Att 0033 FSGA - QA Round 1 - 14OCT26.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EAGLE Fort Stewart, GA W519TC-26-R-A056
- Solicitation number
- W519TC-26-R-A056
About this file
This is a Question and Answer (Q&A) document from the first round of clarifications issued by the Government for federal contract solicitation W519TC26RA056, a Logistics Support Services (LSS) contract for maintenance, supply, and transportation operations at Fort Stewart, Georgia.
The solicitation seeks a single combined Cost-Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) and Firm Fixed Price (FFP) requirements contract with non-fee-bearing cost elements for Other Direct Costs (ODCs). The contract includes a base year and four option years with a six-month extension period, with an estimated Notice to Proceed of January 14, 2027. The Government estimates less than 100 FTEs under the Fort Stewart TD-02 staffing estimate, with estimated Average Annual Dollar Values (AADV) of less than $1M for Maintenance, less than $2M for Supply, and less than $2M for Transportation. The contract is subject to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) with the International Association of Machinists Union District 243 Local 2917 and the Teamsters Union covering applicable labor categories. Offerors must propose realistic and feasible innovations and efficiencies to support any labor hours proposed below the Government's projected hours. The Government will evaluate proposals using strict compliance review methodology and has extended the proposal submission deadline to October 27, 2026. Key deliverables include Attachment 0018 (TD-02 Workload Data and Density List), Attachment 0002 (Staffing and Labor Mix), Attachment 0005 (Cost/Price Matrix), applicable wage determinations per Department of Labor WD 2015-4485, and performance-related surveillance standards across maintenance, supply, and transportation functional areas. The Q&A document comprises 182 questions addressing technical clarifications, workload definitions, facility requirements, clearance requirements (with confirmation that no DD-254 is required), fee structure methodology, and reconciliation of inconsistencies among solicitation attachments.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FSGA Q&A Rd. 1
| Round Question # | # in Attach 00XX | Question Reference (RFP #, PWS #, etc.) | Question | Answer |
| 1 | Att 0018 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List |
B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL RFP Section M.5.2.8(c)(2) Based on the Fort Stewart TD-02 staffing estimate, there are less than 100 FTE on this contract. The estimated AADV for Maintenance is less than $1M annually; Supply is less than $2M annually; and Transporation is less than $2M annually. The RFP AADV does not apply to the Fort Stewart TD-02 staffing.
The AADV provided appears more appropriate for an unrestricted solicitation like Fort Hood or Fort Bliss.
| Request the AADV in Section M.5.2.8(c)(2) be corrected to meet the Fort Stewart TD-02 estimated staffing. | RFP section M.5.2.8(c)(2) has been revised. | ||||
| 2 | Att 0015 Subcontractor Cost Information Submission.pdf | ||||
| Will the Government please confirm that if a subcontractor provides its cost information to the Prime to be included within Offeror's Submission (WIOS), a completed Attachment 0015 is not required from either the Prime or the subcontractor? | Propose IAW RFP Section L.5.4.2.10. | ||||
| 3 | PWS 5.18 and TD-02 Supply Tab | Will the Government please clarify the CLIN associated with PWS 5.18 Consolidated Installation Property Book Office (Asset Management Services)? | See updated attachment 0018, supply tab, CLIN 0004AA line 21 | ||
| 4 | PWS 5.32 and TD-02 Transportation Tab | Will the Government please clarify the CLIN/SLIN associated with PWS 5.32 Arrival/Departure Airfield Control Group (A/DACG)? | PWS paragraph 5.32 has been reserved. | ||
| 5 | TD-02 Transportation | Will the Government please clarify which PWS paragraph is associated with CLIN 0005 GA? | PWS paragraph 5.4 | ||
| 6 | Att. 0018 TD-02 Workload Data and Density | Will the Government please confirm the 12,062 Estimated MHs on the 188th density list represent direct mechanic labor hours that must be supported by mechanic labor categories, with the separate 295 indirect maintenance hours added for production control, technical inspection, tool-room, shop-supply, requisition, and POL activities. If this is not the intended interpretation, please identify the allowable labor-category allocation? | The 188th Tab represents direct hour maintenance, the Government does not dictate what labor category offerors propose. The indirect hours are any hours required outside of the direct hours. | ||
| 7 | Att. 0018 Supply; L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(v); M.5.1.2(c)(1) | Will the Government please identify the controlling Supply functional-area minimum for proposal evaluation and issue a corrected Attachment 0018? | Total estimated hours for Supply has been updated. Please see revised Attachment 0018 | ||
| 8 | PWS 5.4; Section B CLIN 0005GA; Atts. 0002 and 0018 | Will the Government please confirm CLIN 0005GA staffing and hours are to be entered and counted as Transportation FLC1 hours? Will the Government please also confirm which functional area will be used when evaluating past-performance scope for that work? | The Government confirms CLIN 0005GA staffing and hours are to be entered and counted as Transportation hours. For past performance information refer to RFP section M.5.2.8(c)(2) | ||
| 9 | L.5.2.1.1(b) | The RFP requires the Staffing Management Plan to include a detailed narrative of innovations and efficiencies, mapped to Attachment 0018. To ensure Offerors align their proposed solutions with the Government’s strategic goals, will the Government please clarify the types of innovations and efficiencies it values most for this effort? For example, is the Government primarily seeking process improvements, technological automation, or specific cost-saving models? | In accordance with the solicitation, the offeror must provide their own realistic and feasible innovations that they believe will mitigate labor hours that are proposed as lower than the government's projected labor hours. | ||
| 10 | M.5.2.8(c)(2) | The publicly announced incumbent Fort Stewart award was approximately $44M over five years (~$8.8M annualized)—well below the new $19M Prime all-three-function threshold. | |||
| Will the Governement please align the AADV to match the historical norms? If not will the Government please explain what the analytical basis is connecting each AADV threshold to the minimum performance-risk need of Fort Stewart? | RFP section M.5.2.8(c)(2) has been revised. | ||||
| 11 | M.5.2.8(c)(2) | Will the Government please allow multiple relevant references to be aggregated to establish magnitude to meet the $19M average annually; Subcontractor Reference $3.8M average | |||
| annually? | RFP section M.5.2.8(c)(2) has been revised. | ||||
| 12 | Attachment 0007 DOL Wage Determination | WD 2015-4485, Rev. 31, dated 8/12/2026 | Would the Government confirm that Offerors are to use revision 31 for pricing purposes? | Attachment 0007 has been revised. | |
| 13 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Solicitation A.7 | Please provide the current contract value, current funded value, and option-year values for the incumbent contract. | The government will not provide this information. | |
| 14 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.2.5 | Please provide the historical workload data for FY23, FY24, FY25, and current FY26 year-to-date for all workload metrics contained in TD-02. | Propose as solicited. | |
| 15 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.2.5 | What workload growth assumptions were used to develop TD-02 projections, and which workload categories are expected to change significantly during performance? | All workload categories have the potential to increase or decrease during performance. | |
| 16 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.4.3.1 | Can the Government provide historical surge events from the previous five years, including duration, staffing increases required, and approximate labor hours? | Propose as solicited. | |
| 17 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Solicitation L.5.2.1.1(c) | Are there key personnel for this requirement and if so can the government provide the quantity by labor category and position? | Propose as solicited. | |
| 18 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Solicitation L.5.2.1.1(c) | Can the government provide the experience and education requirements by labor category and position? | Propose as solicited. | |
| 19 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.1.4 | Please identify any incumbent performance metrics that have historically been difficult to achieve or have resulted in corrective actions. | Offerors should propose as they see fit based on the information provided in the solicitation. | |
| 20 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 5.2 - 5.6 | Please provide historical annual work orders, induction counts, repair cycle times, and deadline equipment percentages by maintenance function for the past three fiscal years. | Propose as solicited. | |
| 21 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 5.15 | Please provide annual CIF issue, turn-in, direct exchange, deployment, and ETS transaction volumes for FY23-FY26. | Propose as solicited. | |
| 22 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 5.18 | Please provide current property book record count, annual transaction volume, and active hand receipt count. | Propose as solicited. | |
| 23 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 5.29 - 5.33 | Please provide historical motor pool dispatch counts, freight transactions, personal property counseling transactions, HHG inspection volumes, and container yard activity levels. | Propose as solicited. | |
| 24 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.1.2, 1.2.4 | Are there known mission changes, force structure changes, stationing actions, or unit activations/deactivations expected during the ordering period? | The Government is not anticipating changes. Propose as solicited | |
| 25 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.3.12 | Please provide the number of personnel requiring Secret clearances by functional area and labor category. | The Government does not determine the number of personnel that require clearances as it does not dictate the number of contractors required. | |
| 26 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.3.13 | Please provide the current number of CAC-enabled contractor personnel supporting the incumbent effort. | The Government does not determine the number of personnel that require clearances as it does not dictate the number of contractors required. | |
| 27 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.4.2, 1.4.3 | Please define what specific functional areas are considered mission essential and subject to the two-hour emergency response requirement. | There are no Mission Essential personnel identified for this effort | |
| 28 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.4.2.1 | Has Fort Stewart required contingency deployment support within the last five years? If so, please provide historical staffing and labor-hour data. | Contractor should propose their labor efforts according to the workload data provided in the TD-02 Workload Data and Density List | |
| 29 | Attachment 0008 | Attachment 0008 CBA | Can the Government confirm whether any CBA negotiations are pending or anticipated prior to contract start that could materially affect pricing? | There is no additional information regarding CBA negotiations. Propose as solicited | |
| 30 | Attachment 0008 | Attachment 0008 CBA | For pricing and compliance purposes, can the Government confirm the official name of the collective bargaining agreement applicable to this requirement, including the labor union name, local chapter number, agreement effective dates, and the labor categories covered under the agreement? | See Attachment 0008 and 0016 for CBA information. | |
| 31 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Section A.7 | Will the Government provide the current incumbent staffing matrix by functional area, labor category, FTE count, exempt/non-exempt designation, and assigned CLIN to ensure all offerors compete on a common understanding of current staffing levels? | The information you are requesting is proprietary. | |
| 32 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Section A.7 / Attachment 0008 CBA | Can the Government confirm whether all incumbent service employees are subject to Attachment 0008 CBA and identify any positions that are exempt from CBA coverage? | Propose as solicited. | |
| 33 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(v) | Has the Government established a minimum staffing threshold or minimum productive labor hour requirement beyond the TD-02 workload estimates? | There are no minimum staffing requirements, propose as solicited | |
| 34 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Attachment 0002 Staffing & Labor Mix | Will the Government confirm an acceptable annual productive-hour methodology (e.g., 1,880, 1,920, 2,080 hours) for cost proposal consistency across offerors? | Propose as solicited and reference Attachment 0008 and 0016 for CBA information. | |
| 35 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.4.1.2 | Should offerors assume only the listed Federal holidays or should potential training holidays and installation closures also be reflected in productive hour calculations? | Propose as solicited. | |
| 36 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.4.1.4 | For proposal purposes, should offerors assume zero overtime in the baseline pricing model unless specifically identified in workload data? | See Attachment 0001, paragraph 1.4.1.4. | |
| 37 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.4.3 | Is emergency response capability required to be maintained within the proposed staffing baseline, or will such requirements be funded separately when activated? | If activated, these requirements may be funded within the baseline; however, they could also be funded separately. | |
| 38 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.4.3.1 | Should surge staffing costs be embedded within recurring CLIN pricing, or will surge events be separately funded through tasking/modification actions? | In accordance with RFP Section L.5.4.2.3.1, Offerors are NOT to price the surge requirements capability portion, as the surge requirement capability portion will not be evaluated for cost/price. | |
| 39 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Section B CLIN Structure | Can the Government confirm whether fee is allowable only on CPFF labor CLINs and not applicable to ODC CLINs 0006 and 0007? | Confirmed. | |
| 40 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Section C.5 | Will fee percentages proposed at award remain applicable to all exercised option periods and later negotiations for within-scope changes? | Correct | |
| 41 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Section H.12-H.14 | Can the Government clarify whether funding shortages or delayed reimbursements historically impacted contract performance under the incumbent effort? | There is no additional information, propose as solicited | |
| 42 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 3.4 / TD-09 | Will all vehicles identified in TD-09 be available at transition, and are replacement costs Government responsibility when vehicles reach end-of-life? | An inventory of equipment will be conducted during the transition. The Contractor is not responsible to replace end-of-life Government equipment. | |
| 43 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 3.7 | Can the Government provide facility square footage and occupancy data for all contractor-occupied facilities to assist in estimating incidental operating costs? | Refer to TD-07 for square footage of GFF. | |
| 44 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 3.3.2 | Can the Government confirm that utility costs associated with Government-furnished facilities are entirely Government furnished and should not be priced by offerors? | The Contractor is not responsible for utility costs in Government facilities. | |
| 45 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 3.5.7 | Can the Government provide historical annual PPE expenditures or confirm whether PPE purchases are expected to be included within indirect rates or ODC CLINs? | PPE purchases will not be directly reimbursed by the government per PWS 3.5.7. The contractor should account for the cost of PPE for their employees within their proposal. | |
| 46 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 4.1.1 | Should offerors assume mechanic tool replacement and maintenance are normal indirect expenses and not reimbursable ODCs? | Contractor provides Individual personal tools at their own expense. Special tools or TMDE provided as GFP will be requisitioned through supply systems. | |
| 47 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 3.5.1-3.5.2 | Can the Government provide historical local-purchase expenditures for repair parts and materials by functional area for the last three fiscal years? | This should not affect the Contractor's offer; the Government will be furnishing the repair parts and materials, whether through the Government supply systems or through funding for commercial procurement. | |
| 48 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | CLIN 0006 / 0007 ODCs | Will the Government provide historical ODC expenditures by CLIN and fiscal year for the incumbent contract? | Government will not provide this information. | |
| 49 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.3.13 | Are initial CAC processing, suitability, and background investigation costs considered allowable direct costs or should they be included within indirect pricing? | Initial Common Access Card (CAC) processing, suitability adjudications, and pre-employment background investigations are generally treated as indirect costs | |
| 50 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.3.2.7 | Should proposal pricing include development and maintenance of all required management plans and recurring training programs, or will any Government-provided training resources be available? | This is the responsibility of the offeror | |
| 51 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.6.1 | If an offeror is not currently ISO 9001 certified, should certification implementation costs be included within contract pricing? | The Government does not make decisions on the offerors cost proposals, please propose as solicited | |
| 52 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.7.1 | Can the Government clarify whether ISO 14001 certification is currently expected at award or only compliance with the standard during performance? | The awardee needs to be compliant at time of award. | |
| 53 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.8.1 | Are all plan development, updates, and reporting requirements expected to be included within proposed labor rates and indirect rates? | Propose as solicited. | |
| 54 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | L.5.1.12 | Should offerors include the cost of eCRAFT reporting system administration within the PMO pricing structure? | All eCRAFT requirements have been removed from the RFP. Offerors shall disregard all references and requirements related to eCRAFT. | |
| 55 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 1.10.6.1 | Can the Government provide a sample invoice package and monthly burn-rate reporting package used under the incumbent effort? | No. | |
| 56 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | Section A.3 | Is the transition period expected to be performed concurrently with incumbent performance without contractor operational responsibility during transition? | Transition happens concurrently and incoming contractor doesn't take full responsibility until transition completion. | |
| 57 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | H.9-H.10 | Can the Government confirm whether the stated insurance thresholds represent the only required insurance coverage for pricing purposes? | Confirmed. | |
| 58 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 5.15 CIF Operations | Are there any anticipated future SEAM implementation efforts, hardware refreshes, or process changes expected during contract performance that should be priced? | The contractor should propose according to their strategy in anticipation of possible improvements. A detailed schedule of future changes is not known or available. | |
| 59 | PWS Att 0001 | PWS 5.32 A/DACG Operations | Can the Government provide historical deployment and mobility event counts requiring A/DACG support during the last five years? | Contractor should propose their labor efforts according to the workload data provided in the TD-02 Workload Data and Density List | |
| 60 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | L.5.4 Cost Volume / M.5.3 | Will the Government evaluate proposed direct labor rates for realism against incumbent labor rates, market surveys, DOL rates, or any independent Government estimate? | The Government will evaluate in accordance with Section M of the RFP. | |
| 61 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(v), M.5.1.2(c)(1) | Section L permits proposing fewer FLC1 hours than the Government estimate if supported by innovations and efficiencies. Please clarify the level of detail and objective criteria the Government will use to determine whether a proposed innovation or efficiency is considered realistic and feasible for purposes of technical acceptability | In accordance with the solicitation, the offeror must provide their own realistic and feasible innovations that they believe will mitigate labor hours that are proposed as lower than the government's projected labor hours. | |
| 62 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | M.5.3.3, C.5 | Section M.5.3.3 states proposed fee rates will be capped for the life of the task order, including future modifications and requirement changes. Please clarify whether the proposed fee cap applies to new work, out-of-scope requirements, workload growth, or other changes not contemplated at proposal submission. | In any potential future modifications and changes to requirments, Offeror's will be required to propose to those changes, to include a fixed fee. Offeror's proposed fee will then be capped based on that proposal. | |
| 63 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | L.2.1, A.18, M.3.2.1 | Will the Government permit clarification of minor clerical, spreadsheet, formula, or administrative errors identified during the strict compliance review, or will such errors automatically render a proposal non-compliant? | Yes, in accordance with RFO FAR 15.202-2. | |
| 64 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | M.3.2 | Section M.3.2 states the Government will conduct strict compliance reviews beginning with the lowest-priced proposals until at least five compliant proposals are identified. Please clarify whether all proposals will ultimately receive a strict compliance review prior to award, or whether higher-priced proposals may never be reviewed unless lower-priced proposals are found unacceptable. | Strict Compliance will be conducted In accordance with RFP Section M.3.2 | |
| 65 | B08 - Solicitation - W519TC26RA056 - FINAL | L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(iii), M.5.1.2(b)(3) | Please clarify whether the independent quality control representative is required to be a dedicated full-time onsite position or whether part-time onsite support supplemented by corporate oversight is acceptable. | The Government does not dictate the offeror's staffing approach. Propose as solicited | |
| 66 | Att 0018 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List | Att 0018 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List | Will the Government please confirm or clarify as necessary this 295 estimated annual hours in Indirect Maintenance to support the 12,062 annual hours in Materiel Maintenance? | Indirect hours estimates are correct; propose as solicited | |
| 67 | N/A | Will the Government please confirm if there is a DD-254 requirement for this contract, and if there is, please issue the DD-254 to enable offerors to determine which staffing positions require a clearance? | The Government confirms there is no DD 254 requirement for Fort Stewart, GA | ||
| 68 | Att 0018 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List | Att 0018 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List | Will the Government please clarify the requirement? | Total estimated hours for Supply has been updated. Please see revised Attachment 0018 | |
| 69 | Att 0030 eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook_23JUN2026 |
| Att 0031 eCRAFT_Labor Rate Workbook_MAY2026 | N/A | Will the Government break our Transition-In from the Base Year on Attachment 0030? | All eCRAFT requirements have been removed from the RFP. Offerors shall disregard all references and requirements related to eCRAFT. | ||
| 70 | RFP | Section B, B.1; Section C.3; Attachment 0009 | Please reconcile the billing instructions for FFP CLINs 0001 and 0002. Confirm whether RFO FAR 52.216-7 applies only to the cost-reimbursement CLINs and that FFP CLINs will be invoiced as 2-in-1 Services Only in accordance with Attachment 0009. | Cost-reimbursement CLINs will be submited as Cost Vouchers and FFP CLINs to be invoiced as 2-in-1 | |
| 71 | RFP | Section C.5; A.3; Section B | Please confirm Section C.5 is intended to be completed at award using the successful Offeror’s proposed fee rates and revise the statement that the entire contract is CPFF to reflect the combination pricing arrangements identified in Section B. | In accordance with RFP Section L.1.1, It is the Government's intent to award a single combination Cost-Plus Fixed Fee / Firm Fixed Price (Transition-In CLIN and PMO CLINs only) Requirements contract with some non-fee-bearing cost elements (e.g., Other Direct Costs) which are ancillary to the services provided. Propose as solicited. | |
| 72 | Att 0007 DOL WD_2015-4485 | PWS 1.1.1, 1.2.2; Attachment 0007 | Please identify the wage determination(s) applicable to all contemplated places of performance under this task order, including Hunter Army Airfield and any other required locations not covered by the counties identified in Attachment 0007. | DoL WD 2015-4485 is the applicable wage determination. Should work performance in another county warrant another wage determination, the Government will provide it. However, Fort Stewart's footprint crosses multiple municipal boundaries and WD 2015-4485 captures the prevailing wages of the broader economic labor markets and counties that share integrated labor pools. | |
| 73 | Att 0005 Att 0005 Cost Price Matrix 21AUG2026 | Teaming_Matrix_Tab_2, instructions (I) and (J); L.5.1.7(e) | Please provide the intended input location for the information required by instructions (I) and (J), or revise Attachment 0005 to include the corresponding fields. | Instructions (I) and (J) of Attachment 0005, Teaming_Matrix_Tab_2 shall be disregarded when filling out Attachment 0005 | |
| 74 | Att 0005 Cost Price Matrix 21AUG2026 |
| Att 0001 Performance Work Statement (PWS) Stewart - 21AUG26 | Attachment 0005, Teaming_Matrix_Tab_2 instruction (J); PWS 5.22 | Please confirm whether Ammunition Supply Point support is in scope. If it is not in scope, please remove instruction (J) from Attachment 0005; if it is in scope, please identify the applicable PWS requirement and supporting technical data. | Ammunition Supply Point is not in scope for Fort Stewart, GA. Instruction (J) shall be disregarded when filling out Attachment 0005. | ||
| 75 | Att 0009 Purchasing and Invoicing Guide | Sections 1-2, purchase approval authority | Please clarify the required approval chain for purchases below the micro-purchase threshold, including whether ACO concurrence is mandatory and which Government official is responsible for documenting price reasonableness. | Per the PIG, the COR shall submit each PR to ACO for concurrence prior to validation. | |
| 76 | Att 0009 Purchasing and Invoicing Guide | COR/ACO Invoice Process Responsibilities; Invoice Flow Diagram | Please establish one controlling COR/ACO invoice review period and clarify when the deemed-authorization provision becomes effective. | The COR and ACO have 5 business days to validate or not the invoice from time of receipt. Authorization is effective no later than the sixth business day. Attachment 0009 has been revised to correct the flow diagram. Since the PIG is only applicable at time of award, a revised PIG will be attached to the awarded Task Order to this RFP. | |
| 77 | Att 0009 Purchasing and Invoicing Guide | Contractor Invoice Process Responsibilities; H.12-H.13 | Please clarify how the “actual payments made” requirement applies to direct labor and associated indirect costs. May labor be billed based on incurred/recorded payroll cost in the normal accounting cycle, or only after payroll has been disbursed to employees? | Per the PIG, Contractor will submit an invoice for all incurred costs within 45 calendar days of incurring the cost. | |
| 78 | Att 0025 Annex B - Supply PRS |
| Att 0001 Performance Work Statement (PWS) Stewart - 21AUG26 | Annex B, 5.15.2-5.15.5; PWS 5.15.2-5.15.5 | Please reconcile Annex B to the PWS and identify the correct PWS paragraph for each affected PRS row so Offerors can trace the required task, performance standard, and surveillance threshold to the same requirement. | PRS and PWS are correct; if two PRS paragraphs are present with the same PWS number then both PRS sections apply to evaluate that PWS section. | ||
| 79 | Att 0024 Annex A - Maintenance PRS | Annex A, PRS 5.3.8 | Please identify the intended surveillance lot for PRS 5.3.8 tire/wheel maintenance. | The lot will be the number of items for that section that were repaired on the day of surveillance | |
| 80 | Att 0024 Annex A - Maintenance PRS | Annex A, PRS 5.2.1 first-time-pass/rejection-rate row | Please provide the corrected authoritative citation for the mechanical and electrical first-time-pass/rejection-rate standard in PRS 5.2.1. | Please see updated Annex A that removes Appendix B-11, paragraphs (a-d) | |
| 81 | Att 0026 / |
| Att 0001 Performance Work Statement (PWS) Stewart - 21AUG26 | Annex C, PRS 5.27.8; PWS 5.27.8 | Please reconcile the ordinary-shipment in-person inspection threshold. Is 50% the required minimum, or must the Contractor inspect more than 50% to satisfy the PWS requirement for a “majority” of shipments? | 50% is the required minimum |
| 82 | Att 0026 Annex C - Transportation PRS |
| Att 0001 Performance Work Statement (PWS) Stewart - 21AUG26 | Annex C, PRS 5.32.2-5.32.6; PWS 5.32.2-5.32.6 | Please reconcile the PWS-to-PRS paragraph mapping for A/DACG requirements 5.32.2 through 5.32.6 so each surveillance standard can be traced to the correct PWS task. | PRS and PWS are correct; if two PRS paragraphs are present with the same PWS number than both PRS sections apply to evaluate that PWS section. | ||
| 83 | RFP | Section C.2(c), fee decrement methodology; Section B CPFF CLINs | Please clarify the fee base used for a decrement when a deficiency is attributable to a specific functional area or CLIN. Will the decrement be calculated against the affected CLIN/sub-CLIN fee, the total annual fixed fee across all CPFF CLINs, or another defined fee pool? | Propose as solicited. | |
| 84 | Att 0018 | Attachment 0018, Transportation tab, cells D51 and D82; L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(v) | Will the Government please provide a corrected Attachment 0018 identifying the applicable estimated productive hours for the ASC ISR RJT9 A/DACG and Deployment Readiness/Unit Movement requirements and the resulting revised Transportation total estimated productive hours? | CLIN 0005FA lists estimated productive hours as 1981 and is correct. Cell D51 has been removed | |
| 85 | Att 0018 / Att 0005 | Section B; Attachment 0005, Allocation Tab 1b; Attachment 0018, Transportation tab | Will the Government please clarify the correct CLIN assignments for the A/DACG, 908 Rail Operations, and Deployment Readiness/Unit Movement requirements and revise the applicable attachments for consistency? | A/DACG and Rail Operations are not requirements on this effort, Attachment 0018 has been updated. Naming conventions of the CLINs has been updated to provide constistency through the documents | |
| 86 | Att 0008 / Att 0016 | Attachment 0008, Appendix A; Attachment 0016, Carpenter/Maintenance and Truck Driver (Heavy) | Will the Government please confirm the correct March 2027 and March 2028 Carpenter/Maintenance rates and the correct March 2028 Truck Driver (Heavy) rate, and provide corrected Attachments 0008 and 0016, as applicable? | Attachment 0016 has been updated for the Heavy Truck Driver; The rates for Carpenter/Maintenance rates are accurate to the published CBA rates | |
| 87 | RFP / Att 0031 | Section A.4; Attachment 0031, Tab 2 - POP Dates | For the assumed 14 January 2027 NTP, will the Government please provide the specific start and end dates to be entered for the base period, each option year, and the six-month extension period so that the eCRAFT POP dates contain no gaps or overlaps? | All eCRAFT requirements have been removed from the RFP. Offerors shall disregard all references and requirements related to eCRAFT. | |
| 88 | Att 0030 | L.5.1.12.1; Attachment 0030, Fully Loaded Labor Rate Build | Can the Government please clarify whether offerors are to submit five separate copies of Attachment 0030, create separate worksheets for each period, or use another Government-directed method to report all five periods without altering the required workbook structure? | All eCRAFT requirements have been removed from the RFP. Offerors shall disregard all references and requirements related to eCRAFT. | |
| 89 | Att 0001 | ||||
| Att 0018 | Att 0001, PWS 5.32 |
Att 0018, Rows 50-59
| Will the Government provide clarification on A/DACG requirements for this function at FSGA, either by adjusting the PWS requirements or by providing data in Att 0018? | PWS has been updated to remove A/DACG requirments | ||||
| 90 | Att 0001 | ||||
| Att 0018 | Att 0001, PWS 5.18 | ||||
| Att 0018, Tab "Supply" | Will the Government clarify CIPBO requirements for this function at FSGA, either by adjusting the PWS requirements or by providing data in Att 0018? | Please see updated Attachment 0018, supply tab, CLIN 0004AA line 21 | |||
| 91 | Att 0001 / Att 0018 / Att 0002 | PWS 5.18.1, p.48; RFP Section B, pp.9-10; Att 0018 SUPPLY!A4:D31; Att 0002 Staff & Labor Mix!A46:H56; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(i), p.95 | Will the Government identify the CLIN/SubCLIN and Attachment 0002 staffing column applicable to the CIPBO/Asset Management Services requirement and provide the associated annual workload quantities and estimated productive hours? If CIPBO is included within 0004AA, 0004BA, or 0004CA, will the Government identify the controlling block and confirm whether its published hours already include CIPBO work? | Please see updated attachment 0018, supply tab, CLIN 0004AA line 21 | |
| 92 | Att 0018 | Att 0018 SUPPLY!D5, D23, D28, and D31; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(v) and (x), pp.96-97; M.5.1.2(c)(1)(i), p.124 | Will the Government confirm that the controlling annual Supply workload floor is 50,077 productive hours and reissue TD-02 with a corrected, formula-linked Supply Total? If 45,179 hours is intended to control, will the Government identify the excluded workload block and explain the basis for its exclusion? | See updated Attachement 0018 TD-02 | |
| 93 | Att 0018 / Att 0001 / Att 0002 | Att 0018 TRANSPORTATION!A50:D72, especially D51 and D63; PWS 5.32, pp.55-56; RFP Section B 0005FA, p.12; Att 0002 Staff & Labor Mix!A59:K69 | Will the Government confirm that both A/DACG and RJT9 freight/cargo work are intended under 0005FA, provide corrected A/DACG transaction quantities, units, and productive hours, and state the combined 0005FA workload floor to be supported in Attachment 0002? Will the Government also confirm whether the 0005FA title in Section B/Attachment 0002 will be revised to encompass A/DACG? | Attachment 0018 TD-02 has been updated removing A/DACG | |
| 94 | Att 0018 / Att 0001 / Att 0002 | Att 0018 TRANSPORTATION!A81:D98, especially D82; PWS 5.30, p.54; RFP Section B 0005, pp.10-12; Att 0002 Staff & Labor Mix!A59:K69 | Will the Government confirm whether Deployment Readiness/Unit Movement is an active requirement? If active, will the Government provide the controlling PWS paragraph, Section B CLIN/SubCLIN, Attachment 0002 staffing location, annual quantities, and corrected productive hours? If not active, will the Government remove the 0005JA block from TD-02? | Attachment 0018 TD-02 has been updated removing Deployment Readiness | |
| 95 | Att 0018 / Att 0001 / Att 0002 | Att 0018 TRANSPORTATION!A74:D79; PWS 5.34, p.56; RFP Section B 0005, pp.10-12; Att 0002 Staff & Labor Mix!A59:K69 | Will the Government confirm whether Rail Operations is an active requirement? If active, will the Government provide the controlling PWS requirements, CLIN/SubCLIN, Attachment 0002 staffing location, annual workload quantities, productive hours, and required operating coverage? If not active, will the Government remove the 0005HA block from TD-02? | Attachment 0018 TD-02 has been updated removing rail operations | |
| 96 | Att 0018 | Att 0018 TRANSPORTATION!D51, D82, and D103; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(v) and (x), pp.96-97; M.5.1.2(c)(1)(i), p.124 | Will the Government resolve the A/DACG and Unit Movement requirements, provide a corrected, formula-linked Transportation Total, and confirm the exact annual Transportation workload floor that will be used to evaluate proposed FLC1 hours? | Attachement 00018 TD-02 has been updated | |
| 97 | Att 0018 | Att 0018 SUPPLY!D5,D23,D28,D31; TRANSPORTATION!D5,D9,D27,D33,D38,D63,D100,D103; 188th!F3:F7,F30; Indirect Maintenance!D6,D12; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(v),(x), pp.96-97 | Will the Government provide a corrected, formula-linked TD-02 or the calculation methodology supporting each workload block, including task-time/production factors and any utilization or coverage assumptions? At minimum, will the Government confirm that the published block-level productive hours, rather than the transaction quantities alone, are the controlling floors for staffing evaluation? | Attachment 0018 TD-02 has provided the correct estmated hours and transactions. The Estmated productive hours from the TD-02 are the hours used for evaluation purposed as the estimated hours. | |
| 98 | Att 0018 / Att 0001 / Att 0002 | Att 0018 TRANSPORTATION!A99:D102; PWS 5.4.1, p.42; RFP Section B 0005GA, p.12; Att 0002 Staff & Labor Mix!A59:K69; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(x), p.97 | For purposes of Attachment 0002 and the functional-area FLC1-hour test, will the Government confirm whether the 5,568 welding hours are Transportation or Maintenance hours and identify the controlling PWS-to-CLIN mapping for 0005GA? | Those hours fall under Transportation CLINs as shown on Attachment 0018 TD-02 and tracks to PWS section 5.4 of Maintenance | |
| 99 | Att 0018 | Att 0018 TRANSPORTATION!A99:D102, especially B100:D100; PWS 5.4.1, p.42 | Will the Government clarify whether 5,568 represents transactions, direct labor hours, or both; provide the applicable unit of measure and calculation basis for the 5,568 productive hours; and confirm whether those hours cover all three welding duty statements in the block? | The hours listed in B91 represent the hours for 89, 90, and 91. 5568 is the total for all 3 lines. The TD-02 is updated for clarity | |
| 100 | Att 0018 | Att 0018 188th!D30:F30 and Indirect Maintenance!B6:D12; PWS 5.1-5.6, pp.39-44; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(v),(x), pp.96-97 | Will the Government reconcile the 139 indirect work orders/inspections to the 460 work orders on the 188th sheet, confirm whether the 295 indirect hours are additive to the 12,062 direct maintenance hours, and state the exact annual Maintenance workload floor to be used for Attachment 0002 evaluation? | The indirect hours are additive to the hours captured on the 188th Tab | |
| 101 | Att 0018 | Att 0018 TRANS GOVT Owned Vehicles!A1:D558 and TRANSPORTATION!A4:D6; PWS 5.29.1 and 5.29.11, p.54 | Will the Government confirm whether the labor required to manage the 554 listed vehicles is fully included in the 5,209-hour 0005AA workload floor? If the density list is an additional staffing driver, will the Government provide the productive hours or staffing factor associated with the vehicle population? | Attachement 00018 TD-02 includes the estmated hours required; propose as solicited | |
| 102 | Att 0022 | Att 0022 TD-08 cover, p.1; RFP W519TC26RA056 | Will the Government confirm that Attachment 0022 is the correct, complete, and controlling Government Furnished Property listing for W519TC26RA056 and correct the solicitation number on the attachment? | Refer To RFP Section A.29 | |
| 103 | Att 0008 | Att 0008 Article 1, p.7; RFP Section J attachment list, pp.69-72 | Will the Government confirm that W52J1P-18-G-0030 is a transposition of W52P1J-18-G-0030 and that Attachment 0008 applies to this successor procurement? Will the Government also confirm whether any solicited positions are covered by the referenced Teamsters CBA and, if so, provide the applicable agreement and wage schedule? | The Government confirms that Attachment 0008 applies to this RFP and to the awarded Task Order to this RFP. See updated Attachment 0008 and Attachment 0016 including the Teamsters CBA. | |
| 104 | Att 0008 / Att 0016 | Att 0008 Article 20.2, p.36; Att 0016 Sheet1!A50; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c), p.94; M.5.1.2, pp.123-124 | Will the Government provide the current negotiated job descriptions for the CBA classifications or confirm that the SCA Directory of Occupations, Fifth Edition description associated with each Attachment 0016 SCA code is the sole controlling description for technical evaluation? | Propose as solicited. | |
| 105 | Att 0008 / Att 0016 | Att 0008 Appendix A, pp.42-43; Att 0016 Sheet1!A9:D9, A25:D25, and A46:D46 | Will the Government provide the corrected controlling March 2026, March 2027, and March 2028 wage rates for Passport Port Call Clerk, Truck Driver (Heavy), and Carpenter/Maintenance and reissue Attachment 0016 and/or the CBA wage schedule as necessary? | Please see updated Attachment 0016; The Carpenter/Maintenance Rates are accurate to the published and signed CBA | |
| 106 | Att 0016 / Att 0030 | Att 0016 Sheet1!A15:F15 and A30:F30; Att 0030 Fully Loaded Labor Rate Build!Y157:Z159, Y272:Z274, and Y379:Z379; RFP L.5.1.12.1, p.90 | Will the Government provide the correct SCA title/code and required eCRAFT crosswalk for Electronic/Radio Repairman and Small Arms Repairer, including the intended eCRAFT level for Small Arms Repairer, so that the labor-category and eCRAFT submissions use consistent codes and titles? | All eCRAFT requirements have been removed from the RFP. Offerors shall disregard all references and requirements related to eCRAFT. | |
| 107 | Att 0021 / Att 0001 | PWS 1.2.2 and 3.7.1, pp.7 and 35; Att 0021 Government Furnished Facilities!A1:D4 | Will the Government identify the Government-furnished locations, building numbers, and available square footage for CIF, PSCC Stock Readiness, 188th Maintenance, TMP/Fleet, Freight, Personal Property, Container Yard/RJT9, A/DACG, CIPBO, and AIDPMO operations? If any required operating facility is contractor-furnished, will the Government expressly identify it so that it can be priced consistently? | Buildings that are Government Furnished Facilities are listed in TD-07 and include square footage, any buildings that contractors can operate but aren't the sole responsibility of the contractor are not included on the list and will not be provided. | |
| 108 | Att 0002 | Att 0002 Staff & Labor Mix!A1 and A9; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c), p.94 | Will the Government confirm that Attachment 0002 dated 01 June 2023 is the current controlling submission template, confirm that each “Attachment xxxx” reference means Attachment 0018, and advise whether a corrected template will be issued? | Attachment 00018 dated 9-24, has been revised. | |
| 109 | Att 0005 / Att 0002 | RFP Section B 0002AA-0002FA, pp.7-9; Att 0005 Allocation Tab 1b!A8:D14; Att 0002 Staff & Labor Mix!A20:K30; RFP L.5.2.1.1(c)(6), p.95 | Will the Government confirm that offerors should price PMO only at the aggregate 0002 level in Attachment 0005 while allocating PMO FTEs among 0002AA-0002FA in Attachment 0002? Will the Government also provide its intended PMO cost-allocation basis at award so that the staffing and price allocations can be reconciled? | Offers should provide their total FFP proposed amount for CLIN0002-PMO in Attachment 0005 Cost/Price Matrix. That amount should reflect all of the PMO FTEs proposed in Attachment 0002. PMO allocation will not be provided until award. | |
| 110 | See Attachments listed above | See References listed above | In light of the inconsistencies within the RFP identified in the questions above and the potential for significant changes resulting from forthcoming amendments, we respectfully request a three-week extension of the proposal submission deadline. | RFP proposal submission has been extended to 27 October 2026. | |
| 111 | Attachment 0018 | Supply Tab | The Total Estimated Productive Hours for Supply does not correctly reflect the total for all CLINs. It appears to be missing the hours for CLIN 4CA. Would the Government please verify the total estimated productive hours for Supply? | Attachment 0018 has been updated | |
| 112 | Attachment 0002 | FFP PMO; Row 29 | The total for the FFP PMO section states "Total Maintenance FTEs" in Row 29. Would the Government please correct this to accurately read "Total PMO FTEs"? | Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix has been updated | |
| 113 | Attachment 0018 | CLIN 5EA | If the appropriate naming convention for CLIN 5EA is "ASC ISR Container Yard Operations RJT9" as reflected in Attachments 0002 and 0005, would the Government please revise the title in Attachment 0018 to include "RJT9"? | See updated Attachment 0018 TD-02 | |
| 114 | Attachment 0002 | CLIN 5FA | If the appropriate naming convention for CLIN 5FA is "ASC ISR Freight/Cargo Movement RJT9" as reflected in Attachments 00018 and 0005, would the Government please revise the title in Attachment 0002 to coincide? | See updated Attachment 0002 | |
| 115 | Attachment 0021 | CIF | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where CIF operations are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 116 | Attachment 0021 | Stock Readiness | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where SSA Stock Readiness (CLIN 4CA) operations are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 117 | Attachment 0021 | Maintenance | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where Non-ASC Maintenance Support for the 188th (CLIN 3AA) is conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 118 | Attachment 0021 | Fleet Management | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where Fleet Management (CLIN 5AA) operations are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 119 | Attachment 0021 | ASC Freight/Cargo Movement | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where Freight/Cargo (CLIN 5BA) operations are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 120 | Attachment 0021 | Personal Property Office/Counselor | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where Personal Property Office/Counselor (CLIN 5CA) operations are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 121 | Attachment 0021 | Personal Property Office/QC | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where Personal Property Office/QC (CLIN 5DA) operations are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 122 | Attachment 0021 | Container Yard Operations | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where Container Yard Operations (CLIN 5EA) are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 123 | Attachment 0021 | ASC ISR Freight/Cargo Movement RJT9 | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where ASC ISR Freight/Cargo Movement RJT9 (CLIN 5FA) operations are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 124 | Attachment 0021 | Non-ASC AIDPMO Trades SDDC | Attachment 0021, TD-07, Government Furnished Facilities (GFF), only lists the location of the PMO Office and the HAZMAT Warehouse. Would the Government please provide the GFF where Non-ASC AIDPMO Trades SDDC (CLIN 5GA) operations are conducted? | Government Furnished Facilities are Facilities that are entirely operated by the contractor, because CIF isn't in a building solely occupied by the contractor it is not included on TD-07 | |
| 125 | Attachment 0001 | Page 48, paragraph 5.18 | Attachment 0001, PWS, reflects Consolidated Installation Property Book Office (Asset Management Services) services; however, Attachment 0018, TD-02, does not provide workload for CIPBO. Would the Government please review Attachment 0018 to provide the appropriate workload (and also add the appropriate CLINs to Attachments 0002 & 0005) or RESERVE PWS paragraph 5.18? | Please see updated attachment 0018, supply tab, CLIN 0004AA line 21 | |
| 126 | Attachment 0025 | Pages 2-4 | Attachment 0025 has PRS standards for 5.18 CIPBO; however, the TD-02 has no CIPBO workload. Would the Government please revise the appropriate document? | Please see updated attachment 0018, supply tab, CLIN 0004AA line 21 | |
| 127 | Attachment 0001 | Pages 55-56, paragraph 5.32 | Attachment 0001, PWS, reflects Arrival/ Departure Airfield Control | ||
| Group (A/DACG) services; however, Attachment 0018, TD-02, does not provide workload for A/DACG. Would the Government please review Attachment 0018 to provide the appropriate workload (and also add the appropriate CLINs to Attachments 0002 & 0005) or RESERVE PWS paragraph 5.32? | A/DACG is not a requirement on this effort, The PWS has been updated to remove those paragraphs | ||||
| 128 | Attachment 0026 | Pages 4-6 | Attachment 0025 has PRS standards for 5.32 A/DACG; however, the TD-02 has no A/DACG workload. Would the Government please revise the appropriate document? | A/DACG is not a requirement on this effort, The PWS and PRS have been updated to remove those paragraphs | |
| 129 | Attachment 0018 | Transportation Tab | Workload for Non-ASC AIDPMO Trades SDDC (CLIN 5GA) is included as a transportation task; however, this the services are maintenance related. Would the Government please confirm the PWS reference for this work is Maintenance PWS paragraphs 5.2.5 and 5.4.1? | The AIDPMO tasks are associated with Maintenance PWS pargraphs but are captured in the Transportation tab/CLIN | |
| 130 | Attachment 0018 | Transportation Tab | Workload for Non-ASC AIDPMO Trades SDDC (CLIN 5GA) is included as a transportation task; however, this the services are maintenance related. Would the Government please confirm that this workload and CLIN should be listed under Transportation and not Maintenance? | The AIDPMO tasks are associated with Maintenance PWS pargraphs but are captured in the Transportation tab/CLIN | |
| 131 | Attachment 0001 | Page 7, paragraph 1.2.5 | The Government stopped provided a TD-01. Would the Government please revise this paragraph to remove this reference, or provide the associated TD-01? | Paragraph 1.2.5 of the PWS has been updated | |
| 132 | Attachment 0001 | Page 12, paragraph 1.3.12 | The Government did not provide a DD254 as it would relate to PWS paragraph 1.3.12. Would the Government confirm there is no DD254 for this contract or provide the appropriate D254? | DD254 is not required for this effort | |
| 133 | Attachment 0001 | ||||
| Attachment 0008 | N/A | Attachment 0008, CBA, is silent on any uplift for working with hazardous materials; therefore, should offerors assume that no positions meet the specific definition for a hazardous differential, which is only applicable to work with ordnance, explosives, and incendiary material? | The Government has no additional information on the CBA. Propose as solicited |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .