Proposal_Score_Sheet_BPM003384.xlsx_-_drodriguez.pdf

PDF 288 KB Posted

Attached to
Master Agreement AZ|CTR057595
Contract number
CTR057595
Issued by
Arizona

About this file

The document is a Request for Statement of Qualification (SOQ) for Hydro Engineering Services issued by the Arizona Game and Fish Department, solicitation number BPM003384. The evaluation scoresheet includes nine offerors: Cardno Inc, DOWL Hkm, J2 Engineering and Environmental Design LLC, JE Fuller Hydrology & Geomorphology Inc, Natural Channel Design Inc, NextGen Engineering Inc, Stantec Consulting Services Inc, Tetra Tech Inc, and Wilson & Co. The document contains a detailed scoring matrix evaluating each firm across four key criteria: Project Experience, Overall Experience, Design Philosophy/Process/QA/QC, and Common Problems.

The SOQ outlines five primary evaluation sections, each with a maximum point allocation: Project Experience (40 points), Overall Experience (20 points), Design Philosophy (15 points), Common Problems (15 points), and Overall Quality of Proposal (10 points). Firms were required to submit detailed information including relevant project lists from the past 5 years, personnel resumes, organizational charts, design service breakdowns, in-house versus subcontracted work, and references. The scoring was completed on 6/8/2021 by Jose Daniel Rodriguez, the Watercraft Law Enforcement Programs Coordinator. The highest-scoring firm was Wilson & Co with 74 points, while the lowest-scoring firm was NextGen Engineering with 46 points.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
BPM003384_-_Evaluation_SPO_Form_120_-_Procurement_Disclosure_Statement_narasin.pdf PDF
CERT-902318121.pdf PDF
CTR057595_YR5_Contract_Renewal_AZGFD_Signed.pdf PDF
CTR057595__JE_Fuller_Hydrological_Engineering_Services_-Insurance.pdf PDF
CTR057595__JE_Fuller_Hydrological_Engineering_Services_Executed_-_YR2.pdf PDF
Evaluation_Team_Meeting_Sign_in_Sheet.docx DOCX document
JE_Fuller_BAFO_Sheet_9-15-21-Signed.pdf PDF
JE_Fuller_Negotiations_Sheet_6-18-2021__6-21-21_Fuller.pdf PDF
Proposal_Score_Sheet_BPM003384.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ST21E9_1.PDF PDF
STAZMA_3.PDF PDF
hydro_evals_June_2021_gbleyl.pdf PDF
EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_BPM003384.pdf PDF
Evaluation_for_Committee_Members_-drodriguez.pdf PDF
Guidelines_for_Evaluation_for_Committee_Members.pdf PDF
JEFuller_CORRECTED_O_A_for_BPM003384_signed.pdf PDF
JE_Fuller_AZ_Corp_Commision_report.docx DOCX document
STAZMA_2.PDF PDF
STAZMail_to_Unsucessfuls-_10-14-21_Solicitation_-_BPM003384__Hydro_Engineering_Services.pdf PDF
pds_drodriguez_pg2.jpeg JPEG file
pds_drodriguez_pg3.jpeg JPEG file
BPM003384_Due_Diligence_Check_List.pdf PDF
BPM003_2.PDF PDF
CERT-416374195.pdf PDF
Evaluation_Narrative_for_BPM003384_-NS.pdf PDF
Evaluation_Score_BPM003384.pdf PDF
Fuller_Certificate_-_AZ_G_F_5-1-21_to_5-1-22.pdf PDF
JEFuller-SOQ-BPM003384.pdf PDF
JE_Fuller_Negotiations_Sheet_8-10-21Fuller.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SAM_EntityInformation-JE_Fuller.pdf PDF
ST1A87_1.PDF PDF
STAZMA_1.PDF PDF
STAZ_Mail_-_BPM003384_-_Evaluation_Committee_ENGSERVICES-_HYDRO.pdf PDF
pds_drodriguez_pg1.jpeg JPEG file
CTR057595_Renewal_Yr4.pdf PDF
JE_Fuller_Negotiations_Sheet_8-10-21Fuller.pdf PDF
Arizona_Game_and_Fish_Department_JE_Fuller_Hydrology___Geomorphology_25_GL_24_AU_WC_PROF_24__8-21-2025_1293635259.pdf PDF
CTR057595_JE_Fuller_Hydrological_Engineering_Services-YR3.pdf PDF
Evaluation_Narrative_for_BPM003384_-_NS.pdf PDF
Proposal_Score_Sheet_BPM003384_-_NS.pdf PDF
RFP_BPM003384_Hydro_Eng_Services_Award_Determination.docx DOCX document
RFP_BPM003384_Hydro_Eng_Services_Award_Determination.pdf PDF
RFP_BPM003384_Hydro_Eng_Services_Award_Determination_signed.pdf PDF
STAZMA_4.PDF PDF
STAZMail_10-14-21-_NOA-_BPM003384__Hydro_Engineering_Services_-_JE_Fuller.pdf PDF
TO_JE_Fuller_BAFO_Sheet_9-15-21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 46

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Offerors

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT

M ax im um

P oi nt s

C ar dn o

In c

D ow l H km

J 2 E ng in ee rin g an d En vi ro nm en ta l D es ig n

LL

C

JE

F ul le r H yd ro lo gy

G eo m or ph ol og y In c

N at ur al

C ha nn el

D es ig n In c

N ex tG en

E ng in ee rin g

In c

St an te c

C on su lti ng

Se rv ic es

In c

Te tra

T ec h In c

W ils on

C o.

Request for Statement of Qualification for Hydro Engineering Services Solicitation BPM003384

Evaluator's name:

Project Experience 40 28

Overall Experience 20 16

Design Philosophy, Process, QA/QC 15 12

Common Problems 15 12

Overall Quality of Proposal 10 10

TOTAL POINTS 100 78 70 60 68 46 48 58 62 74

I hereby attest that the points awarded to each bidder listed above were scored in accordance with the established evaluation criterita and represent my best judgement of the bidder's proposal. As indicated by the highest total score, my ranking of the proposals are:

DOWL - 3 JE Fuller - 4 Wilson -2 CARDO -1 TETRA -5

Stantec - 7 NEXT Gen - 8 J2 - 6 NATURAL - 9

SIGNATURE

Jose Daniel Rodriguez Watercraft Law Enforcement Programs Coordinator

PRINTED NAME TITLE

DEPARTMENT DATE

Arizona Game and Fish Department 6/8/2021

1. Project Experience (Maximum 40 Points) -List of relevant projects completed within the last 5 years. Please list the location of the project and the personnel who worked on that project that would be working with AGFD. Please list what items of work which that person was responsible for on that project. Please do not list items that were consulted out. A resume should be provided for each person listed. Resumes will not be part of the page count.

2. Overall experience. (Maximum 20 Points) Provide any relevant organizational charts, resumes, and projects created as a team. Please list what design services will be performed in house versus subcontracted. Provide a list of all sub-consultants.

3. Design Philosophy (Maximum 15 Points) Provide factors your firm would consider for each study or design for each category.

4. Common Problems (Maximum 15 Points) List the common problems that you have seen with each criteria or challenges to design. How you have overcome these problems. Provide reference for projects listed with company/agency name, contact person and phone number

5. Overall Quality of Proposal (Maximum 10 Points)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .