABLE

C.2 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW

a. Performance Management Review (PMR) - All tasks under this contract will be subject to periodic (not less than quarterly) PMRs. The Contractor will receive briefings on the PMR slide deck and be allowed the opportunity to submit a response. Corrective Action Request (CARs) / Nonconformance Reports (NCRs) will be reviewed during the PMR, if the Government deems them material. The Contractor's portion of the PMR presentation will consist of participating in conversations regarding work accomplished, evaluation of work against applicable program metrics (to include schedule), cost savings, lessons learned, forecasted staffing requirements based on anticipated workload, self-evaluations/inspection results, corrective actions, funding levels/contractor performance report (financial), and contractor-employee utilization rates.

Prior to the PMR the contractor will complete the following information on the slide deck (Exhibit H) and submit to the AFSB.

-Slides 5-9 (as applicable): The contractor will complete the "Contractor Self-Assessment" portion of the slide and also rate themselves using the ratings of "Green-Meeting Expectations" or "Amber Performance Concern" or "Red-Not Meeting Expectations."

-Slide 10: Contractor will fill out accidents/incidents/areas of concerns along with any comments for challenges, best practices and way ahead. Contractor will also report "close calls" to document lessons learned.

b. Contractor Performance Assessment: Currently, the Government uses an escalating system of deficiency reporting. Local deficiency reporting consists of: verbal notification and CARs. Verbal notification is primarily used for nonrepeating, minor nonconformance/discrepancies of tasks that can be reperformed at no additional cost to the government and with minimal impact to the effort.

A CAR will be issued when previous verbal notifications failed to result in corrective actions or when more/major nonconformance or significant deficiencies exist/occur. CARs are indicators of performance and will be used to substantiate the Government's Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) input. Performance deficiencies may include any government-identified noncompliance with contract requirements; an activity or action did not take place, or did not take place to the standards of timeliness or quality required. Note, that while the contractor will be given the opportunity for re-performance when possible, significant deficiencies will nevertheless be documented. Use of this escalating deficiency reporting procedure does not, in any way, limit the Government's ability to take corrective action up to and including termination.

c. Contractor's Fixed Fee will be assessed for validated negative PMRs, unresolved CARs or as determined by the PCO IAW RFO FAR 52.246-5 using the following schedule:

Critical Nonconformance Contractor's fee will be assessed not less than 10% of the monthly fixed fee in which the critical nonconformance occurred. PCO determination will address the exact fee decrement based on severity, impact to the effort, contractor willingness to resolve and any other factors as deemed relevant by the PCO.

Unresolved CARs Contractor's fee will be assessed not less than 5% of the daily fixed fee starting with first day of delinquency in resolution. Fee reduction percentages are assigned as follows;

however, the PCO has the discretion to apply whatever percentage it deems reasonable based on severity, impact to the effort, contractor willingness to resolve and any other factors as deemed relevant by the PCO.

Percentage of Fee:

Critical: 10% and above (monthly)

Major: 7-10% (daily)

Minor: 5-7% (daily)

The Contractor will be given the opportunity to comment and respond to issued CARs during the PMR prior to the Government executing a fee decrement.

Definitions:

Critical nonconformance - a nonconformance that is likely to result in hazardous or unsafe conditions for individuals using, maintaining, or depending upon the supplies or services; or is likely to prevent performance of a vital agency mission. Repeated or unresolved major nonconformance will result in re-designation as critical nonconformance.

Major nonconformance - a nonconformance, other than critical, that is likely to result in failure of the supplies or services, or to materially reduce the usability of the supplies or services for their intended purpose. Repeated or unresolved minor nonconformance will result in re-designation as major nonconformance.

Minor nonconformance - a nonconformance that is not likely to materially reduce the usability of the supplies or services for their intended purpose, or is a departure from established standards having little bearing on the effective use or operation of the supplies or services.

Unresolved CAR- a CAR remaining unresolved, or unacknowledged, past the PCO established suspense date. May be re-designated as minor, major or critical based on the PCO independent determination.

Daily Fee - The yearly fixed fee amount divided by 12 months divided by 30 days.

C.3 PURCHASING AND INVOICING PROCEDURES

a. The Government and Contractor shall utilize the procedures outlined in the Purchasing and Invoicing Guide (Attachment 0009). This guide details the process that the United States Government (USG) will use to conduct and oversee contractor purchasing and invoicing on this task order. Each step in the process will be described in detail along with the responsibilities of each individual position. It is the intent of the Government that the process will be sufficient for detailed cost accounting and approval without negatively impacting the contractor's ability to provide Maintenance, Supply, and Transportation services at FSGA.