Updated Attachment 0002 - Data Item Description Index - Contains 27 DIDS.docx

Data Item Description (DID) Index for the 155mm XM1128 Artillery Metal Parts Assembly

W15QKN-22-R-0008

DID

Number

11 Feb 2020

18 Jan 2013

29 Nov 2006

(08 AUG 1999)

08 Aug 1999

14 Nov 2006

24 Jan 1997

12 Sep 1988

25 Feb 2014

14 Nov 2006

03 Feb 2015

14 Jul 2015

08 Sep 2015

07 Apr 2015

30 Oct 2006

23 Jun 2009

02 Mar 1992

17 Jan 1989

15 Oct 2019

02 Jun 1998

07 Sep 1989

08 Nov 2006

(IPMDAR)

16 Sep 2015

20 Nov 1995

13 Dec 2010

02 Jun 1998

DI-SESS-80639E Engineering Change Proposal (ECP).pdf

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Title: ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSAL (ECP)

Number: DI-SESS-80639E Approval Date: 20200211

AMSC Number: N10140 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2020-003

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)

Use/relationship: An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) provides the documentation in which the engineering change is described and specifies how the proposed change will be implemented.

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649 (Copies of these standards are available online at www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 [inside USA and Canada] or 724-776-4970 [outside

USA]).

b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80642, Notice of Revision (NOR). A requirement for NORs and Specification Change Notices (SCN) should be contractually imposed in conjunction with this DID.

c. This DID supersedes DI-SESS-80639D.

d. An electronic version of DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), is available online at https://www.esd.whs.mil/dd/.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

2. Format. The ECP shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP),

b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Digital Environment (IDE), or

c. The Supplier’s preferred format.

3. Content. The ECP shall contain all the information required by DD Form 1692.

End of DI-SESS-80639E

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T20:43Z

Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.

http://www.sae.org/ http://www.esd.whs.mil/dd/ image2.emf

DI-SESS-80640E Request for Variance (RFV).pdf

Title: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE (RFV)

Number: DI-SESS-80640E Approval Date: 20200211

AMSC Number: N10141 Limitation: N/A

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2020-004

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV)

Use/relationship: A Request for Variance (RFV) describes a proposed departure from (a nonconformance with) approved product definition information for a limited amount of time/specified effectivity or a product found to be nonconforming with product definition information after the product has been produced by the production process.

When the RFV describes a proposed departure from approved product definition information

(i.e., pre-production), the variance shall result in a reduction in cost; indicated by enclosing the value in parentheses.

When the RFV describes a product found to be nonconforming after the product has been produced (i.e., post-production), the variance shall result in a reduction in cost; indicated by enclosing the value in parentheses.

When the nonconformance is induced or caused by the Acquirer, a reduction in cost is not required when submitting the RFV.

standards are available online at www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive,

b. This DID supersedes DI-SESS-80640D.

c. An electronic version of DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV), is available online at

2. Format. The RFV shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV), Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T20:46Z

DI-SESS-80640E

3. Content. The RFV shall contain all the information required by DD Form 1694.

End of DI-SESS-80640E

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T20:46Z image3.emf

DI-SESS-80642E Notice of Revision (NOR).pdf

Title: NOTICE OF REVISION (NOR)

Number: DI-SESS-80642E Approval Date: 20200211

AMSC Number: N10142 Limitation: N/A

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2020-005

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR)

Use/relationship: A Notice of Revision (NOR) describes the proposed changes to a technical document being requested by an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP).

standards are available online at www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive,

b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80639, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), and DI-SESS-80643, Specification Change Notice (SCN).

c. This DID supersedes DI-SESS-80642D.

d. An electronic version of DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR), is available online at

2. Format. The NOR shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR),

3. Content. The NOR shall contain all the information required by DD Form 1695.

End of DI-SESS-80642E

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T20:49Z image4.emf

DI-QCIC-81891 Acceptance Test Report.pdf

Title: ACCEPTANCE TEST REPORT (ATR) Number: DI-QCIC-81891 Approval Date: 20130118 AMSC Number: N9313 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility: AS/PMA251 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship:

The ATR contains the results of the qualification tests performed by the contractor to demonstrate that the system conforms to the performance specifications, work authorization document, or contract requirements.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains format, content, and intended use information for the data product resulting from the work task described in the Statement of Work (SOW).

1. Format. Contractor’s format is acceptable.

2. Content. The ATR shall contain the following:

a. Test article identification and full description of test specimens utilized, including any deviations for the configuration specified in the applicable test plan.

b. Date and location of test or evaluation.

c. The operator who conducted the test.

d. Results obtained, including specific identification and discussion of objectives demonstrated satisfactorily and those not demonstrated satisfactorily.

e. Contractor’s conclusions, corrective action anticipated, recommendation to correct. deficiencies, and suggested improvements based on evaluation of the test.

f. All analysis and supporting data.

g. All data sheets.

3. End of DI-QCIC-81891.

image5.emf

DI-QCIC-81722 Quality Program Plan.pdf

Title: Quality Program Plan (QPP)

Number: DI-QCIC-81722 Approval Date: 29 NOV 2006 AMSC Number: 7676 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NS/I5223 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/Relationship:

The Quality Program Plan (QPP) describes the methodology that will be used to meet the quality requirements needed for the specific program. The object of the plan is to define and document what, where, and how to procure, fabricate, assemble, inspect, test and deliver only units and other end products that conform to quality standards. The QPP should start with the contractor’s standard quality system and detail changes to that. The QPP shall be used to verify attainability of contract objectives in the area of producing reliable, quality products. This DID is applicable to development, low rate initial production and full rate production efforts.

a. This DID contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001, Quality Management Systems – Requirements (Entire Document).

b. The prime contractor is required to include information from significant suppliers (eg, PWAs) or teammates regarding their standard quality system requirements and any deviations specific to this program.

1. Reference Documents: The applicable issue of the documents herein, including, their approval dates and the dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation; or, for non DODISS-listed documents, as stated herein. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001 Quality Management Systems – Requirements, current edition, is available at International Organization for Standardization website http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.frontpage.

2. Format: Contractor format is acceptable using 8 ½ x 11 in. paper.

3. Content:

3.1 The data item shall have a Title page containing the following information as a minimum:

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T20:57Z

DI-QCIC-81722

3.1.1 Title

3.1.2 CDRL exhibit number

3.1.3 Revision level

3.1.4 Approval/submission

3.1.5 Date

3.1.6 Program name

3.1.7 Contract number

3.1.8 Contractor’s name and address

3.1.9 Data item author

3.1.10 Signature

3.1.11 Approval record

3.2 The data item shall have a table of contents if the length of the document warrants.

3.3 The data item shall have a revision status log page which includes the various revision levels, dates, and summary description of the changes made.

3.4 The QPP shall reference any Industry standard for which the contractor has a current certification. The plan shall reference the contractor’s current Quality Manual, number or identification, and date. The plan shall then detail any changes, deletions or additions to the contractor’s standard requirements, and shall delineate the specific Industry workmanship standards and levels for soldering, printed wiring assembly, etc, that are to be applied to the program. The government shall concur in use of any standard repair procedures and conditions for use on the program.

3.5 The QPP shall include an organizational chart identifying the Product Assurance (PA) organization, names and titles of key PA personnel assigned to the program, and how the PA organization relates to the corporate structure.

3.6 The QPP shall include a proposed end item product flow including test & inspection points. The plan shall briefly address the following topics if different from or not included in the quality manual: quality audit frequency, depth, and independence; process certification and control of automated processes; “cannot duplicate” (CND) and nonconforming material processes; incoming inspection/test, certified supplier program and parts control; and any unique requirements for the program.

4. END OF DI-QCIC-81722

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T20:57Z image6.emf

DI-MGMT-81580 Contractors Standard Operation Procedures.pdf

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:29Z image7.emf

DI-NDTI-80566A Test Plan.pdf

Title: Test Plan

Number: DI-NDTI-80566A Approval Date: 14 Nov 2006 AMSC Number: 7639 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NS/DA02 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Test Plan outlines the plans and performance objectives at every level of testing on systems or equipment. It provides the procuring activity with the test concept, objectives and requirements to be satisfied, test methods, elements, responsible activities associated with the testing, measures required and recording procedures to be used.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the contract.

This DID is applicable to system and equipment tests that include design evaluation tests, engineering tests, preliminary qualification tests, formal qualification tests, human factors tests, operational tests and acceptance tests.

This DID supersede DI-NDTI-80566.

Requirements:

1. Reference documents. None.

2. General. The test plan shall document in detail the contractor’s plan for conducting tests and analyzing the test results to show how the system, when fielded, will satisfy the requirements of the applicable design specification.

3. Format: The plan shall be in contractor’s format.

4. Contents. The plan shall contain the following:

4.1 Title page. The title page shall include the following:

a. Title of the test to be conducted.

b. Identification of system being tested.

c. Contractor’s name.

d. Contractor number.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:41Z

DI-NDTI-80566A

e. Security classification.

f. Distribution statement.

4.2 Introduction. Consists of an overview of the objectives of the test plan, including flow diagrams, milestones, personnel participation, locations, schedules, and security measures to be observed. The plan shall include the following:

4.3 Flow diagrams. The flow diagrams will reflect a functional description of the test program using a block diagram portrayal of the functions that must be met to satisfy the total test program. Functions shall be numbered 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, etc.

4.4 Milestones. Identifies the start and expected completion dates of each test to be performed.

4.5 Participation. Identifies the government and contractor participation roles and responsibilties.

4.6 Location. Identifies the facilities where the testing will be performed.

4.7 Schedule. States when testing will be performed, whether testing is on schedule, and if not, what procedures will be taken to meet the schedule.

4.8 Security. Identify and state briefly any security measures of guidelines to be observed.

4.9 Master test list. Lists all tests to be accomplished in the order they are to be performed. A separate listing for each location shall be provided. Each listing shall include the following:

4.9.1 Test description. Name and brief description of test to be performed.

4.9.2 Applicable specification (s). The specifications shall be identified as follows:

a. Title and identification number.

b. Paragraph number associated with the tests.

c. Title of test.

d. Functional category of test.

4.9.3 Parameters. The number of cycles the test will be performed and selected parameters to be observed.

4.9.4 Special tests. Provides a list of special or unusual tests and examination necessary to verify satisfactory equipment performance to specifications.

DI-NDTI-80566A

4.9.5 Test classification category. State the functional area of each test performed.

4.9.6 Test objectives. Describes the objectives of each test performed, including the criteria, baseline, duration, and number of times each test should be performed.

a. Success/failure criteria.

b. Baseline.

c. Duration.

d. Quantity of test.

4.9.7 Test equipment. List all equipment to be used in the test and identify as follows:

a. Description.

b. Nomenclature.

c. Serial number.

4.9.8 Support equipment. List all support equipment that will be used to perform the tests and identify as follows:

a. Description.

b. Nomenclature.

c. Serial number.

d. Calibration constants.

e. Calibration procedures.

f. Operating instructions.

4.9.9 Special test equipment. List all special test equipment required to be designed or fabricated for use on the program as follows:

a. Description.

b. Nomenclature.

c. Data required.

4.9.10 Approach. Describe the steps used to perform each test.

4.9.11 Instrumentation. Indicates the type and recording devices that will be used and the number and types of parameters to be recorded.

4.9.12 Data reduction and analysis. Describes data to be recorded and the data reduction and analysis techniques that will be used to interpret the data.

4.9.13 Government test facilities. Identifies applicable facility and includes a reference to the appropriate facility requirements documents.

Validation procedure. An overview of the procedures that the contractor will use to validate the test results.

5. END OF DI-NDTI-80566A

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Requirements:

image8.emf

DI-NDTI-80809B Inspection and Test Report.pdf

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION I Form Approved OMB No.0704.0188

1.nTLE 2.IOENTIFICATIONNUMBER

TEST/ INSPECTION REPORT DI-NM’I-80809B

L OESCRIPTlOtVPURPOSE

3.1 The testl inspection report is used to document testl inspection results, findings, and analyses that will enable the government or contracting agency to evaluate compliance with system requirements, performance objectives, specifications, and test linspection plans.

1.APPROVALDATE 5.OFFICEOFPRIMARYRESPONSIBILITY(OPB) Ea.DTICAPPLICABLE 6b.CWIEP AppliCable

(YVMMOD)

F/AFMC-DCJP

970124

,.APPLlCAT\0NflNTER7iElAT10NSH1P

7.1 This data item description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement

I as delineated in the contract.

I

7.2 This DID is applicable to engineering (developmental ), preliminary qualification, qualification, and acceptance testing.

7.3 This DID supersedes DI-NDTI-80809A and DI-MISC-80653

1.APPROVALLIMITATION 9a.APPLICABLEFORMS 9b.AMSCNUMBER

F7231

10,PREPARATIONlNSTRUCnONS

10.1 Format. Contractor format is acceptable.

paragraph 10.2 and its subparagraphs in a manner understanding

10.2 CQnL!aL. The test/inspection report shall

applicable.

Organize the information required by that facilitates presentation and contain the following information, as

10. 2.1 Cove. and tile uaae. The following information shall appear on the outside front :over and title page:

a. Report date.

b. Report number (contractor or government)

Contractor’ s name, address, and commercia 1 and government entity code.

Contract number and contract line item number or sequence number (if applicable)

e. ‘fvpe of test/inspection (for example. first article acceptance test, aualitv con formanc-e-inspection, d-evelopmental test-, qualification test, f Identification of item tested/inspected.

9. Date or period of test/inspection.

h. Name and address of requiring government activity.

i. Security classification, downgrading and declassifying environmental Lest) .“ information, if applicable.

(Continued on page 2 )

1.DIS77UBUTIONSTATEMEW

DISTRIBUTION STATEMRNT A : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELBASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED.

ID Form 1664,APR 89 PreviOLIsedtliomwe obsdem. Page 1 of & Pages 39123

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:44Z

DI-NDTI-80809B

Block 10, Preparation Instructions (continued)

10.2.2 ~. The table of contents shall identify the following:

a. The title and starting page of each major section, paragraph, and apPendix of the report.

b. The page, identifying number, and title of each illustration (for example; figure, table, photograph, chart, and drawing)

10 .2.3 -ductim. The introduction shall include the following information:

10.2 .3.1 obyectlve W. The specific test/ inspection objective (s) as specified in the contract tasking document.

10. 2.3.2 L.temls) tes~. Complete identification of the item(s) testedl inspected including the following:

a. Nomenclature.

b. National stock number.

Model number, part number t and serial number :: Type of item (for example, prototype, production item, laboratory model )

e. Serial or lot number.

f. Applicable engineering changes

9. Production item specification, if applicable.

h. Date of manufacture.

10.2 .3.3 Complete inspection requirements correlated to contractual

Required testl inspection parameters :: Performance requirements, acceptance or environmental criteria.

10.2.4 ~. Complete test/inspection report identification of the testl requirements including the compliance limits, and summary including the

a. A brief discussion of the significant test/inspection results, ObSerVati Qns, conclusions, and recommendations covered in greater detail elsewhere in the report.

b. Proposed corrective actions and schedules for failures or problems encountered.

c. Identification of deviations, departures, or limitations encountered, referenced to the contract requirements.

d. Tables, graphs, illustrations, or charts as appropriate to simplify the summary data.

10.2.5 ~. Complete identification of all documents referenced in the test finspection report including the following, as applicable:

a. Prior testf inspection reports on the same item.

b. Test /inspection plans and procedure documents

c. Prior certifications of compliance.

d. Contractor’ s file designation where test/ inspection records are maintained.

e. Input parameters used.

The applicable issue of the documents cited therein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

Page 2 of 4 Pages Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:44Z

10.2.6 ~. The body of the testlinspection report shall be as follows :

10 .2.6.1 KzZL_ + de.tlflca~.

Complete identification of each item of test equipment used in the testlinspection including the following:

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

9.

10. 2.6.2

Nomenclature.

Model number.

Serial number.

Manufacturer.

Calibration status.

Accuracy data.

Comments, if applicable.

Testlinmection kuhtv mstd.b&mn and set–w. Complete description of the physical set-up used in conducting the test/inspection to include the following:

a. Location or orientation of the item.

b. Location. orientation, or settinm of test equipment and instrumentation.

c. Location, orientation, or settings of sensors and probes

d. Location or orientation of interconnections, cables, and hoop-ups.

e. Electrical power, pneumatic, fluidic, and hydraulic requirements.

Drawings, illustrations, and photographs maY be used for clarification.

10 .2.6.3 wrocedur~. Complete description of the procedures used in conducting the test/inspection to include the following:

a. Item selection and inspection that verified suitability for test/ inspection.

b. Summarized sequence of testing/inspection steps, including a description of how the item was operated during the test/inspection, and any control conditions imposed.

10 .2.6.4 A copy of all testlinspection results and analysis to include the following:

10.2.6 .4.1 ~. The actual recorded data (for example, log book entries, oscillographs, instrument readings, plotter graphs) If the recorded data is extensive, provide it in an appendix.

10. 2.6.4.2 Test/ insQec!iion resu. Identification of all testlinspection results to include the following:

a. Matrices comparing results achieved against test/inspection objectives or requirements

b. A discussion of these matrices as to their significance, and how they compare to any prior testlinspections.

Calculation examples.

;; Discussion of anomalies, deviations, discrepancies, or failures, including their impact, causes, and proposed corrective actions The discussion shall address discrepancies between design requirements and the tested/inspected Configuration.

10. 2.6.5 Conclusicxls Test/ inspection conclusions distinguished between objective and subjective to include the following:

a. The effectiveness of the testlinspection procedures in measuring item performance.

Page 3 of 4 PagesSource: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:44Z

b. The success or failure of the item to meet required test/inspection objectives.

c. The need for repeat, additional, or alternative tests linspections.

d. The need for item redesign or further development.

e. The need for improved test/inspection procedures, techniques, or facilities.

f. The adequacy and completeness of the test/inspection requirements.

10.2 .6.6 Recommendations appropriate to the test/inspection results and conclusions including the following:

a b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

9.

h.

Acceptability of the item tested/inspected (pass or fail) Additional testing/inspection required. ,.

Redesign required.

Problem resolution.

Test/inspection procedure or facility improvements Disposition of items tested/inspected.

Documentation changes required.

Testing/ inspection improvements

10.2.7 The following certifications shall be included, .as

applicable:

10.2 .7.1 A statement that the testlinspection was performed in accordance with applicable testlinspection plans and procedures, and that the results are true and accurate. The authentication shall include the signature of the contractor personnel that performed the test(s) /inspection(s) , a contractor representative authorized to make such certification, and any government witnesses

10.2 .7.2 A statement identifying those requirements not tested/inspected or measured that were previously validated.

Include identification of the data and method employed for such validation (for example, prior test/inspection, analytical verification, equivalent item, and so on) The authentication shall include the signature of a contractor representative authorized to make such authentication and any government witness.

10.2 .7.3 A statement that the item tested/ inspected either passed or failed item acceptability requirements This authentication shall include the signature of a contractor representative authorized to make such authentication and any government witness

10.2.8 Appendices shall be used to append detailed

test/inspection daia, drawings, photographs , or other documentation too voluminous to include in the main body of the report This includes referenced documentation not previously provided by the government, and test/ inspection reports from any associated test/inspection activity that may have performed some of the testing/inspecting requirements.

Page 4 of 4 Pages Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:44Z image9.emf

DI-MISC-80678 Certification Data Report.pdf

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:49Z

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:49Z image10.emf

DI-QCIC-81960 Measurement system evaluation (MSE).pdf

DI-QCIC-81960

Title: MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION (MSE) – MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION

EQUIPMENT SYSTEM DESIGN DOCUMENTATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRODUCT

Number: DI-QCIC-81960 Approval Date: 25 February 2014 ASMC Number: 9461 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: (AR) , RDAR-EIQ-SE Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design documentation for Acceptance of Product describes the Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Automated AIE (AAIE), and various measurement systems, used to meet the inspection and test requirements to deliver units and other end products that conform to contract, specification, QAP and drawing requirements. This documentation is used to evaluate the acceptability of these designs to meet contract requirements.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract.

b. This DID is applicable to all AIE as required by the contract.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in contract documentation.

2. Format. Contractor’s format is acceptable.

3. Content. An AIE package shall include the following (as applicable).

3.1 Cover Sheet. Cover sheet information includes the following:

a. Prime contractor name, address, and contact information.

b. Contract number.

c. Nomenclature of item(s) being produced under contract.

d. Applicable drawing(s), specifications and Quality Assurance Provisions (QAPs).

e. Date and revision of “New” or “Revised” documentation.

f. Sub-component or assembly (if applicable).

g. Subcontractor(s) name, address, and contact information (if applicable).

3.2 Measuring and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation. Measuring and inspection equipment system design documentation covers a variety of measurement systems and equipment used to evaluate acceptability of units to meet requirements. See ISO 9000 paragraph 3.8.2, Inspection and 3.10.4, Measuring Equipment.

3.3 Master List / Matrix. A detailed Master List or Matrix cross references each characteristic and its inspection requirement from the applicable drawings, specifications and QAPs with the proposed inspection methods and equipment. The Master List or Matrix information includes the following:

a. Drawing, specification or QAP number with revision and date of item being inspected.

b. Amendments, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Notices of Revision (NORs), etc.

c. Specification or QAP paragraph number.

d. Drawing, specification, or QAP characteristic letter/number, description, and inspection requirement.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T20:53Z

e. Inspection method with AIE identification with description, revision, and date.

f. Clearly indicate any revisions from previous submission(s).

3.4 Go-No Go/Functional Gages. Gage information includes the following:

a. Gage drawing number (design identification) with revision and date.

b. Drawings showing gage dimensions with tolerances.

c. Drawings showing gage material with surface finish and hardness of contacting gage elements.

d. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.5 Standard Measurement Equipment (SME). SME information includes the following:

a. Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy.

b. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.6 Special Inspection Equipment/Methods. It includes Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Tool Control (TC), Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE), Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. It also includes inspection equipment that is not commercially available along with the corresponding design drawings.

a. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). CMM information includes the following per ASME

B89.4.10360.2-2008:

i. Establishment of the geometry (Datums) and inspection process of the desired characteristic by the CMM. Include the number and location of probe hits to establish geometry (Datums) and any axis necessary to adequately inspect the feature.

ii. Environmental conditions and limits which may influence measurements.

iii. Operating procedures including machine start/warm up cycles, probing system qualification, probe cleaning, and probe calibrations.

iv. Periodic reverification tests in accordance with the user's specification and manufacturer’s procedures including repeatability of point coordinates and length measurement and repeatability.

v. Interim checks between periodic reverifications.

vi. Procedure for checking the CMM immediately after a significant event which could impact CMM performance.

b. Tool Control (TC). Tool Control information includes the following:

i. Measurements of form tools (punches, dies, molds, etc.) and correlation data between tool dimension and component dimension.

ii. Inspection frequency and gages used to measure the form tooling.

iii. Process control parameters that affect the component dimension.

iv. Procedures for tool control inspection including out of tolerance tool control dimension procedures, corrective action plans, and segregation of product since last successful inspection.

c. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). NDT information includes the following:

i. Written procedures for the qualification and certification of NDT personnel and the certification records for each inspector, as described in NAS410 (NAS Certification & Qualification of NDT Personnel), ANSI/ASNT-CP-189 (ASNT Standard for Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel), or SNT-TC-1A (Recommended

Practice for Personnel Qualification and Certification in NDT), and additional procedures identified by the Government.

ii. Records for other certification standards shall identify the applicable standard and confirm the levels of qualification of individuals responsible for acceptance of product to be consistent with those defined in the standard.

iii. The design documentation, specific application techniques, and operating procedures in accordance with ASTM E 543 (Standard Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing) and the applicable nationally recognized standard practice(s) specific to the NDT method(s) employed on the contract, such as ASTM E-1742 (Standard Practice for Radiographic Examination) and SAE-AMS- STD-2154 (Inspection, Ultrasonic, Wrought Metals, Process For).

iv. Documentation on application techniques shall identify the applicable standard(s) utilized.

d. Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE) & Complex Designs. For AIE designs that are complex in nature, (e.g., open set-up, computer controlled, numerically controlled, multistation, and acceptance inspection equipment which is part of an integrated production and assembly system) the following information is to be provided:

i. Concept designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 3, paragraph 3.2.1) includes:

(1) Sketches of the inspecting elements.

(2) Theory of operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams.

(3) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

(4) Description of all fail-safe measures that lead to rejection of Unit Under Test

(UUT).

(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions.

(6) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design.

(7) A method for verifying the integrity of the code (e.g., checksum or cyclic redundancy check).

ii. Detailed proposed designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 4, paragraph 3.2.2) include:

a. After concept approval and before any fabrication:

(1) Drawings of the inspecting elements.

(2) Proposed system operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams. Drawings of the calibration or verification standards.

(3) The computer test program to include software version, software design parameters, and flow charts showing acceptance/rejection settings and computer generated test stimuli (as differentiated from computer controlled standard test equipment stimuli).

(4) Schematic or block diagram of test and measuring circuits where applicable.

(5) Layout or block diagram showing overall equipment arrangement and interconnection, including the Unit Under Test (UUT).

(6) Details of adapters, cables, holding fixtures and like items as applicable.

b. Before performing the test to qualify the AIE:

(1) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification instructions.

(2) The final test plan.

(3) Computer test program, acceptance/rejection settings and a flow diagram.

(4) Detailed operating instructions indicating application of the AIE and the acceptance/rejection settings.

(5) The calibration program for each item of computer controlled test equipment and a sample printout of an actual test and calibration.

(6) A printout of the work instructions which are displayed for the operator.

iii. Final designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 6, paragraph 3.2.5) include:

(1) Results of the test including data generated, printout of test results (when normally generated), unique software test results, and calibration results.

(2) Design depicting the equipment as it was tested.

(3) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures

(4) Calibration and verification records.

e. Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. For Destructive, Environmental, and Functional (DEF) test equipment, the following information is to be provided:

i. Proposed AIE designs include:

(1) Theory of operation.

(2) Detailed drawings or sketches of the inspecting and testing elements and sufficient detail for supporting elements to facilitate evaluation for adequacy.

(3) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design along with any modifications in design or use.

(4) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions (as required).

(6) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures and parameters.

(7) Settings, test conditions, calculations, and verification.

(8) Calibration and verification records.

ii. When DEF test equipment consists of AAIE or complex Designs, AIE design submissions shall include the requirements of paragraph 3.6.d above.

f. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). MSA is any of a number of specialized methods useful for studying a measurement system and its properties (ASTM E2782, paragraph 3.1.7).

There are several basic properties of measurement systems that are widely recognized among practitioners. These are repeatability, reproducibility, linearity, bias, stability, consistency, and resolution (ASTM E2782, paragraph 5.4). An MSA is to include these properties, as applicable.

End of DI-QCIC-81960 image11.emf

DI-MISC-80508B Technical Report.pdf

Title: Technical Report–Study/Services

Number: DI-MISC-80508B Approval Date: 14 Nov 2006 AMSC Number: 7633 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: Yes Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC), 8725 John J. Kingman Rd.

Suite. 0944, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218 GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NS/DA02 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: A technical report provides fully documented results of studies or analysis performed.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the contract.

This DID supersede DI-MISC-80508A

Requirements:

1. Reference documents. None.

2. Format.

(a) The report and all attachments shall be typewritten, or otherwise clearly lettered, and shall be duplicated using non-fading ink.

(b) Text shall be prepared on standard letter size paper (8 ½ x 11”) .

(c) When attachments are included, they shall be fully identified, referenced in the text, and folded to conform to the size paper used in the report.

(d) Security classification and distribution markings shall conform to the requirements of the contract, purchase description and security requirements checklist, as

DI-MISC-80508B

3. Contents.

(a) Title Page – Identifies the report by providing contract number, project name or purchase description title, task number, and reporting period.

(b) Table of Contents.

(c) Section I – Includes the following:

(1) Introduction

(2) Summary – A brief statement of results obtained for the analytic effort.

(3) Conclusions and their condensed technical substantiation’s.

(d) Section II – A complete and detailed description of the analytic results which led to the conclusions stated in Section I above.

4. END OF DI-MISC-80508B

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Requirements:

image12.emf

DI-STDZ-80000C Data Item Descriptions.pdf

Title: DATA ITEM DESCRIPTIONS (DIDs)

Number: DI-STDZ-80000C Approval Date: 20150203 AMSC Number: 9512 Limitation:

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Preparing Activity: SO Project Number: STDZ-2015-002 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/Relationship: This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in the solicitation.

This DID supersedes DI-MISC-80000B.

1. Reference documents. The applicable issue of the document cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the solicitation or contract.

2. Format and Content. Format and content of DIDs shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-963 (http://quicksearch.dla.mil).

END OF DI-STDZ-80000C

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T19:53Z http://quicksearch.dla.mil/ image13.emf

DI-MGMT-81986 Critical Characteristics Control Plan (CCCP).pdf

Title: CRITICAL CHARACTERISTICS CONTROL PLAN (CCCP)

Number: DI-MGMT-81986 Approval Date: 20150714

AMSC Number: N9563 Limitation:

Preparing Activity: SH Project Number: MGMT-2015-005

Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Critical Characteristics Control Plan (CCCP) forms a part of the

Contractor’s quality system and describes how the Contractor and all subcontractors will prevent the creation or occurrence of a critical non-conformance (defect), but in the event of its occurrence, assure its detection and control.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the

1. Reference documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation; or, for non

DODISS-listed documents, as stated herein.

2. Format. The plan shall be in the Contractor’s format.

3. Content. The plan shall include a cover sheet specifying the following:

a. Contractor’s title

b. Contract number.

c. Revision and date.

d. Nomenclature of the system/component/program/project, the security classification, and the distribution restrictions.

e. Government activity issuing the controlling contract.

3.1 Table of contents. The plan shall contain a table of contents.

3.2 Index. The plan shall include an index.

3.3 Descriptive material. The plan shall include any descriptive material needed to provide comprehensibility of the content such as sketches, drawings, photographs, tables, forms, graphs, worksheets, charts, etc.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2021-06-16T21:00Z

DI-MGMT-81986

3.4 Key manufacturing processes. The plan shall identify those aspects of the manufacturing process that can influence the creation of a critical non-conformance including the production process, work instructions/procedures, process controls, mistake proofing, inspection systems (Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE)), materials, material handling, personnel, training, and the quality management system (calibration, corrective/preventive action, control of non-conforming product, and supply chain management).

3.4.1 The plan shall list all of the critical characteristics, the location/facility which produces the material affected by each critical characteristic, and the associated document(s) identifying the requirement (specification and revision, quality assurance arovision (QAP) number, drawing and revision).

3.4.2 The plan shall contain the critical characteristics management structure and roles/responsibilities including:

a. An organization chart addressing the critical characteristics control structure.

b. Personnel performing Quality Assurance (QA) inspections and verification inspections.

c. Relevant QA inspection validation.

d. Material Review Board (MRB) authority.

e. Access/disposition to critical non-conformances, accountability, and traceability.

f. Work stop authority.

g. Restart authority.

h. Notification to Government authority.

3.4.3 The plan shall contain the program management structure and roles/responsibilities including:

a. An organization chart with supporting narrative describing the management office the Contractor establishes to manage the contractual commitments.

b. The direct lines of control, responsibilities, functional relationships, and authority between the management office and the Contractor’s other organizational elements.

c. All interfaces between the Contractor and the Government and between the Contractor and other Contractors which are necessary and pertinent to the accomplishment of contractual tasks, projects, and programs.

3.4.4 The plan shall identify all appropriate critical process documents including:

a. Manufacturing processes and procedures.

b. Work instructions/procedures.

c. Handling instructions.

d. Process controls.

e. Inspection systems and procedures.

f. Accountability/traceability of non-conforming materials documentation.

g. Quality records maintaining an audit trail.

3.4.5 The plan shall contain detailed information about preventing critical non-conformances in the production process and it shall describe how the process is robust with high capability and effective controls including:

a. Process description.

b. Detailed flow chart including Inputs, Outputs, and Key Process

Parameters.

c. How key process parameters are identified, defined, and controlled.

d. Failure Modes analysis methodology.

e. Fail-safe methods, mistake proofing techniques, and assurance that the process is not bypassed.

f. Process control tools.

g. Feedback or in-process inspections.

h. Material handling.

i. Identification of Failure Modes and frequency of occurrence.

j. Method to assess that the system is robust, capable, and under control

(process prove-out; recent, relevant production data, SPC, etc.).

3.4.6 The plan shall contain the schedule for routinely assessing reliability and effectiveness including:

a. Frequency of verification (SPC, process capability, and audit schedules).

b. Monitoring appropriate metrics and reactions to trends.

c. Identification of actions to ensure process is reliable and effective.

d. Frequency for assessing the reliability and effectiveness of the production processes.

3.4.7 The plan shall contain a description of the inspection/verification system, equipment, and detailed information about preventing critical non-conformance escapes including:

a. Contractor’s process to verify that the design of the inspection/verification system is robust, capable, and effective to ensure that non-conformances are identified and correctly dispositioned.

b. Material handling and accountability of non-conforming material.

c. Methodology of inspection utilized (AIE, AAIE, visual, acceptance based on process control, etc.).

d. Identification of MIL-STD-1916 VL VII validation system or alternate proposed method.

e. Personnel involved in inspection and their required qualifications.

f. Throughput of inspections utilized (AIE, AAIE, visual inspections, etc.).

3.4.8 The plan shall identify any proposed referee gages and associated processes to include re-introduction of conforming material into the production process and maximum rates and quantities permitted for referee gages.

3.4.9 The plan shall include a detailed flow chart including Inputs, Outputs, and

Key Process Parameters and the following:

a. Failure Modes of the inspection system.

b. Fail-safe methods, mistake proofing techniques and assurance that the inspection system is not bypassed.

3.4.10 The plan shall include calculations, documentation, and identification of the reliability and effectiveness of the inspection system including:

a. Formula, methodology, or industry standard used to determine the inspection system reliability.

b. The results of the demonstrated reliability based on the verification/validation for each inspection system.

3.4.11 The plan shall identify the schedule for routinely assessing reliability and effectiveness including:

a. Frequency and method of routine verification (when and how many times defect masters/salters are run through and/or audit schedules).

b. Quantification of inspection system error rates.

3.4.12 The plan shall address actions to be taken if the inspection system accepts a defect master/salter (constituting a failure of the inspection system) which would require the following actions:

a. Segregate all material since the last successful verification.

b. Investigate and implement corrective action to the inspection system.

c. Verify suspect material does not contain any critical non-conformances.

d. Update the inspection system’s error rate and overall escape risk calculation.

3.4.13 The plan shall detail test procedure(s) designed to demonstrate the error rate

(reliability) of the inspection system and they shall also include:

a. Identification of sufficient test quantities/samples sizes to assure minimum 90% statistical confidence.

b. A schedule to routinely monitor the non-conformance and inspection system error rates to assure they do not exceed maximum rates allowed.

3.5 Escape Risk Calculation. The plan shall contain non-conformance rates for each individual critical characteristic entering the inspection systems, the error rate of the inspection equipment associated with each characteristic, individual characteristic escape risks, and summative escape risk.

3.6 The plan shall contain procedures to address the necessary actions to be taken if a critical non-conformance is found anywhere in the production process and shall include:

a. How a non-conformance will be identified and segregated.

b. A list of all personnel/positions responsible for identifying, segregating, and maintaining accountability/traceability for the critical non-conformances.

c. Identification of all appropriate documentation, including records for disposition/accountability for tracking a critical non-conformance.

d. Identification of personnel/persons responsible for, and records…