1.17 OPPD 26-R-3108 CNSP RATT.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0024426R3108
About this file
This is an Offeror's Past Performance Data questionnaire for solicitation N00244-26-R-3108, a RATT (Readiness Assistance Training Team) support services requirement issued by NAVSUP FLC San Diego on behalf of CNSP (Contingency Supported Planning) as a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) set-aside among SeaPort NxG MAC holders. The questionnaire must be completed and returned to Christine Jordan at NAVSUP FLC San Diego (christine.jordan@navy.mil, 619-556-6121) by the solicitation closing date.
The form requests past performance information from references who have contracted with the offeror, with evaluation criteria focusing on four primary quality areas: meeting contract requirements and customer satisfaction levels; timeliness of performance schedules and submission of reports and invoicing; contractor responsiveness to customer concerns and problem resolution; and cost control relative to agreed-upon pricing. References are asked to provide detailed assessments of the contractor's strengths and weaknesses, overall satisfaction with performance, willingness to re-engage the contractor for future work, and identification of similar contracted efforts. The completed questionnaire should be sent directly to the Government evaluator, not returned to the contractor originating the request.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00244-26-R-3108 RATT
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Christine Jordan, Code 240 Phone: (619) 556-6121 Email: christine.jordan@navy.mil
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .