R210033 Amendment 0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N40080-21-R-0033, REPAIR MACDONOUGH HALL BUILDING 102, U. S. NAVAL ACADEMY, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND

SEE SF30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-May-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008021R0033

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-May-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-May-2021

CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYS COMMAND

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008021R0033

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the following:

1. Solicitation Revisions

2. Include Liquidated Damages

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. SOLICITATION REVISIONS

1. Page 15-16 of the SF1442, Adjectival Ratings/Descriptions

Item a. has been revised in its entirety to the following to include “subfactors”:

a. A combined technical/risk evaluation considering risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings shall be used. The technical risk evaluationshall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in the following table. Adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign an overall rating to each technical proposal and to assign a rating for each technical factor and subfactor. Upper case letter ratings will be used for major technical factors as well as the overall rating. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.

2. Factor 1a and 1b have been removed in its entirety and replaced with the following Factor 1 – Corporate Experience:

FACTOR 1 – CORPORATE EXPERIENCE:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit a completed Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) with a detailed narrative for each project. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded;

however, the total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) 8 ½” x 11” pages per project (inclusive of Project Data Sheet).

1. The contractor must provide 5 projects that meet recency and relevancy criteria.

Recency will be evaluated by submitting projects that were completed within the past ten

(10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

2. Relevancy will be evaluated as:

• Size: 40,000 square feet or larger and/or final construction cost of $30,000,000 or greater.

• Scope: Renovation of physical training, gymnasium, swimming pool, or other facilities with at least 30% of the project being these functions.

• Complexity: Work performed on facilities that required coordinaton of a Historic Preservation agency.

A project is defined as a single construction project in a stand-alone contract, or a single task order project under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

For the submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e. unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the JV members. Offerors are limited to a total of five

(5) projects combined. If a project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, the Offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the JV partner offering on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole. The JV member proposed for this contract shall specifically address field work performed by that JV member including field staffing and direct field work oversight. The JV member proposed for this contract shall also address home office management performed by that JV member including the number/percent of employees provided for the overall contract by the JV member as well as the overall percentage of work performed by the JV member. This same information shall also be provided for the task orders listed under IDIQ contracts on Attachment A. The Offeror shall submit a signed copy of the Joint Venture agreement indicating the proposed participation of each Joint Venture member. Teaming arrangements are not considered Joint Venture agreements. If the Offeror does not specifically address what portion of the work under the submitted project was performed by the JV member offering on this contract or fails to provide the signed JV agreement, it will result in a deficiency.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Offeror’s project experience will be used as a means to evaluate organizational experience performing work of similar size, scope and complexity. Offerors will be evaluated as Highly Qualified, Qualified, or Not Qualified based on the information provided.

Each of the five projects do not need to meet or exceed all three requirements (size, scope, and complexity); however, the combination of all five projects must demonstrate the breadth of performance experience across all requirements. Further, individual projects that include all requirements may be considered more favorably, and omissions of one or more requirements across the five projects may be considered less favorably.

Projects submitted with values over $40,000,000 will be evaluated more favorably. HVAC renovation, or replacement, including a building integrated climate control system as part of these projects, will be considered more favorably. Projects demonstrating work in an

NCAA/Academic environment or constrained construction sites near public spaces may be evaluated more favorably. Work that included successful and timely commissioning will be rated more favorably. Projects completed within the scheduled timeframe will be rated more favorably. Best value will be determined when this rating is compared to other Offerors’ rating for this factor.

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

The Government will evaluate five (5) projects for construction experience. Submission of less than five (5) project will result in a deficiency. If the Offeror submits more than five (5) projects for evaluation, then the Government will evaluate the first five (5) in the order submitted and disregard any other project information after the first five (5).

3. Page 20 of the SF1442, Evaluation Factors For Award:

Item 1 has been revised to the following:

“1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors and subfactors:

PREQUALIFICATION PHASE

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Past Performance Factor 4 – Small Business Utilization Subfactor 4a – Historical Small Business Utilization

FINAL PHASE

Subfactor 4b – Planned Small Business Utilization Factor 5 – Management Approach Subfactor 5a – Key Personnel Subfactor 5b – Project Delivery Approach Factor 6 – Price

Item 2, paragraph 1, has been revised in its entirety to the following:

“This is a Prequalification procurement. Factors 1 – 4a will be evaluated in the Prequalification Phase and Factors 4b-6 will be evaluated in Final Phase. Factor 1 will only be rated Highly Qualified, Qualified, or Not Qualified based on the information provided. If an Offeror is rated Not Qualified for Factor 1, they will not be considered for Final Phase. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the Technical Factors 1, 2, 4 and 5 and their respective subfactors are of equal importance to each other, respectively and, when combined are equal importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 3). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are more important than price. For purposes of determining the technical rating for Factor 4 and Factor 5, Subfactors 4a and 4b are equal to each other and Subfactors 5a and 5b are equal to each other. ”

2. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES

Liquidated Damages: $6,400.00 Per Calendar Day

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time 02-Jun-2021 10:00 AM has been added.

The Issued By organization has changed from

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND WASHINGTON

1314 HARWOOD ST

WASHINGTON DC 20374

to

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYS COMMAND

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $6,400 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

(End of clause)

(End of Summary of Changes)