Appendix J-12 Pilot Project Plan Template.docx

DOCX document 356 KB Posted

Attached to
Supply Chain Management Services - 100% Full and Open Competition
Solicitation number
SAQMMA11R0186
Issued by

About this file

Appendix J-12 Pilot Project Plan Template

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Solicitation Supply Chain Management A006.docx DOCX document
SF30 Supply Chain Management A006.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A Pricing Tables A006.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF30 Continuation Page A006.docx DOCX document
SF30 Supply Chain Management A005.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-1 Projected Workload Table A004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF30 Supply Chain Management A004.docx DOCX document
SF30 Continuation Page A004.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Supply Chain Management A004.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A Pricing Tables A004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Supply Chain Management A003.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A Pricing Tables A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF30 Supply Chain Management A003.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A Pricing Tables A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF30 Supply Chain Management A002.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-1 Projected Workload Table A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix J-2 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan A002.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-10 Product Comparison Template A002.docx DOCX document
SF30 Continuation Pages A002.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Supply Chain Management A002.docx DOCX document
Exhibit H Equipment Repairs A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit B OCONUS Delivery Locations A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit F Past Performance Questionnaire A002.docx DOCX document
Exhibit I TDB Test Equipment A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit G Government Stock On-Hand A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix J-16 Security Procedures for Consolidated Receiving Points A002.doc.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-17 DD254.pdf PDF
Appendix J-18 SCA Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Exhibit D Historical Equipment Usage A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit C CONUS Delivery Locations A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A001 - Change Page.docx DOCX document
A001 - SF 30 Supply Chain Management.doc.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-15 Technical Bulletin Template.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-3 Acronyms and Definitions.docx DOCX document
Exhibit B OCONUS Delivery Locations.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix J-6 Customer Technology Requirement Template.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-11 Product Evaluation Template.docx DOCX document
Exhibit E Historical Workload Information.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-7 Technology Needs Assessment Template.dotx.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-16 Security Procedures for Consolidation Receiving Points.doc DOC document
Appendix J-13 Deployment Documentation Package.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-1 Projected Workload Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix J-5 Equipment and System Types.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix J-10 Product Comparison Template.docx DOCX document
Exhibit C CONUS Delivery Locations.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit F Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-8 Concept of Operations Template.docx DOCX document
Appendix J-2 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A - Pricing Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix J-14 New Product Bulletin Template.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 55 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

S-AQMMA-11-R-0186 Appendix J-12 Department of State Supply Chain Management

S-AQMMA-11-R-0186 Appendix J-12 Department of State

Pilot Project Plan for the <Product Name>

Version 1.0

Produced for:

Department of State
Technology Development Branch

Produced by:

Systems Development & Engineering

DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24
5800 Barclay Drive
Alexandria, VA 22315

DATE:

Equipment type: < >

· PUBLICATION HISTORY

Date
Version
Description
Author
1.0
Pilot Project Plan for < >

This document can be found on the OpenNet at:

https://intranet.ds.state.sbu/DS/C/ST/FSE/TDB/default.aspx Please refer to the TDB website for the latest version.

Corrections, comments, or questions should be sent to:

Department of State
ATTN: ISE Section Chief
DS/TDB/ISE, SA-24
5800 Barclay Drive
Alexandria, VA 22315

· Table of Contents

1<Product Name> Pilot Project Plan Objective4
2Project Management4
2.1Test Manager4
2.2Changes to the Test Plan4
2.3On-Site Support4
2.4Roles and Responsibilities4
2.4.1Test Manager4
2.4.2OIC/ESO4
2.4.3DS/FSE/TDB4
2.4.4DS/FSE/TDB SME4
2.4.5SMSe and TOG4
2.4.6DS/C/ST and DS/ST/FSE4
2.5Resource Requirements4
2.5.1ESO Labor Hours4
2.5.2DS/FSE/TDB Labor Hours4
2.5.3Material Costs4
2.5.4DS/FSE/TDB SME Travel Costs4
2.6Project Timeline4
2.7Training Requirements4
2.8Test Data and Reports4
2.8.1Classification4
2.8.2Delivery4
2.9Special Requirements4
3Project Tasks4
3.1Work Breakdown Structure4
3.2Task Descriptions4
3.2.1Pre-Installation Tasks – <Duration>4
3.2.2Procurement/Shipping – <Duration>4
3.2.3Installation Tasks – <Duration>4
3.2.4Functional Testing – <Duration>4
3.2.5User Training – <Duration>4
3.2.6Performance Testing – <Duration>4
3.2.7Performance Test Completion – <Duration>4
4Project Completion4
4.1Final Evaluation Report4
5Reference Materials and Links4
Appendix A – Estimated Costs4
Appendix B – Review Forms4

S-AQMMA-11-R-0186 Appendix J-12 Department of State

S-AQMMA-11-R-0186 Appendix J-12 Department of State

<Product Name> Pilot Project Plan Objective

This pilot project objective is to validate use of the <product name>; that is to say, to determine whether the <product name> is fully functional and can be supported in the field. It is the goal and intention of TDB that the <Product name>, its installation and trial use meet all listed criteria.

Specific objectives for this pilot project plan include validating the:

· Use bullet points

To meet the plan objective, the <product name> will be deployed at the following location(s):

· Use bullet points. If the product will be deployed at multiple locations, note any differences between the deployment/installation methods specific to each location.

Project Management

Test Manager

The DS/FSE/TDB Test Manager for the <product name> field evaluation will be <insert name> (<email address>). The alternate Test Manager is <insert name> (<email address>). All ESSRs, evaluation test reports, requests for additional support, questions or other comments are to be sent to the Test Managers.

Changes to the Test Plan

Any changes to or deviations from the test plan must be approved by the Test Manager.

On-Site Support

DS/FSE/TDB will provide a subject matter expert (SME) for on-site support. Deployment of the SME will be scheduled for <duration>, overlapping the end of the installation and the beginning of the functional test phases. The Test Manager will coordinate and schedule the actual timing of this support with the OIC/SEO.

Roles and Responsibilities Test Manager The Test Manager will:

· Use bullet points

OIC/ESO

The OIC/ESO will:

· Use bullet points

DS/FSE/TDB

TDB will:

· Use bullet points

DS/FSE/TDB SME

The DS/FSE/TDB SME will:

· Use bullet points SMSe and TOG SMSe and TOG will:

· Use bullet points DS/C/ST and DS/ST/FSE DS/C/ST will:

· Use bullet points

Resource Requirements ESO Labor Hours Estimated ESO labor hours for the testing of the <product name> are <Insert the number of estimated ESO hours. If there will be multiple installations, use bullet points to indicate how many estimated hours will be devoted to each installation.> DS/FSE/TDB Labor Hours DS/FSE/TDB will assist with installation, training, and monitoring of the project. This will require an estimated <if there will be only one installation, present the number of hours estimated for that installation; if there will be multiple installations, present the number of hours estimated per installation, and then the total number of estimated hours.> Material Costs The estimated material costs of the pilot project plan are <if there will be only one installation, present the estimated material costs for that installation; if there will be multiple installations, use bullet points to show each installation and its estimated material cost.> The estimated itemized cost breakdown and sample bill of material for each post is located in Appendix A.

DS/FSE/TDB SME Travel Costs The estimated travel and per diem costs of this pilot project plan are <if there will be only one installation for the SME to visit, present the estimated travel and per diem costs of that visit; if there will be visits to multiple installations, use bullet points to show the estimated travel and per diem costs of each.>

Project Timeline

The project timeline includes survey, ordering, shipping via unclassified or classified pouch, installation, operations testing, feedback, and project completion. On-site testing is scheduled for <insert number> days, beginning after system installation. The total project timeline is <insert number> weeks.

Project Task
Estimated Hours
Timeline (Weeks)
1
2
3-8
9
10
11
12
13-20
21
Pre-Installation Survey BOM
6
Order Equipment
4
Equipment Processing & Shipment
2
Installation
168
User Training
12
SME On-Site
80
Performance Testing
72
Post Test Analysis Report
22

Above: An example of what might fit into a Project Timeline table; change accordingly.

Training Requirements

List any special training requirements that will be anticipated (or state that none will be).

DS/FSE/TDB personnel may provide on-site and remote technical support as required.

Test Data and Reports Classification Proper classification and marking are required for all test data and reports prepared as part of this pilot project plan. Report/document security classification may range from “UNCLASSIFIED” to “SECRET”. For classification authority and marking instructions, refer to the Diplomatic Security Classification Guide (SCG) for Design and Construction of Overseas Facilities, Table IV-7.

Delivery ESSRs, test data and reports are to be returned to the Test Manager and alternate Test Manager within five business days of task completion. Copies of EESRs and other data must be provided to the RDSE, OIC/ESC and RSO as part of normal reporting.

Special Requirements

List any special requirements that will be anticipated (or state that none will be).

Project Tasks

Work Breakdown Structure

The table below first categoirzes the types of labor that will be necessary to execute the pilot project plan, then divides these categories into specific tasks/requirements. Each task/requirement is assigned a party responsible for producing the associated deliverable(s) within the scheduled timeline.

Below: An example of what might appear in the table; change accordingly.

Task/Requirement
Responsible Party
Start Time/Date/Frequency
Deliverable
Duration

Pre-Installation

Week 1

1 week

Survey/BOM
ESO
Week 1
Completed survey ESSR
Approve survey/BOM
DS/FSE/TDB
Week 1
Completed BOM/CMMS Maximo order
Review of Deployment Document – Application Guide
ESO
Week 1
Application Guide Review Form

Procurement/ Shipping

Week 2

7 weeks

Procure remaining BOM materials
DS/FSE/TDB
Week 2
Equipment delivery on site

Installation

Week 9

3 weeks

Install system per the survey ESSR
ESO
Week 9
Installation Review Form & completed installation ESSR
System Programming
ESO
Week 11
Part of Installation Review Form
Review of Deployment Document – Installation Guide
ESO
Week 11
Installation Guide Review Form

Functional Testing

Week 12

1 week

Walktest, Post 1 communications, SMSe communications and printer verification
ESO
Week 12
Part of Installation Review Form

User Training

Week 12

2 days

User Training
ESO
Week 12
List of personnel trained

Performance Testing

Week 13

8 weeks

Continuous, daily and weekly monitoring
ESO

SMSe

DS/FSE/TDB

Week 13/daily
Weekly Review Form
Review of Deployment Document – User’s Guide
ESO
Week 20
User Guide Review Form
Performance test completion
ESO
Week 20
Performance test completion ESSR

Post Test

Week 21

1 week

Performance test review
ESO

Pilot Project Review Form

Task Descriptions

Pre-Installation Tasks – <Duration> Pre-installation tasks will be completed after the Test Manager officially coordinates/informs all participants of a start date. The objectives of these tasks are the preparation of a site-specific installation plan and the evaluation of documentation quality. These tasks are as follows <drafter: add or subtract as needed>:

1. Task: Survey/BOM

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: Deployment Document – Application Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Deliverable: Survey ESSR

2. Task: Review of Deployment Document – Application Guide

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: Deployment Document – Application Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Deliverable: Application Guide Review Form

3. Task: ESSR Review Adjustment and Approval

· Responsible Party: DS/FSE/TDB

· Reference: Survey ESSR

· Deliverable: Email acknowledgment to OIC/ESO

Procurement/Shipping – <Duration> Using the bill of material from the ESSR, DS/FSE/TDB will supply/order/procure/ship necessary materials to post.

Task: Procure remaining BOM materials

· Responsible Party: DS/FSE/TDB

· Reference: Survey ESSR

· Deliverable: Installation materials (complete BOM) shipped to post

Installation Tasks – <Duration> Work on installation tasks will begin upon receipt of the complete BOM. The objectives for these tasks are system installation, system programming, and ensuring the quality of documentation.

1. Task: Install <product> per the ESSR

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: Survey ESSR/Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Work Procedure: The ESO will install the system. A DS/FSE/TDB SME may provide on-site assistance during <duration of SME visit>.

· Deliverable: Installation ESSR (completed system installation)

2. Task: System Programming

· Responsible Party: ESO/TDB

· Reference: Installation ESSR/Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Work Procedure: <describe the programming procedure>

· Deliverable: Installation Guide Review Form

3. Task: Installation Verification

· Responsible Party: OIC/ESO and SME

· Reference: Survey ESSR/Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Test Procedure: OIC/ESO and SME collectively ensure that the <product name> is properly installed and ready for functional testing.

· Deliverable: Installation Review Form

4. Task: Review of Deployment Document – Installation Guide

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Deliverable: Installation Guide Review Form

Functional Testing – <Duration> After installation, the <product name> will be tested in the site-specific configuration. Reporting requirements will include programming, usability, SMSe integration, documentation clarity, technical attributes of the system, and other ESO observations.

Task: <specify tests applicable to the product>

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: Deployment Document – Installation Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Deliverable: Installation Guide Review Form

User Training – <Duration> Task: User Training

· Responsible Party: ESO/TDB

· Reference: Deployment Document – User’s Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Deliverable: List of personnel trained

Performance Testing – <Duration> Performance testing validates the daily operational use of the system.

1. Task: Continuous, Daily and Weekly Monitoring

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: Deployment Document – User’s Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Test Procedure: Daily: operational assessments; weekly: system log information and walktests

· Deliverable: Weekly Review Form

2. Task: Documentation Review – User’s Guide

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: Deployment Document – User’s Guide/manufacturer’s literature

· Deliverable: User’s Guide Review Form Performance Test Completion – <Duration>

1. Task: Post Test Report

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: None

· Deliverable: Performance Test Review Form

2. Performance Test EESR

· Responsible Party: ESO

· Reference: None

· Deliverable: Performance Test ESSR

Project Completion

Final Evaluation Report

Once field testing is complete, the Test Manager will collate/evaluate test data and prepare a final evaluation report. This report will contain an overview of the <product name> Pilot Project Plan, problems encountered, overall analysis of the test, feedback received from the field, and other significant events.

The final evaluation report will be submitted for DS/C/ST management review and decision. This decision will have one of three outcomes:

· The <product name> is fully approved for general use.

· The <product name> is tentatively approved, subject to additional modifications or adjustment.

· The <product name> is not approved.

If the <product name> is tentatively or fully approved, the installed hardware will remain in operation at post as fully functional. If the <product name> is not approved, the hardware must be removed and replaced with an approved system.

Reference Materials and Links

Primary TDB DSNET website for <subject matter in question>:

<insert address> The following documents are relevant to this field test and can be found at the above website:

· Use bullet points

Appendix A – Estimated Costs

The table below shows the estimated cost/quantity of each component required for installation of the <product>. The actual quantity and total cost may vary per the ESSR.

Component
DS Catalog #
Qty.
Cost Each
Extended Cost

Appendix B – Review Forms

The following items are found in this appendix:

· Application Guide Review Form

· Installation Guide Review Form

· User Guide Review Form

· Installation Review Form

· Weekly Review Form

· Performance Test Review Form

Application Guide Review Form

Completed by: ____________________ Office Symbol: __________________________ Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________

Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the survey. Thank you for your participation.

Email to:HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov)
And to:MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov)
Or: Mail hard copy to:Department of State
ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager
DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24
5800 Barclay Drive
Alexandria, VA 22315

Part 1: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments on rating in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.

Usability Questions
Rating Scale

1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree 5 - Strongly Agree Specific Comments on Rating

The Application Guide and manufacturer’s literature include all necessary information
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The Application Guide is well-organized and concise
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The Application Guide has no ambiguous information
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The illustrations in the Application Guide make sense and follow the text
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Any options in the Application Guide are identified and decision criteria are clearly stated
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The Application Guide clearly explains the application of the <product>
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
System design requirements are clear
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The approved system configuration is logical and appropriate
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The Application Guide’s “Sample Bill of Materials” is adequate and useful
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The survey ESSR was successfully completed using Application Guide and referenced materials
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

Part 2: Additional Comments on the Application Guide and manufacturer’s literature Please make any comments that require extended explanation in the space provided below.

Additional Comments

Installation Guide Review Form

Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________

Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the <product> installation. Thank you for your participation.

Email to:HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov)
And to:MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov)
Or: Mail hard copy to:Department of State
ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager
DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24
5800 Barclay Drive
Alexandria, VA 22315

Part 1: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments on rating in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.

Usability Questions
Rating Scale

1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree

Specific Comments on Rating

The Installation Guide and manufacturer’s literature includes all necessary information
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The Installation Guide is well-organized and concise
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The Installation Guide has no ambiguous information
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The illustrations in the Installation Guide make sense and follow the text
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Any options in the Installation Guide are identified and decision criteria are clearly stated
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Installation steps are clearly described
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The Installation Guide contains only important, DS-specific information
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Installation instructions are clear and logical
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The <product> was successfully installed using only the Installation Guide and referenced materials
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

Part 2: Additional Comments on the Installation Guide and Manufacturer’s Literature

Additional Comments

User Guide Review Form

Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________

Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the performance test. Thank you for your participation.

Email to:HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov)
And to:MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov)
Or: Mail hard copy to:Department of State
ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager
DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24
5800 Barclay Drive
Alexandria, VA 22315

Part 1: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments on rating in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.

Usability Questions
Rating Scale

1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree

Specific Comments on Rating

The User Guide and manufacturer’s literature includes all necessary information
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The User Guide is well-organized and concise
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The User Guide has no ambiguous information
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Illustrations in the User Guide make sense and follow the text
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Any options in the User Guide are identified and decision criteria are clearly stated
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The User Guide clearly describes opening procedures for the <product>
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The User Guide clearly describes closing procedures for the <product>
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The User Guide clearly describes potential error conditions for the <product>
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The User Guide clearly describes system audit data for the <product>
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The User Guide clearly describes MSG operating procedures for the <product>
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
<product> operating instructions are clear and logical
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The <product> was successfully operated using only the User Guide and referenced materials
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Personnel were properly trained using only the User Guide and referenced materials
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

Part 2: Additional Comments on the User Guide and Manufacturer’s Literature

Additional Comments

Installation Review Form

Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________

Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the <product> installation, programming, and verification. Thank you for your participation.

Email to:HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov)
And to:MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov)
Or: Mail hard copy to:Department of State
ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager
DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24
5800 Barclay Drive
Alexandria, VA 22315

Part 1: Time Required to Install and Program the <product> Please enter the labor hours required to complete the tasks listed. Comments may be entered in Part 3 of this document.

Description
Time

Time to install the <product>

Time to program the <product> through the keyboard

Time to program the <product> with the programming software

Part 2: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments on rating in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.

Usability Questions
Rating Scale

1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree 5 - Strongly Agree Specific Comments on Rating

Overall

The <product> was easy to install.
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
No <product> parts failed during installation
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The <product> fulfills its intended function
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Need for the TDB SME was reduced due to well-written documentation
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

Installation

Vendor-provided packages contained all listed parts
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
All parts were undamaged when received
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Installation was completed on schedule
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The installation footprint was reasonable
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

System Programming

System programming through the keyboard is intuitive
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
System programming through the keyboard was completed on schedule
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Changes to the programming through the keyboard are easy and intuitive
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
System programming with the programming software is intuitive
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
System programming with the programming software was completed on schedule
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Changes to the programming with the programming software are easy and intuitive
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

SMSe Integration

System integration with SMSeNet was easy
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Connection with SMSeNet was quickly established
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

Appearance

The <product> installation appears professional
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

Post 1 Integration (Applies to Posts B and D - ONLY)

System integration with Post 1 was easy
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
Connection with Post 1 was quickly established
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

Part 3: Additional Comments on Installation Review Form

Additional Comments

Weekly Review Form

Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________

Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after the end of the week being reported. Thank you for your participation.

Email to:HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov)
And to:MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov)
Or: Mail hard copy to:Department of State
ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager
DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24
5800 Barclay Drive
Alexandria, VA 22315

Part 1: Overall Comments and Technical Beta Evaluation Please complete the questions below, accounting for daily occurrences. All occurrences or failures require a comment for substantiation. One feedback form is required for each week of the eight-week Pilot Project Plan. Please print and attach a weekly log summary of event data.

Unexpected events include loss of communications, unexplained alarms, component failures, or anything that deviates from normal operation.

Week ______

Daily Test
Unexpected Events
Number of occurrences
Specific Comments on Corrective Action

Saturday

Sunday

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Weekly Test
Pass
Fail
Specific Comments on Corrective Action

Walk Test

Post 1 Connectivity

SMSe Connectivity and Reporting

Event Printer

Part 2: Additional Comments on Installation Review Form

Additional Comments

Performance Test Review Form

Phone: __________________ E-mail: ________________________ Date: _____________

Please complete the form and return to DS/FSE/TDB no later than one (1) week after completing the Performance Test. Thank you for your participation.

Email to:HartzogJD@state.gov (HartzogJD@state.sgov.gov)
And to:MorrowTA@state.gov (MorrowTA@state.sgov.gov)
Or: Mail hard copy to:Department of State
ATTN: CU-50 Test Manager
DS/FSE/TDB, SA-24
5800 Barclay Drive
Alexandria, VA 22315

Part 1: Usability Questions and Specific Comments on Ratings Please complete the questions below, using the 5-point rating scale indicated. Please enter any specific comments in the space provided. Any rating of “1” requires a comment for substantiation, but comments for any rating are welcome.

Usability Questions
Rating Scale

1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Somewhat Disagree 3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree (No Opinion) 4 - Somewhat Agree 5 - Strongly Agree Specific Comments on Rating

Overall

The <product> did not require maintenance or repair for the duration of the test
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The <product> operated properly for the duration of the test
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
This system is intuitive and easy to use
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The <product> system is easily configured to the post’s specific situation
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
System output and reports are useful and meet post needs
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

System Use

The <product> system is easy to use by technical personnel
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The <product> system is easy to use by non-technical personnel
1-------2-------3-------4-------5
The <product> system is usable by security personnel
1-------2-------3-------4-------5

Part 2: Additional Comments on Performance Test Review Form

Additional Comments image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .