The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
AMENDMENT 0002
| Question |
| RFP Page or Pre-Proposal Conference or Site Visit |
| RFP Para Reference |
Response
| 56 |
| DDBC PPC Brief Slide 16 lists Equipment that does not appear to align with the GE – MHE inventory provided in Attachment J.18 TE GE – MHE. Attachment J.18 lists 52 items, not 119. Also we don’t see the cranes referenced on Slide 16. Please ensure the attachment lists all Government provided equipment. |
| DDBC PPC Brief |
| Slide 16 |
| In Attachment J.18 TE 3.4 GE MHE has been updated for Amendment 002 |
| 57 |
| CLIN X001 is FFP for “Services to Perform Warehousing and Distribution Operation (Unless specifically identified separately in another CLIN, this CLIN encompasses PWS Sections C-1 through C-6). |
The Section L tables for CLIN X001 allow for Labor only to be included in this CLIN.
If Offerors have costs for Vendors, equipment/vehicles, PMO (project overhead), training, office supplies, etc., where should these costs be captured and presented?
Please modify the pricing template in Section L to include the costs for Other Direct Costs (ODCs) or provide direction if they are to be included in a CR CLIN.
| Various |
| Sections B and L |
| Please see the Section B CLIN descriptions for the complete details. CLIN x003 covers non-capital equipment, CLIN x004 would covers material support costs, and CLIN x005 includes training. |
If there are ODCs associated with performing labor that are not encompassed in the cost reimbursement CLIN, they should be included in CLINs X001. Please include a narrative with what is included in these ODCs.
| 58 |
| The H-4 clause (page 32) pertains to the Contractor and does not involve the Site Manager and Alternate Site Manager. However, Page 74 states that Letters of Intent must include acknowledgement of the requirements in clause H-4. We interpret this requirement that the Offeror (Prime/Subcontractor) acknowledges H-4 and not the individual key personnel. Will the Government please review this requirement and update Section L accordingly. |
| SP3300-21-R-5008 |
Page 32 and Page 74 H-4 Substitution or Addition of Key Personnel
Tab 2 Staffing Approach Section (a) The offeror must comply with the requirements of the H-4. The offeror must determine how to ensure that the agreement with proposed individual key personnel ensures that the offeror complies with the contract requirements.
| 59 |
| Please confirm whether each Tab within each EFile should be submitted as a separate document, or does the Government expect that, for example, EFile III Technical Proposal is inclusive of Tabs 1, 2 and 3 (one file). |
| SP3300-21-R-5008 |
| L-4 Table 1 |
| The tabs within the E-file can be submitted separately or together as long as clearly labeled. |
| 60 |
| PWS C-4.2 Equipment, paragraph B states in part: “A list of the equipment that has historically been Contractor provided is identified in TE 4.6, Contractor Equipment List” TE 4.6 has not been provided, please provide. |
| PWS C-46 |
| C-4.2 Equipment |
| Provided in Amendment 001 as Attachment J.32 |
| 61 |
| PWS C-3.4.1 Custodial references Attachment J.2. Attachment J.2 paragraph 4.5.1.M states in part: The Contractor shall provide all management, tools, supplies, vehicles, transportation, equipment, labor, and applicable licenses, permits, and/or certificates necessary to perform custodial services in buildings 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 401, 404, 635, and 405 located at DLA Distribution Barstow, California (DDBC)…… The Contractor shall schedule all cleanings for each facility and meet or exceed the minimum cleaning frequency scheduled (See TE 4.4.5.1M). |
Question #1: There was no TE 4.4.5.1M provided with the RFP, please provide.
Question #2: Attachment J.38 Staffing Matrix does not address Custodial, where are offerors to provide the means to provide staffing for the required services. Please address.
| PWS C-44 |
| PWS 3.4.1 and Attachment J.2 paragraph 4.5.1M |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated, please include the proposed staffing in attachment J.38. |
TE 4.4.5.1M provided with Amendment 002
| 62 |
| PWS 4.4 Equipment Maintenance references TE 3.6 GE – Office Equipment, TE 3.6 was not provided with the RFP, please address. |
| PWS C-50 |
| PWS 4.4 Equipment Maintenance |
| Attachment J.1 updated in Amendment 002 |
| 63 |
| Attachment J.2 paragraph 4.4.5M states in part: The Contractor shall perform grounds maintenance which includes the removal of debris (broken pallets, strapping, tumble weeds, etc.) and drifting sand from storage lots and official parking lots in DLA Distribution Barstow California designated areas (TE 3.1). |
Question: Attachment J.38 Staffing Matrix does not address Grounds Maintenance, where are offerors to provide the means to provide staffing for the required services. Please address.
| RFP Attachment J.2, Page 3 |
| PWS 3.4.1 and Attachment J.2 paragraph 4.4.5M |
| See response to question 61 |
| 64 |
| Attachment J.32 lists Section C-1.9 Surge, Sustainment and Disaster Recovery Efforts, PWS C-1.9 is titled Continuation of Essential Contractor Services, please address the discrepancy between Attachment J.32 and the PWS. |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS |
| Attachment J.1 PWS, C-1.9 |
| Attachment J.32 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 65 |
| Attachment J.32 lists C-5.3.9.1 Controlled Material. There is no PWS C-5.3.9.1, please address the discrepancy between Attachment J.32 and the PWS. |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS |
| Attachment J.1 PWS |
| Attachment J.32 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 66 |
| Attachment J.32 lists C-5.3.10.1.3 Critical Safety Items (CSI). There is no PWS C- 5.3.10.1.3, please address the discrepancy between Attachment J.32 and the PWS. |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS |
| Attachment J.1 PWS |
| Attachment J.32 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 67 |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS C-5.3. There are numerous discrepancies between the paragraph numbering in J.32 Section C-5.3 and the PWS, e.g. C-5.3.10.1.3 Critical Safety Items, and PWS C-5.3.11.2 Critical Safety Items. Please address the discrepancy between Attachment J.32 and the PWS. |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS |
| Attachment J.1 PWS |
| Attachment J.32 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 68 |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS C-5.4. There are numerous discrepancies between the paragraph numbering in J.32 Section C-5.4 and the PWS, e.g. C-5.4.2 Denial Research, and PWS C-5.4.2 Warehouse Management System (WMS) Physical Inventories. Please address the discrepancy between Attachment J.32 and the PWS. |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS |
| Attachment J.1 PWS |
| Attachment J.32 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 69 |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS C-5.5. There are numerous discrepancies between the paragraph numbering in J.32 Section C-5.5. and the PWS, e.g. J-32 C-5.5.4 Transshipments, and PWS C-5.5.4 Astray Freight (Government Cargo Recovery Effort (GOCARE)) Program. Please address the discrepancy between Attachment J.32 and the PWS. |
| Attachment J.32 and PWS |
| Attachment J.1 PWS |
| Attachment J.32 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 70 |
| Attachment J.32 and Attachment J.38. Is it the Government’s expectation that the hours proposed in each of these attachments balance? If so, please update both Attachment J.32 and Attachment J.38 to ensure the PWS paragraphs for each document are in alignment. |
| Attachment J.32 and attachment J.38 |
| Attachment J.32 and attachment J.38 |
| Attachment J.32 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 71 |
| Please confirm if there are just one or two J.32? Currently, as answered the EXCEL version for Proposed Productive Hours is replace by Contractor+Furnished + Equipment.doc. Is this correct or not? |
| AMEND 1 DOCUMENTS AND ORGINAL RPF ATTACHMENT J.32 EXCEL ONE |
There is only 1 Attachment J.32 updated in Amendment 001 to reflect Contractor Furnished Equipment. All proposed productive hours shall be input into the J.38
| 72 |
| Will you add extra lines for figuring productive hours for Exempt, CBA and SCA as they will be different for each company? |
| Amend 1 J.38 |
Since they will be different for each company, the offeror can add the additional lines per File III Technical Proposal, Tab 2 Staffing Approach
| 73 |
| Physical Inventory 5.4 Whole sale does not include the Government preformed inventories but Retail side does. Shouldn’t both be the same? Either Add GOV performed to Wholesale number or take it out of the Retail side. Current way does not compare each other same. |
| Attachment J.38 |
| Tab 2 Ordering Period 1, Lines 136 and 245 |
| J.38 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 74 |
| Will the Government provide Crane data for all the options years and break it out by Load and Off Load; Rigging; and Block n Bracing? |
| Attachment TE 5.2 |
Load and offload data is provided for all OY’s. Blocking/Bracing and Rigging was updated in Amendment 001 with the number of hours estimated by the Government since historical information for this type of Labor category is not finite.
| 75 |
| Where in J.32 and or J.38 is this requirement staffed and priced? |
| Attachment J.2 |
| Para 4.5.1M.A thru C Custodial |
| J.32 has been updated for Amendment 001 |
See response to question 61
| 76 |
| Is the numbering correct as it goes from 4.5.1M to 4.4.5M? What is missing or should they be rearranged? |
| Attachment J.2 |
| Page 3 of 10 |
| Yes, Attachment J.2 is not always presented in a numerical sequence. |
| 77 |
| Where in J.32 and or J.38 is this requirement staffed and priced? |
| Attachment J.2 |
| Para 5.7.4.2M Local Deliveries |
| J.32 has been updated for Amendment 001 |
Attachment J.38 is the Staffing Matrix
| 78 |
| Will the government provide the projected data for Retail C-5.6.1 as only J.38 Ordering period 1 has any data? |
| Attachment TE 5.2 |
| Retail C-5.6.1 |
| J.38 has been updated for Amendment 001 |
| 79 |
| Will the government provide the projected data for Wholesale C-5.5.2 as only J.38 Ordering period 1 has any data? TE 5.2 does not have it by weight band only by type. |
| Attachment TE 5.2 |
| Wholesale C-5.5.2 |
| J.38 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 80 |
| Will the government provide the projected data for Wholesale C-5.5.3 as only J.38 Ordering period 1 has any data? TE 5.2 does not have it by weight band only by type |
| Attachment TE 5.2 |
| Wholesale C-5.5.3 |
| J.38 updated in Amendment 001 |
| 81 |
| Will the government provide the projected data for Wholesale C-5.5.5 as only J.38 Ordering period 1 has any data as there is none provided in TE 5.2? |
| Attachment TE 5.2 |
| Wholesale C-5.5.5 |
| C-5.5.5 FMS is located under “Value added Lines” in TE 5.2 |
J.38 updated in Amendment 001
| 82 |
| Under Retail, Stows, there is line for UnStowed receipts. Where are they accounted for in the staffing as J.38 does not have a line for them? |
| Attachment J.38 |
| Tab 1 TE 5.2 |
| Unstowed receipts are not linked to the J.38 and for information only purposes. |
| 83 |
| Under the Retail, C-5.3 Warehousing , there is line for C-5.3.10 Local Delivery but no workload in Tab 1 TE 5.2. Will the workload be added to Tab 1 TE 5.2? Please confirm that Government only wants it staffed an priced in Year 4 and Year 5? |
| Attachment J.38 |
| Tab 1 TE 5.2 |
| Local delivery is a calculation not a direct correlation with TE 5.2. |
| 84 |
| Is the bidder to use the data from Attachment J.27 to figure the hours for this area? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.7.4.1M |
J.32 has been updated for Amendment 001
| Is the bidder to use the data from Attachment J.27 to figure the hours for this area? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.7.4.2M |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 85 |
| Will the Government provide workload for these areas with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.7.2M thru C-5.7.2.2.2M |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 86 |
| Will Government correct the numbering as both Forms and Grounds Maintenance both have C-4.5.2? |
| Attachment J.1 PWS |
| Para C-4.5.2 |
| Attachment J.1 has been updated in Amendment 002 |
| 87 |
| Will the Government provide TE 4.4.5.1M ? |
| Attachment J. 2 |
| C-4.5.1M |
| Included with Amendment 002 |
| 88 |
| Will the government provide the sq ft for the building that require custodial support broken out by type of service for buildings 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 401, 404, 635, and 405? |
| Attachment J. 2 |
| C-4.5.1M |
| Please refer to TE 4.4.5.1M included with Amendment 002 |
| 89 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.6.4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 90 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.6.2 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 91 |
| Will the Deployment Support reference be corrected to C-5.5.7 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.8 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 92 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.8 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 93 |
| Will the these reference be corrected to C-5.5.6.1 thru .4 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.7.1 thru .4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 94 |
| Is it the Governments expectation that the hours / FTEs add up to same on both sheets? If so will the Government have the PWS references on each and not some on one and sheet and then on the other? |
| Attachment J.32 and J.38 |
Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001.
| 95 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.7.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 96 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.7.1 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 97 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.5.5.3 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.6.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 98 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.5.5.2 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.6.2 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 99 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.5.4 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.5 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 100 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.5.5.2 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.6.2 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 101 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.4.7 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.4.5 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 102 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.4.5 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 103 |
| There is no Potential Book To Book Processing in Attachment J.1 PWS document. Will this line be deleted or correct the correct title and PWS reference? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.4.6 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 104 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.4.8 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.4.7 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 105 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.3.9 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.5.4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 106 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.4.5 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.4.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 107 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.4.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 108 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.4.4 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.4.2 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 109 |
| What is the correct PWS reference as there is no such paragraph in J.1 PWS Document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| All Lines with C-5.4.1.1 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 110 |
| Why is TPIC”D” left out? Was this an over sight or not? Please clarify |
| Attachment J.32 and TE 5.2 |
| All Lines with C-5.4.1.1 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 111 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.3.11.5 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 112 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.3.11.4 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.2 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 113 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.2 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 114 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.3.11.3 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.1.4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 115 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.1.4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 116 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.3.11.2 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.1.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 117 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.1.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 118 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.3.11.1 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.1.23 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 119 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.1.2 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 120 |
| This Para title for “Non-Hazardous Material Disposals” does not exist in Attachment J.1 PWS documents. Will the government delete it out of Attachment J.32 or update the PWS? Please clarify. |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.11.1.1 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 121 |
| The PWS reference does not exist in Attachment J.1 PWS. There are several PWS references to Controlled Material. Which one is the correct reference to staff and price against? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.9.1 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 122 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.8.4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 123 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.8.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 124 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.8.2 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 125 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.8.1 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 126 |
| Will the reference be corrected to C-5.3.7 as it shows in Attachment J.1 PWS document? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.8 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 127 |
| The data in TE 5.2 for Rewarhousing of Material is not broken into weight bands. Will the Government break it out it out by Weight Bands 1, 2, 3 and 4? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.7 Rewarehousing of Material Weight Band 1 thru 4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 128 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.6 |
Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001.
| 129 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.4.3 |
Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001.
| 130 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.4.2 |
Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001.
| 131 |
| Will the Government provide workload for this area with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.4.1 |
Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001.
| 132 |
| Will the Government provide workload for these areas with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.3.2.B thru C-5.3.2.H |
Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001.
| 133 |
| Will the Government provide workload for these areas with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Line C-5.2.5.1 thru C-5.2.5.13 |
Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001.
| 134 |
| Will the Government provide New Procurement Workload by Weight Bands 1, 2, 3 and 4 for these areas with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files by weight bands? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Lines C-5.2.4.3 Weight Bands 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 135 |
| Will the Government provide Non-Procurement Receipts (Customer Returns/STOs/RDOs) Workload by Weight Bands 1, 2, 3 and 4 for these areas with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files by weight bands? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Lines C-5.2.4.2 Weight Bands 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 136 |
| Will the Government provide Product Receipt Evaluation Workload by Weight Bands 1, 2, 3 and 4 for these areas with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files by weight bands? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Lines C-5.2.4 Weight Bands 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 137 |
| Will the Government provide Receipt Process Documentation Workload by Weight Bands 1, 2, 3 and 4 for these areas with in J.32 as they are not in in of the Historical or Projected Workload files by weight bands? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Lines C-5.2.4.2 Weight Bands 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 138 |
| What has been the historical workload / hours required to train Active Duty and Reserve personnel on annual basis over past 3 years? |
| Attachment J.1 |
| PWS Para C-4.5.5 |
| Historically it has been about 20-24 personnel twice a year- approximately 64 hours of training each time (twice a year) |
| 139 |
| Where is the mail picked up from on daily basis? How many miles or time required to go one way? |
| Attachment J.1 |
| PWS Para C-4.5.3 |
| Local post office on base approximately ¼ mile |
| 140 |
| Please confirm that the Government wants the contractor to purpose hours for Government provided services? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Lines C-3.1, C-3.1.3, C-3.2 and C-3.3 |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 141 |
| Will the Government provide the Collective Bargaining Agreement for this DLA Depot through an amendment or confirm that there is no CBA that applies to this RFP |
| Section J |
| Attachments |
| Added in Amend 1 |
| 142 |
| The Schedule B refers to CLIN one as a Fixed price value CLIN, whereas the Table on RFP page 80 indicates CLIN one is a Total Target Price and states a ceiling price. Is it the intent of the Government for this CLIN to be Firm Fixed only, or does the Government intend to use a target cost/price mechanism? |
| RFP Page 2 and Page 80 |
| All CLIN X001 Schedule B Titles |
Summary table CLIN X001 Updated, the intent is for this to be a FFP CLIN.
| 143 |
| Is this a new requirement? If not, who’s the incumbent and total contract value? |
Technica LLC.
SP3300-17-D-5002
$76,694,367
| 144 |
| What’s the current level of effort supporting this project? |
This information is proprietary to the incumbent and will not be provided.
| 145 |
| What are the hours of operation for the inventory team? |
The Government normal hours of operations are addressed in Attachment J2, Section 1.2.3M.
| 146 |
| Is there a CBA associated to this solicitation? Are there any MOUs? Will the please provide if so. |
| NA |
Added CBA in Amend 001
| 147 |
| The J.38 is in-complete on Tab2 and 3. Will the government furnish a completed J.38 |
| J.38 |
Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001.
| 148 |
| Can the government provide the Government Hours of operation for the current shifts being monitored/executed? |
We provided information in 1.2.3M info for the offeror to use to propose their own shifts.
| 149 |
| Paragraph states in part, “The Offeror shall submit the information in separate, tabbed section (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) as outlined below”. Paragraph numbers (4) and (5) are not included. |
Will the Government remove the reference to paragraphs (4) and (5)?
RFP page 71
References to para 4 and 5 deleted.
| 150 |
| Will the Government exclude the title/cover page, table of contents and glossaries from page count in all the Volumes? |
| RFP page 68 |
Yes, these are excluded from the page count.
| 151 |
| Paragraph reference Statement of Work, Section 1.4 entitled “Key Personnel” |
Would the Government provide the correct paragraph reference?
RFP page 32
Reference title corrected.
| 152 |
| It appears that in Attachment J.38 Staffing Matrix, the workload data from TAB 1 TE 5.2 has not been inserted in Tab 3 Ordering Period years 2-5 in columns E, G, I, and K and no formulas for calculating man hours are included in Column D. Please provide the workload and formulas for years 2-5 in J.38. |
| Attachment J.38 Staffing Matrix, |
| Tab 1 TE 5.2 and Tab 3 Ordering period 2-5, Columns D, E, G, I, and K |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 153 |
| The Government has requested that the Offeror complete J.38, Tab 2 using the productive hours for the base year (three month transition and nine months Full Performance), yet are indicating 1780 hours in Column A lines 17, 28, 38, 46, 54, 61, 89, 130, 141, 159, 182, 192, 205, 239, 254, 279, 289, and 297, which reflect a full year of full production. Would the Government consider adjusting the J.38 lines listed to reflect 1335 hours for the base year? |
| RFP Attachment Attachment J.38 Staffing Matrix, |
| Tab 2 TE% Ordering period 1 column A lines 17, 28, 38, 46, 54, 61, 89, 130, 141, 159, 182, 192, 205, 239, 254, 279, 289, and 297. |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 154 |
| Was it the Government’s intent to provide the Attachment J.38 Staffing Matrix without the workload data from TAB 1 TE 5.2 inserted in Tab 3 ordering period years 2-5 Columns E, G, I, K, or any formulas for calculating the man hours in Column D? If not, please amend the J.38 to include the workload with formulas for years 2-5. |
| RFP Attachment J.38 Staffing Matrix, |
| Tab 1 TE 5.2 and Tab 3 Ordering period 2-5, Columns D, E, G, I, and K. |
| Updated in Amend 1 |
| 155 |
| Can the Government provide confirm that the reference to CDRL A031 is incorrect and should instead read CDRL A029? There is no CDRL A031 listed in J-1 (a) table. |
| PWS Page C-10 |
| RFP Section J-1 (a), page 58 of 89 |
| Updated with Amendment 002 |
| 156 |
| Please confirm that the references to Attachment J.3X Staffing Matrix should read J.38 |
| PWS |
| Page C-10 |
| Updated with Amendment 002 |
| 157 |
| Could the Government provide Attachment J.20? |
| RFP Page 58 |
Provided with Amendment 001
| 158 |
| Reference requires “The Offeror shall provide verification that the Offeror has a Defense Security Service (DSS) approved facility clearance as part of its initial proposal submission.” |
The Offeror is an 8(a) JV. The Managing Venturer has an active DSS FCL. The Partner Venturer has an inactive DSS FCL that can be reactivated. To reactivate the FCL, and to obtain a JV FCL, requires a government classified contract.
Question: To permit bidders to obtain an FCL for this contract, will the government change the requirement to ”must be eligible to obtain a DSS FCL and provide verification of FCL prior to contract start”?
| RFP Page 70 |
| Para L-4 – Proposal Preparation Requirements; TAB 5 – DSS Facility Clearance |
| The Offeror must have an active facility clearance at the time of proposal submission. In accordance with the RFP, the offeror shall provide verification that the Offeror has a Defense Security Service (DSS) approved facility clearance as part of its initial proposal submission. |
| 159 |
| Is the RFP posted on SAM the final? If so, could the government provide a proposal due date? |
Yes- Proposal due date included in solicitation.
| 160 |
| This attachment is not shown in Section J – List of Attachments, nor is it shown as required under any volume in Section L. Please confirm. |
If it is required, please update Section J to show attachment and Section L to include instruction on how to submit with the technical volume. Please confirm whether this attachment would be excluded from the overall 100 page limit.
| Attachment J.32 and RFP page 58 |
| Section J |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 161 |
| Attachment J.32 (Row 2) indicates there are instructions for completing this attachment in Section L of the RFP. However, section L of the RFP contains no guidance relating to Attachment J.32. Can the Government provide instructions for the proper completion of Attachment J.32 in Section L of the RFP? |
| Attachment J.32 |
| Section L |
| Attachment J.32 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 162 |
| Attachment J.38, Tab 2, Cell #F18 references the number 9. Cell # F87 reference the number 890. It is unclear if these references pertain to FTEs or hours. Can the Government revise both these cell numbers and clearly explain if they are hours or FTEs? |
| Attachment J.38 |
| Attachment J.38, Column F |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 163 |
| Attachment J.38, Tab 2, Column H contains numbers that appear to reflect FTEs despite the Row Heading in row 6 that identifies it as Y1 (9 mo) Hours. It is unclear if the numbers referenced in Column H pertain to FTEs or hours. Can the Government revise these cell numbers or column headings to clearly explain if they are hours or FTEs? |
| Attachment J.38 |
| Attachment J.38, Column H |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 164 |
| Please revise Attachment J.38, Tab 3, with any of the changes made in Tab 2. |
| Attachment J.38 |
| Attachment J.38, Tab 3 |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 165 |
| Attachment J.38 (Staffing Matrix) (Row 5) indicates there are instructions for completing this attachment in Section L of the RFP. However, section L of the RFP contains confusing guidance relating to Attachment J.38. Can the Government provide revised instructions for the proper completion of Attachment J.38 in Section L of the RFP? |
| Attachment J.38 and RFP Page 74-75 |
| Section L, Tab 2-Staffing Approach |
| The Government has reviewed the instructions and has reviewed the J.38. The instructions match the revised J.38. |
| 166 |
| Section L , Tab 2-Staffing Approach, Section 2.d. (Column D) of the RFP references C-5-1.6 NAVSUP Weapons Support. However, Attachment J.38 has no references to C-5-1.6 NAVSUP Weapons Support. Can the Government revise the Section L instructions to eliminate this reference? |
| Attachment J.38 and RFP Page 74-75 |
| Section L, Tab 2-Staffing Approach, para 2.d. (Column D) |
| C-5.1.6 NAVSUP Weapons Support has been added to J.38 via Amendment 002. |
| 167 |
| Section L , Tab 2-Staffing Approach, Section 2.e. (Column E) of the RFP references Transition and Sustainment of Operations Approach. However, Attachment J.38 Column E is labeled "Individual Time Standard". Can the Government revise the Section L instructions to correct and explain this reference? |
| Attachment J.38 and RFP Page 74-75 |
| Section L, Tab 2-Staffing Approach, para 2.e. (Column E) |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 168 |
| Reference Section L, Tab 2-Staffing Approach, Section 2.f and 2.h. and Attachment J.38 (Columns F and H). Row 6 of Attachment J.38 references "Hours", yet Row 7 of Columns F and H reference FTEs. Can the Government revise both the Attachment J.38 and Section L instructions to correctly describe whether they want ours or FTEs for these columns? |
| Attachment J.38 and RFP Page 74-75 |
| Section L, Tab 2-Staffing Approach, para 2. f. and h. and Attachment J.38, Column F and H. |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
| 169 |
| Section L, Tab 2-Staffing Approach, Section 2.h. provides detailed instructions pertaining to formulas in Attachment J.38 that do not exist. Can the Government revise Attachment J.38 to include the formulas discussed in Section 2.h and revise the Section L instructions accordingly? |
| Attachment J.38 and RFP Page 74-75 |
| Attachment J.38 and Section L, Tab 2-Staffing Approach, para 2.h. |
| Attachment J.38 has been updated in Amendment 001. |
Attachment J.6 CLIN X006 Labor Rate Table – this worksheet requires that the Offeror show the labor rate buildup for each labor category and provides a format to do so.
Are Offerors allowed to revise the format to remain compliant with their DCAA accounting system and to incorporate any potential subcontractor labor rates?
| Attachment J.6 CLIN X006 Labor Rate Table |
| N/A |
| Yes, offerors may update the table to remain compliant with their approved DCAA accounting system. |
| 171 |
| CLINs X007 list CDRL Data Item Numbers and Titles of Data Items There are numerous disconnects where the Title of Data Item listed on the Section B of the RFP do not match the title shown in Attachment J.11 (Example A004 and A007) |
Which document is correct?
| RFP Sections B-M - multiple pages |
| CDRL Listings |
| The CDRL listing has been updated. |
| 172 |
| CLIN X004 – Material Support Costs. Is it the Governments intent that all Non Labor costs for CLINs X001, X006, X007 and 0008 (Vehicles and Equipment, PPE, Packing and Crating supplies, etc.) for performance of this contract are included in this Government provided estimate? |
| RFP Sections B-M, Multiple Pages |
CLIN x004 is for material support costs in support of CLINs X001, X006, X007, and 0008.
| 173 |
| Section B instructions lists the NAICS code of 493110 with a small business size standard of $30.0M, while Section K-2, paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) lists the NAICS code of 493110 with a small business size standard of $27.5M. Please review the discrepancy and issue appropriate changes. |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 13 and page 59 |
| Section B Instructions (second paragraph) and Section K, Paragraph K-2 paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) |
| The NAICS size standard is $30M and has been updated in all docs. |
| 174 |
| Instructions to Bidders, CLIN X006. The instructions here state “Offeror shall enter the Government provided estimated cost. Offerors shall insert and apply their applicable indirect costs and Fixed Fee to this estimated cost to arrive at the Total Cost.” |
The Section B lists only a place to enter Fixed Fee. The table in Section L for X006 also only requests the Fixed Fee. There is no place for Offerors to enter their Indirect Rate.
Should CLIN X006 be amended to allow for the Indirect Rate to be shown?
Please provide amended documents as required.
RFP Sections B-M, Page 14 and 81
The proposed CLIN x006 labor rates (TE J.6 CLIN x006 Labor Rate Table) should be burdened labor rates. Only the fixed fee amount should be entered into the Section B.
| 175 |
| Reference Section I, Contract Clauses, FAR 52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards. Are there any “conformed” hourly labor categories on the contract that are covered by the referenced FAR clause. If so, please provide a labor category listing and the approved Department of Labor conformed hourly rates for all “conformed” positions. |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 43 |
Please review the attached J.4. Wage Determination and CBA
| 176 |
| Section J, there appears to be a disconnect in the numbering and naming of Attachments shown on these pages and the actual Attachments provided with the RFP. Please review and issue changes as needed. |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 57-58 and Attachments |
Attachments have been corrected to match between the Section J and the RFP.
| 177 |
| CLIN X006. It appears that 0006 & 4006 reflects the NTE amount, the fixed fee line and the total CPFF line. However, all other CLINs 1006, 2006 and 3006 do not. |
Please consider revising the format of Section B for the CLINs to match CLIN 0006 & 4006.
RFP Sections B-M, Page 6
Added lines for 1006, 2006, and 3006.
| 178 |
| The RFP states that a “master table of contents for the entire proposal and a table of contents for each volume are required. The master table of contents for the entire proposal should be filed in Volume I.” Please confirm that Table 1 (L-4) first column identifies the Volume number. Also, where within Volume I should the Master Table of Contents appear (new Tab 6)? |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 68 and 69 |
| L-4. Table 1 and #8 |
| Yes, the first tab is the volume number. The Master Table of Contents can be contained within Tab 1 or a new Tab 6 can be created. |
| 179 |
| The RFP states that “The following statement must be in the header and the footer of each page of the electronic document: “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104”. Is the offeror required to include the statement in both the header and footer or will including the statement in either the header OR footer be adequate marking? |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 69 |
| L-4. #7 last two paragraphs |
| Please include in both header and footer. |
| 180 |
| The POP dates for Ordering Period - Four appear to be incorrect. Please confirm and provide a revised document. |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 7 |
| Ordering Period - Four |
| This was a typo, the ordering period dates have been updated to reflect the correct dates. |
| 181 |
| Can the offeror use 11x17 paper for the organizational chart requirement referenced on page 75? Will using 11x17 paper count as 1 or 2 pages toward the page limitations? |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 75 |
| Tab 2, Section (a), Subfactor (b), #5 |
| If the organizational chart fits on one 11x17 page, it will count as one page towards the page count. |
| 182 |
| E-File V – Cost Proposal, the table shown here for CLIN 0006 states “Offerors shall provide a proposed regular unburdened labor rate, regular burdened labor rate (excluding fee), and overtime labor rate.” |
We assume that the overtime labor rate should be burdened (excluding fee) as well.
Please confirm and provide adjusted documents as required RFP Sections B-M, Page 80 and multiple pages for Section B
Yes, include in J6 Attachment.
| 183 |
| E-File V – Cost Proposal, the table shown here for CLINs X001 requests that Offerors show Target Price AND Ceiling Price (115% of Target Cost) but this breakdown is not requested on Section B. Should it be shown on Section B? Please confirm and provide adjusted documents as required |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 80 and multiple pages for Section B |
Removed all reference to 115% Ceiling price. This is a FFP CLIN.
| 184 |
| Attachment J.5 is referenced twice in this section, but it appears that the Government meant to reference Attachment J.6. (Attachment J.5 is the DD 254) Can the Government revise this apparent typo with the correct Attachment name (Attachment J.6)? |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 81 |
| CLIN X006-SPECIAL PROJECTS/SURGE & SUSTAINMENT |
| This was a typo and has been updated to Reference J.6 |
| 185 |
| Attachment J.5 is referenced twice in this section, but it appears that the Government meant to reference Attachment J.6. (Attachment J.5 is the DD 254) Can the Government revise this apparent typo with the correct Attachment name (Attachment J.6)? |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 81 |
| CLIN X006-SPECIAL PROJECTS/SURGE & SUSTAINMENT |
| This was a typo and has been updated to Reference J.6 |
| 186 |
| CLIN X006 – Special Projects/Surge & Sustainment – This section refers to the completion of Attachment J.5 Schedule B CLIN X006 Labor Rate Table. The document provided in the RFP is named Attachment J.6 CLIN X006 Labor Rate Table. We assume that the reference in this document should be Attachment J.6, please confirm and provide revised document(s). |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 81 |
CLIN X006
Confirmed, the reference has been updated to J.6.
| 187 |
| CLIN X001 Tables, Can Offerors modify to add columns as needed to remain compliant with their DCAA accounting system? |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 81 |
CLIN x001
Yes.
If there are ODCs associated with performing labor they shall be included in CLINs X001.
| 188 |
| CLIN X008 Table, Can Offerors modify to add rows as needed to remain compliant with their DCAA accounting system? |
| RFP Sections B-M, Page 82 |
| CLIN x008 |
| Yes. |
| 189 |
| In regards to the DD254 Requirement. Will the government consider for award a capable contractor that can provide personnel with SECRET clearance at time of proposal submission, and has the ability of obtain a facility clearance post award? |
The Offeror shall provide verification that the Offeror has a Defense Security Service (DSS) approved facility clearance as part of its initial proposal submission.
| 190 |
| Will the government consider providing Facility Clearance Sponsorship at time of award to a responsible contractor, taking into consideration that the contractor will provide personnel with active clearance at time of proposal submission and maintain through contract award. |
The Government cannot sponsor a clearance for this requirement due to the need for an active clearance on day one of contract performance.
| Section C-1.8 Transition Plan provides a link for the SOPs however, the link delivers an error when clicked. Can the Government please provide the SOPs or an active link? |
| Attachment J.1 PWS Amendment 1, pg C-31 |
| C-1.8 Transition Plan |
C-1.8.C.5.c) Please See response to question 33 for requesting access to the SOPs
| 192 |
| Offerors are to complete the Summary Table for this CLIN, however this table only allows labor costs to be provided. There is no place within the table for Offerors to include any applicable other direct costs (ODCs), such as Uniforms, Vehicles, PPE, etc., as required for performance under CLIN X001. |
Will the Government allow Offerors to revise the referenced Summary CLIN Table to allow the inclusion of any applicable Warehousing & Distribution ODCs? An example of the requested revision is shown below. Since our DCAA approved accounting system does not allow for any contract specific other direct costs, (such as Uniforms, Vehicles, PPE, etc.) to be included as an indirect cost or as an indirect cost element within Overhead or G&A.
CLIN X001 – PRIME LABOR COSTS
CLIN X001 – PRIME ODC COSTS
CLIN X001 – SUB LABOR COSTS
CLIN X001 – TARGET COST
CLIN X001 – TARGET PROFIT (___% OF TARGET COST)
CLIN X001 – TOTAL TARGET PRICE
CLIN X001 – CEILING PRICE (115% OF TARGET COST)
RFP SP3300-21-R-5008 Sections B-M, pages 79 and 80.
| Section L, Subsection - CLIN X001 – Warehousing & Distribution Operation and the table titled “Summary Table CLIN X001”. |
| Yes, offerors may revise the table in order to accommodate their approved accounting system. Please include a narrative with the submitted ODC costs detailing what is included. |
| 193 |
| Attachment J.24 TE 4.3 references EJON numbers that are not listed on Attachment J.20 TE 4.2 Amend 0001. None of the EJON numbers cross reference. Please address this discrepancy/oversight. |
| RFP Attachment J.20 TE 4.2 Amend 0001 and Attachment J.24 TE 4.3 |
| N/A |
| If the equipment is not listed on the TE 4.2 - Government Operated Equipment for Contractor Maintenance, then that equipment is not operated by the Government but can be found on TE 3.4 GE MHE |
| 194 |
| Attachment J.24 TE 4.3 references Cranes, Straddle Cranes, Rough Terrain Container Handlers, 35-45K Forklifts, that are not listed on Attachment J.20 TE 4.2 Amend 0001. Please address this discrepancy/oversight. |
| RFP Attachment J.20 TE 4.2 Amend 0001 and Attachment J.24 TE 4.3 |
| N/A |
| TE 4.2 - Government Operated Equipment for Contractor Maintenance, only contains the equipment the Government operates. The Gov does not operate the Crane, straddle crane, RTCHs or the 35-45K forklifts. These can be found in TE 3.4 GE MHE. |
| 195 |
| Will the Government allow Offerors to revise the Section L Table formatting for CLINs X002, X003, X004 and X005 allow compliance with their DCAA accounting system? |
| RFP SP3300-21-R-5008 Sections B-M, Section L, 80 and 81 of 89 |
| Section L, Cost/Price |
| Yes as stated in page 80 of the RFP “Offerors shall identify the specific rate applied to the Government Provided Estimated Cost (G&A rate, Material Handling Rate, or other Indirect Rate supported by the Offeror’s accounting system) |
| 196 |
| PWS paragraph-4.4.4 states in part: Attachment J.2, Site Specific Requirements (Section C-4.4.4AF Calibration and Certification) lists any equipment that is not the Contractors responsibility for calibration and certification. There is no paragraph C-4.4.4 AF in Attachment J.2. What equipment is covered by the reference? |
| Attachment J.1 PWS Amend 0001 |
| Paragraph C-4.4.4 Calibration and Certification |
| Reference to C-4.4.4 AF has been removed from the J.1 in Amendment 002 |
| 197 |
| Attachment J.6 CLIN X006 Labor Rate Table – this worksheet requires that the Offeror show the labor rate buildup for each labor category and provides a format to do so. |
Are Offerors to present labor rates here for Prime and Subcontractors or just Prime? If rates are to be provided for Subcontractors are Offerors allowed to revise the format to protect the proprietary information of the Subcontractors?
| Attachment J.6 CLIN X006 Labor Rate Table |
| N/A |
| Offerors are to present labor rates for both Prime and Subcontractors. The subcontractor may submit rates directly to the Government to avoid disclosing proprietary information. |
| 198 |
| Table L-4 states: *Note that the page limitation for E-File III |
Technical Proposal is 100 pages; however, resumes, letters of intent, documents pertaining to affiliates, sister companies, teaming arrangements and joint venture agreements, the Mission Essential Contractor Services Plan, Attachment J.38 Staffing Matrix, and J.39 Training Plan are not included in this page limitation.
Please confirm that the documents pertaining to affiliates, sister companies, teaming arrangements and joint venture agreements pertain to the E-File II Past Performance proposal and those documents are out of page count within that volume.
| RFP SP3300-21-R-5008 Sections B-M, page 68 |
| L-4 PROPOSAL PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS |
| Confirmed, these are not included in the page count. |
| 199 |
| The Attachment J.39 Proposed Training plan file provided by the Government includes, on Sheet 1, a “J.33 Proposed Training Hours” spreadsheet which lists more courses than the J.39 sheet. Please address this discrepancy. |
| Attachment J.39 Proposed Training Plan |
| N/A |
| J.39 Updated via Amendment 002 |
| 200 |
| Reference PWS C-1.7. Please identify those areas designated as Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) areas. |
| Attachment J.1 PWS (2) |
| C-1.7 D |
| ESD areas are designated as stations which are set up to process any ESD material. DDBC currently has one ESD office. |
| 201 |
| As the Government extended the questions deadline and offerors are waiting for answers to questions, we recommend the Government extend the proposal submission deadline to October 15th, 2021. |
| General |
| General |
| The proposal due date is extended until 7 October 2021. |
| 202 |
| What is the correct number of days prior to the start of full performance for the physical security plan submission? CDRL A024 states 30 days and PWS Para C-1.8.6 states 45 days |
| RFP Attachment J.1, p. 34, and Attachment 11, CDRL A024, p. 1 |
| PWS Para C-1.8.6 and CDRL A024 |
| 45 Days. |
CDRL A024 updated via Amend 002
| 203 |
| The Technica CBA expires on 12/31/2022. Can the government provide pricing guidance on the labor rates offerors should use for the Job Classifications included in Schedule A? That is, for each Job Classification included in Schedule A, what rate of pay should be priced for the period of performance beyond 12/31/2022? |
| Attachment J.3, Technica CBA |
For pricing purposed utilize the final year of the CBA rates beyond expiration. Once the CBA is expired, the rates will be renegotiated and a modification to the contract will be done.
| 204 |
| Have there been any CBA amendments or MOAs between Technica and Teamsters 166 adding additional Job Classifications to Schedule A? If so, can the government provide an updated Schedule A or at minimum a list of the job classifications and pay rates? |
| Attachment J.3, Technica CBA |
No Amendments or MOAs. Utilize J.3 CBA and J.4 Wage Determination for labor rates.
| 205 |
| Please clarify the due date for the Quality Control Plan (QCP). |
CDRL X007 says to “Submit a final site specific QCP not later than 30 calendar days from execution of modification that details the Contractor's process for a quality system…” but that instruction and reference to a “modification” is not clear and seems in conflict with the requirement to submit future revisions “within 10 calendar days of the change.”
Also, please confirm that the proposal requires an “approach” for a QCP, not a full QCP document.
| RFP, p. 73 |
| Quality Control Plan – CDRL X007 and p. 73, L.4, Section (b): |
Proposal is only the approach not a full QCP.
CDRL A006 QCP is to be submitted NLT 30 days from contract Award.
Document updated to clarify dates in Amend 002
| 206 |
| What is the correct number of APLs being measured at DDBC? T.E. 5.0 appears to have a total of 33 APLs with five of them being Retail |
| RFP, Page 72 |
| E-File II, (2) para. C) sub para. ii indicates there are a total of 39 APLs and 28 are Wholesale and 11 are Retail |
| RFP Updated for Amend 002 to state 28 Wholesale APLs and 5 retail |