Appendix J-12 Pilot Project Plan Template.docx
DOCX document 356 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA11R0186
About this file
Appendix J-12 Pilot Project Plan Template
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 55 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
S-AQMMA-11-R-0186 Appendix J-12 Department of State Supply Chain Management
S-AQMMA-11-R-0186 Appendix J-12 Department of State
Pilot Project Plan for the <Product Name>
Version 1.0
Produced for:
| Department of State |
| Technology Development Branch |
Produced by:
Systems Development & Engineering
| DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24 |
| 5800 Barclay Drive |
| Alexandria, VA 22315 |
DATE:
Equipment type: < >
· PUBLICATION HISTORY
| Date |
| Version |
| Description |
| Author |
| 1.0 |
| Pilot Project Plan for < > |
This document can be found on the OpenNet at:
https://intranet.ds.state.sbu/DS/C/ST/FSE/TDB/default.aspx Please refer to the TDB website for the latest version.
Corrections, comments, or questions should be sent to:
| Department of State |
| ATTN: ISE Section Chief |
| DS/TDB/ISE, SA-24 |
| 5800 Barclay Drive |
| Alexandria, VA 22315 |
· Table of Contents
| 1 | <Product Name> Pilot Project Plan Objective | 4 |
| 2 | Project Management | 4 |
| 2.1 | Test Manager | 4 |
| 2.2 | Changes to the Test Plan | 4 |
| 2.3 | On-Site Support | 4 |
| 2.4 | Roles and Responsibilities | 4 |
| 2.4.1 | Test Manager | 4 |
| 2.4.2 | OIC/ESO | 4 |
| 2.4.3 | DS/FSE/TDB | 4 |
| 2.4.4 | DS/FSE/TDB SME | 4 |
| 2.4.5 | SMSe and TOG | 4 |
| 2.4.6 | DS/C/ST and DS/ST/FSE | 4 |
| 2.5 | Resource Requirements | 4 |
| 2.5.1 | ESO Labor Hours | 4 |
| 2.5.2 | DS/FSE/TDB Labor Hours | 4 |
| 2.5.3 | Material Costs | 4 |
| 2.5.4 | DS/FSE/TDB SME Travel Costs | 4 |
| 2.6 | Project Timeline | 4 |
| 2.7 | Training Requirements | 4 |
| 2.8 | Test Data and Reports | 4 |
| 2.8.1 | Classification | 4 |
| 2.8.2 | Delivery | 4 |
| 2.9 | Special Requirements | 4 |
| 3 | Project Tasks | 4 |
| 3.1 | Work Breakdown Structure | 4 |
| 3.2 | Task Descriptions | 4 |
| 3.2.1 | Pre-Installation Tasks – <Duration> | 4 |
| 3.2.2 | Procurement/Shipping – <Duration> | 4 |
| 3.2.3 | Installation Tasks – <Duration> | 4 |
| 3.2.4 | Functional Testing – <Duration> | 4 |
| 3.2.5 | User Training – <Duration> | 4 |
| 3.2.6 | Performance Testing – <Duration> | 4 |
| 3.2.7 | Performance Test Completion – <Duration> | 4 |
| 4 | Project Completion | 4 |
| 4.1 | Final Evaluation Report | 4 |
| 5 | Reference Materials and Links | 4 |
| Appendix A – Estimated Costs | 4 | |
| Appendix B – Review Forms | 4 |
S-AQMMA-11-R-0186 Appendix J-12 Department of State
S-AQMMA-11-R-0186 Appendix J-12 Department of State
<Product Name> Pilot Project Plan Objective
This pilot project objective is to validate use of the <product name>; that is to say, to determine whether the <product name> is fully functional and can be supported in the field. It is the goal and intention of TDB that the <Product name>, its installation and trial use meet all listed criteria.
Specific objectives for this pilot project plan include validating the:
· Use bullet points
To meet the plan objective, the <product name> will be deployed at the following location(s):
· Use bullet points. If the product will be deployed at multiple locations, note any differences between the deployment/installation methods specific to each location.
Project Management
Test Manager
The DS/FSE/TDB Test Manager for the <product name> field evaluation will be <insert name> (<email address>). The alternate Test Manager is <insert name> (<email address>). All ESSRs, evaluation test reports, requests for additional support, questions or other comments are to be sent to the Test Managers.
Changes to the Test Plan
Any changes to or deviations from the test plan must be approved by the Test Manager.
On-Site Support
DS/FSE/TDB will provide a subject matter expert (SME) for on-site support. Deployment of the SME will be scheduled for <duration>, overlapping the end of the installation and the beginning of the functional test phases. The Test Manager will coordinate and schedule the actual timing of this support with the OIC/SEO.
Roles and Responsibilities Test Manager The Test Manager will:
· Use bullet points
OIC/ESO
The OIC/ESO will:
· Use bullet points
DS/FSE/TDB
TDB will:
· Use bullet points
DS/FSE/TDB SME
The DS/FSE/TDB SME will:
· Use bullet points SMSe and TOG SMSe and TOG will:
· Use bullet points DS/C/ST and DS/ST/FSE DS/C/ST will:
· Use bullet points
Resource Requirements ESO Labor Hours Estimated ESO labor hours for the testing of the <product name> are <Insert the number of estimated ESO hours. If there will be multiple installations, use bullet points to indicate how many estimated hours will be devoted to each installation.> DS/FSE/TDB Labor Hours DS/FSE/TDB will assist with installation, training, and monitoring of the project. This will require an estimated <if there will be only one installation, present the number of hours estimated for that installation; if there will be multiple installations, present the number of hours estimated per installation, and then the total number of estimated hours.> Material Costs The estimated material costs of the pilot project plan are <if there will be only one installation, present the estimated material costs for that installation; if there will be multiple installations, use bullet points to show each installation and its estimated material cost.> The estimated itemized cost breakdown and sample bill of material for each post is located in Appendix A.
DS/FSE/TDB SME Travel Costs The estimated travel and per diem costs of this pilot project plan are <if there will be only one installation for the SME to visit, present the estimated travel and per diem costs of that visit; if there will be visits to multiple installations, use bullet points to show the estimated travel and per diem costs of each.>
Project Timeline
The project timeline includes survey, ordering, shipping via unclassified or classified pouch, installation, operations testing, feedback, and project completion. On-site testing is scheduled for <insert number> days, beginning after system installation. The total project timeline is <insert number> weeks.
| Project Task |
| Estimated Hours |
| Timeline (Weeks) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3-8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 12 |
| 13-20 |
| 21 |
| Pre-Installation Survey BOM |
| 6 |
| Order Equipment |
| 4 |
| Equipment Processing & Shipment |
| 2 |
| Installation |
| 168 |
| User Training |
| 12 |
| SME On-Site |
| 80 |
| Performance Testing |
| 72 |
| Post Test Analysis Report |
| 22 |
Above: An example of what might fit into a Project Timeline table; change accordingly.
Training Requirements
List any special training requirements that will be anticipated (or state that none will be).
DS/FSE/TDB personnel may provide on-site and remote technical support as required.
Test Data and Reports Classification Proper classification and marking are required for all test data and reports prepared as part of this pilot project plan. Report/document security classification may range from “UNCLASSIFIED” to “SECRET”. For classification authority and marking instructions, refer to the Diplomatic Security Classification Guide (SCG) for Design and Construction of Overseas Facilities, Table IV-7.
Delivery ESSRs, test data and reports are to be returned to the Test Manager and alternate Test Manager within five business days of task completion. Copies of EESRs and other data must be provided to the RDSE, OIC/ESC and RSO as part of normal reporting.
Special Requirements
List any special requirements that will be anticipated (or state that none will be).
Project Tasks
Work Breakdown Structure
The table below first categoirzes the types of labor that will be necessary to execute the pilot project plan, then divides these categories into specific tasks/requirements. Each task/requirement is assigned a party responsible for producing the associated deliverable(s) within the scheduled timeline.
Below: An example of what might appear in the table; change accordingly.
| Task/Requirement |
| Responsible Party |
| Start Time/Date/Frequency |
| Deliverable |
| Duration |
Pre-Installation
Week 1
1 week
| Survey/BOM |
| ESO |
| Week 1 |
| Completed survey ESSR |
| Approve survey/BOM |
| DS/FSE/TDB |
| Week 1 |
| Completed BOM/CMMS Maximo order |
| Review of Deployment Document – Application Guide |
| ESO |
| Week 1 |
| Application Guide Review Form |
Procurement/ Shipping
Week 2
7 weeks
| Procure remaining BOM materials |
| DS/FSE/TDB |
| Week 2 |
| Equipment delivery on site |
Installation
Week 9
3 weeks
| Install system per the survey ESSR |
| ESO |
| Week 9 |
| Installation Review Form & completed installation ESSR |
| System Programming |
| ESO |
| Week 11 |
| Part of Installation Review Form |
| Review of Deployment Document – Installation Guide |
| ESO |
| Week 11 |
| Installation Guide Review Form |
Functional Testing
Week 12
1 week
| Walktest, Post 1 communications, SMSe communications and printer verification |
| ESO |
| Week 12 |
| Part of Installation Review Form |
User Training
Week 12
2 days
| User Training |
| ESO |
| Week 12 |
| List of personnel trained |
Performance Testing
Week 13
8 weeks
| Continuous, daily and weekly monitoring |
| ESO |
SMSe
DS/FSE/TDB
| Week 13/daily |
| Weekly Review Form |
| Review of Deployment Document – User’s Guide |
| ESO |
| Week 20 |
| User Guide Review Form |
| Performance test completion |
| ESO |
| Week 20 |
| Performance test completion ESSR |
Post Test
Week 21
1 week
| Performance test review |
| ESO |
Pilot Project Review Form
Task Descriptions
Pre-Installation Tasks – <Duration> Pre-installation tasks will be completed after the Test Manager officially coordinates/informs all participants of a start date. The objectives of these tasks are the preparation of a site-specific installation plan and the evaluation of documentation quality. These tasks are as follows <drafter: add or subtract as needed>:
1. Task: Survey/BOM
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: Deployment Document – Application Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Deliverable: Survey ESSR
2. Task: Review of Deployment Document – Application Guide
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: Deployment Document – Application Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Deliverable: Application Guide Review Form
3. Task: ESSR Review Adjustment and Approval
· Responsible Party: DS/FSE/TDB
· Reference: Survey ESSR
· Deliverable: Email acknowledgment to OIC/ESO
Procurement/Shipping – <Duration> Using the bill of material from the ESSR, DS/FSE/TDB will supply/order/procure/ship necessary materials to post.
Task: Procure remaining BOM materials
· Responsible Party: DS/FSE/TDB
· Reference: Survey ESSR
· Deliverable: Installation materials (complete BOM) shipped to post
Installation Tasks – <Duration> Work on installation tasks will begin upon receipt of the complete BOM. The objectives for these tasks are system installation, system programming, and ensuring the quality of documentation.
1. Task: Install <product> per the ESSR
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: Survey ESSR/Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Work Procedure: The ESO will install the system. A DS/FSE/TDB SME may provide on-site assistance during <duration of SME visit>.
· Deliverable: Installation ESSR (completed system installation)
2. Task: System Programming
· Responsible Party: ESO/TDB
· Reference: Installation ESSR/Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Work Procedure: <describe the programming procedure>
· Deliverable: Installation Guide Review Form
3. Task: Installation Verification
· Responsible Party: OIC/ESO and SME
· Reference: Survey ESSR/Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Test Procedure: OIC/ESO and SME collectively ensure that the <product name> is properly installed and ready for functional testing.
· Deliverable: Installation Review Form
4. Task: Review of Deployment Document – Installation Guide
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Deliverable: Installation Guide Review Form
Functional Testing – <Duration> After installation, the <product name> will be tested in the site-specific configuration. Reporting requirements will include programming, usability, SMSe integration, documentation clarity, technical attributes of the system, and other ESO observations.
Task: <specify tests applicable to the product>
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Deliverable: Installation Guide Review Form
User Training – <Duration> Task: User Training
· Responsible Party: ESO/TDB
· Reference: Deployment Document – User’s Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Deliverable: List of personnel trained
Performance Testing – <Duration> Performance testing validates the daily operational use of the system.
1. Task: Continuous, Daily and Weekly Monitoring
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: Deployment Document – User’s Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Test Procedure: Daily: operational assessments; weekly: system log information and walktests
· Deliverable: Weekly Review Form
2. Task: Documentation Review – User’s Guide
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: Deployment Document – User’s Guide/manufacturer’s literature
· Deliverable: User’s Guide Review Form Performance Test Completion – <Duration>
1. Task: Post Test Report
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: None
· Deliverable: Performance Test Review Form
2. Performance Test EESR
· Responsible Party: ESO
· Reference: None
· Deliverable: Performance Test ESSR
Project Completion
Final Evaluation Report
Once field testing is complete, the Test Manager will collate/evaluate test data and prepare a final evaluation report. This report will contain an overview of the <product name> Pilot Project Plan, problems encountered, overall analysis of the test, feedback received from the field, and other significant events.
The final evaluation report will be submitted for DS/C/ST management review and decision. This decision will have one of three outcomes:
· The <product name> is fully approved for general use.
· The <product name> is tentatively approved, subject to additional modifications or adjustment.
· The <product name> is not approved.
If the <product name> is tentatively or fully approved, the installed hardware will remain in operation at post as fully functional. If the <product name> is not approved, the hardware must be removed and replaced with an approved system.
Reference Materials and Links
Primary TDB DSNET website for <subject matter in question>:
<insert address> The following documents are relevant to this field test and can be found at the above website:
· Use bullet points
Appendix A – Estimated Costs
The table below shows the estimated cost/quantity of each component required for installation of the <product>. The actual quantity and total cost may vary per the ESSR.
| Component |
| DS Catalog # |
| Qty. |
| Cost Each |
| Extended Cost |
Appendix B – Review Forms
The following items are found in this appendix:
· Application Guide Review Form
· Installation Guide Review Form
· User Guide Review Form
· Installation Review Form
· Weekly Review Form
· Performance Test Review Form
Application Guide Review Form
Completed by: ____________________ Office Symbol: __________________________ Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________
Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the survey. Thank you for your participation.
| Email to: | HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov) |
| And to: | MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov) |
| Or: Mail hard copy to: | Department of State | |
| ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager | ||
| DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24 | ||
| 5800 Barclay Drive | ||
| Alexandria, VA 22315 |
Part 1: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments on rating in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.
| Usability Questions |
| Rating Scale |
1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree 5 - Strongly Agree Specific Comments on Rating
| The Application Guide and manufacturer’s literature include all necessary information |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The Application Guide is well-organized and concise |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The Application Guide has no ambiguous information |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The illustrations in the Application Guide make sense and follow the text |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Any options in the Application Guide are identified and decision criteria are clearly stated |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The Application Guide clearly explains the application of the <product> |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| System design requirements are clear |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The approved system configuration is logical and appropriate |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The Application Guide’s “Sample Bill of Materials” is adequate and useful |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The survey ESSR was successfully completed using Application Guide and referenced materials |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
Part 2: Additional Comments on the Application Guide and manufacturer’s literature Please make any comments that require extended explanation in the space provided below.
Additional Comments
Installation Guide Review Form
Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________
Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the <product> installation. Thank you for your participation.
| Email to: | HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov) |
| And to: | MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov) |
| Or: Mail hard copy to: | Department of State | |
| ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager | ||
| DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24 | ||
| 5800 Barclay Drive | ||
| Alexandria, VA 22315 |
Part 1: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments on rating in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.
| Usability Questions |
| Rating Scale |
1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree
Specific Comments on Rating
| The Installation Guide and manufacturer’s literature includes all necessary information |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The Installation Guide is well-organized and concise |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The Installation Guide has no ambiguous information |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The illustrations in the Installation Guide make sense and follow the text |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Any options in the Installation Guide are identified and decision criteria are clearly stated |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Installation steps are clearly described |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The Installation Guide contains only important, DS-specific information |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Installation instructions are clear and logical |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The <product> was successfully installed using only the Installation Guide and referenced materials |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
Part 2: Additional Comments on the Installation Guide and Manufacturer’s Literature
Additional Comments
User Guide Review Form
Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________
Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the performance test. Thank you for your participation.
| Email to: | HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov) |
| And to: | MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov) |
| Or: Mail hard copy to: | Department of State | |
| ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager | ||
| DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24 | ||
| 5800 Barclay Drive | ||
| Alexandria, VA 22315 |
Part 1: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments on rating in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.
| Usability Questions |
| Rating Scale |
1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree
Specific Comments on Rating
| The User Guide and manufacturer’s literature includes all necessary information |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The User Guide is well-organized and concise |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The User Guide has no ambiguous information |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Illustrations in the User Guide make sense and follow the text |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Any options in the User Guide are identified and decision criteria are clearly stated |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The User Guide clearly describes opening procedures for the <product> |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The User Guide clearly describes closing procedures for the <product> |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The User Guide clearly describes potential error conditions for the <product> |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The User Guide clearly describes system audit data for the <product> |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The User Guide clearly describes MSG operating procedures for the <product> |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| <product> operating instructions are clear and logical |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The <product> was successfully operated using only the User Guide and referenced materials |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Personnel were properly trained using only the User Guide and referenced materials |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
Part 2: Additional Comments on the User Guide and Manufacturer’s Literature
Additional Comments
Installation Review Form
Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________
Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the <product> installation, programming, and verification. Thank you for your participation.
| Email to: | HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov) |
| And to: | MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov) |
| Or: Mail hard copy to: | Department of State | |
| ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager | ||
| DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24 | ||
| 5800 Barclay Drive | ||
| Alexandria, VA 22315 |
Part 1: Time Required to Install and Program the <product> Please enter the labor hours required to complete the tasks listed. Comments may be entered in Part 3 of this document.
| Description |
| Time |
Time to install the <product>
Time to program the <product> through the keyboard
Time to program the <product> with the programming software
Part 2: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments on rating in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.
| Usability Questions |
| Rating Scale |
1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree 5 - Strongly Agree Specific Comments on Rating
Overall
| The <product> was easy to install. |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| No <product> parts failed during installation |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The <product> fulfills its intended function |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Need for the TDB SME was reduced due to well-written documentation |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
Installation
| Vendor-provided packages contained all listed parts |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| All parts were undamaged when received |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Installation was completed on schedule |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The installation footprint was reasonable |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
System Programming
| System programming through the keyboard is intuitive |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| System programming through the keyboard was completed on schedule |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Changes to the programming through the keyboard are easy and intuitive |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| System programming with the programming software is intuitive |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| System programming with the programming software was completed on schedule |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Changes to the programming with the programming software are easy and intuitive |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
SMSe Integration
| System integration with SMSeNet was easy |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Connection with SMSeNet was quickly established |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
Appearance
| The <product> installation appears professional |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
Post 1 Integration (Applies to Posts B and D - ONLY)
| System integration with Post 1 was easy |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| Connection with Post 1 was quickly established |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
Part 3: Additional Comments on Installation Review Form
Additional Comments
Weekly Review Form
Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________
Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after the end of the week being reported. Thank you for your participation.
| Email to: | HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov) |
| And to: | MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov) |
| Or: Mail hard copy to: | Department of State | |
| ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager | ||
| DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24 | ||
| 5800 Barclay Drive | ||
| Alexandria, VA 22315 |
Part 1: Overall Comments and Technical Beta Evaluation Please complete the questions below, accounting for daily occurrences. All occurrences or failures require a comment for substantiation. One feedback form is required for each week of the eight-week Pilot Project Plan. Please print and attach a weekly log summary of event data.
Unexpected events include loss of communications, unexplained alarms, component failures, or anything that deviates from normal operation.
Week ______
| Daily Test |
| Unexpected Events |
| Number of occurrences |
| Specific Comments on Corrective Action |
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
| Weekly Test |
| Pass |
| Fail |
| Specific Comments on Corrective Action |
Walk Test
Post 1 Connectivity
SMSe Connectivity and Reporting
Event Printer
Part 2: Additional Comments on Installation Review Form
Additional Comments
Performance Test Review Form
Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________
Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the Performance Test. Thank you for your participation.
| Email to: | HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov) |
| And to: | MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov) |
| Or: Mail hard copy to: | Department of State | |
| ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager | ||
| DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24 | ||
| 5800 Barclay Drive | ||
| Alexandria, VA 22315 |
Part 1: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.
| Usability Questions |
| Rating Scale |
1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree 5 - Strongly Agree Specific Comments on Rating
Overall
| The <product> did not require maintenance or repair for the duration of the test |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The <product> operated properly for the duration of the test |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| This system is intuitive and easy to use |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The <product> system is easily configured to the post’s specific situation |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| System output and reports are useful and meet post needs |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
System Use
| The <product> system is easy to use by technical personnel |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The <product> system is easy to use by non-technical personnel |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
| The <product> system is usable by security personnel |
| 1-------2-------3-------4-------5 |
Part 2: Additional Comments on Performance Test Review Form
Additional Comments image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .