N6247024R0062 0006.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See block 14 continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

140 1 27

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 30-May-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247024R0062

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Mar-2025

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

30-May-2025

CODE

COMNAVFACSYSCOM ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247024R0062

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0006

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Extend the proposal due date.

2. Respond to PPIs.

3. Provide attachment.

4. Revise the Solicitation.

5. Revise FAR 52.211-14

1. The proposal due date is extended from 2:00 PM Norfolk, VA local time, Wednesday, 18 June 2025 to

2:00 PM Norfolk, VA local time, Wednesday, 25 June 2025.

2. PPI Responses

510 42 22

13.33 3.4.

This section references 2 sets of full sized contract drawings, i.e. paper, to show record drawing conditions. Are electronic records acceptable?

Propose in accordance with the solicitation. Provide hardcopy as required.

511 1 01 75 00.01

1.1 Please confirm that the PFAS, VOC, & SVOC

treatment are to be included in Line Item 0001K.

See Revised Price Proposal Form provided as part of Amendment 0002.

Base price dewatering treatment system (including VOC and SVOC) is included in CLIN 0001G. Additional dewatering treatment system cost associated with PFAS treatment is included in CLIN 0007.

512 1 01 75 00.01

1.1 Please confirm that the PFAS treatment

requirement can be executed in conjunction with treating for VOC & SVOC, utilizing the same equipment and treatment system, and does not require a separate treatment set-up.

Yes, it may be executed in conjunction.

513 G-006 Asbest os Abate ment

Not e #2

Drawing G-006, Asbestos Abatement #2 indicates all "Electrical fiber conduits within ductbanks must be assumed to have asbestos...".

Drawings ED102 to ED118 and Appendix G provide photos and approximate conduit arrangements for ductbanks to be demolished.

The provided information does not indicate depth or cross-sectional dimensions of electrical ductbank (concrete) to be demolished. Some of arrangements are shown in select areas of the utility profiles in the Appendix A drawings (2017 P-614 Waterfront Utilities) but do not

Propose in accordance with the solicitation.

show the full extent of the duct bank depths to be demolished. Due to the extensive cost and schedule implications associated with abatement and demolition of ductbank with unknown cross section and depth, we request the government either provide the necessary assumptions for the basis of proposals or confirm ductbank abatement and demolition will be considered a change.

514 Page 15 01 57 19.00

1.7.

1.1.

Has a site characterization determined the levels and specific compounds of PFAS contaminated soils to be impacted and removed on site?

Please note that Subtitle D disposal facilities do not handle PFAS contaminated waste. PFAS contaminated soils are typically transported to Subtitle C Hazardous Waste handling facilities.

Please confirm the Navy will be responsible for the costs of handling, transport, and disposal of PFAS contaminated soils at a Subtitle C landfill or thermal treatment incineration facility above and beyond disposal of otherwise nonhazardous contaminated soil at a Subtitle D facility?

Refer to 01 57 19.00 22 Temproary Environmental Controls & Amendments for hazardous waste disposal requirements.

515 Will the EOR please confirm the Switch Machine Requirement as most of the Navy Switch Machines are Manual Only.

Propose in accordance with the solicitation.

516 31 52

2.8.

The required scope of work for this project, such as jet grout, tiebacks, demolition, and civil work require water. The water for grout for tiebacks and jet grout also needs to be potable or meet AASHTO T 26 requirements. Specification 31 52 01 section 2.8.4 states that "Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining their own water source for the project, unless otherwise approved by Government." Please provide information on the water source for the project. Can a hydrant in or near DD3 be used? Other hydrant on site?

Does it require to be metered? Is there a capacity on flow rate or total available output on a daily basis? is the water from the hydrant potable and/or meet AASHTO T26?

A hydrant near DD#3 may be used and has potable water from the city of Portsmouth. The water will be metered and the contractor will be charged for the water used.

517 G-006

ED603

Asbest os Abate ment Notes

Not e 2

Drawing G-006, Asbestos Abatement Note 2 states: "Electrical Fiber Conduits within ductbanks must be assumed to have ACM..".

Drawing ED603 for Electrical Demolition cable schedule tables indicate all conduit in duct banks is PVC. Please clarify where the asbestos containing fiber conduit exists on the project.

Please provide ACM abatement drawings or quantities of ACM containing ductbank to be demolished.

Propose in accordance with the solicitation.

518 G-006 Lead Paint Notes

Not e 1

Drawing G-006, Lead Paint Note1 states all painted surfaces on the exterior and interior portions of buildings are assumed to be lead painted. No Environmental Abatement drawings have been provided. Please clarify if

Refer to 1806701-SPC-APPENDIX E the interior walls of the existing Pump Well are lead painted? Further, please clarify if the existing paint within Pump Well needs to be abated prior to placement of SCC fill.

519 01 32

Based on our review of Specification Section 01 32 17 and 01 11 00, and the assumption that the Standard Calendar and the Security Calendar are functionally equivalent given that the entire site lies within a Controlled Industrial Area, we calculate the total number of non-working days per year to be 102. This total accounts for the following days: 1. Weather Delays: Spec 01 32

17.00 20, paragraph 1.10.1.8 requires use of NOAA climate data to establish a "Weather Calendar" based on the historical average number of days per year with precipitation > 0.10". Based on NOAA data for the project area, this equates to 77 days per year. 2.

Restricted Access Periods: Spec 01 11 00, paragraph 1.10(f), requires the schedule to account for 47 working days during which the contractor will not have access to the site over the course of the project. This equates to approximately 9 days per year based on a 5-year project duration. 3. Hurricane Events: Spec 01 32 17.00 20, paragraph 1.10.1.8 also requires inclusion of schedule allowances for Condition of Readiness (COR) hurricane events. These are estimated to result in up to 10 additional lost workdays per year depending on storm severity.

We request clarification on whether these hurricane-related allowances should be integrated into the project calendar as non-working days or if they are to be captured separately as allowance activities within the schedule. 4. Security Restrictions: Spec 01 32

17.00 20 establishes a "Security Calendar" that includes one restricted workday every two months due to anticipated security-related delays. This results in an additional 6 non-working days per year. Please confirm that the Security Calendar is synonymous with the Standard Calendar. Please confirm that it is the Owner's intent for the Proposal Schedule and Baseline Schedule to incorporate all of these calendar-based restrictions.

The contractor should use multiple differing calendars; at a minimum security calendar needs to be maintained for outdoor activities which are likewise affected by weather events. Hurricane Conditions of Readiness events apply to all calendars used for scheduling on-site construction activities and are to be considered non-working days.

520 Amen dment 0002, Attach ment G

Pric e Sch edul e

AM

D00

The revised price schedule included in Amendment 2, Attachment G, includes Line Item 0001P for the Proposers to include a unit price for demolition and removal of various types of debris and/or obstructions at the entrance cofferdam. If encountered, these obstructions may be of different nature of materials or elevations, which may require varying means and methods of removal. There

Propose in accordance with the solicitation.

is not enough information provided in the bid documents for the proposers to determine the most effective means and methods, and therefore, provide a reliable Unit Price for removal. Considering these obstructions would, by nature, fall under the Differing Site Conditions Clause, would the Government consider adding Time and Materials Item or an Allowance Item in lieu of a Unit Price item?

Alternately, please indicate what specific obstructions, and the estimated depth the proposers are to assume for removing obstructions.

521 p. 583 of 2993

01 75

1.7 b.

Dewatering Specification 01 75 00, Para 1.7 Criteria for Bidding, line b. Reads:

"Contaminant loading will be based upon previous groundwater monitoring that was conducted. The associated tables are attached…" This specification section does not have any water contaminant tables attached.

Please clarify what contaminants the contractor is required to handle. Please provide tables as indicated in the specification.

Two rounds of groundwater sampling were performed for the project. The results of the first program are contained in Appendix C of the specifications. The results of the second program are contained in Appendix H of the specifications.

Reference groundwater sampling test results for provided in Appendices C and H for contaminants to be treated.

522 p. 596 of 2993

01 75 00.01

1.7 b.

Dewatering Specification 01 75 00.01 (Dewatering Treatment System (PFAS)), Para

1.7 Criteria for Bidding, line b. Reads:

"Contaminant loading will be based upon previous groundwater monitoring that was conducted. The associated tables are attached…" This specification section does not have any water contaminant tables attached.

Please clarify what contaminants the contractor is required to handle. Please provide tables as indicated in the specification. Please note that PFAS contaminated water and dewatering filter media is only accepted at Subtitle C hazardous waste landfills an incineration facilities. Please clarify if PFAS contaminated materials will be placed by contractor into Government provided containers and disposed off by the Government as hazardous waste.

Reference groundwater sampling test results for provided in Appendices C and H. Refer to 01 57 19.00 22 Temporary Environmental Controls & Amendments for hazardous waste disposal requirements.

523 Solicit ation

Pag e 23 of

The Temporary Entrance Cofferdam will be removed, except for a small portion of piling that will remain below the tremie slab, however not considered a part of the structure itself. For purposes of the Buy American language, does the temporary entrance cofferdam material need to comply with the Buy American provisions?

Propose in accordance with the solicitation and FAR 52.225-12.

524 S-031 Drawing S-031 calls for removal of existing granite blocks from the Dry Dock. No reports have been provided indicating any environmental testing of the granite. Please confirm the granite can be disposed off as

Propose in accordance with solicitation.

regular construction waste stream, and not a contaminated or hazardous material. Please provide any testing reports available for the granite in the dry dock.

525 31 62 16.13

3.2.

7.1

Specification 31 62 16.13 - Steel Pipe Piles -section 3.2.7.1 states if a pile encounters an underground obstruction within 5 feet of the ground surface of such size as to prevent driving the pile . . . and the obstruction cannot be cleared by excavation . . .. Price Proposal Form line item 0001R accounts for obstructions within the planned excavation limits and only if the obstruction is greater than 1 CY. The pile location 5 feet below ground surface is not in the excavation limits and the pile may be prevented by an obstruction less than 1 CY. Will all pile obstructions, regardless of size, within 5 feet of the ground be treated as a differing site condition and the Contractor compensated accordingly?

Propose in accordance with solicitation.

526 31 41

3.3.

1.2.f

Specification 31 41 16 section 3.3.1.2.f states" if obstructions restrict driving a pile . . . remove or penetrate with a chisel beam . . . if impractical to remove, make changes in the design alignment.".

Will all pile obstructions and potential design alignment changes due to obstructions be treated as a differing site condition and the Contractor compensated accordingly?

Propose in accordance with solicitation.

527 31 52 secti on 3.3.

1.1

Specification 31 52 01 section 3.3.1.1 states "Clear identified obstructions prior to placing cofferdam piling." Will all pile obstructions be treated as a differing site condition and the Contractor compensated accordingly?

Propose in accordance with solicitation.

528 31 52

Specification 31 52 01 does not consider obstructions for tieback installation or jet grout drilling. Will all obstructions preventing or impeding tieback installation and jet grout drilling be treated as a differing site condition and the Contractor compensated accordingly?

Propose in accordance with solicitation.

529 31 63 secti on 3.2.

Specification 31 63 29 section 3.2.3 states "remove surface and subsurface obstructions at drilled shaft locations . . . " Will all obstructions for drilled shafts be treated as a differing site condition and the Contractor compensated accordingly?

Propose in accordance with solicitation.

530 n/a 01 14 00.00 01 57 19.00

1.5.

3.21

Specification section 01 14 00.00 22, 1.5.7 states "Pile driving work hours will be allowed for a maximum of 10 daylight hours between 0700 and 2200, where daylight is defined as sunrise to sunset, Monday through Saturday, excluding Government holidays.". Specification section 01 57 19.00 22, 3.21 limits pile driving to "...Confine pile-driving operations to the period between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, exclusive of holidays, unless otherwise

Specification 01 14 00.00 22 governs.

specified." Please confirm specification section 01 14 00.00 22 governs and 01 57 19.00 22, 3.21 does not apply to this project for pile-driving operations.

531 N/A 01 75 00.01

N/A Please confirm proposers should include cost associated with testing of PFAS treatment system’s spent media, but any resulting hazardous materials disposal for the treatment system spent media will be addressed as a change.

Refer to 01 57 19.00 22 Temporary Environmental Controls & Amendments for hazardous waste disposal requirements.

532 n/a 31 23 00.00 01 57 19.00

1.7.

1.1.

1, 1.5.

h, 1.5g 3.18

Specification section 31 23 00.00 22, 1.7.1.1.1 states “The Contractor must expect that all excavated soils at the site are assumed to be impacted by contaminants (including but not limited to petroleum, PFAS, and metals) and considered characteristic non-hazardous solid waste. Any excavated soil that is not reused on-site must be disposed of at a RCRA Subtitle-D compliant, permitted landfill.”

Specification section 31 23 00.00 22, 1.5.h states "Soil materials designated for offsite disposal and all excess excavated soil materials, must be disposed of offsite at a RCRA Subtitle-D compliant, permitted landfill."

RCRA Subtitle-D compliant landfills under EPA guidelines are designated as Construction and Demolition Debris Landfills without hazardous materials. The designation for hazardous material landfills falls under Subtitle C.

Specification section 31 23 00.00 22, 1.5.g states "Assume 100% of excavated soil material is contaminated."

Specification section 01 57 19.00 22, 3.18 states "If petroleum-contaminated soil, or suspected hazardous waste is found during construction that was not identified in the Contract documents, immediately notify the Contracting Officer who, in turn will notify the NNSY Environmental Department (Code 106). Do not disturb this material until authorized by the contracting officer. ... If the material is hazardous and the handling of the material is necessary to accomplish the work, the Contracting Officer will issue a modification pursuant to "FAR 52.243-4, Changes" and "FAR 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions.”" Please confirm proposers are required to test all excavated material, due to the presence of contaminants, but since no defined quantity of petroleum-contaminated or hazardous materials has been provided, when encountered treatment and disposal of these materials will be considered a change per 01 57 19.00 22, 3.18.

Offerors are required to test all material in accordance with the requirements identified in 01 57 19.00 22 Temporary Environmental Controls. See Spec Appendix C Project Site Characterization Report for testing results.

533 Amend ment n/a n/a The Government Response to PPI #316 in Amendment 0004 appears to be addressing a different question. Please amend.

Concur, question "Drawing G-006, Asbestos Abatement #2 indicates all "Electrical fiber conduits within ductbanks must be assumed to have asbestos...". Drawings ED102 to ED118 and Appendix G provide photos and approximate conduit arrangements for ductbanks to be demolished. The provided information does not indicate depth or cross-sectional dimensions of electrical ductbank (concrete) to be demolished. Some of arrangements are shown in select areas of the utility profiles in the Appendix A drawings (2017 P-614 Waterfront Utilities) but do not show the full extent of the duct bank depths to be demolished. Due to the extensive cost and schedule implications associated with abatement and demolition of ductbank with unknown cross section and depth, we request the government either provide the necessary assumptions for the basis of proposals or confirm ductbank abatement and demolition will be considered a change." Revised response: Propose in accordance with the solicitation.

534 Amend ment n/a n/a Amendment 0003 appears to have combined PPI #162 & 163. Please confirm this was intentional.

Question #163 was included unintentionally and may be treated as a blank question/answer

535 Amend ment n/a n/a PPI #198 appears to have been skipped in responses given. Please confirm this was intentional.

Question #198 was included unintentionally and may be treated as a blank question/answer

536 In response to PPI Response #477, if the water in the dry dock basin needs to be treated, this initial dewatering would take approximately 18 days, not including seepage, based on the bid criteria of providing a treatment system with a flow rate of 1,000 gpm. Please confirm that for basis of bid, KTR is to assume the water to be clean (i.e. no treatment).

Confirmed, for dry dock basin dewatering, assume the water is clean.

537 In response to PPI Response #369, which states that the Utility Bridge will need to be demolished as a part of this project, please provide drawings for the bridge, as demolition is not indicated on the drawings and dimensions have not been provided.

See amendment detail below.

538 E061 Gener ator Permit Notes

Generator stack emission testing and Virginia Environmental Permit updates and filings?

1) Addendum 03, A168, charges the electrical contractor with providing Generator Stack testing and reporting to the NNSY Environmental.

2) Will NNSY interface with VADEQ or the Sub-contractor?

Amendment 3 PPI 168 response to be revised as follows; Stack testing will not be required or will be performed by the government.

3) Who will send test reports to VADEQ. This should be handled by NNSY Environmental and in accordance to their existing operating Air Permit.

4) Stack testing should be performed on the existing 1.5MW diesel generator and the new 800KW diesel generator.

539 combin ed spec page 1572, for instance each

FRCS

25 05 spec, page

1.7.

Will the government please confirm it desires the Control System Inventory Report for each FRCS on this project to include ALL devices, and not just networked devices? Including all non-networked Layer 0 devices such as actuators in an inventory is not typically required.

Confirmed, provide per the specifications.

540 combin ed spec page 1923, for instance

25 08 spec, 1.7.

Will the government please confirm it would like the contractor to obtain and maintain an eMASS account, and to manage the FRCS ATO authorization packages on behalf of the government? In our experience with projects such as these, the contractor provides the requisite RMF package artifacts to the government as needed, but does not directly interact with eMASS. If eMASS management is required, please confirm the government will sponsor a CAC card for the contractor cybersecurity engineer for the duration of the project.

NAVFAC will upload and maintain the documents in eMASS.

541 01 30 00.00

1.15 .3

Amendment 005 changed the review period for RFIs from 5 working days to 15 working days for the contracting officer. On similar jobs of this size and complexity, there can be upwards of a thousand RFIs with multiple iterations of clarification/answers. Due to the aggressive schedule that is required for this project, please reevaluate and reduce the review period to 5 working days or less.

The review time for RFI responses will remain 15 work days. It has been the Government’s experience on projects of similar size and complexity that most of the RFI responses will take less than 5 work days. However occasionally some responses require field investigations an additional engineering services that will add extra time to the response.

542 PPI

#369

Demol ition n/a PPI # 369 responses stated "the utility bridge will need to be demolished as part of this project". Please provide the utility bridge information, details and drawings.

See amendment detail below.

543 n/a n/a n/a Amendment 0003 incorporated FAR 52.216-4 Economic Price Adjustment - Labor and Material (Jan 2017) which states the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer if the rate of pay for labor (including fringe benefits) or the unit prices for materials shown in the Schedule increase or decrease and provide a proposal for an adjustment to the contract unit prices to be negotiated. Appendix B, Attachment AF: DD3 EPA Schedule only accounts for unit prices of materials. Please confirm by incorporating FAR 52.216-4 into this Contract it is the Government's intent for increases or decreases to labor (including fringe benefits) to be submitted by the Contractor for an adjustment to the

Per Attachment AF, price adjustments are limited to the materials/commodities listed in the schedule. There will be no price adjustment based on labor.

contract price. If so, please confirm there are no additional submittal requirements for the proposal to address the labor rates as they are not provided in Attachment AF: DD3 EPA Schedule.

544 Solicita tion pg.

57 of

52.222 -55

2(b) (8)

Paragraph 2(b)(8) of section 52.222-55 Minimum Wages for Contactor Workers Under Executive Order 14026 requires contractor compliance with any applicable Federal or State prevailing wage law. NAVFAC provided Federal Davis Bacon wage determinations in Addendum Three. Federal Davis Bacon wages require accrual of 1 hour of sick time for every 30 hours of work up to 56 hours per year.

Please confirm the project will be following Federal Davis Bacon rules.

FAR 52.222-6 applies. Reference Attachments AB, AC, and AD for the applicable prevailing wages.

545 Solicit ation

Contractors are required to upload the .PRX Primavera schedule file to the Government website with our bid. Our understanding is that this website will only accept .PDF files. Please advise if this is correct and if so, how shall Contractors transmit this file to the Government at bid time?

See amendment detail below.

546 Per PPI response #195, "Award Fee line items is informational and should not be priced by the contractors." Please confirm that the Award Fee is not to be included in the total contract value, therefore the Award Fee does not require bonding.

Confirmed. The Award Fee line item is informational and should not be priced by contractors. It does not require bonding.

547 Amend ment

Solicita tion

00 21 00, pg 23 of n/a Amendment 0002 appears to have removed the following criteria from item b. Basis of Evaluation for Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

- Proposals demonstrating projects that include multiple individual items in one project may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate multiple individual items in one project.

- Offerors who submit projects that demonstrate more relevance to the scope for this RFP may be considered more favorably than those who submit projects that demonstrate less relevance.

- Offerors demonstrating relevant projects performed in highly dense industrial areas may be considered more favorably than those who do not.

- Offerors demonstrating relevant projects performed on Department of Defense (DoD) contracts may be considered more favorably than those who do not demonstrate relevant projects performed on DoD contracts.

Please confirm the removal of these four criteria from the solicitation was intentional (not removed in error) and any submitted projects meeting these criteria under Factor 1 will no

The removal of the criteria was intentional.

longer be considered to be “more favorable” in the proposal evaluation process.

3. Attachment AK – Utility Bridge

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 18-Jun-2025 02:00 PM to 25-Jun-2025 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

4.2 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

4.3 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES (SAM.GOV)

5. INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

6. ATTACHMENTS: MAY BE LOCATED ON CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES UNDER

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A – PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

ATTACHMENT B – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT C – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

ATTACHMENT D – HISTORICAL SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

ATTACHMENT E – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION COMMITMENT DOCUMENT

ATTACHMENT F – INDIVIDUAL SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

ATTACHMENT G – PRICE PROPOSAL FORM AMEND0002

ATTACHMENT H – PIEE SOLICITATION VENDOR ACCESS INSTRUCTIONS

ATTACHMENT I – APPROVED IDENTITY PROOFING DOCUMENTS

ATTACHMENT J – CRITERIA FOR DENYING ACCESS TO NAVY INSTALLATIONS

ATTACHMENT K - 2025 RIOCC CVS SPONSOR NNSY TEMPLATE

ATTACHMENT L - 2025 RIOCC ODP DBIDS

ATTACHMENT M - SECNAV 5512 EXP 2027

ATTACHMENT N - DIRECTIONS TO PWD_ROICC TRAILER

ATTACHMENT O – SITE VISIT LOG

ATTACHMENT P – SITE VISIT HANDOUT

ATTACHMENT Q – LANT JA HSQ TECHNOLOGIES_REDACTED

ATTACHMENT R – LANT JA LIMITORQUE_REDACTED

ATTACHMENT S – 1806701 AMEND0002DWG

ATTACHMENT T – DD3 RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION

ATTACHMENT U – 1806701Amend0003-SPC-APPENDIX A1 ATTACHMENT V – 1806701Amend0003-SPC-APPENDIX I ATTACHMENT W – 1806701Amend0003-SPC-APPENDIX K ATTACHMENT X – 1806701Amend0003 - DWG ATTACHMENT Y – DD3 FF&E Package ATTACHMENT Z – DD3 SID Package ATTACHMENT AA – Site Visit Photos ATTACHMENT AB – Davis-Bacon Act WD VA20250001 ATTACHMENT AC – Davis-Bacon Act WD VA20250161 ATTACHMENT AD – Davis-Bacon Act WD VA20250209 ATTACHMENT AE – Award Fee Plan ATTACHMENT AF – DD3 EPA Schedule.

ATTACHMENT AG - 1806701Amend0004dwg ATTACHMENT AH - 18906701Amend0003-SPC-APPENDIX A2

ATTACHMENT AI – MIL-DTL-29229B

ATTACHMENT AJ - 1806701Amend0005-DWG ATTACHMENT AK – Utility Bridge

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.1.1 This acquisition is being solicited on an unrestricted basis, with Full and Open Competition.

1.1.2 The NAICS code for this procurement is 237990 and the size standard is

$45,000,000.

1.1.3 In accordance with DFARS 236.204(v), the magnitude of construction for this project is over $500,000,000.

1.1.4 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal according to FAR Part 15.

This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of offerors' proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source whose performance provides the best value to the Government.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

Description of Work:

This project will include the following major components for the P1062 Dry Dock 3 Modernization: rebuilding the caisson seats with deep foundations, refurbishing the dock floor and walls, pinning the concrete floor, constructing a wet well and pump house to replace the existing pumpwell, rerouting all utilities into a new utility trench around the dock perimeter, and replacing the dry dock’s surrounding rail systems.

• Cofferdam: A temporary cofferdam at the entrance to Dry Dock 3 will be constructed to allow the contractor to perform demolition and construction under dry working conditions.

The cofferdam consists of a continuous steel pipe pile wall (SPP Wall) driven side-by-side to form a continuous wall. The wall will support approximately 40 feet of water on the riverside. The cofferdam will be constructed approximately 8 feet east of the dry dock entrance (in the river), beyond the existing timber pile supported apron. In the space between the dry dock entrance and the cofferdam, riverbed soils will be dredged and replaced with a tremie concrete slab to seal off upward water flow. In addition, composite sheet pile/concrete closure walls will be constructed on either side of the dock entrance, connecting the SPP Wall to the dock proper and therefore closing off the entrance.

• Dry Dock: The floors and walls of the dry dock will be reconstructed by initially removing all the dry dock’s existing granite blocks (ranging from 15 inches thick along the floor and up to 50 inches thick along the altars) and a minimum of 12 inches of existing concrete beneath the granite. The coping/floodwall elevation will be the entrance, will have a tie-down system to resist increased uplift demands due to higher flood events.

The dry dock’s walls and floor will be reconstructed with reinforced concrete to provide improved capacity accommodating the increased “superflood” load condition and reestablishing the 2009 FCR design blocking loads.

• Wet Well: Selective demolition of the existing below grade Pumpwell is required to accommodate the discharge piping for the Wet Well and Pump House. This includes the removal of the existing ladders, catwalks, platforms, stairs, concrete walls/slabs and fiberglass grating as required by structural work.

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

2.1 The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the Offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2.2 As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)).

The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.3 The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

2.4. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors (Factors, 1, 2,3, and 4) are of equal importance to each and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 5). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are significantly more important than price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non- price factors considered.

2.5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. An Unacceptable rating in any of the non-price factors will result in an overall rating of “Unacceptable” for the non-price factors, unless corrected through discussions.

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

FAR Part 9.6 defines Contractor team arrangements. Contractor team arrangement, as used in this subpart, means an arrangement in which -- (1) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime Contractor; or (2) A potential prime Contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g., personnel, management, equipment that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies shall commit to the performance of this contract).

In particular, the proposal shall clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in the performance of the contract.

Vague commitments to support are likely insufficient; rather, they must demonstrate intent/manner of actual performance on the contract action being solicited.

The Offeror shall submit a signed copy of partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team (e.g., partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.) whose projects are submitted to demonstrate Construction or Design Experience. The Government will not consider any project submitted for Factor 1 if it was performed by a firm other than the Offeror and there is no supporting partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment. Additional joint venture agreements are not permitted on MAC Task Orders. Note: See specific restrictions on the use of subcontractor experience under Factor 1.

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Schedule

Factor 3 – Small Business Utilization Factor 4 – Safety

Factor 5 – Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors Factor 1

Corporate Experience, Factor 2 Schedule, Factor 3 Small Business Utilization, and Factor 4 Safety are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor 5. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are significantly more important than price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor

(a) Non-price Factors:

Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall complete the attached Construction and Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) for each construction project submitted and complete all individual blocks. Attachment C and all information therein is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to evaluate experience. The Government will evaluate only the information provided in Attachment C and all other information provided on other than Attachment C will not be considered. The Offeror may expand individual blocks on the Attachment C; however, Attachment C for each project submitted shall not exceed a total of four (4) single-sided pages or, two (2) double-sided pages, 8.5” x 11”, 1” margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger. Attachment C submittals that do not comply with these requirements will not be evaluated. For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP.

1. Construction Experience: Submit up to a maximum of five (5) construction projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to this project and substantially completed (at least 75%) within the last 15 years that demonstrate the Offeror’s experience. Similar projects include large waterfront facilities such as dry docks, piers, bulkheads, wharves, quay walls, bridges or water-retaining structures. At least one project must be valued at $100 million or more. If the Offeror submits more than five (5) projects for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five (5) projects submitted and disregard any other project information. The construction projects submitted must collectively demonstrate experience in all three (3) of the following individual items. All individual items do not have to be within a single project scope.

a. New construction of shoring systems or combi-wall systems to construct in-water structures

b. Construction of waterfront utility systems for ship berthing or other waterfront operations

c. Deep excavation projects (e.g. wet wells)

Failure to demonstrate experience in all individual items shall be considered a deficiency.

A relevant construction project is further defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. If a project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the JV member offering on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole.

The JV member proposed for this contract shall specifically address field work performed by that JV member including field staffing and direct field work oversight. The JV member proposed for this contract shall also address home office management performed by that JV member including the number/percentage of employees provided for the overall contract by the JV members as well as the overall percentage of work performed by the JV member. The Offeror shall also submit a SIGNED copy of the Joint Venture agreement indicating the proposed participation of each Joint Venture member. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. The Offeror MAY NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor unless specialized subcontractor experience is stated as acceptable. Failure to submit this information may result in a lower rating.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

Proposals demonstrating experience self-performing relevant features of work may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate self-performance.

Factor 2 Schedule

Project Schedule Narrative: The “Offeror” shall provide a narrative limited to ten (10) single-sided pages or, five (5) double sided pages, 8.5” x 11”, 1” margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger. The following shall be addressed:

Based upon a total contract duration of 1825 days and an assumed award date of 12 January 2026 and Notice To Proceed for Full site access of 8 September 2026, at a minimum, clearly identify the proposed dates for the following:

a. Ordering and delivery of long lead materials impacting the critical path

b. Start of in-water work and completion of the cofferdam construction

c. Start and completion date for Dry Dock basin dewatering

d. Start and completion of testing of groundwater dewatering treatment system

e. Start and completion of groundwater dewatering

f. Demolition and construction completion of the wet well structure.

g. Dry Dock basin demolition and installation of precast panels.

h. Cofferdam removal and caisson testing.

1. Schedule: Provide a project schedule using P6 software. Submit the PDF of the full schedule output with the proposal submittal in PIEE Solicitation Module and the native (.xer) file via email to daniel.r.rocha2.civ@us.navy.mil prior to the submission deadline. The proposed project schedule need not be cost loaded; however, shall serve as the basis for the Offeror’s price proposal. The above completion dates in item (3)(i). shall be reflected in this schedule along with major construction activities, milestones, and critical path items. The schedule shall be on 11”x17” pages, single-sided, and there is no page limit.

NOTES:

• [REMOVED]

• Narrative and schedule are not allowed to propose variances from Contract requirements.

For example, Offerors are not allowed to propose contractual conditions that shift schedule risk to the Government or propose limitations on the ability of the Government to properly administer the contract.

• Failure to address any of the submission requirements will result in a deficiency.

• The assumed award date is stated for proposal evaluation purposes only and does not infer or guarantee that an award will be made by that date.

The Offeror's proposed construction completion dates, project schedule, and narratives will be evaluated to ensure timely completion of the project within the dates specified. The evaluation will consider how well the Offeror understands the major construction activities, task predecessors, and critical path items to execute the project.

Construction duration that meets the duration specified may be given more favorable consideration.

Completion dates that are ahead of the dates specified should not be provided and will not be considered.

The project narrative may show or explain the methodologies or innovative approaches that will be implemented to accelerate delivery, while fully mitigating risks to project execution and maintaining quality of construction.

Proposals that identify innovative approaches and lessons learned from previous completed projects that will be applied to this project to mitigate schedule risk and recover schedule time in the event of project delays may be rated more favorably.

Factor 3, Small Business Utilization and Participation

It is the policy of the Government to provide maximum practicable opportunities in its acquisitions to Small Business (SB) concerns, including Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone SB), Veteran- Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and other small business concerns. Further, it is the policy of the Government that such concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contract performance consistent with its efficient performance.

This Factor assesses both the historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns and the proposed small business participation commitment for this requirement. The offeror is required to demonstrate its previous commitment to SBs through its record of past utilization of SBs and the level of commitment to small business if awarded a contract under this solicitation.

All Offerors (large, non-profits, AND small businesses) shall use Attachment D (Historical Small Business Utilization) to demonstrate their historical utilization of SBs. Each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, shall be included on Attachment D.