N44255-18-R-5005_JOC_Solicitation.pdf

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT FOR MINOR CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION OF THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (NAVFAC) NORTHWEST AREA OF RESPONSIBLITY.THE MAJORITY OF WORK WILL BE AT NAVAL BASE KITSAP BANGOR, SILVERDALE, WA; NBK- BREMERTON, BREMERTON, WA; NAVAL STATION (NAVSTA) EVERETT, EVERETT, WA; AND NAVAL AIR STATION (NAS) WHIDBEY ISLAND, OAK HARBOR, WA.

Types of projects include, but are not limited to construction, repair, alteration, demolition, and maintenance services. Certif ied (stamped) design w orks are not a part of this acquisition.

THIS SOLICITATION IS BEING ADVERTISED AS A 100% 8(A) SET ASIDE COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT COMPETITION WILL BE LIMITED TO 8(A) FIRMS LOCATED WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA SERVICED BY THE SBA REGION X AND OTHER 8(A) CONSTRUCTION FIRMS WITH A BONA FIDE PLACE OF BUSINESS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL COMPETITIVE AREA, AND THE ASSIGNED NAICS CODE. ALL OTHER 8(A) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT (BD) PARTICIPANTS ARE DEEMED INELIGIBLE TO SUBMIT OFFERS.

NAICS: 236220

Maximum Dollar Value: $99,000,000 Task Order Range: $2,000 to $1,500,000 Minimum Guarantee: $5,000 Construction Contract: 14 Days for Payment (FAR 52.232-27) SBA Requirement #: 1013/18/804912

TRISHA J. BOLTE 360-315-8299

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

21-Feb-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______1 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________3 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________25 Mar 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______180 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC NORTHWEST

1101 TAUTOG CIRCLE

SILVERDALE WA 98315-1101

N44255

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4425518R5005 65

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4425518R5005

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

CLIN AND ELIN OVERVIEW

CLIN AND ELIN OVERVIEW

LINE ITEM DESCRIPTION

CLIN 0001

NAVFAC Northwest General Construction Job Order Contract

(JOC) FFP

This is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract that utilizes both pre-priced and non-pre-priced items. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer or his/her properly authorized representative, who will issue Task Order Requests for Proposal (RFP). Award of Task Orders will be on a Firm Fixed Price basis. The resultant contract will be a base year plus four one-year option periods, or a maximum of $99,000,000, whichever occurs first.

ELIN 000101

FFP- Coefficient Factor for Pre-Priced (RS Means) Labor, Materials, and Equipment Line Items.

ELIN 000102

FFP- Coefficient Factor for Non-Pre-Priced Labor, Materials, and Equipment Line Items.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 99,000,000 Each NAVFAC Northwest Gen Con JOC

FFP

This is an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract, with preestablished coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer or his/her authorized representative, who will issue Task Order Requests for Proposals.

Award of Task Orders will be on a firm-fixed price basis. The resultant contract will be a base year plus four one-year option periods, or a maximum amount of $99,000,000, whichever occurs first.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 08-APR-2019 99,000,000 NAVFAC NORTHWEST

TRISHA J. BOLTE

1101 TAUTOG CIRCLE

SILVERDALE WA 98315-1101

360-315-8299 FOB: Destination

N44255

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

READ THE FOLLOWING IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS

Proposals must be set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this request for proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS:

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from a technical and price standpoint. Offerors should not assume that they would be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals. Offerors are cautioned that a proposal containing qualifications, conditions, or expressing unilateral interpretations of the RFP/contract requirements may be rejected and the offeror excluded from the potential competitive range. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the established criteria and award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government.

1. INQUIRIES. Offerors who determine that the technical and/or contractual requirements of this RFP require clarification(s) in order to permit submittal of a responsive technical proposal shall submit all questions in writing on a Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) Form, Attachment A. Inquiries shall follow the instructions on Attachment A and be submitted via e-mail to trisha.bolte@navy.mil. Submit only one inquiry per Form. Pre-proposals inquiries will be accepted up to 10 days prior to the due date of the proposals. A response will be provided via amendment to the solicitation.

2. SEED PROJECT INFORMATION AND SITE VISIT. Attachment F- Seed Project Statement of Work and information on the site visit for the seed project will be provided to offerors at a later date via amendment to the solicitation.

3. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Pursuant to FAR 4.502, all solicitation documents will be posted to Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) at https://www.neco.navy.mil/ and Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) at https://www.fbo.gov/.

3.2 Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be submitted in hardcopy and formatted and submitted as follows:

Offerors shall affix their names and return addresses to the upper left corner of the proposal packages. Each package shall include the solicitation number and must be sealed. Submit proposals to:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest Attn: Ms. Trisha Bolte 1101 Tautog Circle, Suite 209 Silverdale, WA 98315-1101

Email or Facsimile transmissions of proposals, acknowledgement of amendments or modifications of proposals is not allowed.

If the offeror is mailing its proposal, mail to the address above. If the offeror is hand delivering its proposal to NAVFAC Northwest building 1101, please call Trisha Bolte at (360) 315-8299 to make arrangements prior to your arrival, to be met at the lobby. Contractors shall not arrive at the building unannounced. PLEASE NOTE: The address listed above is within a controlled area (badge access). Allow yourself ample time for parking and security delays.

Government personnel will not be waiting at Pass and ID to accept hand delivered proposals. The offeror must either mail or hand deliver proposals to building 1101 as specified above. It is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure their proposal is delivered to building 1101 by the specified due date and time for submitting proposals.

Whenever possible use the forms provided; however, unless otherwise stated, offerors may substitute their own forms as long as the information submitted is substantially the same as that shown on each form. Paper dimension shall be 8 ½ x 11”. The font size shall be no smaller than 11 pitch.

Each copy of the proposal shall be securely fastened/ bound. Tab and label all attachments. Provide a table of contents. For recycling purposes, a soft cover or title sheet is sufficient. THE PRICE PROPOSAL SHALL BE

SUBMITTED SEPARATE FROM THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

• Price Proposal (submitted separately from the Technical Proposal): one (1) original price proposal with original signature and date, two (2) additional hardcopy proposals; and one (1) copy on CD.

• Technical Proposal (submitted separately from the Price Proposal): one (1) original technical proposal with original signature and date; three (3) additional hardcopy proposals; and one (1) copy on CD.

• The original proposals shall be identified as “Original” on the cover. See Proposal submission requirements for additional details.

In the event of discrepancies between the original proposal, additional hardcopy proposals, and/or CD copy of proposal, the original proposal shall take precedence.

CLOSING DATE AND LATE SUBMISSIONS. The closing date and time for receipt of Proposals shall be as follows:

Proposals shall be received no later than the date specified in the Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award, Block 13. NO EMAIL or FACSIMILE PROPOSALS WILL BE ALLOWED.

Late submissions shall be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERS – COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION (JAN 2004) reference subparagraphs (c)(3)(ii)(A) and (1), and FAR 15.208.

A cover letter shall accompany the Price Proposal and shall include:

(a) The solicitation number;

(b) The name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers, and email addresses of the Offeror;

(c) The DUNS Number, CAGE Code, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) of the Offeror;

(d) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

(e) Names, titles, phone and facsimile numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation and;

(f) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

Price Proposals shall be organized and include the following:

(a) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including DUNS number

(b) SF 1442, (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with Blocks 14 through 20c completed

(c) Attachment B Coefficient Table and Seed Project Proposal

(d) Letter from the offeror’s surety. The letter should verify the offeror has a minimum of $1,500,000 bonding capacity per project and $20,000,000 aggregate.

(e) Bid Bond in the amount of 20% of the contract guaranteed minimum.

(f) Representations and Certifications, including the supplemental certifications in Section 00600 and VETS-4212 confirmation of filing. If an offeror is not required to file a VETS-4212 report, the offeror shall provide an explanation.

Technical Proposals shall be organized and include the following:

(a) Tab 1: Factor 1 – Technical Approach

(b) Tab 2: Factor 2 – Experience

Factor 3 – Past Performance (immediately following each project submitted for factor 2) (Attachment D- Past Performance Questionaire)

(c) Tab 3: Factor 4 – Safety

Offerors are asked to submit only the information/Attachments required. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures, or other pre-printed materials.

4. JOINT VENTURES

FAR Part 9.6 defines Contractor team arrangements. Contractor team arrangement, as used in this subpart, means an arrangement in which -- (1) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime Contractor; or (2) A potential prime Contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

5. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)

The System for Award Management (SAM) www.sam.gov is combining federal procurement systems and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance into one new system. This consolidation is being done in phases. The first phase of SAM includes the functionality from the following systems: * Central Contractor Registry (CCR) * Federal Agency Registration (Fedreg) * Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) * Excluded Parties List System (EPLS). Contractors must be registered in SAM prior to award of a DoD contract. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor not registered in SAM. Remember to review your NAICS codes listed in your SAM record to make sure that you have listed the NAICS code for this procurement. Please note that Offerors proposing as a Joint Venture must have a current registration in SAM for that Joint Venture prior to contract award.

For additional information, including how to register, please go to www.sam.gov.

6. FEDERAL CONTRACTOR PROGRAM

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.1303, any contractor or subcontractor with a contract of $150,000 or more with the Federal Government must take affirmative action to hire and promote qualified covered veterans which includes, disabled veterans, recently separated veterans, active duty veterans, wartime or campaign badge veterans, or armed forces service medal veterans.

Companies must file an annual VETS-4212 report, which shows the number of qualified covered veterans in their work force by job category, hiring location, and number of new hires, including qualified covered veterans hired during the reporting period and the maximum number and minimum number of employees of such contractor during the period covered by the report. Instructions, information and follow-up assistance is provided at VETS-4212 Internet site at https://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm or employers may contact the VETS-4212 office at (866) 237-0275 or e-mail at VETS4212-customersupport@dol.gov. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor that has not submitted a required annual form VETS-4212, Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (VETS-4212 Report) if subject to the reporting requirements of 38 U.S.C. 4212(d) for that fiscal year.

A confirmation of the VETS-4212 Report filing shall be submitted with the Proposal. If an Offeror is not required to file a VETS-4212 report, the Offeror shall provide an explanation.

This contractor and subcontractor shall abide by the requirements of 41 CFR 60-300.5(a). This regulation prohibits discrimination against qualified protected veterans, and requires affirmative action by covered prime contractors and subcontractors to employ and advance in employment qualified protected veterans.

7. INCURRED EXPENSES

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

8. PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

No plans and specifications will be included in the basic contract. Each task order request for proposal will be issued with its own plans and specifications specific to that project.

9. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK

No work under this contract will commence until such time as the Contracting Officer issues a Task Order, either in writing or orally. Oral task orders will be confirmed by the issuance of a written Task Order within five working days.

10. BASIS OF AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of a technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. In order to permit efficient competition, the following methodology will be utilized. Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order of price (lowest price to highest price). The Government will then evaluate the technical factors of the three (3) lowest priced proposals in accordance with the criteria for acceptability set forth in the solicitation. However, the Government, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review under this methodology. If a proposal is found to be technically acceptable, the Government will make award to the offeror with the lowest price. If not, groups of three (3) proposals will continue to be evaluated in the order of lowest price to highest price until an offer is found to be technically acceptable. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors and subfactors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing competitive range. At no time during the technical evaluation will the SSEB be made aware of the offerors’ pricing, nor their particular price ranking.

4. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award.

An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any subfactor results in the factor being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” and the overall non-price factors being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award. If an offeror receives a “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any non-price factor, no additional proposal evaluation will be performed. Accordingly, under this methodology, some of the technical factors of some of the evaluated proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy.

11. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 - Technical Approach

Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 - Past Performance Factor 4 – Safety

Price

*The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

For the purposes of establishing price for this solicitation, the offeror shall provide a proposed percentage for each coefficient ELIN description and multipliers one, two, three, and four on the “Coefficients and Multipliers” tab of Attachment B, Coefficient Table and Seed Project Proposal. Failure to propose for each coefficient and multiplier will result in the offeror being ineligible for award. The proposed coefficients will become part of the contract upon award and will remain the same for the base year and all options.

On the “Seed Project” tab of Attachment B, Coefficient Table and Seed Project Proposal, the offeror is to enter in their proposed costs for the seed project. The statement of work for the seed project will be provided as Attachment F. The Total Evaluated Price will be the offeror’s total proposed Pre-Priced and Non-Pre-Priced costs of the seed project with the applicable coefficients, city cost index weighted average, multiplier, and sales taxes factored in. Any item descriptions, means item numbers, material, labor, equipment, and other unit costs entered for Pre-Priced items should come directly from R.S. Means.

While filling out both tabs of Attachment B, the offeror shall ONLY fill in grey cells and shall not alter any cells that are not grey. This form contains pre-established mathematical formulas for the express purpose of reducing offerors’ calculation errors and assisting in evaluating the offeror’s price. Revising the formulas, or adding, deleting, or revising any other portion of the form not specified above may result in an unclear or ambiguous price, thereby making the offer ineligible for award without discussions.

Coefficient – A coefficient includes any and all costs (generally indirect costs) above and beyond RS Means bare costs with the exception of specialized costs unique to a given Task Order project (e.g.

specialized training, USL&H insurance, specific environmental permit, etc.). Specialized costs may be negotiated with each Task Order.

Please review section four, Coefficients and Multipliers, and section five, Pre-Priced and Non-Pre-Priced Work of Attachment E, N44255-18-R-5005 Statement of Work for a more detailed description of what should be included in the Pre-Priced and Non-Pre-Priced Coefficients as well as the multipliers for this contract.

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements-The offeror’s price proposal shall be separate from the technical proposal. Complete and submit the following:

(i) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including DUNS number

(ii) SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award Blocks 14 through 20c

(iii) Attachment B, Coefficient Table and Seed Project Proposal

(iv) Letter from the offeror’s surety. The letter should verify the offeror has a minimum of $1,500,000 bonding capacity per project and $20,000,000 aggregate.

(v) Bid Bond in the amount of 20% of the contract guaranteed minimum.

(vi) Ensure the offeror’s Representations and Certifications, including the supplemental certifications included in Section 00600, are current and posted in SAM.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the Total Evaluated Price of the seed project, as calculated in Attachment B, Coefficient table and Seed Project Proposal. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Evaluation of the price proposal will determine the reasonableness, and completeness of the offeror’s proposal.

Evaluation will determine the offeror’s comprehension of the requirements of the RFP as well as to assess the degree to which the proposed price accurately reflects proposed performance.

The Bid Bond will be evaluated for accuracy and completeness in accordance with FAR 28.101.

The letter from the bonding company will be evaluated to assess the risk of the offeror listed in Block 15A of the SF1442 being able to provide sufficient bonding for both individual and multiple task orders during the life of this contract.

Representations and Certifications will be reviewed in SAM to ensure they are complete.

(b) Technical Factors:

Note 1: “Offeror” refers to the entity submitting the proposal, as determined by the name, address, Entity Identifier Number, and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code that appears in Block 14 of the SF 1442 for construction solicitations or Block 15 of the SF 33 for service solicitations. If the offeror's proposal presents the experience, past performance, or safety data of any entity with an Entity Identifier Number or CAGE code that differs from that in the SF 1442 OR SF 33, the information will not be considered unless the offeror establishes a basis for imputing the other entity's data to the offeror. The Government will not assume or independently investigate the existence and nature of a relationship between the offeror and any other entity that has a different Entity Identifier Number and CAGE code. The offeror must clearly explain why another entity's experience, past performance, or safety record is relevant to or indicative of the offeror's ability to perform this contract. A mere statement describing a corporate affiliation is insufficient; the offeror must also establish how the connection or nexus between it and the other entity relates to the offeror's qualifications. The explanation must be included in the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) required under Factor Two, Experience. An offeror's failure to adequately justify a basis for crediting it with another entity's experience, past performance, or safety data could result in a deficiency, thereby making the offeror ineligible for award without discussions.

Note 2: While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete experience, past performance, management, technical, management, safety, and small business utilization information rests with the offeror.

Note 3: The non-price proposal shall be separate from the price proposal. See Section 00100 for additional instructions, format, and submission quantities required for the proposal.

Note 4: The page limitation for each factor/subfactor is provided in the submission requirements for each factor found later in this section. Page limitations will be strictly enforced. Any pages submitted in excess of the page limitations will not be reviewed and any data or material they contain will not be considered. Specific submission items which are excluded from the page count are listed in each factor later in this section.

Note 5: Projects submitted for Factor Two, Experience, shall be the same projects submitted for Factor Three, Past Performance.

Note 6: Failure to meet solicitation submittal requirements may result in an unacceptable rating.

(1) Factor 1, Technical Approach:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor Two, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to one double-sided page (or two single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item two below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

(2) Factor 2, Experience:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(i) Construction Experience:

Submit up to five construction projects for the offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects.

Relevant projects are those that are similar in size, scope, and complexity. For purposes of this evaluation, similar in size, scope, and complexity is further defined as:

Size: Similar in size are projects between $2,000 to $1,500,000. One project shall be over $500,000.

Scope: Similar in scope are general construction projects involving replacement, repair, or alterations of existing facilities and equipment, such as electrical, mechanical (to include HVAC equipment and controls), fire protection equipment (to include alarm panels and pumps), painting, facility renovation, equipment repair and/or alteration, and other general construction activities. New construction would be limited, and of a straightforward, uncomplicated nature. Work may take place in secure industrial areas or hospital environments.

One project shall be facility renovation, remodel, or repair.

Complexity: Similar in complexity is considered as managing projects with limited site access and lay-down area, compliance with environmental regulations, and work in an industrial environment.

Projects submitted for the offeror shall be completed, or substantially complete, within the past five years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The term “substantially complete” shall mean a construction project with construction of the facility/project more than 80% complete.

Offerors failing to provide relevant projects within the specified time frame demonstrating experience in the above may be rated unacceptable.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one double-sided page (or two single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) or Mentor Protégé (MP), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé entity. If the Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé partner. Offerors are still limited to a total of five projects combined. Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé offers must include at least two relevant projects for each partner. If the Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé includes more than two firms, the team's submission shall include at least one relevant project for each firm. Offeror may receive an unacceptable rating if the minimum number of projects for each firm is not submitted.

If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction. Any projects submitted in excess of the five for Construction Experience will not be considered.

(c) Past Performance

(1) Factor 3, Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor Two, construction experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment D) for each project included in Factor Two for Construction Experience. The offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Trisha Bolte, trisha.bolte@navy.mil

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor Two – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor Two – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

(4) Factor 4, Safety

(a) Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR); include five previous calendar years’ worth of data [2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014]. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates; submit five previous calendar years’ worth of data [2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014]. If an offeror cannot submit OSHA DART and TRC rates for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the offeror will describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two double sided or four single sided pages.

Note: For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements are mandatory for each offeror who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative addressing the Technical Approach to Safety is required.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its sub-contractors. The Government will overall evaluate the offeror’s safety performance record, safety management system, and the methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors.

The Government may also consider other sources of information for evaluating safety that may include, but not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases.

EMR: The Government will evaluate the EMR to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

OSHA DART and TRC: The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

Safety Technical Approach Narrative: The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project, the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be * DX rated order; * DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation.

*To be determined at the Task Order level.

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a Firm Fixed Price, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract resulting from this solicitation.

52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States.

The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20% percent of the bid price or $3,000,000, whichever is less.-

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

NAVFAC Northwest ATTN: Stephanie Avery Guillory 1101 Tautog Circle Silverdale, WA 98315-1101

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) Site visits may be arranged during normal duty hours by contacting:

Name: * Address: * Telephone: *

*To be determined at Task Order level.

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for-- *Determined at Task Order level.

(c) Participants will meet at-- *Determined at Task Order level.

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

http://www.acquisition.gov/far/ http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/Far1toc.htm#TopOfPage

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (APR 1984)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of"(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (48 CFR Chapter 2) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

52.252-6 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN CLAUSES (APR 1984)

(a) The use in this solicitation or contract of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) clause with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the clause.

(b) The use in this solicitation or contract of any Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (48 CFR 2) clause with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

(End of clause)

252.228-7004 BONDS OR OTHER SECURITY (DEC 1991)

(a) Offerors shall furnish a bid guarantee in the amount of $* with their bids. The Offeror receiving notice of award shall furnish--

(1) A performance bond in the penal amount of $ * ; and

(2) Payment in full of any sum due the Government.

(b) The Contractor shall furnish the performance bond to the Contracting Officer within *…