PRB_Case_019_Pre_Solicitation_Threshold_NonSeaport__Vendor_Questions.docx

DOCX document 14 KB Posted

Attached to
Manufacturing & Services Acquisition (MASA) IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00174-19-R-0107
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command

About this file

This document contains questions and answers regarding solicitation number N00174-19-R-0107 for manufacturing support services. The Navy seeks proposals for various manufacturing task areas including parts, assemblies, and materials. Vendors must submit a single proposal to perform all work under a given task area, as partial proposals will not be considered. While an extension to the June 10th response deadline was requested, the Navy determined more time was not needed given the remaining 28 days to submit. Clarification was also provided that pricing should include total costs per assembly without separating labor and materials. Any other questions must be submitted via email to the point of contact. A subsequent request for a two-week extension to the response date to allow for further analysis was denied with the Navy referring to an earlier response regarding extension requests.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Manufacturing & Services Acquisition (MASA) IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
MASA_IDIQ_Questions_July_29,_2019.docx DOCX document
MASA_Extension_July_15.pdf PDF
MASA_IDIQ_Questions_July_11_2019.docx DOCX document
MASA_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MASA_Amendment_6.docx DOCX document
MASA_IDIQ_Questions_July_10,_2019.docx DOCX document
MASA_Question_and_Answers_June_26,_2019.docx DOCX document
MASA_Extension_June_25.pdf PDF
MASA_Amendment_June_21,_2019_.pdf PDF
MASA_IDIQ_Questions_June_17.docx DOCX document
MASA_Amendment_3_June_17.pdf PDF
MASA_IDIQ_Questions_June_12.docx DOCX document
MASA_Q&A_June_10.docx DOCX document
MASA_Question_and_Answers_May_30_2019.docx DOCX document
MASA_Question_and_Answers_May_28_2019.docx DOCX document
Past_Performance_Matrix.doc DOC document
MASA_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
MASA_IDIQ_Questions.docx_May_24_2019.docx DOCX document
MASA_Q&A_May_16.docx DOCX document
MASA_Q&A_May_16.docx DOCX document
MASA_Amendment_N0017419R0107-0001.pdf PDF
CDRL_A002_Certification_of_Compliance.pdf PDF
CDRL_A003_Certification_of_Analysis.pdf PDF
CDRL_A005_Request_For_Variance.pdf PDF
CDRL_A007_Special_Tooling_&_Equipment.pdf PDF
CDRL_A001_Meeting_Minutes-BR.PDF PDF
CDRL_A004_Test_Inspection_Report.pdf PDF
CDRL_A006_Quality_Control_Program_Plan.pdf PDF
PRB_Case_019_Pre_Solicitation_Threshold_NonSeaport_Price_Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_A008_Program_Progress_Reports.pdf PDF
MASA_Solicitation_SF-33.pdf PDF
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Manufacturing & Services Acquisition (MASA) Manufacturing Support IDIQ N00174-19-R-0107 Questions & Answers May 14, 2019

1. Question: Is it acceptable to submit a proposal for individual task items under different task areas? For example, can a proposal be submitted for individual parts/assemblies as opposed to a task area as a whole.

Answer: No it is not acceptable to submit a proposal for individual task items under different task areas. These parts are only sample parts, these are not the actual parts being bought. A vendor must submit a proposal to be able to make all parts under a particular task area in order to be able to win that task. Partial proposals for a task area are not permitted/allowed/wanted.

2. Question: We request an extension to the June 10th response date to allow for the intended amount of time to review all drawings and for Past Performance Questionnaires to be sent out, completed, and received back by you.

Answer: Because there are still 28 days left till solicitation close (June 10, 2019) the Government feels an extension at this time is pre-mature. The Government is willing to reconsider at a later date.

3. Question: Can you provide clarity in detail to how we submit response for the “upper” lever assembly SK-IH-12110 A which is not listed in the table1 task 4 on page 125 nor table 2 task 4 on page 128. We may be missing an assembly drawing and source of supply for each of these items.

To confirm we will issue a 1-unit price for each assembly, not separating out materials from labor cost.

Answer: It looks like there was a duplicate line in the ECAPS listing so we had missing drawings, a solicitation amendment will be issued. Yes, one price per assembly not separating out labor from material is correct.

4. Question: When is a good time I can call you with a few questions?

Answer: In order to ensure we meet your needs and provide a complete response, please send all questions via email to Tracy.R.Scott@Navy.mil or designated representative. Questions will only be responded to in writing in accordance with the terms of the solicitation.

5. Question: In preparation and review of the RFP attachments we received, I am graciously requesting an extension to provide a full pricing review analysis and market survey. A 2-week extension will allow for our team to accurately analyze each tasking.

Response proposed due date: Monday, June 24, 2019.

Answer: Please refer to question #2 answer.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .