N6247026R0008 Amendment 0001.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

Created On:

05 Feb 2026, 16:20 PM Greenwich Mean Time

J 1 2

0001 05 Feb 2026 See Continuation Sheet FX74 N62470

NAVFACSYSCOM ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD, NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

NORFOLK, VA 23508-1278

UNITED STATES

Stacy HARPER-MITCHELL, Email: stacy.l.harper-mitchell.civ@us.navy.mil Telephone: 757-322-4667

SCD: PAS:

N6247026R0008

23 Dec 2025

See Section 00 70 00 - Conditions of the Contract

FX74 Strategic Airlift Hangar, Naval Station Rota, Spain

See Amendment detail.

Stacy Harper-Mitchell, Contract Specialist, stacy.l.harper-mitchell.civ@us.navy.mil

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

N6247026R00080001

AMENDMENT 0001

RFP NO: N62470-26-R-0008

FX74 Strategic Airlift Hanger, Naval Station Rota, Spain

Date Issued: 05 February 2026

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Revise the Solicitation

2. Respond to pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs).

1. Revise the Solicitation

Section 00 21 00

CURRENT:

4.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs):

All inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal shall be submitted electronically to Stacy

Harper-Mitchell by e-mail at stacy.l.harper-mitchell.civ@us.navy.mil. Offerors are requested to use the Pre-Proposal Inquiries Submittal Form (Attachment A). Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The Government does not intend to respond to any pre-proposal inquiries submitted less than 15 business days before the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiries.

REVISED TO:

4.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs):

All inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal shall be submitted electronically to Stacy

Harper-Mitchell by e-mail at stacy.l.harper-mitchell.civ@us.navy.mil. Offerors are requested to use the Pre-Proposal Inquiries Submittal Form (Attachment A). Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The Government does not intend to respond to any pre-proposal inquiries submitted after

February 11, 2026.

2. Response to PPIs 1-5

1. Inquiry: In the document “Solicitation___N6247026R0008”, specifically in Standard Form

1442, Block 13b, it is indicated that an offer guarantee is required. However, after reviewing the solicitation documentation in its entirety, we have not identified any reference to a Bank Letter of

Assurance or any other document describing the type, amount, or conditions applicable to such a guarantee. We would appreciate your confirmation that an offer guarantee is not required, notwithstanding the indication included in Block 13b of Standard Form 1442.

Response: Please see revised Solicitation.

2. Inquiry: During review of the Vertical Lift Fabric Door specification for this project, we noted two important paragraphs were removed from the standard UFGS 08 34 16.20 language. These deleted sections are highlighted in green below. Removal of these provisions eliminates common

UFGS-approved alternate methods of construction and appears to restrict participation by otherwise qualified manufacturers who regularly supply doors under this specification. for bidding purposes, please clarify the Government's intent regarding competition for this specification section; 1. Is the omission of the below paragraphs intended to preclude alternate

VLFD manufacturers that comply with the UFGS performance basis, or 2. Will alternate manufacturers that utilize these UFGS alternative methods be considered? Clarification will ensure proper bid preparation and help determine whether the VLFD scope is intended to remain competitive consistent with the UFGS framework.

2.2.1 Fabric Door Leaves

When one-piece fabric construction is utilized, loop fabric over the uppermost beam and attach the fabric to both flanges of the intermediate beams, top beam, and bottom beam with self-tapping screws through corrosion resistant anodized or coated aluminum batten strip. Provide independent, third-party laboratory testing to demonstrate for fabric connection forces while accounting for fabric degradation due to UV and temperature effects. Alternatively, when fabric panel construction is utilized, attach the fabric at all beams using a keder type connection.

Provide independent, third-party laboratory testing to demonstrate connections are stronger than the fabric.

Response: The UFGS 08 34 16.20 para 2.2.1 was purposely edited from the original UFGS version to convey the requirement for the hangar doors. Review the specification in its entirety and propose in accordance with the solicitation. Manufacturers utilizing these UFGS alternative methods will not be considered.

3. Inquiry: During review of the Vertical Lift Fabric Door specification for this project, we noted two important paragraphs were removed from the standard UFGS 08 34 16.20 language.

These deleted sections are highlighted in green below. Removal of these provisions eliminates common UFGS-approved alternate methods of construction and appears to restrict participation by otherwise qualified manufacturers who regularly supply doors under this specification. For bidding purposes, please clarify the Government's intent regarding competition for this specification section; 1. Is the omission of the below paragraphs intended to preclude alternate

VLFD manufacturers that comply with the UFGS performance basis, or 2. Will alternate manufacturers that utilize these UFGS alternative methods be considered? Clarification will ensure proper bid preparation and help determine whether the VLFD scope is intended to remain competitive consistent with the UFGS framework. 2.3.3.2 DoD Leaf Safety Arrester Alternative

Door Leaf safety arresters may be omitted, if each door leaf is provided with four or more lifting belts/wire ropes and if is it demonstrated through analysis of the entire door system that the door leaf remains stable, without falling, with the loss of either end belt/wire rope, or any two intermediate belts/wire ropes. Additionally, it demonstrates that other failure mechanisms inherent in the door system will not result in a falling door leaf.

Response: The UFGS 08 34 16.20 para 2.3.3.2 was purposely edited from the original UFGS version to convey the requirement for the hangar doors. Review the specification in its entirety and propose in accordance with the solicitation. Manufacturers utilizing these UFGS alternative methods will not be considered.

4. Inquiry: Section 4.3 Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI) states PPIs "submitted less than 15 business days before the solicitation closing date" will not be reviewed by the Government. Fifteen business days from the due date of 26 February is 05 February. 05 February is before the site visit scheduled for 09 February. Will the Government change and set a specific due date for PPIs that is at least 3-4 days past the site visit?

Response: The Government does not intend to respond to any pre-proposal inquiries submitted after February 11,2026, please see Amendment 0001 details above.

5. Inquiry: During review of the Vertical Lift Fabric Door specification for this project, we noted two important paragraphs were removed from the standard UFGS 08 34 16.20 language.

These deleted sections are highlighted in green below. Removal of these provisions eliminates common UFGS-approved alternate methods of construction and appears to restrict participation by otherwise qualified manufacturers who regularly supply doors under this specification. For bidding purposes, please clarify the Government’s intent regarding competition for this specification section:1. Is the omission of the below paragraphs intended to preclude alternate

VLFD manufacturers that comply with the UFGS performance basis, or 2. Will alternate manufacturers that utilize these UFGS alternative methods be considered? Clarification will ensure proper bid preparation and help determine whether the VLFD scope is intended to remain competitive consistent with the UFGS framework. Specification 08 34 16.20, Page 12, 2.2.1

Fabric Door Leaves when one-piece fabric construction is utilized, loop fabric over the uppermost beam and attach the fabric to both flanges of the intermediate beams, top beam, and bottom beam with self-tapping screws through corrosion resistant anodized or coated aluminum batten strip. Provide independent, third-party laboratory testing to demonstrate door fabric connection has a minimum 2:1 factor of safety above the required connection forces while accounting for fabric degradation due to UV and temperature effects. Alternatively, when fabric panel construction is utilized, attach the fabric at all beams using a keder type connection.

Provide independent, third-party laboratory testing to demonstrate connections are stronger than the fabric. Specification 08 34 16.20, Page 14 2.3.3.2 Door Leaf Safety Arrester Alternative

Door leaf safety arresters may be omitted, if each door leaf is provided with four or more lifting belts/wire ropes and if is it demonstrated through analysis of the entire door system that the door leaf remains stable, without falling, with the loss of either end belt/wire rope, or any two intermediate belts/wire ropes. Additionally, it demonstrates, that other failure mechanisms inherent in the door system will not result in a falling door leaf.

Response: The UFGS 08 34 16.20 para 2.3.3.2 was purposely edited from the original UFGS version to convey the requirement for the hangar doors. Review the specification in its entirety and propose in accordance with the solicitation. Manufacturers utilizing these UFGS alternative methods will not be considered.