T1628 Bid Amendment 6 03.18.2020~2.docx
DOCX document 138 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 20DPP00471
- Issued by
- Mercer County, New Jersey
About this file
This document is a bid amendment for Bid Solicitation #20DPP00471 T1628 - Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection Maintenance System issued by the State of New Jersey Department of the Treasury Division of Purchase and Property Procurement Bureau. The bid amendment extends the quote submission due date to May 28, 2020 and provides answers to a portion of the electronic questions submitted during the first round of Q&A. It also uploads a revised price sheet and bid solicitation. The project involves providing an enhanced motor vehicle inspection maintenance system for the State of New Jersey, including centralized and private inspection facilities located across Mercer County and Trenton City.
The bid solicitation requires bidders to provide pricing for inspection transaction fees, NGWorkstations for inspection facilities, and other equipment and services. Bidders must also submit a project management plan, transition plan, and other required plans. The current contractor will be responsible for maintaining and operating existing equipment for several months during the transition. The State will not be leveling the inspection volume load or providing any "free" days from wait time penalties. Bidders are expected to include all costs, including facility maintenance and repairs, in their inspection transaction fee pricing.
View the file
Other files
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PHILIP D. MURPHY
Governor State of New Jersey
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
DIVISION OF PURCHASE AND PROPERTY
PROCUREMENT BUREAU
33 WEST STATE STREET
P. O. BOX 230
TRENTON, NEW JERSEY 08625-0230
ELIZABETH MAHER MUOIO
State Treasurer
SHEILA Y. OLIVER
Lt. Governor
MAURICE A. GRIFFIN
Acting Director https://www.njstart.gov
March 18, 2020
To: All Interested Vendors {Bidders}
Re: Bid Solicitation # 20DPP00471 T1628 – Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection Maintenance System
| Original Quote Submission Due Date: April 28, 2020 (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time) |
| Revised Quote Submission Due Date: Thursday, May 28, 2020 (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time) |
Bid Amendment #6
The following constitutes Bid Amendment #6 to the above referenced Bid Solicitation:
· Answers to a portion of electronic questions submitted during the 1st round of Q&A;
· A revised Price Sheet uploaded as T1628 Revised Price Sheet 03/18/2020;
· A revised Bid Solicitation uploaded as T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020;
· Extension of the Quote Submission Due Date until Thursday, May 28, 2020; and
· Notice that answers to the remainder of the questions submitted during the 1st round of Q&A as well as dates for a 2nd round of the electronic Q&A period will be announced in a subsequent Bid Amendment.
Please note that for all additions, deletions, clarifications and modifications to the State-Supplied Price Sheet and Bid Solicitation, please refer to T1628 Revised Price Sheet 03/18/2020 and T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Failure to submit a technical and price Quote in response to the revised documents may render the Vendor {Bidder} non-responsive.
It is the sole responsibility of the Vendor {Bidder} to be knowledgeable of all of the additions, deletions, clarifications, and modifications to the Bid Solicitation and/or the New Jersey Standard Terms and Conditions relative to this Bid Solicitation as set forth in all Bid Amendments.
All other instructions, terms, and conditions of the Bid Solicitation shall remain the same.
Bid Solicitation #20DPP00471 T1628 – Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection Maintenance System Answers to Questions
Where applicable, each question references the appropriate Bid Solicitation section.
Note: These questions have been paraphrased in the interest of readability and clarity.
| # |
| Bid Solicitation |
Section Reference Question (Bolded) and Answer
| 1. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 1.2.1, Program History |
| Is there any litigation pending against New Jersey state relating to the previous tender that could interfere with this tender process? |
At this time, the State is unaware of pending litigation regarding the current Blanket P.O.
| 2. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 1.2.2, Current Program |
| A. The RFP States, "[t]here are approximately 2.1 million inspections done annually." Comparing to the 2016 RFP, the estimated annual test volume was approximately 2.4MM inspections. A subset of that total was TSI tests that were eliminated, the inspection volumes have dropped from 2.3MM to 2.1MM, estimated to be due to motorists leasing or purchasing new vehicles. Has the State of New Jersey considered the possibility of estimated test volumes not matching the projections provided in the RFP? |
Over the term of the Blanket P.O., the pool of 1996 and newer vehicles that require inspection may increase. However, since the TSI tests were eliminated in May 2016 (40 months ago), the volume has stayed relatively flat.
B. If so, what equitable adjustment(s) will be offered should estimated paid test volumes be much higher than actual paid test volumes annually?
There is no need for an equitable adjustment, see the answer above. The Vendor {Contractor} is compensated by the number of inspections performed.
| 3. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 1.2.4, Emission and Mechanical Inspections |
| A. Please provide a definition of "commercial" vehicles as it pertains to the exemption from inspections. |
Commercial vehicles are identified by their registration code and are inspected annually for safety and emissions at either CIF or PIF. Commercial vehicles are only exempt for one-year when they are new and are inspected annually thereafter.
B. Are rideshare (e.g., Uber, Lyft, etc.) vehicles subject to a one (1) year or a five (5) year exemption?
Vehicles used by Uber, Lyft, etc, drivers are subject to the current rules for passenger vehicles as defined in N.J.A.C 13.20-7.2.
| 4. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 1.2.4, Emission and Mechanical Inspections |
| The RFP list here the Emission test components for gasoline vehicles (LDGV, LDGT, HDGV, LDDV)...?, but LDDV is diesel. Should it instead say, ?Emission test components for vehicle of type LDGV, LDGT, HDGV, and LDDV are...?? |
Yes. Diesel vehicles are subject to the same primary emission test-OBD-as light duty gasoline vehicles. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 1.2.4 has been revised.
| 5. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.1.2, Existing CIF |
| Does taking over responsibility for all operations of existing CIFs after 90 days mean that the contractor will be responsible for taking over the support and maintenance and support of the existing CIF software within 90 days of contract award? |
No. The current Vendor {Contractor} shall be responsible for continued support of the legacy VID system until the entire program is transitioned to the new program. Please refer to Section 3.1.3 Transition Form Legacy VID to NGVID.
| 6. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.1.2, Existing CIF |
| In addition to taking over responsibility for all operations of existing CIFs after 90 days, will the new contractor also be responsible for taking over the support and maintenance of the existing fleet of PIF/PFF software in the first 90 days too? Or will the PIF/PFF fleet need to be replaced within 90 days with new NGWorkstation software? |
Please refer to question #5.
| 7. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.1.3, Transition from Legacy VID to NGVID |
| This section indicates, “Prior to the rollout of the NGWorkstations and software, the Vendor {Contractor} must populate the NGVID with legacy vehicle information and inspection data. Once the implementation transition period begins, vehicle information and inspections will be conducted on and transmitted from both the legacy workstations using the current software and the NGWorkstations using the new NGWorkstation Software. The Legacy and VID and the NGVID shall operate simultaneously. The State will make inspection results from the Legacy VID available to the Vendor {Contractor} in order for the Vendor {Contractor} to be able to perform re-inspections between the old and new workstation software. The data shall be provided on a periodic basis (e.g. every hour or more frequently) and the Vendor {Contractor} shall perform any conversion of the data as necessary. The NGVID shall be communicated with MVC/OIT data systems to populate the MVC Comprehensive System.” Is the Legacy VID also expected to receive results from the NGVID, to accomplish the same intent in the opposite direction? |
No, the Legacy VID is not expected to receive results from the NGVID to accomplish the same intent in the opposite direction.
| 8. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.2, Project Descriptions and Requirements |
| A. The term "Real Time" is used in this section and other sections of the RFP. What is NJMVC's expectation of "Real Time"? |
Real Time is less than one (1) minute. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 2.3 has been revised.
B. Conversely, is the State willing to provide a definition of "non-real time"?
Non-Real Time means a daily batch process. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 2.3 has been revised.
| 9. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.2, Project Descriptions and Requirements |
| Would the State please elaborate on the specific content and details of this required training? |
If this questions is in regard to item F, the Vendor {Contractor} must provide training on how to use the NGWorkstation and NGWorkstation software to all users, including inspectors. The Vendor {Contractor} must ensure that all users have a complete understanding of the workstation.
| 10. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.2.1, Project Management Plan |
| RFP 3.2.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN indicates the PMP content must include: A. Timely updates to organization charts submitted with the Quote pursuant to Section 4.4.4.2 of this Bid Solicitation; B. Budget statuses; and C. Any issues of concern. This section also indicates, A draft of this plan is required with Quote submission pursuant to Section 4.4.3.3.5 of this Bid Solicitation. Section 4.4.3.3.5 PLANS SUMMARY lists the Project Management Plan under heading CIF Transition to Vendor {Contractor}. Is the expected Project Management Plan intended only to include the scope of CIF Transition to Vendor {Contractor}, and for that, only to include the organization charts, budget status, and issues of concern? |
No. The draft (and revised) Project Management Plan shall cover the entire transition of services, and the Vendor {Bidder} shall include organization charts, budget status, and issues of concern. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.2.1 has been revised.
| 11. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.4, Management Console |
| A. Section 3.4 requires Vendors to ensure the Management Console is web-based and "compatible with common and future web browsers." Would the State please clarify what is expected from Vendors with regard to "future web browsers"? Does this mean future versions of current browsers such as Internet Explorer and Google Chrome? |
Yes, the Management Console must always be available and working on every web browser. For example, if Google Chrome is updated, the Vendor {Contractor} must ensure that the Management Console is compatible with and works on Google Chrome’s updated browser.
B. Is there a preferred browser for the requested web portal?
No, the Management Console must be available and work with all browsers.
| 12. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.4.10, Reporting |
| A. Where are the requirements for the 150 reports? |
Reporting requirements will be defined during the Implementation Phase and JAD sessions required under the Blanket P.O. Example reports are available for review in Appendix 3.2A.
B. Would the State be willing to provide a list of these reports with specific data header information?
Yes, the State will provide a list of the reports with specific data header information during the Implementation Phase of the Blanket P.O.
| 13. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.6.1, Operating Performance Standards |
| Would the State please define "principal operating period" as it pertains to the service levels listed in the solicitation? |
The principal operating period are the hours that the inspection stations are open and operating. Refer to Section 3.20, Hours of Operation.
| 14. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.6.1, Operating Performance Standards, H |
| How is this SL to be measured? Is it from the time the request reaches the host system to the time it is sent back (i.e., it does not take into account travel time over the internet to the NGWorkstations)? |
The State currently tracks the time the request is received and the time the State sends a response.
| 15. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.1.5, PIF and PFF Support Hotline |
| The RFP requires that a monthly status report be provided by the 5th of each month. Will the State accept the report on the next business day following the 5th calendar day of each month? |
No. The monthly status reports must be submitted to the State by the 5th of each month.
| 16. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.2.1, CIF Network and Lane Configuration |
| Will the State consider transitioning the entire inspection system to an all appointment system? |
No, the current appointment system has had mixed results. Appointment stations have limited on-site or street queuing. There is no conclusive proof that the appointment stations leveled the monthly day to day volume any differently than the other stations. In addition, they have generated complaints either by customers unaware there were appointment stations, or by customers with appointments not taken at their appointed time.
| 17. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.2.1, CIF Network and Lane Configuration |
| Will the State entertain proposals for an all appointment system? |
Please refer to question #16.
| 18. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.2.1, CIF Network and Lane Configuration |
| Please provide the total number of emissions inspections at each CIF for both inspections and re-inspections. The Annual Report provides only the number of Initial Emissions Inspections, not the number of re-inspections. |
See Attachment 1 to this Bid Amendment titled CIF Inspection Data Last 12 Months - Revised.
| 19. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.2.1, CIF Network and Lane Configuration |
| Also, please provide the total number of mechanical safety inspections conducted at the CIFs. The Annual Report does not provide the number of mechanical inspections. |
See Attachment 1 to this Bid Amendment titled CIF Inspection Data Last 12 Months - Revised.
| 20. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.2.1, CIF Network and Lane Configuration |
| Is there a procedure manual for safety inspections? The appendices provide a Mechanical Inspection Process that appears to be a list of data elements not the inspection procedure or process. If available, please provide it. |
The Mechanical Inspection Process is based upon the NJ Administrative Code sections cited in Bid Solicitation Section 1.3.6, Pre-Quote Document Review, including N.J.A.C. 13:20-32 and N.J.A.C. 12:20-33. Additionally, the method by which the Vendor {Contractor} designs their lane software and lane operation will determine how the Mechanical Inspection Process is conducted in the inspection lane. The State expects the awarded Vendor {Bidder} to meet with State representatives and prepare an original manual during the JAD sessions during the Implementation Phase of the Blanket P.O.
| 21. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.3, Facility Inventory |
| Under RFP section 3.13.3, it is expected by the State that the Vendor "shall prepare an inventory of each item or component of the CIF." What qualifies as an item? What qualifies as a component (i.e., "components must be photographed")? |
An Item is anything that is identified with an asset inventory tag. A component is a peripheral element(s) that would go with an item, i.e., a keyboard and mouse are components of a PC. The State will provide an inventory list to the Vendor {Contractor}.
| 22. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.4, Transition, Retrofit, Operations, and Management Plan, D |
| Will the state please provide a historical staffing breakdown by month/day/station to help bidders understand future staffing needs? |
See Attachments 2-13 to this Bid Amendment titled CIF Thruput WaitTime Month-Year. Each spreadsheet details the staffing at each station for each day of the month, for the month in the attachment title.
| 23. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.5, Removal of Old Equipment |
| Under RFP section 3.13.5, the disposal and removal of all equipment must be coordinated with the State. Will the State be able to accommodate the return of the removed legacy equipment as it is retrofitted out of each facility? Or, will equipment need to be stored during transition for later removal and disposal by the State? Are all Vendors to assume costs for the removal and disposal of State-owned property? |
Removal of equipment shall be performed in accordance with State procedures including those currently identified in Circular Letter No. 08-03- DPP https://www.nj.gov/infobank/circular/cir0803x.pdf which deals with removal of surplus property. The State will coordinate disposal with the Vendor {Contractor}. The Vendor {Contractor} shall assume costs for removal/disposal of equipment. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.13.5 has been revised.
| 24. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.5, Removal of Old Equipment |
| In regard to Security Video Cameras. If the current antiquated camera system does not meet the specifications set forth in Appendix 3.2 D and is out-of-date and incompatible with current OS/Security Standards, and any component of that system needs to be upgraded to the new specification, will the contractor be required to replace the entire infrastructure? |
The current video system is adequate for the State’s needs and meets the requirements in Appendix 3.2D. If over the term of the Blanket P.O., the current system becomes incapable of repairs and must be replaced, the Vendor {Contractor} shall be responsible for the cost of replacement as noted in the revision to Section 3.13.5. The Vendor {Contractor} shall install no less than one (1) in each lane to view the insertion of the OBD connector.
| 25. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.5.1, Installation of New Equipment |
| The RFP states the Vendor shall maintain and upgrade the current video monitoring system as necessary. Does the current video monitoring system currently meet MVA requirements for use by the new Vendor? If so, does a camera that meets MVA requirements currently exist for the sticker issuance area at all CIFs? |
Yes, the current video monitoring system meets the minimum requirements. Yes, a camera currently exists for the sticker issuance area.
MVC checks the system on a regular basis and reports to the Vendor {Contractor} when there is an issue. The State has not had any issues with the current system that would warrant a replacement. As the system is stand alone at each facility, if replacements are needed over the term of the Blanket P.O., they can be replaced as needed. The current system was installed in 2008. The system is capable of storing video past 90 days. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.13.5.1 (A) has been revised.
| 26. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.13.5.1, Installation of New Equipment, C |
| C) Undercarriage video - contractor can use the current system or present an alternate solution. If maintaining or enhancing the current system includes a monitor and a camera mounted in each lane, so you can view the entire undercarriage wheel to wheel as the vehicle passes over, that would require all Vendors to supply alternatives that met the specifications in Appendix 3.2.E, correct?, no hand mirrors on a pole allowed, correct? |
No, that was just a specification for the camera system to obtain the largest view possible. If a Vendor’s {Bidder’s} alternate solution is hand mirrors, they should propose that solution. The undercarriage video was installed to aid in the identification of catalytic converters and leaks and additionally on commercial vehicles exhaust systems and suspension. The Vendor {Contractor} is still required to inspect for these items; however, if they no longer want to use the aid of the undercarriage video system they may propose alternative solutions such as mirrors on poles or manual visual observation, to identify all items.
| 27. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.14.1, Labor Costs |
| Would the State please provide a definition of Prevailing Wage as it pertains to all employees and subcontractors performing scope under this RFP? The bidder will have to research this question with the unions and/or the NJ Department of Labor and Workforce Development. |
New Jersey Prevailing Wage Act can be found at N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.25 et seq.
| 28. | |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.14.2, Inspector Training | |
| Is the offeror required to provide standardized training to all inspectors working at both CIFs and PIFs? |
No, the Vendor {Contractor} is only required to do inspector training for its own employees at CIFs. The only training required to be provided to the PIFs is workstation training (see Sections 3.2 (F) and 3.13.1.2 (C) of the Bid Solicitation). The Vendor {Contractor} may become an inspection training provider and offer training to employees at the PIF (see Section 3.13.1.2 (B)).
| 29. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.14.3, Inspector Training/Retraining and Testing/Retesting |
| Is the offeror required to provide standardized retraining to all inspectors working at both CIFs and PIFs? |
Please refer to Question #35.
| 30. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.17, Wait Time System |
| All inspection stickers expire the last day of the month in New Jersey, it is common to have excessive waits the last two days and first two days of the month as motorists tend to wait to the last minute to get their vehicles inspected. This has been a known and ongoing issue dating back before the program was privatized in 1998. The contractor has no control over this. Since the State has not leveled the inspection volume load, will the State exempt the first and last two days of the month from wait time penalties? |
For the purpose of this Bid Solicitation the State is requiring the Vendor {Bidder} to adhere to the specified service level for wait times at the current customer arrival time. Wait time violations should not occur if the Vendor {Contractor} properly manages the Blanket P.O. by using all available lanes, providing proper staffing during peak hours, and developing a software system that maximizes throughput.
| 31. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.17, Wait Time System |
| Under Section 3.17 of the RFP regarding the wait time, will the State be making the wait time data available to the Vendors prior to the bids being due? |
Please refer to question #22.
| 32. | |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.17, Wait Time System | |
| Regarding the calculation of hourly average wait times and associated penalties, the RFP States that any two (2) contiguous hours is $1,000, and an additional $500 for each additional 10 minutes beyond the initial wait. The information on wait times in Appendix D penalties for 2015, 2016 and 2017 appears to be based upon the old wait time criteria and penalties. In those years, the Vendor had four (4) "free" relief days each month from daily penalties to address heavy arrival volumes at the end and start of every calendar month or following holidays. To appropriately and accurately estimate wait time penalties, it is recommended that the State provide estimates of the penalty amounts if the new criteria were applied, thus allowing bidders the ability to adjust staffing plans. For example, for 2019, less than $80K in LDs associated with wait times have been incurred and are estimated for the remainder of the calendar year. Applying the new rules, it is estimated that these same penalties would exceed $600K for the year. These estimates include maximum staffing levels of full-time unionized employees. Is the State willing to modify the data provided in Appendix D to ensure a consistent basis for cost estimating for all bidders? |
No, the State will not modify any data in its Appendix D. The appendix is used to show historical data and only demonstrates how the current Vendor {Contractor} has operated the lanes. How another Vendor {Contractor} operates the program could yield entirely different results and, therefore, providing estimates as such would not provide reliable predictive results.
| 33. | |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.17, Wait Time System | |
| In the RFP, Daily Hourly Average Wait Time is calculated using all daily operational hours: "Hourly average wait time A violation occurs when the average wait in any whole hour (beginning upon the opening of the inspection facility, and hourly thereafter) exceeds greater than 30 minutes in any two (2) contiguous hours at each inspection facility. Additional violations occur each time the 30-minute average Wait Time has been exceeded by ten (10) minutes. For each additional ten (10) minute interval that the 30-minute average has been exceeded." Using the RFP-provided calculation for Monthly Wait Time Averages ("The sum of all vehicle wait times divided by the total number of vehicles inspected at the station in the month") appears to remove all time (operational hours) that exceed the sum of Total Wait Time Minutes. Historically--as calculated by NJ Treasury--monthly wait time averages have been calculated as follows: Total Wait Time Minutes/Monthly Operational Hours = Monthly Average Wait Time Would the State please clarify the formula utilized for Daily Hourly Average Wait Time? Is the historical calculation used by NJ Treasury intended to be utilized under the new program? |
The wait time calculation is stated in Section 3.17 (C) Items 1 and 2 of the T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. The question combines both monthly and hourly wait time and cannot be clearly answered. The State has used the calculation specified in the current Blanket P.O. to assess wait times. See examples:
Station A inspected 5,000 vehicles in a month. The sum of the wait times for the 5,000 vehicles was 50,000 minutes. 50,000 minutes would be divided by 5,000 vehicles. The monthly wait time average for Station A would be 10 minutes.
Station B inspected 5,000 vehicles in a month. The sum of the wait times for the 5,000 vehicles was 80,000 minutes. 80,000 minutes would be divided by 5,000 vehicles. The monthly wait time average for Station B would be 16 minutes.
| 34. | |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.1, Inspection Equipment Maintenance | |
| Is the Vendor {Contractor} responsible for cost when replacing/repairing equipment due to misuse, abuse, and neglect by non-incumbent users? |
The question is unclear as posed; therefore, the State cannot provide an answer.
| 35. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.2, Routine Maintenance and Operations of Buildings and Grounds, B |
| A. Contractor has the responsibility for the 3 SIF's for routine service operations, maintenance, and repairs to the grounds and buildings. Would the State please provide details regarding how the Vendor will manage services provided at these facilities given that State employees work there? |
If routine services are needed, the Vendor {Contractor} and the State will come to an agreement on the services requested. Once an agreement is reached, State personnel will provide access to the State buildings to the Vendor {Contractor} to carry out the services.
B. How will coordination of these services occur? Is the Vendor required to indemnify State employees working at these facilities? Is the Vendor required to insure these employees?
The State will meet with the Vendor {Contractor} to discuss the requested services and provide a mutually agreed upon schedule to allow services to be provided. Sections 5.17 and 9 of the Bid Solicitation address insurance and indemnification requirements.
C. How will safety be managed at these facilities?
Safety protocols will be coordinated between Vendor {Contractor} and the State.
| 36. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.2, Routine Maintenance and Operations of Buildings and Grounds, B |
| Contractor has never maintained the 3 SIF's, for developing a baseline, does the State have any statistical data, showing the repairs made to those buildings by the State? |
The three (3) SIFs consist of two (2) properties with the State’s primary structures built in the late 1930s and one property (1) that was built in the early 1990s. All three (3) facilities require approximately $25,000 per facility of preventative and corrective maintenance each year.
| 37. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs |
| If the State is going to require Vendors to do all major capital repairs, will they be providing an exclusion list to include the pending capital repair jobs in the amount of $308,396.65? |
No, the State will not provide an exclusion list. Additionally, the State is not aware of the basis of the calculations behind the dollar amount listed above and therefore cannot confirm its accuracy.
As per Section 3.21.3, the Vendor {Contractor} and State will mutually assess each facility. The Vendor {Contractor} shall prepare a report on the condition of the facilities within 45 days of Blanket P.O. award for review and approval by the SCM as part of the CIF Capital Project Plan. Within 90 days of Blanket P.O. award, the Vendor {Contractor} must accept all responsibility for all Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations of Work (Work) including pending projects at all authorized NJ State inspection facilities. This report shall set a baseline for each facility’s condition, as well as identify any necessary Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Work the Vendor {Contractor} will be responsible to perform.
To estimate the costs of Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Work, please refer to Appendix 3.2H, which lists historical repair costs of CIFs for the last 10 years. The cost of outstanding capital repairs fluctuates overtime depending on what repairs have been completed, changed, requested, and or denied by the SCM.
| 38. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs |
| A. Pursuant to the new requirement for contractors to provide all facility maintenance, repairs, and renovations, will the State of New Jersey be including a list of excluded items? |
Please refer to question #44.
B. Are all bidders to include these estimated costs in their baseline financial proposal.
These costs should be included in the inspection transaction fee.
C. Will the State of New Jersey be making these repairs in advance of the start of the next contract term?
No, the State will not be making these repairs. These costs should be included in the inspection transaction fee. To estimate the costs of Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Work, please refer to Appendix 3.2H, which lists historical repair costs of CIFs for the last 10 years. The cost of outstanding capital repairs fluctuates overtime depending on what repairs have been completed, changed, requested, and or denied by the SCM.
| 39. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs |
| Are any Vendor costs for Capital, Maintenance, Repairs, or Renovations at existing CIFs reimbursable by the State? |
No, the Vendor’s {Contractor’s} costs for Capital, Maintenance, Repairs, or Renovations at existing CIFs is not reimbursable by the State. These costs should be included in the inspection transaction fee.
| 40. | |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs | |
| The State has a number of outstanding capital projects for the Centralized Inspection Facilities which are awaiting funding and the completion. If it is not the State’s intention to prepare an exclusion of all those outstanding repairs, will it be the Vendor’s obligation to complete those outstanding capital repairs? |
Yes, the awarded Vendor {Contractor} shall be responsible for the repairs as part of the Blanket P.O. A comprehensive listing of all the proposed repairs should be developed and prioritized according to severity and protection of State assets and submitted to MVC; MVC will then decide which repairs to complete. Please refer to question #44.
| 41. | |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs | |
| If the State is going to prepare an exclusion list of the currently outstanding capital repairs that are in need of performance, will the State be paying the Vendor to complete those capital repairs? |
Please refer to question #44.
| 42. | |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs | |
| Under Section 3.21.3 of the contract, the Vendor is responsible for the exterior structure of the building? The roofs are not included in the listing of the exterior structure of the building. Does the State consider the roofs to be part of the exterior structure of the building which are included in the capital improvements to be assumed by the bidder? |
Yes, the roofs are considered part of the exterior structure. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.21.3 F (1) has been revised.
| 43. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs |
| Currently, the Cherry Hill, Rahway, South Brunswick, Southampton and Deptford station roofs need excessive repairs. Will the State be making those roof repairs before the new contract commences? |
Roof repairs are considered a Capital Expense. The Vendor {Contractor} will be responsible for roofing repairs. Note: of the facilities referenced in the question, Rahway and South Brunswick, have no leaks; Cherry Hill has a minor leak which has been approved for repair; Deptford has been repaired; and there is no record of a roof repair request for Southampton.
| 44. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs |
| Currently, four stations: Bakers Basin, Manahawkin, Newark and Newton require repaving of the entire inspection areas. Will the State be making those paving repairs before the new contract commences? |
The MVC partners with the Department of Transportation (DOT) to resurface the paved areas of State owned properties. The MVC will continue to evaluate paving needs and address with DOT on an as needed basis. The Vendor {Contractor} is not responsible for the cost of paving; however, is responsible for asphalt repairs such as pothole filling. Note: of the facilities referenced in the question, Newark has been approved for repaving. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.21.3 F (2) has been revised.
| 45. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs |
| A. Under Section 3.21.3, Capital Improvements, will the Vendor be responsible for completing any of the capital repairs that are outstanding and identified during the first forty-five days of the contract? |
Yes, please see answer to question #44.
B. Will the State be making those repairs?
No, the awarded Vendor {Contractor} shall be responsible for all repairs. Please see the answer to question #44.
| 46. | |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs | |
| The RFP states that the Vendor (Contractor) shall be solely responsible for all work and costs associated with capital maintenance, repairs and renovations deemed necessary by the State at the CIF and SIF inspection facilities. Will the State consider setting a maximum capital expenditure budget per year so all bidders will be on level footing? |
The State will not agree to a maximum capital expenditure. The State has provided historical data on capital maintenance and repairs in Appendix 3.2H since 2009. This will provide a benchmark for these expenses. Vendor’s {Bidder’s} were given the opportunity to inspect the facilities during the week of November 18, 2019 to have an opportunity to see the condition of the facilities.
| 47. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs, D |
| A. Do the expenditure amounts listed in Appendix 3.2H from 2009 ($486,877) through the estimate for 2018 ($672,728) include utilities? |
No, the expenditure amounts and estimates do not include utilities.
B. If not, will the State proved the annual cost for utilities for each of the buildings?
Under the current Blanket P.O. the State is not responsible for payment of utilities. The cost of utilities is included in the inspection fee. However the monthly utility costs for the three (3) shared sites are included in Appendix 3.2H and estimates can be made from this information.
| 48. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.3, CIF Capital Maintenance, Repairs, and Renovations At Existing CIFs, D |
| A. Do the expenditure amounts listed in Appendix 3.2H from 2009 ($486,877) through the estimate for 2018 ($672,728) include the items listed in 3.21.2 Routine Maintenance and Operations of Buildings and Grounds? |
No, the expenditure amounts listed in Appendix 3.2H from 2009 through the estimate for 2018 do not include the items listed in Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.2, Routine Maintenance and Operations of Buildings and Grounds. The cost of routine maintenance and operation is part of the inspection transaction fee.
B. If not, will the State provide the annual cost for these items for each of the buildings?
The current Vendor {Contractor} provides these services with no additional charge to the State, as the costs are included in the inspection fee. The current Vendor {Contractor} has not provided any information as to what portion of the current per-vehicle inspection fee is used for Routine Maintenance and Operations; therefore the State cannot provide information that directly answers this question. Because the Vendors {Bidders} have been given an opportunity to visit and inspect all of the CIFs, it is expected that each can arrive at an estimated cost of such services for each location, and include this amount in their quoted per-vehicle inspection cost.
| 49. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.21.4, Specialty Inspection Facilities (SIFs) |
| A. Would the State provide the age of the Hunter Brake testers and their model number? |
The Hunter Brake testers are 20 years old and their models numbers are B400T and B414 Surface Mount.
B. Are these units still supported and manufactured by Hunter Engineering?
Hunter Engineering no longer manufactures Hunter Brake testers, but the units are still supported by Hunter Engineering via local representatives.
C. Who currently provides support on these units?
The current Vendor {Contractor} provides support on these units including arranging repairs, maintaining functionality of the Hunter Brake testers, and assuming cost.
| 50. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.23.1, Audit Components |
| How often does MVC perform equipment audits and what are the overall and individual component failure rates? |
Decentralized equipment audits are required to be performed at least twice per year, and centralized equipment audits are required to be performed at least one per month. Failure rates for 2018 can be obtained from the NJ I/M Program Annual Report to US EPA Section IV Quality Control Report at the following link: www.nj.gov/dep/bmvim/NJ2018_Annual_Report.pdf.
MVC performs audits on brake testers twice a year. 52 audits were performed from August 2018 through July 2019; 37 passed and 15 failed which represents a 28% failure rate.
| 51. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.23.1, Audit Components |
| Would the State please provide a list of the four (4) types of audits and the corresponding failure rate of each audit type? |
The three types of audits are Equipment audits, Performance Audits (which includes overt and covert performance audits) and Record audits. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.23.1 has been revised.
Failure rates for Equipment and Performance (covert) Audits for 2018 can be obtained from the NJ I/M Program Annual Report to US EPA Section III Quality Assurance Report & Section IV Quality Control Report (www.nj.gov/dep/bmvim/NJ2018_Annual_Report.pdf.).
Safety equipment audits of the brake testers and pneumatic lifts are performed along with record audits of the stickers.
| 52. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.23.6, Audit Service Level Agreements |
| Because the new contractor will be responsible for maintaining and operating the existing equipment or several months, will the State provide the current failure rates for overall equipment audits? |
2018 failure rates can be obtained from the NJ I/M Program Annual Report to US EPA Section IV Quality Control Report. (www.nj.gov/dep/bmvim/NJ2018_Annual_Report.pdf.)
| 53. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.24.2, OBD Test |
| A. What is the definition of HD in HDGV and HDDV? |
The acronym HD stands for heavy duty. Refer to Section 2.3 of the T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020.
B. What is the GVWR range?
The GVWR ranges of the vehicles that are required to be OBD tested are defined in Appendix 3.4A.1 Applicable Vehicles.
| 54. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.24.8, Miscellaneous Emissions Check |
| A. What is the "overheating" Standard? |
Overheating standard is considered to be vehicles operating in excess of their normal operating range as indicated by the temperature gauge or other temperature indicator or exhibiting physical indicates of overheating such as coolant overflow.
B. What is the RPM standard that "High RPM" is measured against?
Vehicles with Revolutions Per Minute (RPM) in excess of 1500 RPM in park or neutral, or cannot sustain static RPM for a minimum of 10 consecutive seconds in park or neutral.
C. What defines "Emission Control Tampering" and what procedures are used to verify it?
Emission control tampering is defined in detail at N.J.A.C. 7:27-15.7. There are no regulatory procedures because this is not intended to be a full anti-tampering inspection. Rather, sometimes inspectors see obvious tampering they are not looking for and would like to be able to fail the inspection and need a condition to select.
| 55. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.24.10, Mechanical Inspections |
| Maintain all the light duty and heavy duty brake testers in the CIF's and SIF's. The contractor has been told that Hunter no longer makes heavy duty brake testers. The contractor has been spending over 160k per year in parts to keep these 21 year old brake testers running. If any of these totally fail, it would cost over 200k to dig out the old and install a new heavy duty brake tester. Will the State reimburse the contractor if they need to be replaced? |
As with the current Blanket P.O., the Vendor {Contractor} is required to repair, maintain and replace as needed the brake testers. The State will not reimburse for the replacement of brake testers that cannot be repaired or refurbished. Any drive on platform brake testers that meets the attached specifications in Appendix 3.2.J could be used as a replacement brake tester.
| 56. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.24.10, Mechanical Inspections |
| Is the Vendor/Contractor required to maintain safety testing equipment if inspections are performed by the state? |
Yes. The Vendor {Contractor} shall maintain all emission and safety inspection equipment which include the heavy-duty brake testers, pneumatic lifts, undercarriage camera and emission equipment, air compressors, and other related equipment needed for operation of safety equipment at SIFs and CIFs. Refer to Section 3.21.4 (A) of T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020.
| 57. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.24.10, Mechanical Inspections |
| A. This section says all CIF shall retain current light and heavy-duty brake testers and pneumatic lift equipment. Are mechanical (safety) inspections performed using the existing pneumatic lifts and brake testers the CIFs? |
Yes, the inspections performed using the existing pneumatic lifts and brake tests are the CIFs.
B. If yes, are they performed by Vendor personnel?
Yes, the inspections are to be performed by the Vendor’s {Contractor’s} personnel. Refer to Section 3.14 of T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020.
| 58. | |
| Bid Solicitation, Section 3.25.2, NGWorkstation Requirements | |
| Can the NGWorkstation software operate the same way or does it have to be the exact same software configured to operate differently at the different types of facilities (e.g. CIF/SIF/PIF/PFF/MIT/BIT)? |
NGWorkstation software must be the same software at each facility, but would be configured based on the type of inspection the facility is performing.
| 59. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.26.1, PIF and PFF Equipment |
| Please define "consumables" as referenced in Section 3.26.1 of the RFP. |
Consumables include, at a minimum, ink, toner, batteries and other items needed for the workstation to function, except paper. See revisions to Section 2.3 Blanket P.O. Specific Definitions of T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020.
| 60. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.26.2, CIF Equipment |
| Can CIF lane use software running in a single-position setup? Or needs to be broken into two or three positions? |
Please refer to question #16.
| 61. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.26.4, Mobile Teams |
| If the number of required NG Workstations supplied for the Mobile Teams exceeds (75), will the Vendor {Contractor} be reimbursed for additional units? |
Yes, the Vendor {Contractor} will be reimbursed for additional units. Please see T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.26.4 Mobile Teams has been revised. Also, please see T1628 Revised Price Sheet 03/18/2020. A price line for Mobile Team NG Workstations has been added.
| 62. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.26.4, Mobile Teams |
| A. How many Vehicles will the equipment be installed in? Are the State Mechanics going to supply and install any required power converters to power the equipment? |
The equipment will be installed in 75 vehicles. The State requires no power converters as the equipment is run off a generator or stationary power source.
B. Please define the Vendor {Contractor}s liability under this broad Statement: "This includes but is not limited to making the necessary modifications, alterations, and changes under the direction of the State mechanic(s)."
The standard configuration of the workstation may need to be altered to fit in vehicles. The Vendor {Contractor} must work with the State mechanic determine the best configuration of equipment. There is no Vendor {Contractor} cost for this function. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Sections 3.26.4 (C) has been revised.
| 63. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.26.5, Audit Software and Section 3.29.2, Hardware General Requirements and Section 3.29.3, NGWorkstation Hardware Configurations |
| A. The RFP states in 3.26.5 OTHER STATE EQUIPMENT: The Vendor {Contractor} shall provide NGWorkstations to the State for use in testing. This equipment shall consist of two (2) NGWorkstations of each major configuration being offered to the PIFs/PFFs/MITs. The major configurations shall be defined as a PC desktop-based configuration, a laptop-based configuration (if offered), and a tablet-based configuration. Each of these NGWorkstations shall include all software available in the PIFs/PFFs NGWorkstations. The RFP states in 3.29.2 HARDWARE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The NGWorkstation must be based on a desktop PC, a laptop PC, or a tablet. The RFP states in 3.29.3 NGWORKSTATION HARDWARE CONFIGURATION: The desktop unit shall also include a monitor, a keyboard, and a mouse. The desktop PC unit and the laptop PC unit shall include a LAN port. An optional modem shall be offered for the desktop PC and the laptop pc configurations; it shall not be offered for the tablet configuration. Section 3.26.5 seems to suggest that both a PC-based and tablet-based solution are required, and the PC-based solution can be either a desktop or laptop. Or, does it mean the vendor may propose either a tablet-based or PC-based solution as suggested in 3.29.2? |
The Vendor {Contractor} must offer a desktop configuration, a tablet configuration, and a laptop configuration. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.26.5, 3.29.2, 3.29.3 have been revised.
B. Section 3.29.3 is similarly unclear as to whether it is describing the required components if each configuration is used or is requiring multiple configurations be supplied. Please clarify.
Please see the response above.
| 64. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.27, NGWorkstation Supply, Maintenance, and Repair Plan |
| A. The RFP States that a transition of 90 days is expected to provide operational NGWorkstations for the Centralized Inspection Facilities (CIFs) and 180 days for the Private Inspection Facilities (PIFs). Would the State please explain why this difference exists in the requirements? |
There is no reference to time frames or requirements for operational equipment in this Section 3.27. The requirement in Section 3.27 NGWorkstation Supply, Maintenance, and Repair Plan, is for the Vendor {Contractor} to submit an NGWorkstation Supply, Maintenance and Repair Plan to the SCM for review and approval within 180 days. This plan is only for new equipment, not existing equipment. All new workstations at both CIF and PIF locations will only be deployed once approved by the State, no later than 365 days after Blanket P.O. award.
As per Section 3.1.2 Existing CIFs, the Vendor {Contractor} shall assume responsibility for only NGWorkstations at existing CIFs within 90 days.
B. How will offerors guarantee operation of the PIFs after the initial 90-day transition period?
See answer above.
| 65. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.27, NGWorkstation Supply, Maintenance, and Repair Plan |
| Considering the modem requirements: Does this pertain only to PIFs? |
Yes, the modem requirements pertain to PIFs. The modem is optional equipment to be provided as needed at no additional cost to the State. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 3.29.3 has been revised.
| 66. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.29.2, Hardware General Requirements |
| A. The language in 3.29.2 suggests a PC, Laptop or a tablet NGWorkstations are options, however there are price lines for all three. Are all three options required? |
Yes, all three (3) configurations are required.
B. If so, are they required for each type of facility (PIF, PFF, SIF, etc.)?
No, they are not required for each type of facility. The facility will choose which configuration they want.
| 67. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.36, Software Currency and Section 3.39.2, System Environments and Section 3.52.1 NGSystem Plans, Manual, and Specifications Summary and Section 4.4.3.3.5 Plans Summary |
| Please confirm “NGSystem Maintenance Plan” and “NGSystem System Maintenance Plan” refer to the same plan. |
Yes, NGSystem Maintenance Plan and NGSystem System Maintenance Plan refer to the same plan. Refer to T1628 Revised Bid Solicitation 03/18/2020. Section 4.4.3.3.5 Plans Summary references have been revised.
| 68. |
| Bid Solicitation Section 3.39, NGVID Overview |
| Regarding OIT-ODSR: “Although it is hosted and maintained by the State (OIT), the NGVID Operational Data Store Replica (OIT-ODSR) is considered part of the NGVID data system. Along with other NGVID components, its new structures shall be developed and tested by the Vendor {Contractor} with OIT input.” Is the Vendor {Contractor} responsible to supply licensing for, and set up of, the State (OIT) hosted NGVID Operational Data Store Replica (OIT-ODSR), or is this a responsibility of the State? |
If the proposed Vendor {Bidder} solution includes Oracle Golden Gate (GG) then a separate dedicated Virtual Machine (VM) host would likely be provisioned by the State OIT staff to host the ODSR. In this case, the Vendor {Contractor} would be responsible for installation, configuration, and patching of all database software on the VM for this solution.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .