N6945013R7999-0012.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N69450-13-R-7999 GTMO BASE OPERATING SUPPORT SERVICES

*** THIS AMENDMENT IS ONLY APPLICABLE TO THOSE OFFERORS IN THE COMPETITIVE RANGE ***

See BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Mar-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N69450-13-R-7999

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Jul-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Mar-2014

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

FSC-BOS

BUILDING 903, PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N69450-13-R-7999

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

AMENDMENT 0012

**THIS AMENDMENT IS ONLY APPLICABLE TO THOSE OFFERORS IN THE

COMPETITIVE RANGE**

The purpose of this amendment is to:

a. Request revised proposals and provide instructions for revised proposals.

b. Section C has been updated. A summary of the changes is provided below. The revised

Section C attachment is provided as file named:

“N6945013R7999SectionCAmendment0012.pdf”

i. 0200000 Management and Administration, Spec Item 2.3.12 Extended Stay Berthing Facilities (ESBF); Spec Item 2.3.13, Contractor Family/Management Quarters; Spec Item 2.3.17, Medical and Dental Services; and Spec Item 2.4.5, Availability of Petroleum Products: Updated requirements in Spec Items 2.3.12, 2.3.13, 2.3.17, and 2.4.5.

ii. 1502000 Facility Investment, Spec Item 3.2.1, HVAC and Refrigeration Systems: Related information was updated to remove Hospital air filter requirement from this sub-annex.

iii. 1606000 Water, Spec Item 3.2.1, Water Quality: Related Information and the Performance Standard was updated to include requirements regarding CNIC Instruction 5900.1, CNIC Instruction 5900.2 and CNIC Instruction 5900.3.

iv. 1700000 BSVE, Spec Item 3.2.2, Dispatching Service: Hours of operations were changed from 0730 to 1630 to 0600 to 1700.

c. Revise NFAS Clause 5252.246-9303, Consequences of Contractor’s Failure to Perform Required Services (OCT 2004) to include Change of Occupancy Maintenance (COM) liquidated damages.

d. Section J – The JB-2 Supplemental Pricing spreadsheet has been provided as file named:

“N6945013R7999JB-2SupplementalPricing.xls”

e. Revise 5252.215-9300, Content of Proposals.

i. 5252.215-9300(b)(2)d., to add the JB-2 Supplemental Pricing spreadsheet as a submittal.

ii. 5252.215-9300(b)(3)c., to request the JB-1 Attachment be provided in hard copy and EXCEL format.

iii. 5252.215-9300(b)(3)e., to increase the number of Non-Price Proposal Binder, page count limitation by 20 pages, for a total of 220 pages.

f. Updated Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award, 3(a)(1), to include the JB-2

Supplemental Pricing Attachment.

Note: Changes are annotated in red colored font.

The due date and time for revised proposals is 2:00 PM EDT, Tuesday, 25 March 2014.

REVISED PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

Offerors may now submit written proposal revisions for their responsibility determination, non-price/technical proposal, and/or price proposal, as applicable. Revised proposals must be received in our office by 2:00 PM EDT, on Tuesday, 25 March 2014.

As previously stated in NAVFAC letter dated 4 March 2014, the Government will require submission of fully conformed proposal revisions, with all changes annotated. The original submission requirements will remain unchanged, reference 5252.215-9300 CONTENT OF PROPOSALS, for details of proposal submittal requirements. Revised proposals shall be sent to the original proposal submission location, reference L.2 PROPOSAL DELIVERY, for proposal markings and delivery addresses.

You are permitted to increase the conformed non-price/technical proposal by 20 pages in order to fully address the issues set forth in the discussion questions. Index each change in the front of your revised proposals and ensure the location of the response to each question is identified (i.e., Volume, Table No., Paragraph No., Page No., etc.). Clearly mark the areas you have revised in your proposal. Revisions may be identified with bold print, vertical line in the margin, by underlining or with some type of identifiable marking to allow evaluators to find the changes easily. All remaining format restrictions provided in the original RFP remain unchanged.

Responses to each responsibility determination, technical and price discussion question shall be submitted with your revised proposal. These responses will not be included in the page limitation. In order to be binding, your responses must be included in your responsibility determination, technical and price proposals respectively. Index each change in the front of your revised proposal and ensure the location of the response to each question is identified (i.e., Volume, Table No., Paragraph No., Page No., etc.). A complete resubmission of the revised responsibility determination, technical and price proposal, with changes annotated, is required. Offerors who elect not to make any changes to their last responsibility determination, technical and/or price proposal submission shall provide a response stating there are “no changes to the offer” and submit the written response no later than the date and time stated above.

However, the offeror must address and include responses to all discussion questions in order to remain in the competition.

The Government will not accept any “conditioning” of your revised proposals. “Conditioning” means placing any restriction on your responsibility determination, technical and/or price proposals. You should have resolved all uncertainties during discussions.

The response to the questions and revised proposals are subject to FAR 52.215-1. The Government intends to make award without obtaining further revisions. Therefore, your revised proposal shall contain the best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 31-Dec-2013 02:00 PM to 25-Mar-2014 02:00 PM.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

This is a performance-based contract which incorporates performance-based specifications.

Consolidated BOS Services:

The files for Section C are provided as the following attachment posted on the NECO website at https://www.neco.navy.mil/index.aspx:

N6945013R7999SectionCAmendment0012.pdf

SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

5252.246-9303 CONSEQUENCES OF CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO PERFORM

REQUIRED SERVICES (OCT 2004)

The Contractor shall perform all of the contract requirements. The Government will inspect and assess Contractor performance in accordance with FAR 52.246-4, INSPECTION OF SERVICES - FIXED PRICE

The Government will require re-performance, withhold payment, or seek other suitable consideration for unsatisfactory or non-performed work. When defects can’t be corrected by re-performance, the Government may reduce the price to reflect the reduced value of services performed.

(a) PROCEDURES. In the case of unsatisfactory or non-performed work, the Government:

(1) may give the Contractor written notice of observed deficiencies prior to withholding payment for unsatisfactory or non-performed work and/or assessing liquidated damages. Such written notice shall not be a prerequisite for withholding payment for non-performed work. The Government may specify, as provided for below, that liquidated damages can be assessed against the Contractor. Such liquidated damages are to compensate the Government for administrative costs and other expenses resulting from the unsatisfactory or non-performed work.

(2) may, at its option, allow the Contractor an opportunity to re-perform the unsatisfactory or non-performed work, at no additional cost to the Government. In the case of daily work, corrective action must be completed within __4____ hours of notice to the Contractor. In the case of other work, corrective action must be completed within __24____ hours of notice. In addition, the Government can assess liquidated damages, as referenced above, in the amount of ___10___ percent of the value of all observed defects. The original inspection results of the Contractor’s work will not be modified upon re-inspection. However, the Contractor will be paid for satisfactorily re-performed work.

(3) shall withhold from the Contractor’s invoice all amounts associated with the unsatisfactory or non-performed work at the prices set out in the Schedule or provided by other provisions of this contract, unless the

Contractor is required to re-perform and satisfactorily complete the work. In addition, the Government can assess liquidated damages, as referenced above, in the amount of __20____ percent of the value of all observed defects.

(4) may, at its option, perform the work by Government personnel or by other means. The Government will reduce the amount of payment to the Contractor, by the amount paid to any Government personnel (based on wages, retirement and fringe benefits) plus material, or by the actual costs incurred to accomplish the work by other means.

If the actual costs cannot be readily determined, the prices set out in the Schedule will be used as the basis for the deduction. In addition, the Government can assess liquidated damages, as referenced above, in the amount of __10__ percent of the computed cost.

(b) The Contractor is responsible for maintaining an effective Quality Control Program during the course of the contract. Failure to maintain adequate quality control may result in Termination for Default.

(c) Re-performance by the Contractor does not waive the Government’s right to terminate for nonperformance in accordance with FAR clause 52.249-8, DEFAULT (FIXED-PRICE SUPPLY AND SERVICE) of Section I and all other remedies for default as may be provided by law.

(d) When WATCHSTANDING SERVICES apply. If the Contractor fails to provide qualified personnel or allows any post to be unmanned for a total of __10____ minutes in any shift, the Government may assign other persons to perform such work or withhold payment as specified below;

(1) When Watchstanding Services are performed by Government employees, withholdings shall be computed based on the current Federal Pay Schedule including wages, retirement and fringe benefits of the Government employees (civilian or military) who actually performed the work. In addition, the Government can assess liquidated damages, as referenced above, in the amount of __10____ percent of the computed cost.

(2) When non-performed Watchstanding Services are obtained under another contract, the Government will withhold an amount equal to the cost to the Government under that contract. In addition, the Government can assess liquidated damages, as referenced above, in the amount of __10___ percent of the cost.

(3) If no guard replacement is furnished by the Government and the work is not performed, the Government will withhold an amount equal to the cost to the Government of having a Government employee perform the work.

In addition, the Government can assess liquidated damages, as referenced above, in the amount of __10___ percent of the computed cost.

(4) The Contractor will be held liable for property losses sustained by the Government as a direct, consequential result of a failure to furnish the required personnel.

(5) Computations of the costs for Government employees to perform work not performed by the Contractor shall be in conformance with FAR 52.222-42, STATEMENT OF EQUIVALENT RATE FOR FEDERAL HIRES.

(e) Change of Occupancy Maintenance (COM). In the event the contractor fails to complete change of occupancy maintenance within the number of days allowed, the Government may assess the COM liquidated damages shown below in addition to the liquidated damages set forth above. COM liquidated damages are based on the prevailing average daily Basic Allowance for Quarters (BAQ) with dependents, plus the average Variable Housing Allowance (VHA). Current applicable rates are shown below; however, actual charges shall be based on the prevailing rates in effect at the time.

COM Liquidated Damages

Type of Unit LDs Per Calendar Day

4 BR, 2.5 bath $1,165

3 BR, 2 bath $976

3 BR, 1 bath $883

2 BR, 1.5 bath $788

2 BR, 1 bath $737

1 BR, 1 bath $737

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J

Section J - Table of Contents list the Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments for this Section are posted on the NECO website at https://www.neco.navy.mil/index.aspx with the solicitation.

The ACQUISITION documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table.

Section J – Table of Contents

ACQUISITION:

JB-1 JB-1 Supplemental Pricing (Provided as file name:

AttachmentJB1FTESheetAmendment0011.xls) JB-2 JB-2 Supplemental Pricing (Provided as file name:

N6945013R799JB2SupplementalPricing.xls) Conformed Copy of Section B (Provided as file name:

N6945013R7999SectionBConformed.pdf) JL-1 Government Pre-award Inquiry Form (GPIF): (Provided as file name:

N6945013R7999JL1GPIF.xls) JL-1A Responses to GPIs 1-109: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999-0003_GPIs.pdf) JL-1B Responses to GPIs 110-131: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999-

0004_GPIs.pdf) JL-1C Responses to GPIs 132-233: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999-

0005_GPIs.pdf) JL-1D Responses to GPIs 234-433: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999-

0006_GPIs.pdf) JL-1E Responses to GPIs 434-436: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999-

0009_GPIs.pdf) JL-1F Responses to GPIs 437-461: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999-

0010_GPIs.pdf) JL-1G Responses to GPIs 462-523: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999-

0011_GPIs.pdf) JL-2 AMAG Form to Obtain Visitor’s Pass (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999JL-

2AMAG.xls) JL-3 Entry Clearance Form (Provided as file name:

N6945013R7999_Entry_Clearance.pdf) JL-4 Site Visit Itinerary: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999_SiteVisitItinerary.pdf) Site Visit Sign-In Sheets: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999_SiteVisitSign-

In.pdf) Site Visit Brief: (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999_SiteVisitBrief.pdf) JM-1 Past Performance Questionnaire (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999JM-

1PPQ.doc) Industry Forum Sign In Sheet (Provided as file name:

“N6945013R7999_IndustryForumAttendees.pdf”) Industry Forum Brief (Provided as file name:

“N6945013R7999IndustryForumBrief.pdf”) Award Fee Plan (Provided as file name: N6945013R7999_AwardFeePlan.pdf)

The TECHNICAL documents for the Consolidated BOS Services Requirements are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table below or “all-inclusive” under filename: N6945013R7999_Section JAmendment0011.pdf.

TECHNICAL:

J-0200000-07 COMMANDER, NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST INSTRUCTION 4101.1 (Provided as file name: J020000007CNRSEINST41011Amendment0010pdf) J-0200000-08 EXHIBIT LINE ITEM NUMBERS (Provided as file name:

J020000008ELINsAmendment0011.xls) J-1401000-12 HVAC SYSTESMS DESCRIPTIONS AND INVENTORY (Provided as file name:

J140100012HVACSystemsDescriptionandInventoryAmendment0011.pdf) J-1502000-03 FACILITY PROPERTY INVENTORY (Provided as file name:

J150200003FacilityPropertyInventoryAmendment0011.pdf) J-1502000-04 BASE MAP (Provided as file name: J150200004BaseMapAmendment0011.pdf) J-1502000-09 HVAC AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEM INVENTORY – PM (Provided as file name:

J150200009HVACandRefrigerationSystemsDescriptionandInventory_PMAmendment00 11.pdf)

J-1502000-15 HVAC AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEM INVENTORY – IMP (Provided as file name:

J150200015HVACandRefrigerationSystemsDescriptionandInventory_IMPAmendment0 011.pdf)

J-1502000-15

(BUMED)

Medical Air Gas And Vacuum Systems Maps (Provided as file name:

J1502000015(BUMED)MedicalAirGasAndVacuumSystemsMapsAmendment0011.pdf)

J-1502000-19

(BUMED)

Fire Walls and Fire Doors Map (Provided as file name:

AttachmentJ1502000019(BUMED)FireWallsandFireDoorsMapAmendment0011.pdf)

NAVSTAGTMOINST 5090.1D- HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

(Provided as file name: NAVSTAGTMOINST 5090.1D.pdf)

NAVSTAGTMOINST 5090.4A- LANDFILL PROCEDURES (Provided as file name:

NAVSTAGTMOINST 5090.4A.pdf)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

5252.215-9300 CONTENT OF PROPOSALS (JAN 2003)

(a) PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. The responsibility determination, non-price proposal, and the price/cost proposal shall be submitted in separate volumes. The non-price proposal shall not contain any cost/pricing information. The non-price proposal presented by the offeror to whom the award is made will be incorporated into the contract at time of award.

(b) The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Responsibility Determination Binder: 2 (1 original and 1 copy) copies of the responsibility determination information. With the responsibility determination binder, submit the following:

a. Submit completed and signed Standard Form 33 with the applicable DUNS Number and

CAGE code of the offeror provided on the face of the SF-33. Ensure the SF-33 includes the appropriate name and address of any newly formed joint venture/partnership arrangement if applicable;

b. Submit acknowledgement of all amendments;

c. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and DUNS for all team members and identify their role (prime, significant subcontractor, subcontractor, etc.);

d. Submit individual representations and certifications if System for Award Management (SAM) representations and certifications are not complete in accordance with FAR 52.204-8;

e. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If a new joint venture/teaming/partnership arrangement is being proposed, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization.

f. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital from an independent financial institution, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract.

g. If joint venture/teaming/partnership arrangement is being proposed, include copies of agreements and letters of commitment signed by the appropriate individuals of each firm.

Agreements must include company name, DUNS number, address, point of contact, email address, phone number and fax number. The agreements shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind the firm/joint venture/team/partnership. Offerors proposing significant subcontracts (subcontracts exceeding 10% of the total contract value) shall submit signed letters of commitment from the subcontractors which define the contractual relationship and identify contribution to the planned arrangement in terms of the type and proportion of work to be performed. For Joint Venture arrangements discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

h. Offerors shall submit plan in accordance with DFARS 252.237-7024 NOTICE OF

CONTINUATION OF ESSENTIAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES (OCT 2010).

i. Submit two copies of the entire Responsibility Determination information on CD filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Responsibility Determination binder.

j. Paper should be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides.

Double-side printing is permitted. Text will be black using a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier.

k. There is no page limitation on the responsibility determination submission. Double-side printing is permitted.

(2) Price Proposal Binder: 3 (1 original and 2copies) copies of the cost/price proposal. With the price proposal, submit the following:

a. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and DUNS for all team members and identify their role (prime, significant subcontractor, subcontractor, etc.);

b. Submit all Price factor requirements;

c. Submit two copies of the entire Price Proposal on CD in readable/searchable electronic format and filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Price Proposal binder. Acceptable readable/searchable formats include MS Word, Excel, and searchable PDF.

d. Offerors shall submit pricing spreadsheet data (Section B, Section J Attachment J-02000010 Exhibit Line Item Numbers, JB-2 Supplemental Pricing) in hard copy and in EXCEL (Microsoft Office Version 2007 compatible) format on a CD-ROM. Formulas shall be traceable. Failure to do so may be cause to render the offer non-responsive. Offerors may utilize the pricing attachments in EXCEL (Microsoft Office Version 2007 compatible) format in Section J for submission of pricing data. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the price proposal hard copies and the price proposal electronic copies, the price proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

e. Paper should be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides. Text (including text in all graphics, exhibits and tables) will be black using a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier. Double-side printing is permitted. For larger spreadsheets, the offeror may submit folded 11 by 17 inch sheets (with 1 inch margins on all four sides) with printing on one side only.

f. Offerors shall put company name on every pricing page.

g. There is no page limitation on the pricing proposal.

(3) Non-Price Proposal Binder: 6 (1 original and 5 copies) copies of the non-price proposal. With the non-price proposal, submit the following:

a. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and DUNS for all team members and identify their role (prime, significant subcontractor, subcontractor, etc.);

b. Submit all Non-Price factor requirements divided. Each Non-Price factor must have an individual tab divider;

c. Submit three copies of the entire Non-Price Proposal on CD in readable/searchable electronic format and filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Non-Price Proposal binder.

Acceptable readable/searchable formats include word, excel, and searchable PDF. For the JB- 1 Attachment, ensure data is submitted in hard copy and in EXCEL (Microsoft Office Version 2007 compatible) format on the above mentioned CD. In the event of a discrepancy between the Non-Price proposal hard copies and the Non-Price proposal electronic copies, the Non- Price proposal hard copies will take precedence.

d. State a clear acknowledgement within the beginning of the binder that nothing in the following proposal is meant to supersede or reduce any of the individual requirements to which the offer addresses. It is the Government’s intent to incorporate the offeror’s proposal into the final contract while at the same time eliminating any contradictory or conflicting requirements between the two. In the event of a conflict between any part or parts of the offer and part or parts of the requirement, the government has the right to selectively choose that part or those parts which are the more advantageous of the two.

e. The non-price proposal submittal shall not exceed 220 pages. Blank tab dividers are excluded from the page limitation. Past Performance Questionnaires and Contractor Performance Assessment Reports will not count toward the page limitation.

f. Offerors shall put company name on every Non-Price page.

g. Paper will be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides. Text

(including text in all graphics, exhibits and tables) will be black using a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier. Double-side printing is allowed; however each side will be counted as one page.

h. Foldouts are only permitted for the organization charts. Foldouts are limited to 11 by 17 inch white paper (with 1 inch margins on all four sides) that must be folded to fit within the 3-ring D-binder, printing on one side only. 11 by 17 foldouts are considered one page.

(4) All binder covers and spine inserts will contain the solicitation number and title, the offeror’s name including individual point of contact, with phone number AND email address.

(5) Offers are solicited on an “all or none” basis and FAR 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION in Section L, is hereby modified. Failure to submit offers for all line items listed shall be cause for rejection of the offer.

(End of clause)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Management Factor 3 – Technical Approach Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 5). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

i. Provide a completed Section B of the solicitation.

ii. Provide a completed Section J Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment. There are multiple worksheets within this file that require completion.

iii. Provide a completed JB-2 Supplemental Pricing Attachment for the Base Period of performance.

iv. Offerors shall submit pricing data (Section B, JB-2 Supplemental Pricing

Attachment, and Section J Exhibit Line Item Numbers Attachment) in hard copy and in EXCEL (Microsoft Office Version 2007 compatible) format on a CD-ROM.

Offerors may utilize the pricing attachments in EXCEL (Microsoft Office Version 2007 compatible) format in Section J for submission of pricing data. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the proposal hard copies and the proposal electronic copies, the proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

i. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

ii. Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

iii. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

iv. Comparison of market survey results.

(3) The Government will evaluate remaining pricing submittals to ensure the following:

i. Pricing submitted within Section B and Section J ELIN Pricing Attachment is consistent.

ii. Fair and reasonable ELIN/unit pricing and identification of unbalanced pricing as appropriate.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror (or the partners or joint venture partners that make up the offeror) shall demonstrate experience as a prime contractor providing services similar in size, scope and complexity to those described in the statement of work/specifications of the RFP. Experience that is not directly attributable to the offeror (or the partners or joint venture partners that make up the offeror) as the prime contractor will not be considered under Factor (1), Corporate Experience. Experience of the parent company, sister company, or subcontractor will not be considered or evaluated as the offeror for the submittal requirements of Factor (1). The offeror shall submit at least one and no more than five (5) examples of recent, relevant projects that the offeror (or the partners or joint venture partners that make up the offeror) completed and served as the prime contractor. Relevant projects include those that demonstrate the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity as described in the statement of work/specifications of the RFP with a contract value of approximately $10,000,000.00 per year or greater and shall be: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of proposals, or 2) shall be completed, within the last five (5) years.

For each project the offeror shall provide:

a. Contract number, title, location, and original award date.

b. Type of Contract (i.e. fixed price, cost reimbursable, etc.)

c. Client points of contact with current telephone and facsimile numbers, and electronic mail addresses if available (Confidential clients are not acceptable and will result in non-consideration of the project.) Failure to provide an accessible point of contact and a correct telephone number may result in a lower rating.

d. Description of work (service) performed – similar scope, size & complexity.

e. Describe the relevance of this project to this solicitation.

f. Percentage of the work that your firm subcontracted out.

g. Provide the final/revised contract completion date.

h. Dollar value; annually and contract life.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The standard is met when the offeror (prime, joint venture, or partnership) demonstrates relevant corporate experience in providing management and delivery of the same or similar work as described in the statement of work/specifications of the RFP. Relevancy will be evaluated in terms of similar size, scope, and complexity.

(2) Factor 2, Management

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

a. The offeror shall clearly demonstrate a feasible approach for controlling and managing the entire project, including the interface between the major functional areas and sub-annexes, and the offeror’s general management and administration structure. For organizational purposes, address the requested information in the following format below.

(A) Workforce Management. Provide and explain a plan to organize, manage, and supervise workforce personnel to accomplish the requirements of this contract. The plan shall include an organization chart identifying the on-site organization and staff that will be used to perform this contract as well as the lines of management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, sub-annex area organizations, and subcontractors. The plan shall identify the function(s) of the various groups of the organization, direct and indirect staffing and associated trade classifications with skill level (journeyman, etc.) consistent with the FTEs and labor hours provided in Section J Attachment JB1 FTE. The plan shall indicate the number of productive hours per year for each full time and part time employee.

(B) Quality Control Management. Provide a summary “Quality Control Plan” (QC), i.e. the quality processes (practices, resources, and activities) and minimum controls that will be used to ensure full compliance with all performance objectives and standards as described in Section C 0200000 Management and Administration. Describe the methods to be used to document, measure, and control and improve the quality processes. Describe the plan for training employees in the quality processes. Describe the processes that will be used to ensure consistent satisfactory performance of subcontractors. Limit the Quality Control Management submission to five (5) pages.

(C) Scheduling. Provide the methodology used (i.e. management indicators) to determine if/when there is a need to adjust the recurring work schedule. Describe scheduling procedures that will minimize interference with normal occurrence of Government business and the flexibility to adjust schedules to allow for access outside regular working hours and the flexibility to adjust to workload fluctuations. Describe procedures to manage foreseeable fluctuations in workload, for handling workload surges for IDIQ orders and natural disasters that could occur.

(D) Phase-In and Phase-Out Plans. Provide an approach to each phase-in and phase-out plan. The phase-in plan is limited to no more than 90 calendar days. The plans shall include: 1) a schedule for all key events; 2) personnel actions and responsibilities regarding employees at all levels; acquisition, delivery, storage, inventory and disposal of equipment, working stock, and materials (to include inbound items as applicable).

(E) Energy Management. Describe procedures to comply with CNRSEINST 4101.1 Energy Management requirements. CNRSEINST 4101.1 is provided as an attachment in Section J. Proposal shall address approach for instilling a culture of conservation and use of technology and influence over operations to execute work requirements at the lowest possible energy use and cost. Include approach for complying with Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) energy efficient, water (Water Sense) conserving, and low power standby power product type selection and use.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: Factor 2 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no subfactors. The standard is met when the offeror demonstrates a satisfactory management plan that demonstrates an effective and resource efficient approach to management of their workforce; labor; quality control; scheduling;

phase-in and phase-out plans; and energy management. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s Energy Management approach to ensure the proposal demonstrates a culture of conservation, use of technology, and influence over operations to reduce energy consumption to include use of FEMP listed products.

(3) Factor 3, Technical Approach

a. Describe staffing levels for each annex and sub-annex listed below.

Provide a completed summary Attachment JB1 for the total effort to include the prime contractor and all subcontractors for the Base Period. Attachment JB1 FTE is provided under file name N6945013R7999JB1FTE.xls.

In summary, provide the rationale for Basis of Estimate (BOE) for each specification item listed in Section J Attachment JB1 FTE. BOE shall include labor classification, annual hours and FTEs for performing each specification item listed in JB1. Detailed estimate worksheets are not required.

b. The offeror shall include the methodology to be implemented to accomplish the requirements in each annex and sub-annex and detail how the proposed approach will effectively achieve each performance objective and standard across all annexes and sub-annexes. For each applicable sub-annex, the offeror’s methodology shall demonstrate an approach to perform service calls, preventative maintenance program, integrated maintenance program, other recurring services program, unscheduled services, and all other spec items in the respective sub annexes. The solicitation uses a systems description and inventory approach that does not list every ancillary part/component of a system, however, the requirement is to maintain the system to include all mechanically and/or electronically interlocked parts, equipment, and components forming a functioning system (i.e. fire protection system, HVAC system, etc.). The offeror’s methodology shall clearly demonstrate an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The methodology clearly demonstrates a labor efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements. The methodology clearly demonstrates understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement for each of the following annexes and sub-annexes:

Annex 14 Housing Sub-annex 1401000 Family Housing

Annex 15 Facilities Support

Sub-annex 1501000 Facility Management Sub-annex 1502000 Facility Investment Sub-annex 1503010 Custodial Sub-annex 1503020 Pest Control Sub-annex 1503030 Integrated Solid Waste Management Sub-annex 1503040 Other (Swimming Pools) Sub-annex 1503050 Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping

Annex 16 Utilities Sub-annex 1602000 Electrical Sub-annex 1604000 Wastewater Sub-annex 1606000 Water

Annex 17 Base Support Vehicles and Equipment (BSVE)

c. Risk Mitigation. The offeror shall identify and describe how the technical approach and contingency plans will ensure mitigation of risks involving material, shortages of material, equipment, licensing and certification of workers, workforce of foreign national labor, language barriers of foreign national labor, contractor berthing, working in secured areas, and any other risks expected to be encountered under the performance objectives and standards of this solicitation across all annexes and sub-annexes.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: Factor 3 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no subfactors. The standard is met when the offeror’s technical approach:

a. Demonstrates adequate staffing levels for each annex and sub-annex supported by a reasonable Basis of Estimate (BOE), a reasonable understanding of the requirements and labor quantities and skills needed to successfully perform.

b. Demonstrates an approach/methodology to effectively achieve performance objectives and standards for each annex and sub-annex that reflects the current industry and/or commercial practices, standards and procedures for each major task. The offeror’s methodology shall clearly demonstrate an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The methodology presents a labor efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements. The approach demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

c. Demonstrates an understanding of the potential, relevant risks to be encountered during contract performance as well as an approach/contingency plan to effectively mitigate risks across all annexes and sub-annexes.

(4) Factor 4, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

a. Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years [2010, 2011, 2012], submit your EMR (which compares your company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums over a three year period). If you have no EMR, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

b. OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART)

Rate: For the three previous complete calendar years [2010, 2011, 2012], submit your OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

c. Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, any and innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) database, and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

– Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

– OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

– Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

– Other sources of information available to the Government

a. Experience Modification Rate (EMR): The Government will evaluate the

EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

b. OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART)

Rate: The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART Rate to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

c. Technical Approach to Safety: The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(5) Factor 5, Past Performance

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE

PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN

A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment N6945013R7999JM-1PPQ), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Rebecca Jones, via email at rebecca.m.jones@navy.mil, and Cari Fiebach, via email at cari.fiebach@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

The Government will evaluate past performance information of team members that have relevant experience and will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. Offerors must clearly name and describe the work previously performed on prior contracts, as well as a description of thje work that will be performed on this contract, by any subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, affiliate, predecessor, or key personnel that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, in order for the Government to evaluate that entity for Factor 5.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

– A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

– A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

– A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task…