Attachment P - Past Performance Questionnaire Rev 1.docx

DOCX document 105 KB Posted

Attached to
Base Operations Support Services, Dugway Proving Ground, Utah
Solicitation number
W5168W23R0002
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment S - PIEE Solicitation Vendor Posting Offer Training.pdf PDF
Attachment H - Dugway Pricing Matrix Revised 15 JUN 23.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 0008 W5168W23C0002.pdf PDF
Amendment 0007 RPF W5168W23R0002-0007.pdf PDF
Attachment H - Dugway Pricing Matrix Revised 14 JUN 23 Cell J31 Formula.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment H - Dugway Pricing Matrix CLIN Structure revised 14 JUN 2023.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W5168W23R0002 MOD 0006_Contracting Officer POC Update.pdf PDF
W5168W23R0002-0005 DOCUMENTS.zip ZIP file
Amended_RFP_W5168W23R0002_0005_DPG_BASOPS_12JUN2023_Conformed Copy.pdf PDF
Amended_RFP_W5168W23R0002_0005_DPG_BASOPS_12JUN2023_w_Changes.pdf PDF
Attachment H - Dugway Pricing Matrix CLIN Structure revised 30 May 2023.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amended_RFP_W5168W23R0002_0004_DPG_BASOPS_31MAY2023.pdf PDF
Amended_RFP_W5168W23R0002_0004_DPG_BASOPS_31MAY2023-Conformed Version.pdf PDF
Amended RFP W5168W23R0002-0003-Conformed Document -.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0003 DPG BASOPS TECHNICAL EXHIBITS.zip ZIP file
Amended RFP W5168W23R0002-0003.pdf PDF
W5168W23R0002 0003 Attachments.zip ZIP file
Amended_RFP_W5168W23R0002_0002_DPG_BASOPS_27APR2023.pdf PDF
Amended_RFP_W5168W23R0002_0001_DPG_BASOPS_23MAR2023.pdf PDF
DGP BaseOps Site visit Sign-in Roster 2-2-2023.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6 - Pricing Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-NN_Boiler_Operating_Log_Revision 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-WWWW Work Capability Levels.docx DOCX document
TE-Q_Real_Property_Facilities_C.5.2.2_Revision 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-ZZZZ Priority Facilities.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-C_ISR_Requirements_Revision 1.pdf PDF
Attachment 23 - CLS 503 Wastewater Services_12 Apr 22.docx DOCX document
TE-Z_Top_Dressing_Soil_Spec_Revision 1.pdf PDF
W5168W23R0002 -Solicitation BaseOps Dugway Proving Ground.pdf PDF
TE-UUUU OVERHEAD DOORS 20210512.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10 - DBA Wage Determination - Highway.pdf PDF
Attachment 21 - CLS 500 Electrical Services_12 Apr 22.docx DOCX document
TE-KKKK Snow Ice and Sand Removal Plan.docx DOCX document
TE-XXX_Estimated_Appliances_Replacment_Revision 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-G_Burn_Rate_Example_Revision 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-SSSS Stored Presticides Report Example.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-H_GFP_and_CAP_Report_Revision 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-JJ-1_Generator_Hour_Report_Revision 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-UUU_List_Back_Flow_Preventors_Revision 1.pdf PDF
TE-QQQ_Sewage_Treatment_Monthly_Log_Revision 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-LLL-2 DPW Utility Reimbursable Meters 18MAY2020.pdf PDF
TE-CCC_Auto_Gates_and_Arms_Revision 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-NNNN Monthly Pest Management Operations Record.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-AA_Pure_Live_Seed_Mix_Revision 1.pdf PDF
TE-AAAA ArMA Process.pdf PDF
TE-GGGG Water Line Flush Record Deliverable Example and Flush Point Drawing.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Installation Fueling Services_12 Apr 22.docx DOCX document
Attachment 13 - CLS 200 UPH Management Operation_12 Apr 22.docx DOCX document
Attachment 9 - DBA Wage Determination - Heavy.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 151 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command Installation Readiness Center 2371 Infantry Post Road, Building 602 JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Tx 78234-1361

27 January 2023

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Mission and Installation Contracting (MICC) – Installation Readiness Center (IRC) is in the process of selecting a contractor for Army Base Operations Support Services. The services required are for Dugway Proving Ground, Dugway, UT, Solicitation W5168W-23-R-0002, The service encompasses Base Operations Support Services.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Our schedule is extremely tight, and we need your written response no later than 2:00 PM CST 16 June 2023. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and emailed to all the following Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at: jeffery.d.harris.civ@army.mil and Andrew.s.graham.civ@army.mil. Please email the Contracting Officer or Contract Specialist prior to transmission if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection record.

Your help is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.

Please return this completed questionnaire via email to the following Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at the following email addresses: Jeffery.d.harris.civ@army.mil and Andrew.s.graham.civ@army.mil, subject line should reflect the corresponding solicitation number W5168W23R0002.

Note: Questionnaire submitted by some other entity other than the reference will not be accepted.

When filled in, this document is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor B. Cage Code C. Contract Number D. Contract Type E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No F. Period of performance _ G. Initial contract cost $ H. Current/final contract cost $ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs

J. Description of service provided

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name B. Customer or agency description

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name B. Title C. Phone/Fax ________________________________________ D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract ________________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an X in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CodePerformance Level
SSatisfactory – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MMarginal – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
USUnsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NANot Applicable – Unable to provide a score.
Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation
S
M
US
NA

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Technical Performance
S
M
US
NA

T1. Overall Contract Management.

T2. Adequacy of Contractor Workforce to Perform Contract.

T3. Quality Control.

T4. Government Furnished Property Administration.

T5. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

T6. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

T7. Understand/complied with contract objectives and technical requirements.

T8. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

T9. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

T10. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T11. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contract Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations No If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .