W519TC26RA045 Amd 0001 SF 30.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

U 1 57

0001 24 AUG 2026

W519TC

W6QK ACC-RI

ACC ROCK ISLAND BLDG 60, 3055 RODMAN AVE

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-0000

UNITED STATES

ALEXANDER WILCOX, EMAIL: ALEXANDER.M.WILCOX2.CIV@ARMY.MIL

TELEPHONE: 000-000-000

SCD: PAS:

W519TC26RA045

30 JUL 2026

SEE SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

To provide responses to industry questions related to the Presidio RFP, and provide revised RFP attachments.

MICHAEL D. THUNE

26 AUG 2026

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

The purpose of Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W519TC-26-R-A045 is to accomplish the following:

1. Revise Section J List of Attachments to incorporate updated attachments based on Questions from industry. The following attachments have been revised or added to this RFP:

a. Att. 0002 - Staffing and Labor Mix dated 17 August 2026 has been revised to correct a cell title for PMO Totals.

b. Att. 0009 Purchasing Invoicing Guide dated 20 August 2026 has been updated to reflect Revolutionary FAR Overhaul changes.

c. Att. 0011 Contract References Sheet dated 17 August 2026 has been revised to allow offerors to submit Period of Performance End Dates past 2030.

d. Att. 0016 - TD-02 Workload Data and Density List dated 25 August 2026 has been revised to include clarification on ASE and EVT Mechanics.

e. Att. 0019 - TD-07 Government Furnished Facilities dated 24 August 2026 has been revised to include reference to the location for Bulk Warehousing.

f. Attachment 0031 - POM - QA Round 1 dated 25 August 2026 has been added to this RFP to provide responses to questions from industry.

g. Annex A - Maintenance PRS-PoM dated 18 August 2026 has been revised under Paragraph

5.7.3 to remove the reference to Emergency Vehicle Calls in the 'Standards' section.

h. Annex C - Transportation PRS-PoM dated 24 August 2026 has been revised to correct the timeline for reconciling Centrally Billed Accounts as listed in 5.28.5

i. Att. 0007 - Wage Determination 2015-5633 Rev. 27 dated 22 August 2026 has been revised to the most current version.

2. Revise the following paragraphs in Section L and Section M:

a. L.5.3.1.1(c)

FROM: Subcontractor(s), as used in the Past Performance factor, means those who are expected to perform 20% or more of the Offeror's total estimated dollar value as found in column F of the Offeror's Cost Price Matrix (Attachment 0005, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix). The Government will verify the tasks each proposed subcontractor is expected to perform via the Offeror's Cost Price Matrix - Attachment 0005, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix, Column J.

TO: Subcontractor(s), as used in the Past Performance factor, means those who are expected to perform 20% or more of the Offeror's total estimated dollar value as found in column F of the Offeror's Cost Price Matrix (Attachment 0005, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix). The Government will verify the tasks each proposed subcontractor is expected to perform via the Offeror's Cost Price Matrix - Attachment 0005, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix, Column E.

b. L.5.3.1.4(b)(21)

FROM: Columns Q, R, and S: Shall list the work performed by the contractor to the corresponding functional area's performance tasks of this Task Order. These performance tasks can be found in Attachment 0001 on pages 1-53, excluding the paragraphs marked as "RESERVED."

TO: Columns Q, R, and S: Shall list the work performed by the contractor to the corresponding functional area's performance tasks of this Task Order. These performance tasks can be found in Attachment 0001 on pages 41-58, excluding the paragraphs marked as "RESERVED."

c. M.1.1

FROM: The Government expects to award a single combination Cost Plus Fixed Fee/Firm-Fixed Price (Transition-In CLIN and PMO CLINs only) task order with 1, 12-month base period, to include a 30-day transition, 4, 1-year evaluated option periods, and 1, 6-month evaluated option period with this RFP. The Government will make an award to the responsible Offeror (IAW RFO FAR 9.1) whose proposal complies with the RFP requirements and is determined to be the lowest total evaluated (fair and reasonable) priced proposal that is determined to be Technically Acceptable with Substantial Confidence in Past Performance. The responsibility determination shall include the following:

TO: The Government expects to award a single combination Cost Plus Fixed Fee/Firm-Fixed Price task order with 1, 12-month base period, to include a 30-day transition, 4, 1-year evaluated option periods, and 1, 6-month evaluated option period with this RFP. The Government will make an award to the responsible Offeror (IAW RFO FAR 9.1) whose proposal complies with the RFP requirements and is determined to be the lowest total evaluated (fair and reasonable) priced proposal that is determined to be Technically Acceptable with Substantial Confidence in Past Performance. The responsibility determination shall include the following:

3. Due to the timing of question submissions, not all questions have been incorporated into this amendment. At this time, the USG does not expect to release another Q&A round to address more questions.

4. The proposal submission due date has been extended to 09 September at 1200 CDT.

4. All other terms and conditions of the RFP remain in full force and effect.

SECTION A

THIS RFP WILL BE COMPETED AMONGST ONLY THOSE OFFERORS THAT HOLD AN

ENHANCED ARMY GLOBAL LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (EAGLE) BASIC ORDERING

AGREEMENT (BOA) BY THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS RFP. THIS ACQUISITION IS A 100%

SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE ACQUISITION AND ONLY BOA HOLDERS WHO CAN CERTIFY

PARTICIPATION IN THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (SBA) UNDER NORTH

AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS) CODE 561210 BY THE CLOSING

DATE OF THIS RFP WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

A.1 The U.S. Army Presidio of Monterey (POM) has a requirement for logistics support services, including maintenance, supply, and transportation support.

A.2 This is an official RFP and supporting documentation for the POM requirement.

A.3 This RFP is a small business set aside acquisition and will be competed among those Offerors that hold an EAGLE Program BOA who can certify small business status under NAICS Code 561210 by the closing date of this RFP.

This RFP will result in a CPFF with FFP elements task order with 1, 12 month base period, to include a 30 day transition in period, 4, 1-year options, and 1, 6-month option period in accordance with (IAW) Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO FAR) 52.217-8 for a total of 5 years and 6 months if all options are exercised. The evaluated option periods, which will be awarded at the Government's sole discretion, will be based on need and performance of contractors.

A.4 The period of performance for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) from Notice to Proceed (NTP) through 1826 Days after NTP is identified below:

CLIN SERVICE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

Base Year (includes 30 day Transition In): CLIN 0001 through 0010, NTP to 365 days after NTP

Option Year 1: CLINs 1002 through 1010, 366 days after NTP to 730 days after NTP

Option Year 2: CLINs 2002 through 2010, 731 days after NTP to 1095 days after NTP

Option Year 3: CLINs 3002 through 3010, 1096 days after NTP to 1461 days after NTP

Option Year 4: CLINs 4002 through 4010, 1462 days after NTP to 1826 days after NTP

Option Period IAW RFO FAR 52.217-8: CLINs 5002 through 5010, 1827 days after NTP to 2008 days after NTP

Transition and Fully Operational Capability (FOC) efforts are part of a single requirement and period of performance. All Transition efforts are still required to be completed within the first 30 days of performance; however, transition to FOC is part of a seamless process. The Contracting Officer may authorize proceeding into FOC as various elements of transition are complete prior to the end of the 30 -day Transition period.

A.5 This Best Value / Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process will include an evaluation of the following three (3) factors: (1) Technical, (2) Past Performance, and

(3) Cost/Price. A Task Order award under this EAGLE competition will be made to the Offeror determined to be responsible IAW RFO FAR subpart 9.1 whose proposal conforms to the RFP requirements and is determined to be the lowest evaluated (fair and reasonable) priced proposal that is determined Technically Acceptable with Substantial Confidence in Past Performance.

A.6 The Offeror's proposal shall be valid for 180 days from the closing date of the RFP.

A.7 The incumbent contractor(s) is LOGMET, LLC under contract(s) W519TC-23-G-0004, W519TC25F0093.

A.8 NOT APPLICABLE

A.9 Government Furnished Facilities and Equipment are identified in the Exhibits/Attachments in Section J of this RFP and identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

A.10 Please note that this RFP contains a Section B, "Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs";

however, Offerors are required to complete and submit the Cost/Price Matrix identified as Attachment 0005.

A.11 The Government intends to conduct a Post Award Conference with the awardee following Task Order award.

A.12 This RFP should not be discussed with any Government employee except the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Michael D. Thune or Contract Specialist, Alexander M. Wilcox who may be contacted at michael.d.thune2.civ@army.mil and alexander.m.wilcox2.civ@army.mil respectfully

A.13 This RFP and any amendments to this RFP shall be issued electronically. Because of this, the Government is under no obligation to maintain an Offerors mailing list. Any EAGLE BOA holders interested in this requirement must periodically access Contract Opportunities located at https://SAM.gov. Failure to provide proposals in accordance with the instructions/format specified in this RFP shall render the Offerors proposal non-compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award.

A.14 The Government is not obligated to provide responses to any questions submitted by Offerors, but will consider them and incorporate changes into the RFP as deemed necessary.

A.15 The closing date and time for this RFP is identified on page 1 of this RFP, the Local Time is Central Time. All proposal documents are due at the time set forth in this RFP.

A.16 Proposals shall be submitted electronically to alexander.m.wilcox2.civ@army.mil and m ichael.d.thune2.civ@army.mil. Due to file size restrictions, Proposals may be submitted through Department of Defense (DOD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE), https://safe.apps.mil/. Note that only 25 files can be submitted with one upload . Multiple drop-off codes may be requested from the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer, if necessary. Non-CAC users will have to request a drop-off request from the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer. Please visit the website for more details and instructions for its use. Cloud Services and third party drop boxes are not acceptable for proposal submission.

Emailed proposals shall state the following in the subject line: Proposal for solicitation number [W519TC-26-R-A045] - Add company name.

It is highly recommended that the Offeror request a Return Receipt or other form of acknowledgement to verify that the proposal submission was received prior to the closing of the

RFP.

A.17 Not Applicable

A.18 The Government will compare the Offeror's proposal to Section L in order to perform a strict compliance review. Failure to provide proposals in accordance with the instructions/format specified in this RFP shall render the Offerors proposal non compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award. The Government reserves the right to waive the Strict Compliance Review if it is in the Government's best interest.

A.19 NOT APPLICABLE

A.20 The Army Sustainment Command (ASC) may employ the services of a support contractor to assist in the management and oversight of ASC contracts. The contracted support provided by a support contractor is technical in nature, and in no way supplants the Governments exclusive responsibility for the decision making regarding contract management and oversight. The contract with ASC's support contractor prohibits the unauthorized use or disclosure of any of the information and data associated with ASC contracts in support of management and oversight responsibilities.

In the event ASC determines it will use a support contractor for management and oversight assistance, awardees shall work with the Contracting Officer and support contractor to establish appropriate agreements and proper protections (see RFO FAR 9.505-4(b)) allowing permission for the support contractor to have necessary access to information and data to assist ASC in its management and oversight for any associated contracts.

A.21 Organizational conflict of interest (OCI) means a situation in which

(1) A Government contract requires a contractor to exercise judgment to assist the Government in a matter (such as in drafting specifications or assessing another contractor's proposal or performance) and the contractor or its affiliates have financial or other interests at stake in the matter, so that a reasonable person might have concern that when performing work under the contract, the contractor may be improperly influenced by its own interests rather than the best interests of the Government; or

(2) A contractor could have an unfair competitive advantage in an acquisition as a result of having performed work on a Government contract, under circumstances such as those described in paragraph (1) of this definition that put the contractor in a position to influence the acquisition.

(3) If the Contractor identifies an OCI, the Contractor shall make a prompt and full disclosure in writing to the PCO. OCI that arise during performance of the contract, as well as newly discovered conflicts that existed before contract award, shall be disclosed.

A.22 Notice of OCI: ASC's support contractor, and any affiliates, subsidiaries, or subcontractors and any affiliates, subsidiaries, or subcontractors have OCIs, and are precluded from offering a proposal as either a prime or a subcontractor, or from participating as a member of any team competing for this contract and/or any other resultant contracts stemming from this RFP. The

Government reserves the right to reject any offer it considers to represent an OCI. Offerors are directed to RFO FAR 9.5 for further information on OCIs for detailed OCI contract restrictions /requirements.

A.23 This is a Requirements Contract IAW RFO FAR 52.21621 for the services specified in the PWS and workload data, and effective for the period of performance identified in Paragraph A.4.

A.24 The Estimated Total Contract Value (ETCV) is TBD (at award). The ETCV amount is NOT a ceiling price, but rather an ESTIMATE of the total 5 and a half years of performance under this contract.

A.25 Not Applicable

A.26 If an Amendment is deemed necessary for this RFP, the Amendment notice will be posted to Contract Opportunities as stated in Section A, Paragraph A.13. Please be advised that when an Amendment is posted to Contract Opportunities it will be listed on the bottom of the RFP notice.

A.27 All clauses and provisions identified within the EAGLE BOA are incorporated by reference to this RFP.

A.28 The Army Contracting Command (ACC) is in the process of deploying the Electronic Cost Reporting and Financial Tracking (eCRAFT) Enterprise tool (E2) to all ACC organizations. E2 is a tool designed to enhance cost reporting and financial tracking utilizing standardized labor categories, authoritative data, and automated reports. E2 is expected to be deployed in Fiscal Year 2026 and its utilization is required for service contracts/orders that contain Cost type Contract Line

Item Numbers (CLINs). Offeror(s) are required to provide the information listed within Section L of this solicitation.

The eCRAFT CDRL will be a requirement of the resultant contract as stated in Section C of this solicitation and a subsequent revision to Section J Attachment 0001: PWS.

Section J - List of Attachments

The attachments table has changed from:

To:

The following contract documents were added:

The following contract documents were modified:

The following contract documents were deleted:

The following contract documents Page Counts were changed:

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

L.1.1 These instructions are a guide for preparing a proposal. These instructions describe the type and extent of information required and emphasizes the significant areas to be addressed in the proposal. Review the Performance Work Statement (PWS) contained in this Request for Proposal (RFP) for further insight into the areas that must be addressed within the proposal.

Include detailed information sufficient to enable the Government evaluators to conduct a meaningful review and make a determination relative to the Offeror's understanding of the requirements in each of the evaluated areas. It is the Government's intent to award a single combination Cost-Plus Fixed Fee / Firm Fixed Price Requirements contract with some non-fee-bearing cost elements (e.g., Other Direct Costs) which are ancillary to the services provided.

L.1.2 In accordance with (IAW) RFO FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisition, the Government intends to award a contract without negotiations. Offerors are cautioned to examine this RFP in its entirety and to ensure that proposals contain all necessary information, provide all required documentation, and are complete in all respects. The Government is not obligated to make another request for the required information nor does the Government assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. The Government reserves the right to conduct negotiations in the evaluation process and to permit Offerors to revise proposals, if deemed necessary. During the evaluation process, the Government may request clarifications as needed. Clarifications do not constitute Competitive Negotiations IAW RFO FAR 15.204-2 and an Offeror is not allowed to change its proposal in response to a request for clarification. In accordance with RFO FAR 15.204-1, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Any Offeror eliminated from further consideration will be notified in writing.

L.1.3 Offerors shall submit proposals that will remain valid for not less than 180 days from the required submission date.

L.1.4 Proposals, modifications, revisions, or withdrawals of proposals received after the date established in this RFP for receipt of proposals will be handled IAW RFO FAR Clause 52.215-1.

L.1.5 An Offeror is defined as the prime BOA Holder submitting a proposal under this RFP.

L.1.6 For the purposes of this Task Order RFP, a Joint Venture (JV) is defined as a team of two or more firms that have entered into a legally binding JV agreement. A firm proposing as a JV will be referred to as the Offeror.

L.1.7 Updates related to this Task Order RFP, to include the RFP, amendments, notices, and other information, will be posted to Contract Opportunities as stated in Section A, Paragraph A.13.

Offerors are advised to continuously monitor Contract Opportunities website for new information.

Offerors are deemed to have knowledge of all information that is posted to Contract Opportunities.

L.1.8 Notice to Offerors: Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in Proposal Evaluations

L.1.8.1 Use of AI tools in Support of Evaluations: The Government may employ AI as a tool to assist in the analysis and review of Offeror proposals. AI tools may be used to support tasks such as summarizing proposal content, identifying compliance with request for task order proposal /solicitation requirements, and highlighting areas of potential strength, weakness, or risk.

L.1.8.2 Maintaining Inherently Governmental Functions: Notwithstanding the use of AI tools to support the evaluation process, all final evaluation judgements, including the assignment or assessment of adjectival ratings, best value determinations, and source selection decisions, will be made exclusively by duly appointed Government personnel. The Government retains sole responsibility for all inherently governmental functions and will not delegate decision making authority to any AI tool.

L.1.8.3 Offeror Confidentiality and Data Protection: The AI tools utilized by the Government will be employed in a manner consistent with applicable regulations that govern the protection of proprietary and source selection information. The AI tool will be an output-only system. Any generated report data is not saved. No proposal data will be transmitted to or processed by external, non-Government systems without appropriate safeguards and authorizations in place.

L.2 PROPOSAL PREPARATION:

L.2.1 The proposal must be prepared in a clear and legible manner. In addition, the Offeror shall write the proposal in English and the proposal must be specific and complete as described in these instructions. Offerors shall not specifically prepare samples or descriptive literature for submission with the proposal. Adherence to the prescribed format is required. FAILURE TO PROVIDE

PROPOSALS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS SPECIFIED AS "STRICT

COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS" IN SECTION L OF THIS RFP AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH

ALL INSTRUCTIONS IN SECTION M.3 OF THIS RFP SHALL RENDER THE OFFEROR'S

PROPOSAL NON-COMPLIANT. THE PROPOSAL WILL NOT BE EVALUATED AND WILL NOT

BE FURTHER CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

L.2.2 All information pertaining to a particular volume shall be confined to that volume. For example, no Cost/Price information shall be included in any volume other than the Cost/Price Proposal volume. The Government is not required to and will not search other volumes for a missing file or missing information.

L.2.3 The proposal must not contain any classified material.

L.2.4 Offeror must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and have a Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code.

L.2.5 Digital Microsoft (MS) Word files and MS Excel files must be compatible with Microsoft Office 2013.

L.2.5.1 Please Note: The Offeror shall not lock or password protect any file (e.g. *.doc/.docx, *.

pps/.pptx, *.xls/.xlsx, *.txt, *.msg).

L.2.6 Adobe PDF (Portable Document Format) Files. Scanned PDF documents must be legible and must be viewable in Adobe Acrobat.

L.2.6.1 Text Searchable Adobe PDFs: File formats that are identified as "Text Searchable Adobe PDF" must be formatted to contain searchable text. All elements of the file must be able to be searched for text. The Government will not accept scanned or image-only PDF files in lieu of this requirement and will not invoke the text recognition feature within Adobe Acrobat.

L.2.7 Compressed files (e.g. *.zip) and Executable files (e.g. *bat, *.exe,*.jar, *.vb, *.wsf) will NOT be accepted. Refer to - Blocked File Extensions for a complete list of non-Attachment 0010 acceptable file types.

L.2.8 For the purposes of proposal preparation and evaluation only, the Offeror shall use 09 as the Notice to Proceed (NTP) date. Proposal information shall reflect that NTP February 2027 date.

L.3 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS:

L.3.1 Proposals shall be submitted electronically to alexander.m.wilcox2.civ@army.mil and Michael.d.thune2.civ@army.mil. Due to file size restrictions, proposals may be submitted through Department of Defense (DOD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE), https://safe.apps.mil/ . Note that only 25 files can be submitted with one upload. Multiple drop-off codes may be requested, if necessary. Non-CAC users will have to request a drop-off request from the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer. Please visit the website for more details and instructions for its use. Cloud Services and third party drop boxes are not acceptable for proposal submission.

Emailed proposals shall state the following in the subject line: Proposal for solicitation number (W519TC-26-R-A045) - Add company name.

It is highly recommended that the Offeror request a Return Receipt or other form of acknowledgement to verify that the proposal submission was received prior to the closing of the

RFP.

L.3.2 The proposal submittal method used for this solicitation is the electronic response via document upload method.

L.3.3 Offerors should enter a description for every file uploaded. For files over 10 megabytes (MB) the "Large Upload (JAVA)" button must be utilized. The combined file size limit for upload using "Large Upload (JAVA)" is 100MB. If needed, the Offeror can break single files over 100MB into smaller files or use the upload utility multiple times if files exceed the 100MB size limit.

L.3.4 Digital file names must use the required naming convention for each specific proposal document identified below. Filenames must be 40 characters or less and must not contain single quotes, spaces and pound or percent signs. If an Offeror's file name is too long (more than 40 characters), it is permitted to abbreviate the Name of the Company field within the file name.

L.3.5 Proposal revisions are possible and permitted until the solicitation response deadline.

Note: The Offeror must be logged in to the system to be able to submit / revise electronic responses.

L.3.6 Do not assume submission will be instantaneous. File size and number of files to be uploaded will be factors to consider. Offeror/ Subcontractors should allow adequate time for submission completion because the entire proposal (i.e., Offeror's submission and all Subcontractor(s) submissions) must be received by the due date and time for the proposal to be considered.

L.3.7 To avoid rejection of an offer, the Offeror must make every effort to ensure its electronic submission is virus-free. Proposals, or portions thereof, submitted with the presence of a virus or which are otherwise unreadable will be treated as unreadable pursuant to RFO FAR 15.108(c).

L.3.8 Submission Instructions for Subcontractor Cost proposal can be found in L.5.4.2.10.

L.4 PROPOSAL STRUCTURE:

L.4.1 The Offeror must submit a proposal IAW the guidelines below.

L.4.1.1 For all documents, each page shall include the complete Offeror's name, volume number, file name, date, and solicitation number in a header and/or footer.

L.4.1.2 Each Offeror shall submit ONLY one proposal and that proposal shall address all of the requirements of the RFP. To be considered for this requirement, the Offeror must submit a complete response to this RFP using the instructions provided in Section L. STRICT

COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: IF THE OFFEROR'S PROPOSAL FAILS TO MEET THE TERMS

AND CONDITIONS OF THE RFP OR TAKES EXCEPTION TO ANY OF THE TERMS AND

CONDITIONS OF THE RFP, THIS WILL RENDER THE OFFEROR'S PROPOSAL

UNACCEPTABLE AND WILL NOT BE FURTHER CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

L.4.1.2(a) Each Offeror shall submit the most current versions of Attachment 0002 - Staffing and Labor Mix, Attachment 0003 - Performance Questionnaire, and Attachment 0005 - Cost Price Matrix required for this RFP. The Government will verify that the Offerors submission contains the most current RFP Attachments 0002, 0003 and 0005 that were posted to Contract Opportunities as stated in Section A, Paragraph A.13.

L.4.1.2(b) STRICT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE MOST

CURRENT VERSIONS OF THE RFP ATTACHMENTS 0002, 0003, OR 0005 SHALL RENDER

THE OFFEROR'S PROPOSAL NON-COMPLIANT AND WILL NOT BE FURTHER CONSIDERED

FOR AWARD.

L.4.1.3 A proposal is presumed to represent the Offerors best efforts to respond to the RFP. The Offeror must provide adequately detailed information that complies with the solicitation requirements, allows for meaningful review by the Government evaluators, and affirmatively demonstrates the merits of its proposal. The Offeror shall provide sufficient detail to substantiate the validity of all stated assertions and must not merely repeat the RFP requirements, but rather must provide convincing documentary evidence of how contract requirements will be met. Data not submitted with the proposal, but submitted previously, or presumed to be known (i.e., previous projects performed for the USG) will not be considered. Clarity and completeness are essential. It is the Offerors obligation to submit an unambiguous proposal that clearly reflects the Offeror's intended technical approach and establishes cost credibility. If the use of new and innovative techniques is intended, the impact on cost must be explained. As another example, if a business policy decision to absorb a portion of the estimated cost was made, that approach must be stated within the proposal (including any associated calculations).

NOTE: Offerors must propose to the requirements of this three-step Task Order RFP. Possessing a BOA does not guarantee that an Offeror will be determined technically acceptable for the purposes of this solicitation. Therefore, Offerors must meet the requirements described in this solicitation to be eligible for award.

L.5 INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED:

L.5.1 General Documents: The Offeror shall include the following:

L.5.1.1 One executed signed copy of the RFP coversheet titled "Solicitation, Offer and Award

(SF33)."

L.5.1.1(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_SF33

L.5.1.1(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.1(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.1(d) STRICT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE SIGNED SF

33 WILL RENDER THE OFFEROR'S PROPOSAL NON-COMPLIANT. THE PROPOSAL WILL

NOT BE EVALUATED AND WILL NOT BE FURTHER CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

L.5.1.2 EITHER all signed amendment coversheets titled "Amendment of Solicitation/ Modification of Contract" (SF30) or one executed signed copy of the RFP coversheet (SF 33) with block fourteen (14) completed.

L.5.1.2(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_SF30(Amends)

L.5.1.2(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.2(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.3 Section I clauses that require Offeror completion.

L.5.1.3(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_Iclauses

L.5.1.3(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.3(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.4 Section K clauses that require Offeror certification.

L.5.1.4(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_Kclauses

L.5.1.4(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.4(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.5 Offeror Points of Contact (POC): The Government does not intend to conduct negotiations prior to awarding this Task Order. However, any exchanges to include clarifications between the Government and the Offeror will be conducted through e-mail. Therefore, the Offeror is required to provide at least 2 company individuals whose responsibilities will include reading and responding to Evaluation Notices (ENs) through e-mail. For example, the Offeror's Contract Manager, as an agent of the company might be the main agent responsible, but a second agent shall be available in case of the main agent's unavailability. The agents' names, company titles, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, and e-mail addresses should be provided, and it is the Offeror's responsibility to keep the information updated throughout the competition; submission of updated POC information will not constitute a proposal revision. A Title Page is allowable to provide for the restriction or disclosure and use of data as specified in RFO FAR Clause 52.215-1.

L.5.1.5(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_POCs

L.5.1.5(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.5(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.6 Business Systems Information:

L.5.1.6.1 The Contracting Officer will review the Offeror's accounting system status for determining contractor responsibility IAW RFO FAR 16.301-3; a cost-reimbursement type contract may be used only when the contractor's accounting system is adequate for determining costs applicable to the contract. An adequate system is a system that can separately accumulate costs under a Government contract and has the ability to generate the specific cost information required under the anticipated contract. An SF 1408 has been attached to this RFP (Attachment 0006) which contains the specific procedures that are considered part of an adequate system.

Therefore, for an Offeror to receive an award under this RFP, the successful Offeror will be required to demonstrate that the design of its accounting system can accomplish the specific SF 1408 procedures; as a result, the Offeror is required to provide in its proposal:

- Official documentation, from either a successful Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audit of the Offeror's accounting system; or

- A letter from the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) documenting its approval /adequacy of the Offeror's accounting system; or

- Rationale for why documentation cannot be presented at proposal submission and a proposed date for which required documentation will be available. Absent an adequate accounting system, an apparent awardee cannot be determined responsible under RFO FAR 9.104-5 and will be ineligible for award. Per RFO FAR 9.104-5(d), an apparent awardee who does not furnish the certification or such information as may be requested by the Contracting Officer shall be given an opportunity to remedy the deficiency. Therefore, if an Offeror is unable to provide the certification with its proposal as required, it will be given another opportunity to present the required certification prior to award in the event it is determined to be the apparent awardee.

L.5.1.6.1(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_AcctSys

L.5.1.6.1.(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.6.1(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.6.2 The Offeror shall provide its current Government approval status of the following business systems: billing (internal controls), estimating, budget and financial control, purchasing and quality assurance. The Offeror shall provide official Government approval documentation for any systems that have Government approval. The approval status and approval documentation will not be evaluated and is for Government contract administration. If approval of any of these business systems is not available, provide a statement of such and a brief rationale as to why these systems have not been approved.

L.5.1.6.2(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_BusSys

L.5.1.6.2(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.6.2(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.7 Attachment 0005-Cost Price Matrix, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix: The Offeror shall provide the full company name, CAGE code, role of participant, functional area(s) to be performed, proposed labor/fee for each participant for the entire period of performance (excluding ODC's and the option to extend), percent of participation, and cost proposal submittal method. The Offeror shall populate every column using the instructed fill-ins on the Attachment 0005, Tab 2 for itself, and proposed Subcontractors.

L.5.1.7 (a) STRICT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: THE AMOUNT IN THE TOTAL OF

COLUMN F (TOTAL ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUE, CELL F12) PROVIDED ON ATTACHMENT

0005, TAB 2 SHALL MATCH THE AMOUNT OF 'SUBTOTAL - PROPOSED LABOR/FEE' FOUND

ON ATTACHMENT 0005, TAB 1A, CELL I20'. FAILURE TO MAKE THESE TWO AMOUNTS

MATCH SHALL RENDER THE OFFEROR'S PROPOSAL NON-COMPLIANT. THE PROPOSAL

WILL NOT BE EVALUATED AND WILL NOT BE FURTHER CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

L.5.1.7 (b) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_4_Att0005

L.5.1.7 (c) File Format: MS Excel

L.5.1.7 (d) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.7 (e) STRICT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: IF AN OFFEROR IS PROPOSING

SUBCONTRACTORS, FAILURE OF THE OFFEROR TO POPULATE ALL BLUE HIGHLIGHTED

CELLS FOR ITSELF AND EACH OF ITS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTOR(S) ON THE COST

PRICE MATRIX (ATTACHMENT 0005, TAB 2-TEAMING MATRIX) WILL RENDER THE

OFFEROR'S PROPOSAL NON-COMPLIANT. THE PROPOSAL WILL NOT BE EVALUATED

AND WILL NOT BE FURTHER CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

L.5.1.7 (f) The strict compliance requirements of L.5.1.7(a) and (e) do not apply to an Offeror performing 100% of the requirement by itself with no subcontractors.

L.5.1.8 Not Applicable.

L.5.1.9 Not Applicable.

L.5.1.10 Mission Essential Contractor Services (MECS)

L.5.1.10.1 The Offeror's MECS proposal shall adhere to the following:

L.5.1.10.1(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_MECS

L.5.1.10.1(b) File Format: Text Searchable Adobe PDF

L.5.1.10.1(c) Page Limit: 2 pages

L.5.1.10.1(c)(1) Page limit excludes cover page, table of contents, and glossary of abbreviations and acronyms.

L.5.1.10.1(c)(2) Pages larger than 8.5 inches x 11 inches will be counted as two pages.

L.5.1.10.1(c)(3) The font size shall be no less than 10 point font for all documents, to include charts, tables, and diagrams.

L.5.1.10.2 Mission Essential Contractor Services (MECS): The Offeror shall provide its MECS Plan that details its approach as to how it will continue to perform the essential contractor services listed in Attachment 0013 - Mission Essential Contractor Services by specifically addressing each part of the RFO DFARS Clause 252.237-7024 (b)(2)(i through v).

L.5.1.12 Electronic Cost Reporting & Financial Tracking (eCRAFT)

L.5.1.12.1 Offerors shall complete the eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook, Section J attachment 0028 of the solicitation. This workbook provides step-by-step instructions of how to propose labor cost, horizontally, for supporting the eCRAFT reporting requirements.

(**Note Only: The eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook should be utilized. This workbook does NOT incorporate travel, material, or ODCs. THIS IS NOT THE COST VOLUME. The cost volume will support pricing evaluation purposes.)

The eCRAFT_Labor Build Workbook provides a crosswalk of all offeror proposed labor categories to corresponding Government Standard eCRAFT Labor Categories and must be completed by the offeror. Offeror shall propose Standard eCRAFT Labor Categories based on the descriptions listed at: http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NUWC-Newport/Partnerships/Commercial- Contracts/Labor-Categories/

For labor categories that provide for various skill levels (I, II, III, IV), the Offeror shall select the skill level that best matches (best fit) the proposed individual and company-specific labor category. For Service Contract Act (SCA) labor categories (if applicable), Offerors may propose an SCA labor category listed in the SCA Directory of Occupations at http://www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts/sca.

htm.

The eCRAFT_Labor Rate Workbook, Section J - attachment 0029, is also required to create the Labor Cost Baseline, for each eCRAFT labor category proposed in support of the eCRAFT platform and its corresponding metrics.

L.5.1.12.1(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_e2Builds

L.5.1.12.1(b) File Format: MS EXCEL

L.5.1.12.1(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.12.1(d) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_e2Rates

L.5.1.12.1(e) File Format: MS EXCEL

L.5.1.12.1(f) Page Limit: None

L.5.2 Technical Management Factor:

L.5.2.1 The Offeror shall demonstrate mission capability by detailing its proposed technical approach to meet the requirements specified in the PWS and this RFP by providing its Staffing and Management Plan (SMP).

L.5.2.1.1 Staffing and Management Plan (SMP):

L.5.2.1.1(a) The Offeror's SMP proposal must adhere to the following:

L.5.2.1.1(a)(1) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_2_SMP

L.5.2.1.1(a)(2) File Format: Text Searchable Adobe PDF

L.5.2.1.1(a)(3) Page Limit: 15 Pages

L.5.2.1.1(a)(3)(i) Page limit excludes cover page, table of contents, and glossary of abbreviations and acronyms

L.5.2.1.1(a)(3)(ii) Pages larger than 8.5 inches x 11 inches will be counted as two pages

L.5.2.1.1(a)(3)(iii) The font size must be no less than 10-point font for all documents, to include charts, tables, and diagrams.

L.5.2.1.1(a)(4) STRICT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT PLAN AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH L.5.2.1.1(a)(3) THROUGH L.5.2.1.1(a)(3)(iii) WILL RENDER THE OFFEROR'S PROPOSAL NON-COMPLIANT. THE

PROPOSAL WILL NOT BE EVALUATED AND WILL NOT BE FURTHER CONSIDERED FOR

AWARD.

L.5.2.1.1(b) The Offeror's Staffing and Management Plan must detail the Offeror's approach to deliver services required in the RFP and PWS. The Offeror's SMP must detail the overarching methodology used to determine the proposed skill sets / skill level; the SMP must also contain any rationale used to support staffing decisions with any explanations needed to clarify staffing decisions (e.g., cross utilization of specific labor categories, dual hatted positions, etc.), to include a detailed narrative of innovations and efficiencies. Rationale for innovations and efficiencies must be clearly identified, by placing under a separate header, in the SMP and confirmed within the Attachment - TD-02 Workload Data and Density List. The Government will NOT accept 0016 methodologies previously utilized under a different EAGLE Task Order or any other similar service contract, Government or otherwise, as supporting rationale for this requirement. The methodology shall be independent to this RFP only. As the Government will utilize the Service Contract Act (SCA) Directory of Occupations (5th Edition) and Attachment 0016 - TD-02 Workload Data and Density List for technical evaluation purposes, the Offeror shall utilize those sources whenever possible to determine which labor categories/position titles to propose as part of its proposed staffing.

For all positions identified as "Non-Exempt" on the Offeror's Attachment 0002 Staffing/Labor Mix, the Offeror shall provide a labor category/title under the column "Position Title" that is specifically found within the SCA Directory of Occupations (5th Edition). If additional explanation is necessary beyond the definitions provided in the SCA Directory to describe the proposed skillset or capabilities of that labor category based on the Offeror's unique business practices or staffing approach, then the SMP narrative must include an adequate duty description for that position which will enable the Government to evaluate the skill set / skill level that is being proposed (this requirement is in addition to any supplemental description the offeror can include under the "Duty Title" column on its Attachment 0002- Staffing and Labor Mix).

For positions identified as "Exempt" on Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix, if an Offeror designates a position as "Exempt" on Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix and the position title provided does not match an existing SCA labor category, the Offeror must include a detailed description of the duties for that position in the SMP narrative. This will allow the Government to evaluate the proposed skill set / skill level. (this requirement is in addition to any supplemental description the offeror can include under the Duty Title column on its Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix).

The SMP MUST BE SUPPORTED BY THE OFFEROR'S ATTACHMENT 0002 STAFFING /LABOR MIX and, at a minimum, must address the following elements:

L.5.2.1.1(b)(1) Staffing and organization of the required effort by providing its approach to creating its management structure from general staff oversight by first line supervisors through its company headquarters management. This approach must detail the management and supervision structure related to executing this effort.

L.5.2.1.1(b)(1)(i) The on-site FFP PMO positions are determined to be material to the effort and must remain staffed throughout the duration of the contract. The required labor categories are identified as "firm fixed price". Offeror must propose PMO staffing, if required by the Offeror's business processes to fully support the effort solicited within this RFP. Additional positions proposed within the firm fixed-price portion of the effort must be identified as "firm fixed-price" in Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix.

L.5.2.1.1(b)(1)(ii) The Offeror's SMP must include a description of its capability to successfully implement surge support for the additional workload required under contingency operations in accordance with . The Offeror shall provide a plan detailing how it will successfully PWS 1.4.3.1 meet the surge requirement and achieve full operational capability (FOC) not later than 21 days following the NTP on the surge requirement from the PCO. The Offeror's detailed description must include an immediate response to the NTP, its staffing increase plan, and the hiring practices proposed. Consideration should be given to the temporary nature and limited duration of the work, and the effect on recruitment and retention.

L.5.2.1.1(b)(2) The Offeror must provide an Organizational Diagram to depict a comprehensive organizational overview that identifies the following:

L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(i) Identification of the tasks to be performed by the Offeror and all proposed subcontractor(s) (if applicable) as identified on the Offeror's Teaming Matrix (Attachment 0005, Tab 2-Teaming Matrix).

L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(ii) Identification of the command-and-control relationship among the Offeror, all proposed subcontractor(s) as identified on the Offeror's Cost Price Matrix (Attachment 0005, Tab 2- Teaming Matrix). The command-and-control relationship must include identification of leadership positions (i.e., team leads, foremen, supervisors, deputies, managers, etc.) responsible for performing successful oversight of each of the primary task areas identified in Section C-5 of the

PWS.

Note: FTE Counts are not required on the Organizational Diagram. Proposed FTEs counts will only be evaluated on the Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix and will not be evaluated as part of the Organizational Diagram.

L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(iii) The Offeror must clearly identify its onsite independent quality control approach to include an independent quality control representative identified within both the staffing approach and PM-01 Contractor Employee Information Format with direct coordination to the responsible corporate quality office. To be considered "independent" the quality control representative shall not be a cross utilized position with any other position or "dual hatted" and shall only report to the corporate level.

L.5.2.1.1(c) Staffing and Labor Mix (Attachment 0002 - Staffing and Labor Mix): The Offeror must provide its proposed labor categories (skill sets / skill level, number of employees) in relation to the PWS requirements and Attachment 0016 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List for both the base period and option periods (fully operational capable 12-month periods (365-day periods)).The Offeror's proposal must present a staffing approach which demonstrates a thorough understanding of the effort and provides the expected skill sets / skill level of each position, to include level of responsibility to successfully…