AMENDMENT 0018.pdf

ACQR5607219

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SOLICITATION: N40080-19-R-0001-8(a) SMALL BUSINESS MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR AND RENOVATION OF VARIOUS FACILITIES AT NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (NAVFAC) WASHINGTON AREA OF RESPONSIBLITY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WASHINGTON, DC, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA

As an amendment to the solicitation, the follow ing is hereby incorporated.

Proposal due date is hererby extended to 21 July, time of submission is changed to 10:00 am.

Additional claif ication to responses to RFI.

CONTINUED ON PAGE 2

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Jul-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008019R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Mar-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Jul-2022

CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND WASHINGTON

1314 HARWOOD ST.

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008019R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. See additonal claification to response issued with amendment 0016 response to RFI# 11.

The only assembly that will be attached to the building will be the new RTU. Please advise if any AT/FP design required for this item.

RESPONSE: There are no AT/FP requirements for the new RTU.

2. See additional clarification to response issued with amendment 0016 to RFI# 46. RFI responses to 25 and 46 are conflicting. Please confirm a licensed Interior Designer is not required for this project.

RESPONSE: Follow the NAVFAC requirements for FF&E on all projects. With the a very small FF&E scope on this project, a qualified Architect per the UFC can also develop the FF&E package.

3. See additional clarification to response issued with amendment 0016 to RFI#44. Since this scope is undefined, please provide an allowance for the contractor to carry as part of their proposal for movable furnishings.

RESPONSE: Movable furnishings are showen on the drawings, room requirements sheets of ESR-E20, these shoud in the bid. Any movable furnishings not identified or shown, these would be added through a contract modification.

4. See additional clarification to response issued with amendment 0016 to RFI#47.

a) Please confirm the RTU is to be included in the base bid to serve the gang bathrooms (124, 126, 212, 214, 216, and 216A).

b) Please provide selective roof demolition requirements for the base bid.

c) Regarding the RTU, please confirm Option 1 only includes routing the supply and exhaust duct from the RTU to the Breakroom 107, restroom 107A, and Office 109.

d) For Option 1 please advise the intent for routing the new duct to the breakroom/ bathroom 107. Is the intent to run it across the roof and then down into the ceiling above the rooms? Please advise how we are to route the ductwork through the second floor to the first-floor breakroom/ bathroom/ office?

Are there any existing cuts/ elevations of the building in this area that are available for review?

RESPONSE:

a) Confirmed

b) The DOR can provide additional information related to selective roof demolition.

Please include in your proposal.

c) Confirmed, the intent of Bid Option 1 is to provide ventilation to these spaces from the new RTU as described in the RFP.

d) Routing of the ductwork to be determined by design/build contractor and must be approved by NAVFAC.

e) Limited as-builts are available and included in Part 6 attachments in the RFP.

See additional 13 photos with this amendment.

5. See additional clarification to response issued with amendment 0016 RFI#75. If the existing sprinkler system does not meet current code requirements, please confirm a contract modification will be issued to address the changes.

RESPONSE: The Design Intent is for a restroom renovation. NAVFAC does not anticipate extensive sprinkler layout modifications beyond what is identified in the drawings and specifications. The sprinkler system for the scope identified in the RFP should meet the code as it pertains to a minor renovation such as this. The design intent was not to update the entire buildings sprinkler system. Your bid should include the cost to make sure the scope identified meets the code. Any work beyond the scope identified would require a contract modification.

6. See additional clarification to response issued with amendment 0016 RFI# 76. Please confirm if any of the walls to be demolished are found to be load bearing a contract modification would be issued to address this issue.

RESPONSE: The design intent is to renovate the restrooms. At this time, we do not believe any load bearing walls will need to be demolished. However, based on the question, if there is work outside what is shown on the drawings or identified in the specifications, this would require a contract modification.

7. See additional clarification to response issued with amendment 0016 RFI# 84. For bidding purposes please advise how we should carry this cost in our bid. Please provide an allowance.

RESPONSE: Every NAVFAC project requires a life safety analysis. Include the costas it pertains the scope identified in the RFP.

8. See additional clarification to response issued with amendment 0016 to RFI# 108. When working on the first-floor restrooms we will need access to the second-floor restrooms to route the ductwork through the second floor to serve the first floor from the new RTU.

Would we be permitted to close off sections of the second-floor restrooms to install the new duct chases? Is the intent for the duct chases to run in the space behind the second-floor showers shown on the concept drawings? Please advise.

RESPONSE: Yes, sections can closed off. Will required coordination with the Customer. Yes, this is the intent.

9. See additional clarication to response issued with amendment 0016 to RFI# 111.

a) Is there a subfloor underneath the plywood (i.e., underlayment)? Or is there just one layer of plywood on the metal grating?

b) Since there will be new showers installed on the second floor, please advise if the existing plywood is marine grade plywood? If not, what is the existing plywood?

c) Please if the alternate plywood subfloor should be price as marine grade plywood to mitigate moisture.

RESPONSE:

a) The subfloor is unknown, as that would require destructive investigation.

b) The grade of the existing plywood is unknown.

c) DOR should determine appropriate materials. If the contractor includes an add/alternate to replace all the plywood subfloor, please indicate in narrative if you included marine grade plywood mitigate moisture.

10. See additional clarification to response issued. For the SF1442 form. Do we need to include all the amendments from phase I or we only required to include amendment 11 forward?

RESPONSE: All amendments are to be acknowledge on the price schedule.

11. See additional clarication to response issued with amendment 0016 to RFI# 23. These responses are conflicting, Amendment 16 RFI 23 response states door and frame for room 124 is not required. Amendment 17 RFI 34 response states that specs overrule drawings meaning the doors would be required. Are the entry doors for bathrooms 124 and 126? To be clear the room requirements for both 124 and 126 call for new door and frame but the concept drawing do not depict new doors.

RESPONSE: After further review, both rooms 124 and 126 will require new entry/exit doors and frames.

12. See additional clarication to response issued with amendment 0017 to RFI# 61. Per the provided site photos in the original RFP, the existing toilets are floor mounted and the toilets called for in the room requirements are also to be floor mounted. Please advise the locations of wall mounted toilets.

RESPONSE: The specifications show the toilets to be floor mounted.

13. See additional clarification to response issued with amendment 0017 RFI# 60. Please clarify if all 3 positions can be performed by 1 individual if they can meet all requirements.

RESPONSE: One person cannot hold 3 positions. As indicated, one person can be dual hat, as long as they can show they are qualified for both roles. Please follow the specifications for each role.

END OF AMENDMENT 0017