N6247024R0062 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as p rovid ed herein, all terms and cond itions o f th e document referenced in Item 9A o r 10 A, as hereto fore chang ed , remains un ch an ged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND T IT LE OF SIGNER (T ype or print )

30-105-04EXCEP TION T O SF 30

AP PROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) P rescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See block 14 continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

140 1 43

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Apr-2025

16B. UNITED STAT ES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signa ture of Cont ract ing Officer)(Signat ure of person aut horized t o sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACT OR (No., St reet , County, Sta te and Zip Code) X N6247024R0062

X 9B. DATED (SEE IT EM 11)

04-Mar-2025

10B. DATED (SEE IT EM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS IT EM ONLY AP PLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITAT IONS

X Th e ab ove n umbered solicitation is amend ed as set forth in Item 1 4. Th e hou r and date sp ecified for receipt o f Offer X is extend ed , is not extended.

Offer mu st ackn owled ge receipt of this amen dment p rior to the h our an d d ate specified in the solicitation or as amen ded b y o ne of the following method s:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15 , and returnin g co pies of the amen dment; (b ) By ackn owled ging receipt of this amen dment o n each copy of the o ffer sub mitted ;

o r (c) By separate letter o r teleg ram wh ich includ es a reference to th e so licitation and amend men t nu mbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtu e of this amen dment y ou desire to change an offer already su bmitted, su ch change may be made by teleg ram or letter, p rovid ed each telegram o r letter mak es reference to th e so licitation and this amen dment, an d is receiv ed prio r to the op en ing hou r and date sp ecified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND AP PROP RIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM AP PLIES ONLY T O MODIFICATIONS OF CONT RACT S/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES T HE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED P URSUANT T O: (Specify aut horit y) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN T HE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. T HE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office , appropria tion dat e, et c.) SET FORT H IN ITEM 14, P URSUANT TO T HE AUT HORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. T HIS SUPP LEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENT ERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUT HORITY OF:

D. OT HER (Specify type of modificat ion and aut horit y)

E. IMP ORTANT: Contrac tor is not, is required t o sign this document and re turn copies to t he issuing office.

14. DESCRIP TION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, inc luding solic ita tion/contrac t subject mat t er where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If app licable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Apr-2025

CODE

COM NAVF ACSYSCOM AT LANTIC

6506 HAM PT ON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7 . ADMINISTERED BY (If o ther than item 6)

4 . REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247024R0062

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Extend the proposal due date.

2. Respond to PPIs.

3. Revise Specifications.

4. Revise Drawings.

5. Revise the solicitation.

6. Provide clause revisions.

7. Provide attachments.

1. The proposal due date is extended from 2:00 PM Norfolk, VA local time, Thursday, 8 May 2025 to

2:00 PM Norfolk, VA local time, Friday, 6 June 2025.

2. PPI Responses

PPI

NO

REFERENCE QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Page Section Para

1 A-103 sheet keynote

N/A Drawing A-103, sheet keynote 34 references structural for details of ladder & ladder fall arrest system. Drawing S- 506 section C1 refers to access ladder on S-504 detail A4. Please provide detail regarding the fall arrest system.

Fall arrest systems are required for the ladder from the Wet Well 3 pump level to the environmental chambers and at the Wet Well 3 sluice gate slots. Detail A4/S-571 schematically details these ladders notes the fall arrest system criteria in adherence to the requirements set forth in the specification Section 05 51 33 (Paragraph 2.3.1).

2 S-547 sheet note

N/A Drawing S-547 sheet note 2 references drawing S-606 for manhole location tables. Please provide drawing S-606.

Northings and Eastings of Electrical Manholes are listed on S-547. See amendment detail below.

3 N/A 31 52 00 N/A In order to provide a basis of proposal to meet the requirements outlined in Specification sections 01 75 00.01 and 31 52 00, please provide groundwater testing and sampling for contaminants in the vicinity of the Dry Dock.

Two rounds of groundwater sampling were performed for the project. The results of the first program are contained in Appendix C of the specifications. The results of the second program are contained in Appendix H of the specifications.

4 N/A 31 52 00 3.7.4.b Please provide the water quality and quantity restrictions imposed by NNSY wastewater treatment plant operator (WWTPO) or Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD) sanitary systems, which may be allowed with prior approval per Specification section 31 52 00, 3.7.4.b.

See amendment detail below.

5 S-901 N/A N/A Please confirm the Dry Dock #2 dewatering pump station, which will be used to initially unwater Dry Dock #3, discharges into the Elizabeth River outside of the entrance cofferdam protected area.

The Dry Dock #2 dewatering pump station (Pumpwell 2) may not be used for the dewatering of Dry Dock #3. Dewatering of Dry Dock 3 during construction must be performed using Contractor provided pumping equpment as specified in Section 31 52 00.

6 MD113 sheet keynote 1 & 3

N/A Several locations require salvaging equipment/material, turned over to the government. An example of this exists on Drawing MD113, sheet keynotes 1 & 3.

Please provide an address or location where salvaged equipment/material is to be turned over to the government.

Salvage materials will go to building 298 which is within the NNSY controled industrial area.

7 ED103

to

ED118

N/A N/A Electrical demolition Drawings ED103- ED118 provide a plan view of demolished duct bank. Please provide a profile view of existing duct bank to be demolished.

Propose in accordance with the solicitation.

8 EP101

to

EP118

N/A N/A Drawings EP101 - EP118 indicated the plan view location of new duct banks, but do not include depths or profiles. Please provide depths or profiles of the duct banks similar to CU201 - CU204 for the saltwater system.

Electrical power profiles are provided on Sheets EP201 through EP204. Telecommunications profiles are provided on Sheets ET201 and ET202.

9 N/A 31 52 00 3.7.2.e Specification section 31 52 00, 3.7.2.e requests dewatering facilities with stand-by pumps with 50 percent standby capacity. Please confirm this requirement requests 50 percent extra pumps of similar capacity available (on site or onsite within 4 hours).

Requirement confirmed. Extra pumps must be on site or available onsite within 4 hours.

10 N/A 31 52 00 3.7.4.d Please confirm after the initial water quality requirements are met, continuous discharge to the river is allowed with monthly sampling and testing per Specification section 31 52 00, 3.7.4.d.

As indicated in the specifications, the KTR is responsible for applying for, obtaining, and complying with a VPDES VAG83 discharge permit for the project. The KTR will be responsible for complying with sampling and testing requirements of the specifications and the VAG83 permit. Refer to attached NEPA documentation.

11 S-005 05 50

C1, note 2 2.1.8.4 Drawing S-005 detail C1, cementitious grouted floor anchor note #2 specifies an anchor hole diameter to be 5 times (1:5) the diameter of the anchor. Specification section 05 50 13, 2.1.8.4 specifies "holes for grouted anchors must be 1.5 times the nominal bar diameter and provide a 1 inch annulus.". Please confirm S-005 contains a typo and 05 50 13 is correct.

12 SC252 A1 N/A Drawing SC252, section cut A1 scales the suction floor (new wet 3) foundation mat to be 10ft thick. Please confirm it is acceptable to place this foundation in multiple lifts.

Confirmed, it is acceptable to place the wet well foundation mat in multiple lifts.

13 S-005 C1 N/A Drawing S-005, detail C1 shows detail of post-installed anchors. Please confirm if this detail applies to all post-installed anchors other than vertical floor anchors on this project .

Detail C1/S-005 is typical for post-installed epoxy/adhesive anchors unless noted or specified elsewhere.

This detail is not applicabee to cementitious grouted, vertical anchors for the dry dock floor.

14 C-003 Sequence of Constructi on #11

N/A Drawing C-003, Sequence of Construction #11, limits the length of open trench to 500 lnft during utility installation. Please confirm this note is referring to cumulative open trench for the project site.

Sheet C-003, Sequence of Construction Note 11 applies to the total length of discrete utility trench excavations open at any time. The note does not apply to utility installations within the limits of mass excavation between the outer crane beam and dry dock coping wall.

15 S-031 Proposed Constructi on Sequencin g of Basin and Wet Well #12, A1, C3

N/A Drawing S-031, Proposed Construction Sequencing of Basin and Wet Well #12 indicates "grade beam demolition is spaced at least 50 ft apart at all times".

Drawing SB404 plan A1 indicates the majority of the grade beams are spaced at 25' OC. Drawing S-502 section C3 indicates the grade beams are 5'-0" wide.

This would allow less than 45-ft of clearance (assuming over excavation) if every other grade beam was demolished at the same time. Please revise the note to indicate "grade beam demolition may occur concurrently at every other grade beam, at roughly 45-ft apart at all times".

This would allow every other grade beam to be demolished concurrently, rather than every third grade beam.

16 N/A 01 45 35 N/A Please confirm temporary works, such as the temporary entrance cofferdam, do not require special inspections as detailed in specification 01 45 35.

Special Inspections are required for temporary works.

17 G-006 01 14

00.00 22

1.6.1.4 Specification section 01 1400.00 22,

1.6.1.4 indicates contractor parking at Lot 43. Please confirm proposers can plan on adequate parking will be provided at no cost to the contractor.

Please identify the area provided on a drawing or aerial image.

Lot 43 has over 500 parking spaces.

It is used for shipyard overflow parking and contractor parking. The amount of vehicles parking in lot 43 will vary through out the duration of this contract. Parking is on a first come first served basis. There will not be reserved spaces in lot 43 for thiss contract. There is no cost for parking in lot 43.

18 G-006 01 14

00.00 22

1.6.1.4 Specification section 01 1400.00 22,

1.6.1.4 indicates contractor's employees will be required to card in through the CIA turnstiles. Please confirm contractor's employees will be required to exit the bus to pass through CIA turnstiles.

All contractor personnel will have to exit through a shipyard turnstyle.

19 S-050 Structural General Note #4.F.2

N/A Drawing S-050, Structural General Note #4.F.2. Please confirm any design changes will be considered a change to the contract and will be evaluated for cost and schedule changes and remove this note.

20 S-031 Proposed Constructi on Sequencin g of Basin and Wet Well #35 & 37

N/A Drawing S-031, Proposed Construction Sequencing of Basin and Wet Well #36 & 38 refer to "Shovel/Broom Clean" and "White Glove". Please define these cleaning terms.

21 S-050 Structural General Note #1.E

N/A Drawing S-050, Structural General Note #1.E. Please confirm any features not fully shown or called for on the contract drawings or specifications will be considered a change to the contract and will be evaluated for cost and schedule changes and remove this note.

22 I-102 Attachm ent G Price Proposa l Form

Sheet note #1

N/A Please confirm all content shown in the Sheet Notes and Furniture Schedule on Drawings I-102 & I-103 are intended to be included in Attachment G Price Proposal Form Line Item 0002.

Items listed in the Furniture Schedules on Sheets I-102 and I-103 are included in the FF&E package (Price Proposal Line Item 0002).

23 M-052 General Mechanic al Notes #2, 3, 15

N/A Drawing M-052, General Mechanical Notes #2, 3, and 15. Please confirm the bid documents are intended to be fully designed and not design-build and remove these notes.

24 P-051 General Plumbing Notes #3, N/A Drawing P-051, General Plumbing Notes #3 and 13. Please confirm the bid documents are intended to be fully designed and not design-build and remove these notes.

25 N/A 02 41

00.00 22

1.2.3 Specification section 02 41 00.00 22, 1.2.3

states: "Prior to beginning demolition activities, the Environmental Department must be contacted to evaluate the project area for both Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) issues. If the site/building/area requiring demolition contains areas of concern under RCRA or CERCLA, special procedures must be followed for subsurface disturbances.

Detailed handling requirements for any waste generated (both solid and hazardous wastes) shall be enforced." Please confirm areas of concern identified post bid will be considered a change.

26 N/A 31 09 13 1.1 Specification section 31 09 13, 1.1 states "Contractor shall procure the services of local personnel from a geotechnical specialty firm hereafter called the "Contractor's Specialty Engineer" to install, maintain, and perform all required readings and interpretation of data as indicated." Please confirm the piezometer standpipes do not need to be installed by the "Contractor's Specialty Engineer".

Concur, Contractor's Specialty Engineer doesn't need install but needs to be involved in the supervision of the installation of instrumentation (approval of procedures, details, etc). See amendment detail below.

27 S-050 Structural General Note #1.D n/a Please confirm structural cofferdam drawings SC101 - SC551 are not contractor designed and drawing S-050, structural general note #1.D does not apply to these drawings.

Sheet S-050 WET WELL 3

STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES

- 1 OF 2 is applicable only to the Wet Well Construction, it does not apply to the Temporary Entrance Cofferdam.

28 N/A 31 23

00.00 22

1.7.3 Specification section 31 23 00.00 22, 1.7.3

states "Excavation made with power-driven equipment is not permitted within two feet of known Government-owned utility or subsurface construction." Please confirm this restriction only applies to active utility lines.

The restriction is only applicable to active utility lines or subsurface features that are to be protected in-place.

29 N/A 31 23

00.00 22

3.3.1 Specification section 31 23 00.00 22, 3.3.1

states "Where excessively soft soils or other unsuitable soils are encountered, they must be removed and remedied as directed by the Contractor's geotechnical engineer and approved by the Contracting Officer." Please confirm remediation of soft and unsuitable soils under this paragraph will be considered a change.

30 N/A 31 52 00 3.3.2 Specification section 31 52 00 page 13 paragraph 3.3.2 states "If obstructions restrict driving a piling to the specified penetration, the obstructions must be removed or penetrated with a chisel beam or other approved means." How does the Contractor get paid for any obstruction removal that is encountered during Probing activities?

If a pile cannot be offset within specified tolerances to clear an obstruction and the obstruction must be removed. Removal of the obstruction will be considered a changed condition.

31 N/A 31 62 16.16

3.3.2 Specification section 31 62 16.16 page 11

paragraph 3.2.2 states "A final lateral deviation from the correct location at the cutoff elevation of not more than 12 inches measured by the square root of the sum of squares (SRSS) in the principal plan dimensions will be permitted for vertical piles. Manipulation of piles will not be permitted." Dry Dock 3 is supported by numerous existing timber piles. The Contractor is required to demolish the existing granite blocks and core the existing concrete base of Dry Dock 3 in locations where new H-piles are to be installed. Please confirm, any additional work required to mitigate the

Oversized core holes have been specified to provide space for H-pile installation with an existing timber pile co-located within the core area.

If additional coring or demolition is required to install an H-pile in the plan location it will be considered a changed condition.

location deviation for a new H-pile will be considered a change.

32 N/A N/A N/A Specification sections do not provide "Measurement and Payment" paragraphs for each of the Bid items identified in the price proposal form. Please provide.

solicitation. Measurement of unit price bid items is described on the bid form or in the specifications.

33 S-503 S-508 03 31

C3, C2 2.1.1.3, 2.1.1.4

Specification 03 31 30, 2.1.1.4 indicates "Concrete for cast-in-place dry dock floor placements must contain synthetic reinforcing fibers." Please confirm03 31 30, 2.1.1.4 only applies to the cast-in-place floor slabs (S-503 section A4).

Please confirm the Floor Grade Beams (stage 1 & 2) (S-503 section C3) and the CIP Floor Trench (S-508 section C2) are intended to be governed by 03 31 30,

2.1.1.3 rather than 03 31 30, 2.1.1.4.

Correct, synthetic reinforcing fibers are only required for cast-in-place dry dock floor (slab) placements.

34 Attachm ent G Price Proposa l Form

N/A N/A Please confirm Attachment G Price Proposal Form, Line Item 0001A should be modified to state "...but excluding work provided in Line Items 0001B thru 0001Q."

35 Attachm ent G Price Proposa l Form

N/A N/A Please confirm Attachment G Price Proposal Form, the row after 0001O should be revised to reference "Line Item 0001O" not "CLIN 0001K".

36 Attachm ent G Price Proposa l Form

N/A N/A Please confirm Attachment G Price Proposal Form, the row after 0001P should be revised to reference "Line Item 0001P" not "CLIN 0001L".

37 Attachm ent G Price Proposa l Form

N/A N/A Please confirm the intent of Attachment G Price Proposal Form, is for Line item 0001 to be the sum of Line Item 0001A thru Line Item 0001Q.

38 N/A 00 21 00 3.(a) Please confirm 00 21 00, 3.(a) Factor 2 Schedule indicates "Notice to Proceed for Full site access of 8 September 8 2026".

Please confirm this date should be used for planning a total contract duration of

The period of performance is 1825 days from the project award date.

1825 days, resulting in a Final Completion date of September 7 2030.

40 09 90 00.00 09 97 13.27

N/A N/A Specification sections 09 90 00.00 22 and 09 97 13.27 do not provide a schedule for painting sheet piles, pipe piles, and H-piles. The drawings do not indicate if these elements are to be painted. Is there a coating requirement for sheet piles, pipe piles, and H-piles? If so, please provide.

No coating is required for the steel sheet piles, pipe piles, or H-piles.

41 S-002 Demolitio n Notes:

Note 11

N/A Drawing sheet S-002, Demolition notes:

Note 11 states: ...."Install new timber pile(s) and hardware at Berth 15 after cofferdam has been removed." The drawings do not provide details of the timber piles and hardware for Berth 15.

Please provide.

42 FA051

FX051

General Note #2

N/A Drawing FA051 & FX051, General Note #2. Please confirm all requirements needed to "Coordinate all required systems to the satisfaction of the engineer and authority having jurisdiction." have been identified in the bid documents and remove these notes.

43 E-002 Electrical General Note #2

N/A Drawing E-002, General Note #2. Please define a threshold of what will be considered "...Deviations from confined work spaces..." in terms of schedule, quality, and cost so bidders may include, or remove this note.

44 N/A 00 21 00 3.(a) The solicitation 00 21 00, 3.(a) Factor 2 Schedule indicates an assumed award date of "12 January 2026" with "Notice to Proceed for Full site access of 8 September 8 2026". Please confirm Proposers can assume the Government will extend authority to commit and bill for material and equipment purchases.

The government will not pay for materials to be installed on this contract that are not delivered to the site or materials that do not have a stored material agreement with the contracting Officer. The government will pay for materials that meet these requirements. The government will not compensate the contractor for equipment stored on site or dedicated to this project ahead of the approved DD#3 site access date established in the approved contract schedule.

45 G-104 Phasing Notes #2.A.(2) & 3.A.(1)

Drawing G-104, Phasing Notes #2.A.(2) & 3.A.(1) appear to overlap from 06/10/2029 to 08/15/2029. Please confirm these notes contain the correct dates.

The dates indicated on drawing G- 104 have been confirmed by the Government.

46 S-309 S-504 S-551

A1/C1, A1/A4, B2

N/A Drawings S-309 detail A1, S-311 detail A1, and S-504 section A1 indicate 1'-8" from the Sill (EL 61.0) to the Seat EL 59.33). Drawings S-309 detail C1 and S- 551 details B2, indicate 1'-8" at Sill and 2'-2" @ Jamb. Drawing S-504 section A4 indicates a caisson swale and drain without an EL 58.83 (2'-2" below EL 61.0). Please clarify where an EL 58.83 occurs and where the elevation transitions, including steepness occurs.

The corner geometry on A1/S-311 uses two radii to transition from the 1’-8” sill to 2’-2” wall jamb. The 2’- 2” thickness is only applicable to the wall jambs. Detail A4/S-504 demonstrates how the swale geometry is formed starting from EL59.33. The swale is formed using 1:1 slopes to transition from EL59.33 to EL58.75 and EL59.33 to EL59.08, for the south and north sides respectively.

47 N/A 01 11 00 1.10.f Please confirm specification section 01 11 00, 1.10.f refers to 47 workings days over the contract duration, not 47 working days per year.

The Contractor's schedule must include a total of 47 working days where site access will not be available due to Government activities not specified elsewhere in the bid documents. These days are included in the total contract duration.

48 Solicitat ion N62470 24R006 2 (page 1 & 53)

Pg. 1 Section 11 & Pg. 53 Section 52.211-10

On page 1 of solicitation N6247024R0062, the contractor is directed to complete the project 1825 calendar days after receiving the notice to proceed (8 September 26); however, on page 53 the contractor is to complete the work no later than 1825 calendar days after contract award (12 January 26).

Please clarify whether the schedule is to refelct 1825 calendar days from the award date or notice to proceed.

The period of performance is 1825 days from the project award date.

49 ED112 Sheet ED112, note 2 states that EMH 1528 and its associated east ductbank are to remain during construction. The single hash marks along the east ductbank indicated on sheet E-001 state to demolish the existing underground ductbank.

Additionally, EP112 shows construction of a new east ductbank from EMH 1528.

Please confirm the intent is to demolish/replace the east ductbank.

See amendment detail below.

50 SPECS 31 52 00 1.1 Item #5 on S-031 says lower groundwater to EL60 whereas 31 52 00 1.1 says EL50.

Please confirm

EL 50 is correct. See amendment detail below.

51 SD301 Seemingly from the contract drawings both a model of the new work has been created as well as a surface of the existing

No, models will be provided to the successful bidder after award.

dock from a point cloud. If possible, please provide any Revit, AutoCAD Civil 3D, AutoCAD DWG, Point Cloud files/models available.

52 S-002 Demolitio n

11 Note 11 states that concrete fender pile are indicated to be salvaged and that new timber pile are to be installed after the cofferdam has been removed. Please clarify as no fender pile are indicated.

See amendment detail below.

53 CS201 On sheet CS201, the 15"/18" storm drain is labeled as RCP except between structures 3914 and 3915A it is labeled as DIP. Please confirm RCP is intended.

See amendment detail below.

54 CD103 CD103, CD105, CD106, and CD113 note 30 state to demolish a valve; however, the valves are not shown within any utility.

Additionally, there is not a detail provided once the valve is demolished. Please confirm what utility each valve is associated with and any detail once the valve is demolished

See amendment detail below.

55 5 of 79 & Page 5 or 5

RFP &

Attachme nt G Price Proposal

CLIN

0007 & Line Item

CLIN 0007 Option 6 states "Price for providing additional construction dewatering treatment system for treatment of PFAS contaminated water, in accordance with the drawings and specifications." Line Item Option 6 on Price Proposal states "Price for providing all work for initial dewatering of the Dry Dock 3 basin following cofferdam construction using contractor provided pumps, in accordance with the drawings and specifications." Please clarify which is correct?

See amendment detail below.

56 Please confirm that Appendix "C" was not provided and is not part of this contract.

The file "1806701-SPC-APPENDIX C.pdf" is included with the posted bid documents.

57 G-006 Asbestos Abatemen t Notes

1 "1. ELECTRICAL MANHOLES MUST

BE ASSUMED TO HAVE ASBESTOS

CONTAINING FIRE WRAP ON ALL

CABLES. DEMOLISH IN

ACCORDANCE WITH

SPECIFICATION SECTION 02 82 00.00

22, ASBESTOS REMEDIATION.

Should KTR assume that the concrete manholes are asbestos containing as well, and dispose of accordingly?

Propose in accordance with the solicitation.

58 G-006 Asbestos Abatemen t Notes

2 2. ELECTRICAL FIBER CONDUITS

WITHIN DUCTBANKS MUST BE

ASSUMED TO HAVE ASBESTOS

CONTAINING MATERIAL WITHIN

THE CONDUIT ITSELF. HANDLE IN

ACCORDANCE WITH

SPECIFICATION SECTION 02 82 00.00

22, ASBESTOS REMEDIATION."

Should KTR assume that the concrete duct banks are asbestos containing as well, and dispose of accordingly?

59 Appendix G

Multiple images of the electrical manholes show trash, garbage, and sludge in the bottom of them. Please confirm if it is the responsibility of the contractor to remove and dispose of this garbage during the demolition phase of the manholes.

Yes, the contractor is responsible for removing garbage and debris during demolition.

60 Appendix G

Please confirm that the garbage/trash/sludge that is stated in the previous PPI is to be considered non-hazardous. If it is hazardous, please provide the hazardous parameters for disposal.

Contractor should assume debris is non-hazardous.

61 CN101 Please confirm that all dredging operations have to occur inside a Turbidity Curtain and Oil Boom, and contractor is required to provide ample turbidity curtain to encompass all equipment and operations.

Please review Section 35 20 23 of the bid documents. Dredging must be performed after the turbidity curtain and the cofferdam/sheet piling are in place.

62 31 52 00 Jetting and/or probing of cofferdam pipes was not addressed in the specification.

Please clarify if jetting and/or probing is expected to be necessary to install the temporary cofferdam pipe piles.

Please review Section 31 52 00 of the bid documents. Probing is addressed in Section 31 52 00, Paragraph 3.3.2. Jetting is not permitted.

63 SC-301,

SC-501

D1, C1 Details call for *S 31 Pile connectors and *S 31 SSP. Please verify that these are PS 31 sheet piles and any other call outs with *S 31 are indeed PS 31 sheet piles.

Correct, PS31 or approved comparable sheet/connector.

64 S-501 B3, A3, A4

Details show pile shoes and splices being installed in field. Can pile shoes and splices be installed prior to delivery to job site?

Yes, pile shoes and splices can be completed prior to delivery to the job site.

65 S-031 Proposed Constructi on Sequence

6C, 12C

Notes call for a 1' closure sealed once H-pile is installed. S-502, Detail A1 shows a 2' closure pour. This detail also shows concrete being poured below the bottom of the drydock concrete, conflicting with S-301. Please clarify.

See amendment detail below.

66 S-206 This sheet references G-301 for Dry Dock 3 transverse section information. G-301 has not been provided. Please provide.

We do not see a reference to Sheet G-301 on Sheet S-206. There is no Sheet G-301 in the drawing set.

67 SD206-

SD213

Sheet elevations call out top of wall elevation at El 104.35 to 104.41. All other demolition sections call out top of coping wall at El 103.0. Please advise.

See amendment detail below.

68 SD-213 Sheet Note

1 Note says to "See notes on Sheet SD101."

Sheet SD101 has not been provided.

Please provide.

See amendment detail below.

69 Please confirm that all manhole structures (electrical, storm drain, etc.) and yard

Correct, 24" stone bedding is required for utility structures cast on drain structures require a 24" stone bedding.

grade (storm drain inlets/yard drains, storm drain manholes, storm drain valve vaults, electrical manholes, telecommunications manholes, steam vault, and water meter vault). It is not required for pile supported utility structures.

70 21 Solicitatio n, Section

4.1 - Proposal Submissio n Instructio ns

N/A Please confirm that a complete proposal will consist of a total of three (3) electronic files that are be uploaded to PIEE: one (1) PDF of the Non-Price Proposal (Factors 1-4), one (1) PDF of the Price Proposal (Factor 5), and one (1) native (.xer) schedule file as a supplement to the Non-Price proposal.

71 N/A 00 21 00 4.1 We request an extension to the proposal submission deadline, currently due on 8 May 2025. Due to the complexity of the project, amount of information within appendices, coordination of a site visit, and to provide Small Businesses adequate time to develop proposals, we kindly request an extension until 26 June 2025.

We believe the additional time will allow us to submit a more comprehensive and high-quality proposal aligning with the objectives and requirements of the Government.

72 53 of 79 52.211-12

LIQUIDA

TED

DAMAG

ES --

CONSTR

UCTION

(SEP

2000)

Paragra ph (a)

Potential bidder notes the liquidated damages amount of $244,910.95 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted. Can the Navy please confirm this high amount for liquidated damages was intended? If so, we request that the Navy consider lowering the daily liquidated damages amount to $20,000, which is more in line with what is being observed in the industry.

73 10 of 79 00 21 00 Factor 1

(a) 1

The second sentence states "Similar projects are defined as large in-water facilities such as drydocks, …" We request a one word revision to this sentence. The revised sentence should read "Similar projects are defined as large waterfront facilities such as drydocks…" As currently defined, a project would have to be constructed 100% in the water to be deemed similar and relevant. This does not accurately capture the scope of work for a drydock, bulkhead, wharves, etc. or for this specific project. Please revise this single word to accurately capture similar contract experience per Factor 1.

74 10 of 79 00 21 00 Factor 1

(a) 1

We request that one of the five(5) projects submitted in response to Factor 1 be allowed to be a project that is partially complete. We propose the following text be added to Factor 1 : "One (1) relevant construction project can be an active project, that meets the monetary size requirements and where construction cost is a minimum of 75% complete based on the total contract value as of the date of issuance of this RFP."

Projects similar to the scope of work required by this contract are less common and allowing one partially completed project would open up Prime Contractor competition and participation.

75 10 of 79 00 21 00 Factor 1

(a) 1

We request that the minimum construction project size be revised from $50M to $45M. Projects similar to the scope of work required by this contract are less common and lowering the minimum threshold for relevant projects to $45M would open up competition and participation amongst Prime Contractors.

76 Solicitat ion -p.10

Factor 1, Corporate Experienc e

(a) 1 Solicitation document states, “Submit a maximum of five (5) construction projects that best demonstrates the offeror’s experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to this project. Similar projects are defined as large in-water facilities such as dry docks, piers, bulkheads, wharves, quay walls, bridges or water-retaining structures with a complete construction cost of $50 million or more with at least one project of $100 million or more. Submitted projects shall be completed within the last 10 years of the date of issuance of this RFP.”

Due to the specialized work that this project will demand and the specialized scope that should be required to be a relevant project, please allow projects above $20 million to be utilized as a relevant project for Corporate Experience. Especially in the Hampton Roads area, there have only been a few large similar projects in the past 20 years. Allowing projects to be submitted over $20M will allow for more qualified offerors to demonstrate their corporate experience locally in the Hampton Roads area on naval facilities (including Norfolk Naval Shipyard).

Similar to the successfully completed Dry Dock 4 Repairs at Norfolk Naval Shipyard, we are requesting these requirements be modified to similar projects with a complete construction cost of $20 million or more with at least one project of $100 million or more, and projects shall be completed within the last 20 years of the date of issuance of this

RFP.

In addition, even though piers, bulkheads, wharves, quay walls, bridges or water-retaining structures are similar, we are requesting that actual dry dock projects should weigh more heavily in the corporate experience evaluation. The specialized industrial details and intricacies involved in a large dry dock project are different and more complex than piers, bulkheads, wharves, quay walls, bridges, or water-retaining structures projects. In other words, in a recent NAVFAC MIDLANT solicitation for a pier replacement project, dry dock repair projects along with projects involving bridges or water-retaining structures were not considered relevant to a pier project. Actual dry dock repair projects should be weighed more heavily than any other relevant projects.

3. Revise the following Specifications:

SECTION 05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

2.1.8.4 Cementitious Grouted Anchors

DELETE the second sentence and REPLACE with:

“Holes for the grouted anchors must be 1.5 times the nominal anchor diameter and provide 1/2 in. minimum annular gap, or the recommended annular gap provided by the grout manufacturer in writing for grouted anchors in vertical holes (not for baseplate grouting).

SECTION 31 09 13 GEOTECHNICAL AND SURVEY MONITORING

1.1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

DELETE the second subparagraph and REPLACE with:

“Contractor must procure the services of local personnel from a geotechnical specialty firm hereafter called the "Contractor's Specialty Engineer" to supervise installation of instrumentation and perform all required readings and interpretation of data as indicated. Contractor must hire a firm hereinafter called "Contractor's Surveyor" to monitor project bench marks.”

SECTION 31 52 00 TEMPORARY DRY DOCK ENTRANCE COFFERDAM AND DRY DOCK

DEWATERING

3.7.4 Water Discharge

DELETE subparagraph “b.” in its entirety and REPLACE with:

“b. Contain and store surface and leakage water from the floor of the dry dock, pumpwell, and wet well/intake areas. Collect and analyze water samples taken directly from each storage container to verify that the water meets applicable discharge water quality requirements. The Contractor is cautioned that water within the dry dock will be contaminated with grit and concrete residue during construction activities. Filtration and treatment may be required to meet discharge water quality requirements. Water that is tested and determined to meet discharge water quality standards may be discharged directly to the Elizabeth River. Maintain discharge outlet in the river below EL 85. Water that does not meet the requirements for discharge to the Elizabeth River must be disposed of offsite in accordance with regulatory requirements. Do not discharge water to the sanitary sewer, industrial wastewater, or stormwater systems.”

4. Revise the following Drawings.

DRAWING

NO.

REVISION

NO.

NAVFAC

DWG NO.

DRAWING TITLE

CD103 1 14144782 CIVIL DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -

AREA 103

CD104 1 14144783 CIVIL DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -

AREA 104

CD105 1 14144784 CIVIL DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -

AREA 105

CD106 1 14144785 CIVIL DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -

AREA 106

CD113 1 14144791 CIVIL DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -

AREA 113

CS201 1 14144807 STORM DRAIN PROFILES - SHEET 1 OF 2

S-002 1 14144855 STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES - 2

S-005 1 14144858 TYPICAL DETAILS - 2

S-031 1 14144859 OVERALL STRUCTURAL DRY DOCK PLAN

SD204 1 14144878 DEMOLITION ELEVATION - DD3 NORTH WALL

- AREA 104

SD205 1 14144879 DEMOLITION ELEVATION - DD3 NORTH WALL

- AREA 105

SD206 1 14144880 DEMOLITION ELEVATION - DD3 NORTH WALL

- AREA 106

SD210 1 14144881 DEMOLITION ELEVATION - DD3 SOUTH HEAD WALL

- AREA 110

SD211 1 14144882 DEMOLITION ELEVATION - DD3 SOUTH WALL

- AREA 111

SD212 1 14144883 DEMOLITION ELEVATION - DD3 SOUTH WALL

- AREA 112

SD213 1 14144884 DEMOLITION ELEVATION - DD3 SOUTH WALL

- AREA 113

S-547 1 14145033 ELECTRICAL-COMMUNICATIONS S-547 - MANHOLE

DETAILS - 1

SD301 1 14144887 TYPICAL DEMOLITION SECTION AT GRADE BEAM

SD302 1 14144888 TYPICAL DEMOLITION SECTION BETWEEN GRADE

BEAMS

SD303 1 14144889 DEMOLITION SECTION - SLIDE D (SOUTH) LOOKING

WEST

SD304 1 14144890 DEMOLITION SECTION - STA 16+13 TO STA 16+39

LOOKING WEST

SD305 1 14144891 DEMOLITION SECTION - STAIRS STA 16+39 TO STA

16+75 LOOKING EAST

SD308 1 14144894 DEMOLITION SECTION - DOG HOUSE

SD309 1 14144895 DEMOLITION SECTION - VRC GEARLIFT

SD310 1 14144896 DEMOLITION SECTION AT REFUELING TUNNEL

SD312 1 14144898 DEMOLITION SECTIONS - HEAD OF DOCK

MS405 1 14145190 ENLARGED RISERS AND SECTIONS – 4 OF 8

MS503 1 14145197 DETAILS – 3 OF 4

MS601 1 14145202 SCHEDULES – 1 OF 3

MF103 1 14145206 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA 103

MF104 1 14145207 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA 104

MF105 1 14145208 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA 105

MF110 1 14145210 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA 110

MF111 1 14145211 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA 111

MF112 1 14145212 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA 112

MF113 1 14145213 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA 113

MF204 1 14145215 FIRE PROTECTION ELEVATION – DD3 NORTH WALL

– AREA 104

MF205 1 14145216 FIRE PROTECTION ELEVATION – DD3 NORTH WALL

– AREA 105

MF211 1 14145219 FIRE PROTECTION ELEVATION – DD3 SOUTH WALL

– AREA 111

MF212 1 14145220 FIRE PROTECTION ELEVATION – DD3 SOUTH WALL

– AREA 112

MF601 1 14145226 SCHEDULES

E-002 1 14145246 ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES

ED112 1 14145256 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLAN – AREA 112

ED113 1 14145257 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLAN – AREA 113

5. See amended Section 00 21 00 below.

6. See amended clauses and provisions below.

7. Attachments:

• Attachment O – Site Visit Log

• Attachment P – Site Visit handout

• Attachment Q – LANT JA HSQ Technologies_redacted

• Attachment R – LANT JA Limitorque_redacted

• Attachment S – 1806701 Amend0002dwg

• Attachment T – DD3 Record of Categorical Exclusion

• Revised Attachment G – Price Proposal form Amend0002

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time 06-Jun-2025 02:00 PM has been added.

The performance code has changed from Notice to Award.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

4.2 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

4.3 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES (SAM.GOV)

5. INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

6. ATTACHMENTS: MAY BE LOCATED ON CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES UNDER

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A – PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

ATTACHMENT B – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT C – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

ATTACHMENT D – HISTORICAL SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

ATTACHMENT E – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION COMMITMENT DOCUMENT

ATTACHMENT F – INDIVIDUAL SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

ATTACHMENT G – PRICE PROPOSAL FORM AMEND0002

ATTACHMENT H – PIEE SOLICITATION VENDOR ACCESS INSTRUCTIONS

ATTACHMENT I – APPROVED IDENTITY PROOFING DOCUMENTS

ATTACHMENT J – CRITERIA FOR DENYING ACCESS TO NAVY INSTALLATIONS

ATTACHMENT K - 2025 RIOCC CVS SPONSOR NNSY TEMPLATE

ATTACHMENT L - 2025 RIOCC ODP DBIDS

ATTACHMENT M - SECNAV 5512 EXP 2027

ATTACHMENT N - DIRECTIONS TO PWD_ROICC TRAILER

ATTACHMENT O – SITE VISIT LOG

ATTACHMENT P – SITE VISIT HANDOUT

ATTACHMENT Q – LANT JA HSQ TECHNOLOGIES_REDACTED

ATTACHMENT R – LANT JA LIMITORQUE_REDACTED

ATTACHMENT S – 1806701 AMEND0002DWG

ATTACHMENT T – DD3 RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.1.1 This acquisition is being solicited on an unrestricted basis, with Full and Open Competition.

1.1.2 The NAICS code for this procurement is 237990 and the size standard is

$45,000,000.

1.1.3 In accordance with DFARS 236.204(v), the magnitude of construction for this project is over $500,000,000.

1.1.4 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal according to FAR Part 15.

This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of offerors' proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source whose performance provides the best value to the Government.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

Description of Work:

This project will include the following major components for the P1062 Dry Dock 3 Modernization: rebuilding the caisson seats with deep foundations, refurbishing the dock floor and walls, pinning the concrete floor, constructing a wet well and pump house to replace the existing pumpwell, rerouting all utilities into a new utility trench around the dock perimeter, and replacing the dry dock’s surrounding rail systems.

• Cofferdam: A temporary cofferdam at the entrance to Dry Dock 3 will be constructed to allow the contractor to perform demolition and construction under dry working conditions.

The cofferdam consists of a continuous steel pipe pile wall (SPP Wall) driven side-by-side to form a continuous wall. The wall will support approximately 40 feet of water on the riverside. The cofferdam will be constructed approximately 8 feet east of the dry dock entrance (in the river), beyond the existing timber pile supported apron. In the space between the dry dock entrance and the cofferdam, riverbed soils will be dredged and replaced with a tremie concrete slab to seal off upward water flow. In addition, composite sheet pile/concrete closure walls will be constructed on either side of the dock entrance, connecting the SPP Wall to the dock proper and therefore closing off the entrance.

• Dry Dock: The floors and walls of the dry dock will be reconstructed by initially removing all the dry dock’s existing granite blocks (ranging from 15 inches thick along the floor and up to 50 inches thick along the altars) and a minimum of 12 inches of existing concrete beneath the granite. The coping/floodwall elevation will be the entrance, will have a tie-down system to resist increased uplift demands due to higher flood events.

The dry dock’s walls and floor will be reconstructed with reinforced concrete to provide improved capacity accommodating the increased “superflood” load condition and reestablishing the 2009 FCR design blocking loads.

• Wet Well: Selective demolition of the existing below grade Pumpwell is required to accommodate the discharge piping for the Wet Well and Pump House. This includes the removal of the existing ladders, catwalks, platforms, stairs, concrete walls/slabs and fiberglass grating as required by structural work.

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

2.1 The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the Offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2.2 As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)).

The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.3 The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

2.4. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors (Factors, 1, 2,3, and 4) are of equal importance to each and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 5). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are significantly more important than price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non- price factors considered.

2.5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. An Unacceptable rating in any of the non-price factors will result in an overall rating of “Unacceptable” for the non-price factors, unless corrected through discussions.

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

FAR Part 9.6 defines Contractor team arrangements. Contractor team arrangement, as used in this subpart, means an arrangement in which -- (1) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime Contractor; or (2) A potential prime Contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g., personnel, management, equipment that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies shall commit to the performance of this contract).

In particular, the proposal shall clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in the performance of the contract.

Vague commitments to support are likely insufficient; rather, they must demonstrate intent/manner of actual performance on the contract action being solicited.

The Offeror shall submit a signed copy of partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team (e.g., partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.) whose projects are submitted to demonstrate Construction or Design Experience. The Government will not consider any project submitted for Factor 1 if it was performed by a firm other than the Offeror and there is no supporting partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment. Additional joint venture agreements are not permitted on MAC Task Orders. Note: See specific restrictions on the use of subcontractor experience under Factor 1.

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Schedule

Factor 3 – Small Business Utilization Factor 4 – Safety

Factor 5 – Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors Factor 1

Corporate Experience, Factor 2 Schedule, Factor 3 Small Business Utilization, and Factor 4 Safety are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor 5.