Attachment C Past performance questionnaire_ (002).docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- QSE--36C78626Q50075
About this file
This file is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor performance on completed or ongoing contracts. The questionnaire requires respondents to provide company information (name, contract number, type of work, contract period, and estimated award amount) and then rate the contractor's performance on a five-point scale ranging from unacceptable performance (1) to superior performance (5), with a "Not Applicable" option available.
The questionnaire assesses seven key performance dimensions: compliance with contractual terms and technical requirements, demonstration of reasonable and cooperative behavior in resolving customer requests and complaints, flexibility in satisfying customer requirements, adherence to contractual response times, invoice clarity and accuracy, overall performance, and likelihood of future contract award. Each question includes space for comments, allowing evaluators to provide context or specific examples supporting their ratings. This template would be used by the Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration to evaluate past performance of contractors bidding on the Turf Treatment Services contract for Culpeper National Cemetery (Solicitation Number QSE--36C78626Q50075), with quotes due February 26, 2026, by 12:00 PM EST.
View the file
Other files
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
COMPANY: __________________________________
Contract Number: ______________________________________
TYPE OF WORK: ___________________________________________
CONTRACT PERIOD: __________________________________________________
ESTIMATED CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT: _________________________________________
For the following questions, please choose the number on the scale from 1 to 5, which most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance on the contract referenced above.
1 --- unacceptable performance 2 --- marginally acceptable 3 --- fully acceptable or good 4 --- very good, with very few incidents 5 --- superior performance
1. Evaluate the company’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions and the technical requirements of the contract
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Comments:
2. Has the company demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior in resolving customer requests and complaints?
Comments:
3. Is the offeror flexible in satisfying the requirements of the customer?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Comments:
4. To what extend did the company meet the response times in the contract?
5. Are invoices easily understood and do they accurately reflect charges?
6. Rate the company’s overall performance:
7. Would you award to this company again?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .