Solicitation Amendment N0024426R31080002 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 29 Jul 2026 04 Aug 2026

N0024426R31080002

Section C - Description/Specifications/Statement of Work

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

READINESS ASSISTANCE TRAINING TEAM

1.0 GENERAL: This is a non-personal services contract to provide Readiness Assistance Training Team (RATT) Support Services to Commander, Naval Surface Forces, Pacific Fleet (CNSP/COMNAVSURFPAC). The Government will not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn, is responsible to the Government.

1.1 INTRODUCTION

The requirement is for CNSP RATT support services. The RATT is comprised of six (6) visit teams and one (1) Organic Repair Capability Assessment (ORCA) team, with additional level of effort (LOE) for Program Management and administration.

RATT is a Type Commander (TYCOM) asset employed to provide timely direct support to ships, tailored to the ship's needs and requirements. RATT ship visits are intended to significantly enhance a ship's organic proficiency and capabilities for a discrete period of time as added capability to conduct training, and address material issues. RATT visits exist outside the normal training and maintenance regimen and are not prerequisites for any event in the ship's operating cycle allowing flexible responsiveness to unique circumstances that may be present aboard a given ship. RATT represents an enhancement to the existing structures emplaced to produce the readiness required of CNSP ships to achieve their mission requirements. RATT is an important TYCOM directed capability to support the Fleet and Commanding Officers with expertise without the imposition of a formal inspection or assessment requirement. RATT also provides a resource of naval engineering, combat systems, damage control and 3M experience upon which the TYCOM staff can draw in addressing current and future readiness challenges.

The ORCA was established in direct response to the COMNAVSURFPAC direction that all ships be assessed to ensure that they can successfully complete repairs while underway and/or deployed. ORCA provides a baseline review of a ship's self-sufficiency capability and fleet sustainability. The ORCA is HM&E focused and will provide a detailed shortfall list of items that are required in the various workshops and special tools that are specific to the ship class. Also, the ORCA will make note of manning shortfalls for critical NECs and repair rates. Additional emphasis has been added in the areas of performing Root Cause Analysis, configuration audits, identifying training deficiencies and providing data to support government third-party ORCA dashboard development. ORCA is typically a 3 - 4 day assessment, requiring limited ship support from Engineering Department personnel. A final ORCA report is sent to the ship CO, ISIC, and

CNSP N43.

1.2 SCOPE

The Performance Work Statement (PWS) describes the technical, engineering, logistical and support services that are required to support the CNSP mission to maintain and provide operational war-fighting assets to the Fleet Commanders. RATT events are training and assessment evolutions, partnering with the crews to improve technical knowledge, organic repair capability, operational understanding, performance during assessments, and ultimately, enhanced readiness.

RATT provides proficient subject matter experts (fifteen (15) years of naval experience each) to conduct Sailor centric deck-plate training, material review, program auditing, and naval readiness support to enhance overall proficiency and material readiness through recommendations to the ship and staff to enhance CNSP ship's readiness to conduct sustained operations at sea in support of the nation's strategic objectives.

RATT provides support for Dock Landing Ships (LSD), Amphibious Transport Docks (LPD), Mine Counter Measure Ships (MCM), Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), Guided Missile Destroyers (DDG51/1000), Guided Missile Cruisers (CG), Guided Missile Frigates (FFGX), General Purpose Assault Ships (LHA), Multiple Purpose Assault Ships (LHD), and Amphibious Command Ships (LCC). is RATT mainly operated at customer sites in Continental United States (CONUS) at San Diego, CA; Everett, and Outside Continental United States WA;

(OCONUS) locations at Pearl Harbor, HI; Sasebo, Japan and Japan. The will be primarily assigned to San Diego, CA.Yokosuka, RATT

RATT staffing shall be sufficient to support task organized teams conducting simultaneous comprehensive visits on two CGs or DDGs; two LPDs or LSDs or one LHD or LHA; and one MCM/LCS. Visits on LHA and LHD with hybrid propulsion requiring gas turbine SME support are expected to decrement the ability for RATT to support a concurrent visit on a CG or DDG by one (i.e. only one full CG or DDG concurrent visit is expected when supporting a LHA or LHD with hybrid propulsion). In addition to engineering expertise RATT provides deck systems expertise and general combat systems coordination to address engineering interface and integrated system support for deck systems and combat systems respectively.

Under special circumstances specific team members may be tasked to provide SME support to address discrete readiness issues identified on a ship. Each RATT team member will conduct approximately 40-45 weeks of visits per one year performance period with approximately 30% of those visits occurring in OCONUS locations. Optimum visit length to a ship is two weeks but one week visits and specialized assistance visits are also supported. Visits to OCONUS locations are routinely grouped to minimize travel costs which can result in four to six weeks of engagement time in an OCONUS location. One week per year shall be reserved for the conduct of a Standardization Conference (STANCO).

Key to the successful employment of the RATT is that the cadre of proficient, experienced and credible experts stand apart from other fleet assessors and inspection teams by providing assistance at all levels of the command that is focused on enhancing a ship's own internal resources and capabilities to improve their material condition and proficiency.

1.4 GENERAL INFORMATION:

1.4.1 CONTRACTOR PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: The primary place of work to be performed under this contract will be aboard Navy ships at the following locations/U.S. Navy Fleet Pacific Fleet concentration areas:

1.4.1.1 San Diego, CA.

1.4.1.2 Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

1.4.1.3 Everett, WA

1.4.1.4 Yokosuka, Japan

1.4.1.5 Sasebo, Japan

1.4.1.6 Contractor's facility

1.4.2 RECOGNIZED HOLIDAYS:

New Year's Day Labor Day

Birthday of Martin Luther King, Columbus DayJr.

President's Day s yVeteran Da

Memorial Day Juneteenth

Thanksgiving Day Independence Day

Christmas Day

1.4.3 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

Base Period: 01 Oct. 2026 - 30 Sep. 2027

Option Year 1: 01 Oct. 2027 - 30 Sep. 2028

Option Year 2 01 Oct. 2028 - 30 Sep. 2029

Option Year 3 01 Oct. 2029 - 30 Sep. 2030

Option Year 4 01 Oct. 2030 - 30 Sep. 2031

1.4.4 TRAVEL/SURGE: Travel will be required in the performance of this contract. All travel shall be in accordance with the Government's Joint Travel Regulations (JTR) or Federal Travel Regulation (FTR). RATT visits shall be conducted over a one to two week (5-10 day) period. On average, 170 CONUS RATT visits and 38 OCONUS RATT visits are conducted per year. On average, 42 ORCA visits and 11 OCONUS ORCA visits are projected per year.

All travel will be at the request of the government and must be approved in advance by the COR or TA. Travel vouchers and supporting documents must be presented for payment within days after completion of the travel.60

The Contractor shall provide surge support to accommodate increased demands during contingency operations, national emergencies, or other unforeseen readiness needs that exceed the baseline requirements of the RATT and Organic Repair Capability Assessment (ORCA) schedules.

Any use of the Surge CLINs must be approved in advance by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR). Prior to the execution of any surge requirements, the Contractor shall submit a written estimate detailing the required level of effort, specific labor categories, timeline, and associated travel or material costs. The Contractor shall not commence work on any surge effort without formal, written authorization from the COR.

All authorized surge efforts must remain strictly within the general scope of this Performance Work Statement (PWS). COR approval for surge execution is limited exclusively to the available, obligated funding on the established Surge CLINs. In no event shall the COR authorize surge support that exceeds the funded ceiling of the Surge CLINs. Only the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) has the authority to obligate additional funds, modify the contract terms, or increase the overall ceiling of the contract.

1.4.5 QUALITY CONTROL: The contractor shall develop and maintain an effective quality control program to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The contractor's quality control program is the means by which he assures himself that his work complies with the requirement of the contract. The contractor's Quality Control Plan (QCP) will be part of the proposal submission and evaluation, as detailed in the Solicitation. After acceptance of the quality control plan the contractor shall receive the contracting officer's acceptance in writing of any proposed change to his QC system.

1.4.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE: The government shall evaluate the contractor's performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan. This plan is primarily focused on what the Government must do to ensure that the contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. It defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance, and the minimum acceptable defect rate(s).

1.4.7 DATA RIGHTS: The Government has unlimited rights to all documents, reports, data and any material produced under this contract.

All documents, materials and data produced under this contract shall be Government owned and are the property of the Government with all rights and privileges of ownership and copyright belonging exclusively to the Government. These documents, materials and data may not be used or sold by the contractor without written permission from the Contracting Officer. All materials supplied to the Government shall be the sole property of the Government and may not be used for any other purpose. This right does not abrogate any other Government rights.

1.4.8 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS: Contractor personnel performing work under this contract must have a SECRET at time of the proposal submission, and must maintain the level of security required for the life of the contract. The security requirements are in accordance with the attached DD254.

The contractor shall ensure that all of its personnel that work on this contract are US. Citizens.1.4.8.1

All personnel assigned to shall have and maintain a SECRET clearance or higher.1.4.8.2 RATT

1.4.8.3 The contractor shall have the ability to communicate via signed and encrypted e-mail with the government using Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and other software as directed.

1.4.8.4 The contractor shall establish procedures for the safe and orderly backup of computers and network data pertaining to the programs.

1.4.8.5 The Contractor is responsible for its employees (and subcontractors) supporting this contract, to comple and remain up to date on all training required by CNSP and supported activities for individuals working in Government installations. Some examples of required training are Information Assurance Training and Cyber Awareness Training, as well as the following:

Level One Antiterrorism Training

Combating Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) General Awareness

Records Management in the DON: Everyone's Responsibility

Operations security (OPSEC)

Privacy and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Awareness Training

Active Shooter Training

The required training is subject to change throughout the life of this contract. The Contractor shall provide documentation to the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) confirming that contractor personnel have completed the required training on the Required Training Report CDRL. (see Sec. 5.0 Contract Deliverables).

All contract personnel attending meetings, answering government telephones, and working in other situations where their contractor status is not obvious to third parties are required to identify themselves as such to avoid creating an impression in the minds of members of the public that they are Government officials. They must also ensure that all documents or reports produced by contractors are suitably marked as contractor products or that contractor participation is appropriately disclosed.

1.4.9 The Contractor shall furnish all supplies, equipment, facilities and services required to CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS:

perform work under this contract.

2.0 APPLICABLE PUBLICATIONS/REFENCES/DOCUMENTS: The Contractor shall abide by the following DoD and DoN regulations, publications, manuals, and local policies and procedures.

2.1 COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3 Series, Joint Fleet Maintenance Manuel (JFMM)

2.2 SURFACE FORCE TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL -

2.3 COMNAVSURFPAC/COMNAVSURFLANT INSTRUCTION 3502.7A

3.0 DEFINITION AND ACRONYMS:

3.1.1. CONTRACTOR . A supplier or vendor awarded a contract to provide specific supplies or service to the government.

The term used in this contract refers to the prime.

3.1.2. CONTRACTING OFFICER . A person with authority to enter into, administer, and or terminate contracts, and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the government. Note: The only individual who can legally bind the government.

3.1.3. CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR). An employee of the U.S. Government appointed by the contracting officer to administer the contract. Such appointment shall be in writing and shall state the scope of authority and limitations. This individual has authority to provide interpretation of technical requirements of the contract and provide feedback to the Contractor. This individual does NOT have authority to change the terms and conditions of the contract.

3.1.4. DEFECTIVE SERVICE. A service output that does not meet the standard of performance associated with the Performance Work Statement.

3.1.5. DELIVERABLE. Anything that can be physically delivered, but may include non-manufactured things such as meeting minutes or reports.

3.1.6. KEY PERSONNEL . Contractor personnel that are evaluated in a source selection process and that may be required to be used in the performance of a contract by the Key Personnel listed in the PWS. When key personnel are used as an evaluation factor in best value procurement, an offer can be rejected if it does not have a firm commitment from the persons that are listed in the proposal.

3.1.7. PHYSICAL SECURITY. Actions that prevent the loss or damage of Government property.

3.1.8. QUALITY ASSURANCE . The government procedures to verify that services being performed by the Contractor are performed according to acceptable standards.

3.1.9. QUALITY ASSURANCE Surveillance Plan (QASP). An organized written document specifying the surveillance methodology to be used for surveillance of contractor performance.

3.1.10. QUALITY CONTROL. All necessary measures taken by the Contractor to assure that the quality of an end product or service shall meet contract requirements.

3.1.11. SUBCONTRACTOR. One that enters into a contract with a prime contractor. The Government does not have privity of contract with the subcontractor.

3.1.12. WORK DAY. The number of hours per day the Contractor provides services in accordance with the contract.

3.1.12. WORK WEEK. Monday through Friday, unless specified otherwise.

3.1.13. ACRONYMS:

ACRONYM DEFINITION

3M Maintenance and Material Management

AQL Acceptance Quality Limits

ATG Afloat Training Group

CG Guided Missile Cruiser

CNSP Commander Naval Surface Forces U.S. Pacific Fleet

CONUS Continental United States

COR Contracting Officer Representative

COSAL Coordinated Shipboard Allowance List

CSMP Current Ship Maintenance Project

CSOSS Combat Systems Operational Sequencing System

DDG Guided Missile Destroyer

EOSS Engineering Operational Sequencing System

ERAT Engineering Readiness Assist Team

ISIC Immediate Superior In Command

LCC Amphibious Command Ship

LCS Littoral Combat Ship

LHA Assault Ship (General Purpose)

LHD Assault Ship (Multiple Purpose)

LOA Light Off Assessment

LPD Amphibious Transport Dock

LSD Dock Landing Ship

MCM Mine Counter Measures Ship

NAC National Agency Check

OCONUS Outside Continental United States

OCI Organizational Conflict of Interest

ODC Other Direct Costs

PCO Procuring Contract Officer

PMS Preventive Maintenance System

PWS Performance Work Statement

QASP Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

RATT Readiness Assistance Training Team

RFP Request For Proposal

SIB Ship's Information Book

STANCO Standardization Conference

TYCOM Type Commander

4.0 RATT TASKS:

4.1 The Contractor shall coordinate, schedule, and conduct ship training visits for the purpose of improving Sailor proficiency in the operation and maintenance of ships systems through targeted training and aiding ship's leadership in assessing material condition and readiness program efficacy.

4.2 The contractor shall generate listing of material discrepancies noted and not corrected during the course of the visit to be included in the Final Visit Report CDRL

4.3 The Contractor shall coordinate and schedule ship visits.

4.4 The Contractor shall solicit ship inputs for the team employment schedule through coordination with the CNSP staff.

4.5 The Contractor shall provide, manage, maintain, prioritize per TYCOM guidance, and de-conflict the team employment schedule.

4.6 The Contractor shall provide persistent and routine fleet visibility for current employment schedule.

4.7 The Contractor shall de-conflict schedule such that other training entities or organizations (e.g. Afloat Training Group (ATG) with common training equities are not aboard the same ship for the duration of a visit.

4.8 The Contractor shall group to the extent feasible ship visits in a geographic location for the purpose of minimizing ODC expenditures.

4.9 The Contractor shall coordinate in advance, document, and provide tailored training requirements for a specific crew based on pre-visit contact with ship's leadership.

4.10 The Contractor shall assemble teams of relevant senior Subject Matter Experts (SME) for ship visits.

4.11 The contractor shall develop a Cost Visit/Travel Estimate for RATT events requiring travel (approximately 30% of RATT Events occur in OCONUS locations.) Estimate will be submitted to COR/TA for approval in advance of travel.

4.12 The Contractor shall provide training for ships force in coordination with ship requests and assessed need.

4.13 The Contractor shall compile, curate, develop (if not existent), and provide training resources (references and curriculum) for ship systems, required programs, technical watchstanding, installed equipment, and maintenance management for use in classroom and deckplate training for ship's force and RATT personnel.

4.14 The Contractor shall obtain and provide existing relevant curriculum from Navy and maritime industry school houses as needed to enhance onboard training resources.

4.15 The Contractor shall ensure team members are consistently and persistently indoctrinating and reinforcing sound shipboard operating principles and processes through leadership by example and deckplate training.

Supporting Processes:

- Operational Risk Management (ORM)

- Plan, Brief, Execute, and De-Brief (PBED)

- Incident Reporting

4.16 The Contractor shall develop and conduct tailored training evolutions for ship's force.

The following items must be within the training capabilities of the RATT (relevant to the RATT focus) that can be integrated into a tailored training plan:

- Proper review and upkeep of the Current Ships Maintenance Project (CSMP) per standing guidance.

- Corrective maintenance procedures for both ship's force and maintenance activity work.

- Preventive maintenance procedures to include proper use of the Maintenance and Material Management (3-M) system.

- Proper and safe conduct of "Cold Checks" on equipment to include pre-operational visual inspection and pre-light off preventative maintenance actions and testing per established procedures on any equipment or system.

- Proper and safe conduct of "Hot Checks" on equipment to include light off and operating parameter checks and operational testing per established procedures on any equipment or system.

- Proper and safe conduct of preventive maintenance, operational checks, or special test procedures on any equipment.

- Proper management, inventory, stowage, and calibration of precision test equipment.

- Proper conduct of equipment validation to include procedures for reporting discrepancies.

- Development of long-range maintenance Plan of Actions and Milestones for maintenance availabilities.

- Proper management of tools, parts, and material inventories to support operations and maintenance.

- Proper conduct of safety "walk throughs" as a precursor to equipment or system light off.

- Development of executable material inspection Sequence of Events and Execution Plan.

- Proper conduct of material inspections to include effective identification, documentation, and correction of deficiencies.

- Collateral damage prevention, equipment and system layup procedures, and special inactivation procedures.

- Equipment rigging to support routine or special evolutions.

- Routine effective review of administrative programs supporting readiness requirements.

- Effective compilation and review or pre-material inspection deliverables.

- Proper logging of operations.

- Formal voice communications.

- Proper alarm and indication management.

- Enforcement of cleanliness and stowage standards.

- Proper use and stowage of hazardous material to include use and maintenance of personnel protective equipment

(PPE).

- Compliance with safety, occupational health, and environmental protection standards.

- Component and system troubleshooting that should be within the capability of ship's force.

- Effective management of installed calibrated equipment and components with defined operational life.

- Proper upkeep of material history files to support maintenance requirements.

4.17 The Contractor shall conduct classroom training to meet training objectives and requirements previously coordinated for a ship visit.

4.18 The Contractor shall provide records of training conducted.

4.19 The Contractor shall generate and provide documentation for each training session conducted.

4.20 The Contractor shall conduct comprehensive material condition assessments for installed equipment, portable equipment, safety gear, ship systems, and ship structure relevant to the focus of the visit (Engineering or Combat Systems).

4.21 The contractor shall generate a listing of material discrepancies noted and not corrected during the Organic Repair Capability Assessments (ORCA), to be provided in the ORCA Material Deficiency Report CDRL.

4.22 The Contractor shall review and assess ship's preventive and corrective maintenance processes and procedures.

4.23 The Contractor shall provide comprehensive documentation of deficiencies and poor practices of ship's Current Ship's Maintenance Project (CSMP).

4.24 The Contractor shall review, assess, observe (if needed), document, and provide feedback regarding operating procedures for ship systems, installed equipment, and associated evolutions.

4.25 The Contractor shall advise ship's leadership regarding crew proficiency, material condition, maintenance practices, and required program efficacy.

4.26 The Contractor shall aid the Type Commander in identifying and addressing issues and deficiencies that have a wider impact on the fleet.

4.27 The Contractor shall provide feedback on the status of the level of knowledge and experience on the deck plates to the various training stakeholders and learning centers.

4.28 The contractor shall, in coordination with the N43 TPOC (or designated Rep.), assess issues of priority to the Fleet.

4.29 The Contractor shall manage resources to achieve a sustained and consistent level of effort for the full contract period.

4.30 ORCA TASKS

4.30.1 The Contractor shall coordinate, schedule, and conduct ship Organic Repair Capability Assessments (ORCA) and training visits for the purpose of assessing ship's organic repair capability and improving Sailor proficiency in the maintenance systems through targeted training and aiding ship's leadership in assessing material condition. An individual hull shall not be inspected more than once per 3 year cycle. (Task Frequency: Daily).

4.30.2 The contractor shall solicit open ended fleet feedback and document response on adequacy of workshop system configurations from user perspectives during ORCA inspections. Feedback may comment on, but is not limited to: safety, compartment arrangement, administrative fixture provisions, material handling, material or tool storage, and support services (e.g. compressed air, lighting, ventilation, electrical power, etc.). Feedback will be considered as part of modernization and improvements to design practices. The contractor shall include input as part of the ORCA Material Deficiency Reports. (Task Frequency: Daily)

4.30.3 The contractor shall perform Industrial Plant Equipment Root Cause Analysis (RCA) that expands the scope of inspections to go beyond simply identifying broken equipment and failure mode. The contractor shall investigate and report on the root cause(s) of failures (the "5 Whys") such as, but not limited to specific process deficiency, under/over usage, environmental factor (e.g. humidity, shipboard vibration induced failure), equipment quality, equipment misuse, or deficient maintenance procedure. RCAs shall be selectively completed on up to 20 instances per contract year, prioritizing equipment failures based on the top 15 problems identified by TYCOM. Up to an additional 10 optional instances may be selected covering east coast vessels dependent on funded scope. Report RCA completion and results in the ORCA Material Deficiency Report. (Task Frequency: Daily until instances are complete)

4.30.4 The contractor shall audit shipboard Industrial Plant Equipment against configuration data records and assist ship with preparing CKs for equipment not reflected in configuration data. Report completed actions in the ORCA Material Deficiency Report. (Task Frequency: Daily per visit)

4.30.5 The contractor shall identify prerequisite Navy training (e.g. Job Qualification Requirement (JQR), Personnel Qualification Standard (PQS), "A" school, "C" school code, and/or other sources) relative to afloat Industrial Plant Equipment use and maintenance, and highlight gaps where shipboard repair training may be deficient. Maintain listing of training and keep up to date. Report training gaps and discrepancies in the ORCA Material Deficiency Report. (Task Frequency: Daily an update as required)

4.30.6 The contractor shall include actionable recommendation(s) to resolve discrepancies and issues found during ORCA inspections to the ship or other designated Navy organization, to enhance ship's readiness to conduct sustained operations at sea in support of the nation's strategic objectives. Report recommended actions in the ORCA Material Deficiency Report.

(Task Frequency: Daily per visit)

4.30.7 The contractor shall consult with the TYCOM/COR and establish a methodology for providing ORCA data to a third party the government activity (i.e. NSWC, Corona) for the purposes of establishing and developing an online dashboard. The contractor shall act as the ORCA data provider on behalf of the TYCOM. The contractor is not responsible for the overall hosting, access or functionality of the ORCA dashboard. Report the status of data delivery in the ORCA Material Deficiency Report. (Task Frequency: Daily until 100% complete)

5.0 CONTRACT DELIVERABLES: The contractor is responsible for providing the following deliverables:

Deliverable Recipient

Fo r m at of Co pie s

Frequency

Staffing Plan COR/TA

M S

Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

10 days after award

Team Employment Matrix COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Weekly

Ship Pre-RATT/ORCA Visit Plan COR/TA M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Monthly

TYCOM Visit Report and Program update

COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Bi-weekly

RATT ORCA Final Visit Report COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

5 working days following the completion of each trip

RATT ORCA Shipboard Training Summary Report & Roster

COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

5 working days following the completion of each trip

ORCA Material Deficiency Report COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

5 working days following the completion of each trip

Required Training Report COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Monthly

Schedule and Solicitation for Schedule Input Message

COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Monthly

Cost Visit/Travel Estimate COR/TA

M S

30 days prior to overseas travel

Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

RATT Commanding Officer's Visit Report

COR/TA/Ship CO

/XO

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

5 working days following the completion of each trip

Prioritized Material Deficiency Report

COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

5 working days following the completion of each trip

Ship's CSMP Deficiency Report COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

5 working days following the completion of each trip

Expenditure Report COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Quarterly

Class Issues Assessment Report COR/TA/Ship CO

/XO

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

5 working days following the competion of each ship visitMonthly

Program Review Brief COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Quarterly

Fleet Priority Issues (Task 4.29) COR/TA

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Monthly

Industrial Plant Equipment failure root cause Analysis Report (Task

4.30.3)

COR/TA

M S Of fic e

20 working days following completion of ship visit, with final report due 30 days after ship visit

Training/IPE Matrix Report (Task 4.30.5)

COR/TA/Ship CO

/XO

M S Of fic e

1 1 time and update as required

ORCA Data (Task 4.30. 7) COR/TA/Govt Data

Mgr (i.e. NSWC Corona)

M S Of fic e

1 O rigi nal

Monthly

6.0 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY: The government shall evaluate the contractor's performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan. This plan is primarily focused on what the Government must do to ensure that the contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. It defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance, and the minimum acceptable defect rate(s).

T a s k

Performance Objective Performance Standard

F re q u e n c y

Acceptable Quality Level

(AQL)

S u rv ei ll a n ce M et h o d

Coordinate, schedule, and conduct ship training visits

Satisfactory Commanding Officer visit feedback. Visits are supportable and executable.

D ai ly p er vi

80% (4 on a scale of 1 to 5) on average.

An average score of 4.0 or higher across all visit feedback

C us to m er fe si t reports received during the monthly reporting period ed ba ck

Conduct ship Organic Repair Capability Assessments and Training Visits

Visits supportable and executable.

D ai ly p er vi si t

100% of scheduled visits are executed.

In sp ec ti o n

Coordinate and schedule ship visits

Visits supportable and executable. Timely coordination of scheduled visits.

D ai ly

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

Team employment schedule Routine solicitation for inputs. Employ standard communication methods to solicit inputs.

M o nt hl y

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

/ Team Employment Matrix

No concurrent training events with common training equities with RATT are aboard the same ship for the duration of the visit unless specifically approved by the Government.

D ai ly

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

Training Requirements Coordinate in advance, document, and provide tailored training requirements for a specific crew based on pre-visit contact with ship's leadership

D ai ly

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

Assemble SME's Assemble teams of relevant senior Subject Matter Experts (SME) for ship visits

D ai ly

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

Cost Visit Estimate Travel expenditures approved in advance d a ys pr io r t o tr a v el

100% are submitted on time.

95% are accepted by the COR without substantive correction.

In sp ec ti o n

Training for Ships Force Satisfactory Commanding Officer visit feedback

D ai ly p er vi si t

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

Compile, curate, develop (if not existent), and provide training resources (references and curriculum) for ship systems, required programs, technical watchstanding, installed equipment, and maintenance management for use in classroom and deckplate training for ship's force and RATT personnel.

Training resources comprehensive, effectively shall be organized, current, technically accurate and ship specific.

P er vi si t

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

Conduct comprehensive material condition assessments for installed equipment, portable equipment, safety gear, ship systems, and ship structure

Provide a comprehensive material assessment.

D ai ly p er vi si t

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

Current Ship's Maintenance Project

Provide comprehensive documentation of deficiencies and poor practices of ship's Current Ship's Maintenance Project w ee ks pr io r t o sh ip s vi si t.

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

Provide Feedback and Assess

Provide feedback regarding operating procedures for ship systems, installed equipment, and associated evolutions; advise ship's leadership regarding crew proficiency, material condition, maintenance practices, and required program efficacy; identifying and addressing issues and deficiencies that have a wider impact on the fleet; provide feedback on the status of the level of knowledge and experience on the deck plates to the various training stakeholders and learning centers, including SWOS Board of Visitors

D ai ly p er vi si t

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

Fleet priority issues.

Provide status of Fleet priority issues

M o nt hl y

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

Manage Resources

Manage resources to achieve a sustained and consistent level of effort for the full contract period

D ai ly

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

ORCA visits Conduct ORCA visits

D ai ly

100% Compliant

In sp ec ti o n

Solicit open ended feedback

Documentation that feedback was solicited and summary of feedback provided

D ai ly

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

D ai ly u

Investigation of Industrial Plant Equipment failure root cause analysis Provide comprehensive root cause analysis nt il in st a n ce s ar e c o m pl et e d

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

Audit shipboard Industrial Plant Equipment against configuration data records

Documentation of CK assistance provided

D ai ly p er vi si t

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

Identify Navy training relative to afloat industrial Plant Equipment and gap areas

Training matrix shall be effectively organized, informative and technically accurate

D ai ly p er vi si t

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

Identify discrepancies and issues with resolution recommendations

Recommendations provided that are actionable with notional action party identified

D ai ly p er vi si t

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring

In sp ec substantive revision.

ti o n

Provide ORCA data to identified third party Govt analyst activity

Provided ORCA data in sufficient quality, quantity and format acceptable by Govt third party analyst activity

D ai ly p er vi si t

100% of del iverables are submitted on time.

95% of deli verables are accepted by the COR without requiring substantive revision.

In sp ec ti o n

If performance falls below the AQL defined above, the COR shall document the instance(s), coordinate with the Contracting Officer and advise the Contractor. The Contractor will be requested to review the documentation and provide a written response on how performance will be corrected in the future. Re-performance of any work for failure to perform in accordance with the specified AQL or task requirement shall be completed at the Contractor's own expense and at no additional cost to the Government.

7.0 PERSONNEL: Contractor personnel shall be fully capable of performing in an efficient, reliable, and professional manner.

The Contractor shall be responsible for employing technically qualified key and non-key personnel to perform the work specified in the Performance Work Statement.

7.1. Key Personnel Qualifications:

RATT Program Manager(x1)

Team Leads (x7):

ORCA Team Lead (x1)

Gas Turbine Team Lead / Main Propulsion / Control Systems (x3)

AMPHIB Team Lead /Diesel Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME (x1)

AMPHIB Team Lead /Steam Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME (x1)

LCS / MCM Team Lead / Diesel Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME (x1)

Note: Not only are the Team Leads the subject matter experts (SME's) in their respective technical areas, but also they may fill Function Lead roles or fill other SME roles on the individual ship visit teams. During performance, this is an area of potential FTE efficiency and cost efficiency (i.e., dual hating).

7.1.1 RATT Program Manager (Key, x1): The RATT RATT Program Manager (PM) must be able to balance the workforce to meet multiple RATT work force event requirement timelines that are essential to this effort. The PM must be able to manage the supporting PACFLEET ships.

aThe PM must be able to manage contract effort for this magnitude and scope (across multiple locations).

Qualifications: RATT Program Manager (x1): The proposed RATT Program Manager should satisfy the following skill, knowledge, and experience requirements:

-- A minimum of fifteen (15) years of experience in the management of various labor categories and monitoring performance of federal Government service contracts is required. Experience of twenty-five (25) or more years in this area is considered highly desirable.;

-- Project Management Professional (PMP) certification, by contract award or within 3 months of award;

-- Senior Navy ship leadership experience as a Surface Warfare Officer and Commanding Officer of a U.S. Navy warship;

--Senior Navy ship engineering leadership experience as a Chief Engineer of a U.S. Navy warship

--Maintenance/training staff experience (e.g. Immediate Superior In Charge (ISIC), Type Commander (TYCOM), or Afloat Training Group);

-- Extensive Navy technical management experience;

--Extensive experience in Navy ship maintenance strategy and process development, implementation, and control;

--Supervisory experience in analyses, information system operations, and implementation of technical projects similar to those indicated in the PWS;

--In-depth, detailed knowledge of Navy ship depot level maintenance processes;

--Navy shipboard experience on multiple ships;

--Post-graduate degree from an accredited university in management or a technical field.

7.1.2 Team Leads (Key, x7): RATT is of 7 (3) comprised teams: (1) Organic Repair Capability Assessment Team (ORCA); Gas Turbine Teams;

Team; (1) Amphibious (Steam) Team; Team. Team of (1) Amphibious (Diesel) and (1) MCM/LCS The respective Lead roles for each these 7 of to provide to a specialized areas are essential because they possess the depth and breadth experience best recommendations keep warship ready Team for combat. Utilizing resource experiences, the Leads are able to provide candid guidance to their team and to the ship's crew for expanding the their methodology. to knowledge with insightful These roles are essential the outcome of ships' material condition and readiness.

7.1.3 Qualifications: Team Leads (x1 per Team): The proposed Team Leads are the subject matter experts assigned to the individual ship visit teams and should satisfy the skill, knowledge, and experience requirements listed below:

Qualifications: ORCA Team Lead SME (Key, x1): The proposed ORCA Team Lead should satisfy the following skill, knowledge, and experience requirements:

-- A minimum of fifteen (15) years of supervisory experience in analyses, information system operations, and implementation of technical projects similar to those indicated in the PWS is required. Experience of twenty-five (25) or more years in these areas is considered highly desirable;

--Maintenance/training staff experience (e.g. Immediate Superior In Charge (ISIC), Type Commander (TYCOM), or Afloat Training Group);

--In-depth knowledge of Navy ship depot level maintenance processes;

--In-depth knowledge of the theory and workings of surface ship maintenance processes;

--Under-graduate or associates degree or, --7 years demonstrated experience in a management role.

Qualifications: RATT Team Lead (Key, x6): The proposed RATT Team Leads should satisfy following Team Lead requirements and the SME requirements below:

-- A minimum of fifteen (15) years of supervisory experience in analyses, information system operations, and implementation of technical projects similar to those indicated in the PWS. Experience of twenty-five (25) or more years in these areas is considered highly desirable.

--Supervisory main propulsion experience with Navy surface ship maintenance processes;

--Extensive experience as shipboard Engineering Officer of the Watch (EOOW) on multiple ships.

--Extensive experience in Navy Ship main propulsion engineering on multiple ships;

--Maintenance/training staff experience (e.g. Immediate Superior In Charge (ISIC), Type Commander (TYCOM), or Afloat Training Group);

--In-depth knowledge of Navy ship depot level maintenance processes;

--In-depth knowledge of the theory and workings of surface ship maintenance processes;

--Under-graduate or associates degree or extensive demonstrated experience in a management role.

7.1.3.1 Gas Turbine Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME (Key, x3):

--A minimum of fifteen (15) of on or years supervisory level watchstanding experience warships military auxiliaries with gas Officer, turbine main propulsion as Engineering Officer of the Watch, Propulsion Plant Watch Chief Engineer, or equivalent and responsible for overall propulsion plant operations and associated control auxiliary systems.

--Direct operational and maintenance experience, within the last five years, with gas turbine main propulsion, gas turbine generators, and in by Navy.associated control systems, associated auxiliaries currently use the

7.1.3.2 Amphib Steam Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME (Key, x1):

--A minimum of fifteen (15) years of supervisory level watchstanding experience on warships or military auxiliaries with steam main propulsion as Engineering Officer of the Watch, Propulsion Plant Watch Officer, Chief Engineer, or equivalent responsible for overall propulsion plant operations and associated control and auxiliary systems.

--Direct operational and maintenance experience, within the last five years, with steam turbine main propulsion, steam turbine generators, associated control systems, and associated auxiliaries currently in by Navy.use the

7.1.3.3 Amphib Diesel Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME (Key, x1):

--A minimum of fifteen (15) years of supervisory level watchstanding experience on warships or military auxiliaries with diesel engine main propulsion as Engineering Officer of the Watch, Propulsion Plant Watch Officer, Chief Engineer, or equivalent responsible for overall propulsion plant operations and associated auxiliary systems.

--Direct operational and maintenance experience, within the last five years, with diesel main propulsion, diesel generators, associated control systems, and associated auxiliaries currently in use by the Navy.

7.1.3.4 LCS/MCM Diesel Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME (Key, x1):

--A minimum of fifteen (15) years of supervisory level watchstanding experience on warships or military auxiliaries with diesel engine main propulsion as Engineering Officer of the Watch, Propulsion Plant Watch Officer, Chief Engineer, or equivalent responsible for overall propulsion plant operations and associated auxiliary systems.

--Direct operational and maintenance experience, within the last five years, with diesel main propulsion, diesel generators, associated control systems, and associated auxiliaries currently in use by the Navy.

7.2 Table 1 Notional Team Construct provides a historical snapshot of the recommended SME's that comprise each team. Due to potential overlap in coverage, this table does not represent precise FTE staffing of the respective ORCA/RATT Teams. For example, each Team Lead also fills an SME role, but the role could vary depending on overall team composition and SME requirements.

Table 1 NOTIONAL TEAM SME CONSTRUCT (not a FTE reference)

Team Labor Category

Program Manager/Director (PM)

Deputy Program Manager

Administrative Assistant

Project Planner

ORCA Analyst

Organic Repair Capability Assessment (ORCA) Team

ORCA Team Lead/Deck Ops

Gas Turbine Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME

Damage Control SME

Electrical Systems SME

Auxiliaries Systems SME

Maintenance, Material Management, and Logistics SME

Cruiser/Destroyer/(Gas Turbine) Team #1 Gas Turbine Team Lead / Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME

Lead Marine Gas Turbine Inspectors (MGTI)

Damage Control SME

Gas Turbine Main Propulsion/Control System

SME

Auxiliaries Systems SME

Cruiser/Destroyer Combat Systems SME

Maintenance, Material Management, and Logistics SME

Cruiser/Destroyer (Gas Turbine) Team #2 Gas Turbine Team Lead / Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME

Marine Gas Turbine Inspectors (MGTI)

Damage Control SME

Electrical Systems SME

Auxiliaries Systems SME

Deck Operations and Systems SME

Cruiser/Destroyer Combat Systems SME

Lead Maintenance, Material Management, and Logistics SME

Cruiser/Destroyer (Gas Turbine) Team #3 Gas Turbine Team Lead / Main Propulsion and Control Systems SME

Marine Gas Turbine Inspectors (MGTI)

Damage Control SME

Electr…