Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, INTERMOUNTAIN REGION 4, ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES MATOC
Solicitation number
1240LU24R0012
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for offerors responding to USFS Region 4 Road and Bridge Construction MATOC Solicitation 1240LU24R0012. The questionnaire is to be submitted to clients for projects listed under Factor 1, Subfactor 1-Experience where no CPARS evaluations exist, with completed forms to be sent directly to the Contracting Officer at paul.larsen@usda.gov.

The PPQ requires offerors to complete basic project information (items 1-10) including contractor name, client details, contract value, work description, role as prime/sub, project duration, location, and completion status. The client portion evaluates contractor performance across multiple categories including quality, schedule compliance, client satisfaction, management effectiveness, cost control, and safety using a 5-tier rating system (Outstanding, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory). The form emphasizes confidentiality of respondent names per FAR 15.306(e)(4) and includes space for additional remarks.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
1240LU24R0012 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
RFIs as of 27Jan2025.pdf PDF
RFIs as of 21Jan2025.pdf PDF
FSR4_RoadandBridgeMATOC_SiteVisit_Attendance_241028.pdf PDF
Upper Green River Drawings 1.7.2025 Amd 0002.pdf PDF
Causey Reservoir Drawings 01.10.2025_Part2.pdf PDF
Causey Reservoir Drawings 01.10.2025_Part1.pdf PDF
Causey Reservoir SOI 1.10.2025 Amd 0002.pdf PDF
Cove Mountain SOI Amd 0002.pdf PDF
Upper Green River SOI 1.7.2025 Amd 0002.pdf PDF
1240LU24R0012 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Charleston Jarbidge Site Pictures.pdf PDF
RFIs as of 16Jan2025.pdf PDF
RFIs as of 8Jan2025.pdf PDF
North Fritz Creek Images.pdf PDF
1240LU24R0012 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Cove Mountain Drawings.pdf PDF
Charleston Jarbidge TOPR.pdf PDF
Upper Green River TOPR.pdf PDF
Charleston Jarbidge Bridge FSSS.pdf PDF
Upper Green River Drawings.pdf PDF
North Fritz Culvert TOPR.pdf PDF
Cove Mountain FSSS final.pdf PDF
North Fritz Culvert Drawings.pdf PDF
North Fritz Culvert SOI.pdf PDF
Cove Mountain TOPR.pdf PDF
Upper Green River FSSS.pdf PDF
Causey TOPR.pdf PDF
Charleston Jarbidge SOI.pdf PDF
Causey Cover Sheet Signed.pdf PDF
North Fritz Culvert FSSS.pdf PDF
Cove Mountain SOI.pdf PDF
Causey Reservoir FSSS.pdf PDF
Causey Reservoir Drawings.pdf PDF
Causey Reservoir SOI.pdf PDF
1240LU24R0012 USFS Region 4 MATOC.pdf PDF
Upper Green River SOI.pdf PDF
Charleston Jarbidge Bridge Drawings.pdf PDF
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CONTRACTOR (Offeror) INSERT YOUR NAME HERE USFS Region 4 Road and Bridge Construction MATOC Solicitation 1240LU24R0012 Past Performance Questionnaire

Instructions to Offeror for sending Questionnaires:

This Past Performance Questionnaire should be submitted to the clients of any of the projects listed in Factor 1, Subfactor 1- Experience of the proposal for which there are no Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluations. For government contracts, send to the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer’s Representative. For commercial clients, send to personnel with duties similar to those for government contracts. Offerors should follow-up and encourage references to return completed questionnaires in a timely manner.

The offeror shall complete items 1- 10 and send to the clients for completion and submission to the Contracting Officer at: Paul.larsen@usda.gov

USFS Region 4 Road and Bridge Construction MATOC Solicitation 1240LU24R0012 Past Performance Questionnaire We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm will be submitting a proposal under a project advertised by the United States Forest Service, Region 4. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), the government will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the questions below will assist the government evaluation team in this process. Please complete the questions below as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided at the end for additional comments. Only one response is required.

Please return your completed questionnaire directly to the Contracting Officer for the Forest Service at: paul.larsen@usda.gov This documentation must arrive NOT LATER THAN [Contractor to enter date and should note that these questionnaires need to be delivered prior to the solicitation closing date] so that it can be evaluated with our proposal.

If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact the Contracting Officer at paul.larsen@usda.gov (primary means) or by telephone at (406) 223-4463. Thank you for your assistance.

ITEMS 1-10 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR:

1. Contractor Name (Offeror):

2. Client or Customer Name and POC:

3. Project Name:

4. Contract Number (if applicable):

5. Contract Value:

6. Description of work performed:

7. Was work performed as a prime or subcontractor?

8. Approximate duration of the project (weeks or days):

9. Project location:

10. Date project completed (if not yet complete list percent completed):

THE FOLLOWING TO BE SENT TO AND COMPLETED BY THE CLIENT:

Please note that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306(e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained.

Ratings:

· Outstanding (O): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

· Very Good (VG): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Client’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

· Satisfactory (S): Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

· Marginal (M): Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

· Unsatisfactory (U): Performance does not meet the contractual requirements and correction or recovery is not likely. Contractor corrective actions were ineffective.

· Not Applicable (NA): No information or did not apply to your contract.

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE THAT BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

QUALITY

Ability to meet the quality standards specified in the contract
O VG S M U NA
Timeliness/effectiveness of solving contract problems
O VG S M U NA
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control and adherence to quality assurance requirements
O VG S M U NA

SCHEDULE

Compliance with contract delivery requirements and use of resources to manage contract schedule
O VG S M U NA

CLIENT SATISFACTION

Extent to which the client/end user was satisfied by the final product
O VG S M U NA
Extent to which the contractor was cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer
O VG S M U NA

MANAGEMENT

Effectiveness of on-site management, including subcontractors and material suppliers
O VG S M U NA
Knowledge and expertise demonstrated by contractor staff
O VG S M U NA
Ability to incorporate changes or modifications that arose during project execution
O VG S M U NA

COST/FINANCIAL

Contractor’s ability to perform within the contractually agreed to pricing
O VG S M U NA

SAFETY

Contractor’s ability to maintain a safe working environment and effectiveness in responding to any safety issues
O VG S M U NA

GENERAL

Compliance with contract terms and conditions
O VG S M U NA
Would you hire or work with this contractor again?
YES NO
In summary the overall rating for the work performed
O VG S M U NA

Please add any additional remarks as needed here (attach up to one additional page if needed):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .