RFP 20R6009.pdf

SOLICITATION N6247020R6009

OFFICER IN CHARGE OF CONSTRUCTION FLORENCE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINNERING COMMAND ATLANTIC

1121 HAMMOND ROAD, CAMP LEJEUNE, NC 28547-2521

POC: Primary: Diana Rivera, (910) 467-6278, diana.rivera3@navy.mil Secondary: Meghan Hislop, (910) 450-7173, meghan.hislop@navy.mil

GLOBAL CONTINENCY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (GCC)

NAVFAC ATLANTIC

PROPOSED TASK ORDER:

DESIGN BUILD HADNOT POINT FACILITY REPAIRS, BUILDING 309

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA

DATE OF SOLICITATION: 20 May 2020

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT FUNDING MAY NOT BECOME AVAILABLE. IF FUNDS

ARE NOT AVILABLE, NO AWARD WILL BE MADE AS RESULT OF THIS SOLICITATION.

OFFERORS WILL NOT BE REIMBURSED FOR ANY EFFORT OR PROPOSAL COSTS

RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION.

ONLY THE FOLLOWING LIST OF GCC MACC CONTRACTORS MAY SUBMIT A

PROPOSAL FOR THIS PROJECT:

N6247019D8022 AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 POC: Gary Bilyeu, Tanya Arries, Gary Engle, Michael Blount, & Nick Steyn Email: gary.bilyeu@aecom.com;

tanya.arries@aecom.com;

gary.engle@aecom.com;

michael.blount@aecom.com;

nick.steyn@aecom.com

N6247019D8023 Aptim Federal Services, LLC 1725 Duke Street, Suite 400 Alexandria, VA 22314 POC: William Deane & Ron Plaseied Email: william.deane@aptim.com;

ron.plaseied@aptim.com

N6247019D8024 CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.

9189 South Jamaica Street Englewood, CO 80112 POC: Steven Griswold & Brian Yoon Email: Steven.Griswold@jacobs.com;

Brian.Yoon@jacobs.com

N6247019D8025 Environmental Chemical Corporation 1240 Bayshore Highway Burlingame, CA 94010 POC: Roland Moreau Email: RMoreau@ecc.net;

corporate@ecc.net mailto:christina.newton1@navy.mil mailto:meghan.hislop@navy.mil mailto:gary.bilyeu@aecom.com mailto:tanya.arries@aecom.com mailto:gary.engle@aecom.com mailto:michael.blount@aecom.com mailto:nick.steyn@aecom.com mailto:william.deane@aptim.com mailto:ron.plaseied@aptim.com mailto:Steven.Griswold@jacobs.com mailto:Brian.Yoon@jacobs.com mailto:RMoreau@ecc.net mailto:corporate@ecc.net

20-0040 Hadnot Point Facility Repairs Bldg. 309 Solicitation N6247020R6009 Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Work Order 1661573

N6247019D8026 Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.

100 Fluor Daniel Drive Greenville, SC 29607 POC: Lisa Bennett & Michael D’Arcangelo Email: Lisa.Bennett@fluor.com;

Michael.D’Arcangelo@Fluor.com

N6247019D8027 Perini Management Services, Inc.

73 Mount Wayte Avenue Framingham, MA 01702 POC: Paul Lloyd, Brian Labbe, & Chris Chace Email: plloyd@perini.com;

blabbe@perini.com;

cchace@perini.com GCC@perini.com mailto:Lisa.Bennett@fluor.com mailto:plloyd@perini.com mailto:blabbe@perini.com mailto:cchace@perini.com mailto:GCC@perini.com

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

All terms and conditions of N6247019D8022/8023/8024/8025/8026/8027 Indefinite Delivery Quantity Contract apply to this solicitation. Please review your MACC award document for guidance on contract clauses and requirements that may pertain to this order. You are responsible to adhere to all applicable clauses, even if they are not stated in this RFP package or the Task Order award document. For clarification on any clause or other contractual issue, please contact Meghan Hislop at meghan.hislop@navy.mil.

Amendments will be posted directly to beta.sam.gov under Contract Opportunities.

NAVFAC Solicitation No.: N6247020R6009

The specifications, drawings, and other pertinent attachments are posted on https://beta.sam.gov/ under ‘Attachments/Links.’

Title: Design-Build Hadnot Point Facility Repairs, Building 309

Description of the Work: The project includes full building renovation of building 309.

Estimated Budget Amount for Design and Construction: Approximately $20,000,000.00

Time for Completion: Contract completion date is 675 calendar days. The days are calculated from date of task order award, which includes the initial 15 days allowed for distribution of the task order award, submission and approval of insurance, bonding and other requirements set forth in the task order/MACC. Task order award is considered notice to proceed.

Special Scheduling Requirements: Not applicable.

Wage Determination: General Decision Number NC20200038 dated 01/03/2020, Construction Type:

Building, applies and is included below.

Liquidated Damages: In accordance with FAR 52.211-12 Liquidated Damages, if the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $1,715.00 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

Utilities: In accordance with FAR 52.236-14 Availability and Use of Utility Services - The Government shall make all reasonably required amounts of utilities available to the Contractor from existing outlets and supplies, as specified in the contract. Unless otherwise provided in the contract, the amount of each utility service consumed shall be charged to or paid for by the Contractor at prevailing rates charged to the Government or, where the utility is produced by the Government, at reasonable rates determined by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall carefully conserve any utilities furnished without charge.

Record Shop Drawings: In accordance with FAR 52.236.21 Specifications and Drawings for Construction, record shop drawings are required. Reproducible copies of these record drawings are required.

Government Furnished Property: Not Included.

mailto:meghan.hislop@navy.mil https://beta.sam.gov/

Basis for Award: This task order will be awarded on a fair opportunity basis pursuant to FAR 16.505 ordering procedures. The proposed task order will be awarded to the responsible offeror, offering the best value to the Government. For this task order, to make a determination of best value, tradeoff selection procedures are selected.

Bond Requirements: In accordance with FAR 52.228-1, Bid Guarantees, each offeror shall submit with its offer a guarantee bond (Standard Form 24) in a penal sum equal to at least 20 percent of the offer price or $3,000,000, whichever is less.

Performance and Payment Bonds are required from the contract task order awardee ten (10) calendar days after date of award.

Proposal Acceptance Period: 120 days from receipt of offers.

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs): Offerors who determine that the technical and or contractual requirements of this RFP require clarification(s) in order to permit submittal of a responsive proposal shall submit all questions in writing. PPIs must be submitted in writing to Diana Rivera at diana.rivera3@navy.mil. The cutoff for PPIs is 12 June 2020 in order to process all inquiries by the proposal due date. Additionally, all inquiries shall be submitted using the Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) form, filed under “Attachments/Links.” Do not submit the same inquiry more than once. Please verify that inquiries submitted by you on behalf of your subcontractors are not duplicates. A response will be published via an amendment to beta.sam.gov.

Site Visit: All MACC holders are invited to attend Site Visit for the project. Firms participating in the site visit will not be directly compensated for their participation. The site visit will be held the week of June 1st. Additional information regarding base access, time, date and location will be addressed in a future amendment. Photographs will be allowed.

Proposal Due Date: 25 June 2020 no later than 1400 (EDT). LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE

CONSIDERED.

Proposal Delivery Information: All proposals shall be mailed or hand carried to the following address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic Attn: Meghan J. Hislop 1005 Michael Road Camp Lejeune, NC 28547

Hand Carried Proposals: Offerors who would like to hand deliver their proposal must have a valid DBIDS badge to enter Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune.

Evaluation Factors for Award

The Proposed Task Order will be awarded to the responsible offeror offering the best value to the Government. To make a determination of Best Value, the Government shall evaluate price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Past Performance mailto:christina.newton1@navy.mil

Factor 2 – Technical Solution

The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factor (Factor 2

– Technical Solution) is of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 1 – Past Performance). The combined non-cost/price factors are approximately equal to price.

Non–price factors Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, and two (2) copies marked “Copy”, each in a separate three-ring binder (1.5 inch. maximum), and one electronic copy on CD with the following characteristics:

• Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format

• Drawings 11x17 inches and folded down to 8-1/2 x 11 inches

• 12-point font, Times New Roman

• One complete electronic copy of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file on a CDROM (include with the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard copies and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Title, phone number, and email address.

Price information contained in the technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, technical information contained in the price proposal will not be considered.

Factor 1 – Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offerors do not need to provide any information under this factor as the Government will base the evaluation on known past performance on task orders awarded under this Multiple Award Contract (MAC), or, if there is no past performance information available under this MAC, the Government will rely on information from the evaluation for the basic contract award. However, Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on task orders under this MAC. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues under this MAC. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on projects under this MAC. More emphasis will be placed on task orders that are more similar to the RFP. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s ability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking past performance information on other task orders under this Multiple Award Contract will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive a Neutral Confidence rating.

Factor 2 – Technical Solution

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror shall submit both a narrative describing its proposed technical solution for executing the project in a manner that meets the requirements of the RFP and a basic project schedule. The narrative for Factor 2 – Technical Solution shall not exceed five (5) double-sided pages (or ten (10) single-sided pages). The total page count is comprised of both 8 ½ x 11 inches text pages and 11x17 inches drawings/schedule pages. The narrative shall address all of the following:

- Project management team: Include a description of the proposed team members (including a) offeror’s key personnel and b) proposed major subcontractors) and their respective experience in executing requirements similar to the RFP. Address how the project management team intends to identify and obtain (either through direct employment or subcontracting) the necessary labor force to execute the requirements of the RFP.

- Project schedule: Describe the key elements of your scheduling/phasing plan, to demonstrate understanding of the project requirements. Address at a minimum the ability to complete all the work within the provided timeframe or better. Offerors may propose a shorter duration in their schedule; however, the proposed duration will be incorporated into the contract and liquidated damages shall start the day following the completion date included the Offeror’s proposal. The schedule and narrative should address potential impacts of submittals, reviews, and permits and detail a logical sequence of events to accomplish the scope of work as described in the RFP.

- HVAC and Direct Digital Control (DDC) installation and performance verification plan:

The narrative should address the Offeror’s plan to ensure proper design and installation of HVAC and DDC requirements, including Offeror’s proposed quality control measures and plan to ensure new DDC connects and communicates appropriately with the existing energy management control system (EMCS).

Narrative should also detail Offeror’s proposed TABS and performance verification plans.

If the Offeror utilizes experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate an acceptable technical solution under this evaluation factor, the proposal must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. Any provided letters will be exempt from the page count.

Price information contained in the technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, technical information contained in the price proposal will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative, considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project, and capability to fulfill the solicitation requirements, with a focus on the project management team, planned project schedule, and planned execution of HVAC and DDC requirements. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the design-build team's technical solution to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the technical requirements of the RFP.

Price

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offerors shall submit an original and one (1) copy of the price proposal, in separate three-ring binders or folders, which shall include the following:

• Cover page that includes:

- Solicitation Number

- Solicitation Title

- Prime Contractor Name

- Prime Contractor Address

- Phone Number

- Fax Number

- DUNS

- Cage Code

- Point of Contact

- Point of Contact Phone No.

- Point of Contact Email

• Price Proposal Form

• Acknowledged Amendments (if applicable)

• Bid Bond

The price proposal shall be submitted separately, but at the same time as the technical proposal. Offerors may ship both the price proposal and the technical proposal in the same shipping container. In the event of discrepancy, the original hard copy will govern. Furthermore, technical information contained in the price proposal will not be considered. Likewise, price information contained in the technical proposal will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total lump sum price. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

a. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

b. Comparison of proposed prices with the Independent Government Cost Estimate

(IGCE).

c. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

d. Comparison of market survey results.

VI. EVALUATION

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value-the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. Technical factor 2 and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price in the final best value determination.

5. Any proposal found to have a Deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the Deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a Significant Weakness or multiple Weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified Weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the Weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

ATTACHMENTS:

(A) Price Proposal Form

(B) Wage Determination

PRICE PROPOSAL FORM

DOCUMENT 00 22 13.00 20 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

02/14

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 CONTRACT LINE ITEMS

The terms Offeror and Bidder and versions thereof (offer/bid) have the same definition as used within this contract.

Provide the Contract Line Item (CLIN) lump sum price for the following items:

CLIN 0001 - BASE PRICE. Price includes the following for Project 20-0040, Hadnot Point Facility Repairs, Building 309:

CLIN 0001.

CLIN DESCRIPTION TOTAL PRICE FOR

CLIN 0001

0001 Price for the entire work for Building 309, in accordance with drawings, specifications, and RFP documents, but excluding work described in all other specified Contract Line Items

(CLIN).

Total Price for CLIN 0001 - BASE PRICE: $______________

1.2 GENERAL BID NOTES

a. Award will be made on the total sum of Contract Line Item 0001 (CLIN).

b. The Government may reject an offer as nonresponsive if it is materially unbalanced. An offer is unbalanced when it is based on prices significantly less than cost for some work and prices which are significantly overstated for other work.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

Not used.

PART 3 EXECUTION

Not used.

-- End of Document

Amendments Acknowledged

Amendment No. Date Amendment No. Date Amendment No. Date

Submitted by:

Offeror: _________________________________

Signature: _________________________________

Wage Determination

General Decision Number: NC20200038 01/03/2020

Superseded General Decision Number: NC20190038

State: North Carolina

Construction Type: Building

County: Onslow County in North Carolina.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include single family homes or apartments up to and including 4 stories).

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.80 for calendar year 2020 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015.

If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.80 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2020.

If this contract is covered by the EO and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must pay workers in that classification at least the wage rate determined through the conformance process set forth in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(ii) (or the EO minimum wage rate, if it is higher than the conformed wage rate). The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Please note that this EO applies to the above-mentioned types of contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but it does not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/03/2020

IRON0848-005 02/01/2018

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, STRUCTURAL...........$ 25.00 13.50

* PLUM0421-003 07/01/2018

Rates Fringes

PIPEFITTER.......................$ 28.00 12.01

SUNC2011-019 08/24/2011

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 19.00 0.00

CARPENTER (Drywall Hanging Only)............................$ 13.83 0.00

CARPENTER (Form Work Only).......$ 13.38 1.80

CARPENTER, Excludes Drywall Hanging, and Form Work...........$ 16.39 4.26

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 15.80 0.00

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 20.64 6.68

HVAC MECHANIC (HVAC Duct Installation Only)...............$ 17.37 1.82

LABORER: Common or General......$ 11.13 0.32

LABORER: Landscape & Irrigation.......................$ 9.13 0.28

LABORER: Pipelayer..............$ 13.35 2.80

LABORER: Mason Tender-Brick/Cement/Concrete.....$ 12.00 0.00

OPERATOR:

Backhoe/Excavator/Trackhoe.......$ 18.47 2.41

OPERATOR: Bulldozer.............$ 16.00 1.87

OPERATOR: Crane.................$ 19.77 4.48

OPERATOR: Forklift..............$ 13.86 0.00

OPERATOR: Grader/Blade..........$ 15.72 1.49

OPERATOR: Loader................$ 16.17 0.25

PAINTER: Brush, Roller and Spray............................$ 12.35 0.00

PLUMBER..........................$ 18.48 3.93

ROOFER...........................$ 11.75 1.06

SHEET METAL WORKER, Excludes HVAC Duct Installation...........$ 15.81 1.40

TRUCK DRIVER.....................$ 13.38 1.48

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year. Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of ""identifiers"" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than ""SU"" or ""UAVG"" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey.

Example: PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the ""SU"" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination.

5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010

08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.) and 3.)

should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

Proposal Due Date: 25 June 2020 no later than 1400 (EDT). LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.