Evaluation_Score_BPM003384.pdf
PDF 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR057595
- Contract number
- CTR057595
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is an evaluation scoresheet for Solicitation BPM003384 for Hydro Engineering Services, featuring individual and consensus scores for nine engineering firms: Cardno Inc, Dowl Hkm, J2 Engineering, JE Fuller, Natural Channel Design, NextGen Engineering, Stantec, Tetra Tech, and Wilson & Co. Three evaluators scored each firm across five categories: Project Experience, Overall Experience, Design Philosophy/Process/QA/QC, Common Problems, and Overall Quality of Proposal, with maximum possible points totaling 100.
The scoring reveals that J2 Engineering ranked first with a total score of 73.33, followed by Dowl Hkm at 68.67 and Cardno Inc at 68.33. The evaluation considered multiple technical and qualitative aspects of each firm's proposal, with scores ranging from 39.33 to 76 across different evaluators. The lowest-ranked firms were Natural Channel Design and NextGen Engineering, scoring 45.33 and 39.33 respectively. The scoresheet provides a comprehensive comparative assessment of the engineering firms' capabilities and proposal quality for hydro engineering services, with weighted scoring across different professional competency areas.
View the file
Other files
Show all 46
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
M A
X
IM
U M
P O
IN
T
S
C a rd n o I n c
D o w l H k m
J
E n g in e e ri n g
J E
F u ll e r
N a tu ra l
C h a n n e l
D e s ig
N x tG
E g in e e ri g
S ta n te c
T e tr a
T e c h
W il s o
C o
Evaluator 1 22 22 10 22 5 5 18 14 10
2 28 32 25 35 20 15 30 31 32
3 28 28 18 28 20 20 20 20 28
CONSENSUS SCORE 26 27.333 17.667 28.333 15 13.333 22.667 21.667 23.333
Evaluator 1 14 12 10 14 5 5 8 8 15
2 15 13 15 18 10 10 18 15 17
3 16 16 14 16 12 12 14 16 16
CONSENSUS SCORE 15 13.667 13 16 9 9 13.333 13 16
Design Philosophy, Process, QA/QC
Evaluator 1 8 9 12 13 5 5 11 7 7
2 12 14 12 13 10 10 12 12 12
3 12 8 10 8 6 8 8 10 12
CONSENSUS SCORE 10.6667 10.333 11.333 11.333 7 7.6667 10.333 9.6667 10.333
Evaluator 1 6 7 7 14 12 2 5 11 5 2 12 12 12 10 10 10 8 8 12 3 12 8 8 6 4 4 8 6 8
CONSENSUS SCORE 10 9 9 10 8.6667 5.3333 7 8.3333 8.3333
Evaluator 1 2 6 6 6 4 2 6 5 6
2 8 9 10 7 9 6 8 8 9
3 10 10 10 10 4 4 8 10 10
CONSENSUS SCORE 6.66667 8.3333 8.6667 7.6667 5.6667 4 7.3333 7.6667 8.3333
100 68.33 68.67 59.67 73.33 45.33 39.33 60.67 60.33 66.33
Evaluator 1 52 56 45 69 31 19 48 45 43
2 75 80 74 83 59 51 76 74 82
3 78 70 60 68 46 48 58 62 74
64 68 60 76 45 35 62 60 63
RANK 3 2 6 1 8 9 5 6 4
Solicitation BPM003384 Hydro Engineering Services - EVALUATOR'S INDIVIDUAL SCORES
Project Experience
Common Problems
TOTAL SCORE
Overall Experience
Overall Quality of Proposal
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .