MASA_Extension_July_15.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Extend the solicitation to close on July 30, 2019 at 4:00PM EST.

2. Revise sections L & M to increase technical proposal page limit from 75 to 100.

If you have previously submitted a proposal you may revise it up until solicitation close. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 22

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Jul-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0017419R0107

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06-May-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Jul-2019

CODE

NSWC IHEODTD N

4081 N. JACKSON RD

BLDG 841

INDIAN HEAD MD 20640-5116

N00174 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0017419R0107

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES (FINAL)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The solicitation is hereby extended to close on July 30, 2019 at 4:00PM EST.

The following have been modified: All changes are in RED font.

SECTION L NOTICES TO OFFERORS

SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 OVERVIEW

The purpose of this procurement is to assist the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division (NSWC IHEODTD) in support of a wide variety of military projects that require build-to-print fabrication of products via processes utilized by machine shops.

1.1 Contract Award:

1.1.1 The Government intends to award up to three (3) contracts for each specific task area of the Statement of Work (SOW) (Task Areas 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6) and up to five (5) contracts for Task Area 2 as a result of this solicitation in accordance with Section M, to the responsible Offerors whose proposals represent the Best Value, utilizing a trade-off process, to the Government in accordance with the Factors and Sub-factors set forth in the solicitation. Once the Government makes contractual awards, individual delivery or task orders will be competed and awarded based on Lowest Price/Technically Acceptable approach, pursuant to FAR 15.101-2 with the exception of man-rated items which will be competed and awarded based on Best Value, pursuant to FAR 15.101-1.

Once the Government makes contractual awards, individual delivery or task orders will be competed and awarded based on Lowest Price/Technically Acceptable approach, pursuant to FAR 15.101-2.

1.1.2 The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government’s interest.

1.1.3 The Government reserves the right to award multiple contracts, based on initial offers and without holding discussions, but reserves the right to hold discussions at the Government’s discretion; therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost/price and technical standpoint.

1.1.4 The Government will conduct price analysis on the price proposal.

2.0 NOTICES TO OFFERORS

Each Offeror must (1) submit an offer, (2) submit information that addresses the evaluation factors, and (3) submit supporting price data. Offerors are advised that if they choose to propose to more than one task area their submittal shall clearly identify the proposed task areas within each separate volume. The Government will evaluate each Offeror's understanding of the Government's requirements and ability to perform the work on the basis of its proposal. It is the Offeror's responsibility to provide information and evidence that clearly demonstrates its ability to meet the solicitation requirements. Unless otherwise allowed, all questions shall be submitted by 4:30PM EST no later than 10 calendar days of solicitation closing.

This procurement includes controlled unclassified technical information assigned a restricted distribution statement which is export controlled. To receive this unclassified controlled technical information, an Offeror must be currently certified through the United States/Canada Joint Certification Program. To become certified for receipt of the technical documents, a U.S. Offeror must submit a completed DD Form 2345 to the U.S./Canada Joint Certification Office. Canadian Offerors may submit either a completed DD Form 2345 or DSS-MAS 9379 for certification. In addition, a copy of the company's State/Provincial Business License, Incorporation Certificate, sales Tax Identification Form or other documentation which verifies the legitimacy of the company must accompany all DD Form 2345s. Additional information on the Joint Certification Program and a checklist for completion of the DD Form 2345 is available at the following website:

http://www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/Offers/Products/LogisticsApplications/JCP/. Offerors are encouraged to apply for certification as early as possible in order for processing and receipt of information to be completed in sufficient time to prepare a proposal before solicitation closing.

Interested Offerors must request the drawing package in writing. E-mail the following information to Tracy.R.Scott@navy.mil:

-Name -Title -Company name and address -DUNS and CAGE numbers -E-mail address

This procurement includes controlled unclassified information (CUI) that will be provided upon request as a .piz file.

Offerors must convert this file to a /zip file. A separate email will be sent with the password to access these files.

Special Notice: TASK TWO OF THE APPLICABLE STATEMENT OF WORK IS SET-ASIDE FOR SMALL BUSINESS.

ONLY SMALL BUSINESS OFFERORS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR THIS TASK. ALL OTHER TASKS ARE FULL

AND OPEN.

Applicable for Small Business Set-Aside: Limitations on Subcontracting: In accordance with FAR 52.219-14, the Offeror must demonstrate in its proposal that at least 50% of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the Offeror. Any proposal that on its face fails to demonstrate that the Offeror’s personnel will be performing at least 50% of the contract work will be deemed to be technically unacceptable and therefore ineligible for award.

Once the Government makes contractual awards, individual delivery or task orders will be competed and awarded based on the Lowest Price/Technically Acceptable approach, pursuant to FAR 15.101-2, and man-rated items will be competed and awarded based on Best Value, pursuant to FAR 15.101-1 except as noted below:

Although it is the Government’s intent to compete all task or delivery orders (pursuant to FAR 16.505) among the Contractors awarded a base contract, the Contracting Officer may determine that a sole source is appropriate in the following instances:

(1) The agency’s need for such services is of such urgency that providing a competitive opportunity would result in unacceptable delays;

(2) Only one Contractor is capable of providing such services or materials necessary at the level of quality required because the services ordered are unique or highly specialized;

(3) The order should be issued on a sole source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency as a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.

(4) It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.

(5) For orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, a statute expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified sources.

(6) In accordance with section 1331 of Public Law 111-240 (15 U.S.C. 644(r)), contracting officers may, at their discretion, set aside orders for any of the small business concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3). When setting aside orders for small business concerns, the specific small business program eligibility requirements identified in part 19 apply.

3.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

3.1 Submission

3.1.1 Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals

(i) The Offeror shall submit the following information in both hard copy and electronic copy format; failure to do so will render an offer ineligible for award:

1. Six (6) copies of the Technical Volume I.

2. Two (2) copies of Past Performance Volume II, including a list of no more than seven relevant contracts performed within the last five years that are listed in PPIRS. A separate listing shall be provided for the Prime and each subcontractor.

3. Two (2) copies of the Price Volume III, containing the completed and signed RFP package, with all representation certifications executed, and with costs in Section B, and any amendments issued.

(ii) Any proposal modification or revision not received/submitted by the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and may not be considered. The solicitation will close at the exact date and time specified in the solicitation and Offerors will be unable to submit their proposal after that time.

(iii) Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice to the Contracting Officer provided such notice is received prior to contract award. Withdrawals are effective upon receipt of notice by the Contracting Officer.

4. Two (2) copies of the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Volume IV (Applies to other than small business Offerors only)

Failure to submit a complete proposal prior to the solicitation closing date and time may render the proposal unacceptable.

3.2 Offer Expiration Date

Proposals in response to this solicitation shall be valid for 270 calendar days.

4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

4.1 GENERAL

Offerors must comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal; proposals that do not comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal may be considered non-responsive and may render the Offeror ineligible for award. The Offeror’s technical proposal must demonstrate an understanding the task areas they are proposing to in the Statement of Work (SOW) and RFP terms and conditions. The resultant Offeror’s proposal will be incorporated into the contract by reference and the Offeror shall perform in accordance with the technical proposal presented with its proposal.

Format shall comply with the following information:

8.5 x 11 inch paper Single-spaced typed lines 1 inch margins 12-point Times New Roman Font text

Offerors are instructed to clearly label all files with Volume number, company name and a unique identifying name which is reflective of the contents of the file (i.e., VOL. III, ABC COMPANY, PRIME COST PROPOSAL). Please keep the file names consistent for all volumes.

The electronic proposal shall be prepared so that when printed, the proposal meets the following format requirements:

8.5 x 11 inch paper Single-spaced typed lines 1 inch margins 12-point Times New Roman Font text No hyperlinks Microsoft Office 2016 or earlier (Word, Excel, Power Point)

For electronic submission, PDF or Microsoft Office submission is acceptable.

Cost Information shall be submitted for Section B. Narratives related to cost data may be provided in MS Word.

There is no limitation on the font size of the cost proposal.

Any other attached documents requested herein shall be compatible with Microsoft Office 2016 or earlier format.

Compression tools are limited to PKZip or WinZip. The font size for text contained in embedded graphics (tables and illustrations) shall be no smaller than 10 point Times New Roman font.

Offerors shall have all subcontractors submit proposal information in a uniform format consistent with the above instructions.

The Offeror shall submit proposals in hard copy to:

NSWC IHEODTD

Contracts Department 4081 North Jackson Road Indian Head, MD 20640-5115 Code 022TS Attn: Tracy R. Scott

The Offeror shall also submit one proposal in electronic copy to:

Tracy.R.scott@navy.mil

For electronic submission, PDF or Microsoft Office submission is acceptable.

4.1.1 Page Numbering

The Offeror shall use a standard page numbering system to facilitate proposal references. Number consecutive pages within sections.

Charts, graphs and other insert materials shall be page-numbered as part of the page numbering system.

4.1.2 Page Limitations

Page limitations are identified for each volume/section of the proposal, as described in paragraph 5.0 below and will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in proposal evaluation. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Graphs, charts, and tables are included in the page count. The following are not included in the page limitations:

(i) Title/Cover pages

(ii) Tables of contents

(iii) Glossaries of abbreviations and acronyms

(iv) Subcontracting agreements, letters of intent, resumes, subcontract plan and subcontract agreements

(v) Proposal Cross-Reference Tables (vi). Quality Assurance Plan

4.2 Cover letter, provided as a separate file, of the proposal must provide the following:

(i) The solicitation number;

(ii) Cage code

(iii) The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of points of contact for the Offeror and subcontractors;

(iv) Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation;

(v) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal.

(vi) A statement that the Offeror consents meets and agrees with all terms, conditions, requirements, provisions, and amendments included in the solicitation. Offerors must meet all requirements at time of proposal submission; or provide with its cover letter an acceptable plan to meet the requirements by the start date of contract performance. Failure to meet all requirements at time of proposal submission or provide an acceptable plan to meet the requirements by the start date of contract performance may remove the Offeror from consideration of award. The following elements of the technical proposal shall be addressed in the cover letter:

• Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Certification/Mitigation Plan: The Offeror shall certify compliance with the OCI clause HQ L-2-0005 - Notification Of Potential Organizational Conflict(s) Of Interest (NAVSEA) (JUN 1994).

If a potential conflict of interest exists at any tier, each potential prime Offeror is requested to notify the Contracting Officer within 14 calendar days of the date of this solicitation or prior to presenting an offer and present an acceptable plan to neutralize any potential organizational conflict of interest. Those Offerors deemed to have a conflict of interest may be ineligible for award.

• Small Business Subcontracting Plan: The Offeror shall propose at least 5% to small businesses (not applicable to small business Offerors).

4.3 Cover Page, Table of Contents, Proposal Cross-Reference Table

Each proposal volume must include a Cover Page and a Table of Contents. The Cover Page shall identify the solicitation number, amendment number, proposal volume and title, specific proposed task areas and the Offeror’s name. Volume I shall include a Master Table of Contents and a Proposal Cross-Reference Table. The Proposal Cross-Reference Table shall indicate the required proposal content by solicitation section/page number and the section/page number where this content appears in the proposal.

4.4 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

Each volume separate shall contain a glossary which includes all abbreviations, acronyms and their corresponding definitions.

4.5 Cost and Pricing Information

Pricing information of any kind shall only be included in Volume III, Cost Proposal and Volume IV, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

5.0 PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION

All non-priced factors, when combined, are approximately equal to Price in importance.

Volume I – TECHNICAL (Factor 1)

The Offeror’s Technical Proposal shall address each subfactor listed below, which are of equal importance and shall specify by Statement of Work paragraph number to which of the task area(s) the Offeror is proposing. The Technical Proposal shall not exceed 100 single sided pages for each task area proposed, not less than 12 pitch (Times New Roman or similar). Offerors are advised that excess pages will not be evaluated. The Technical Proposal shall not contain any hyperlinks or other electronically imbedded links.

The Technical Proposal shall contain information/documentation in sufficient detail to enable evaluation based on the factors/sub-factors listed in Section M, Clause entitled Best Value Evaluation and Basis for Award and as detailed below. To this end, each technical proposal shall be specific, detailed and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate that the prospective contractor has a thorough knowledge and understanding of the requirements and has valid and practical solutions for technical problems. Statements that paraphrase the specifications or attest that standard procedures will be employed are inadequate to demonstrate how the Offeror will comply with the requirements of the specifications.

The Offeror shall describe how it plans to accomplish the task(s) associated with the following sub factors:

SUB-FACTOR 1: Technical Approach/Production Plan

For all of the task areas, except Task 3: Inspection, the Offeror will be provided with a sample program drawing package for each task area. These sample drawings will be generally representative of the types of products that will be procured under that task area.

They will not be the exact items procured under this contract. The Offeror shall provide the technical details of the end to end production plan for the specific tasks /program(s) they choose to propose in support of the drawing packages listed in Table 1 below. Offerors are not required to submit a proposal for each task area. Quantities for each part are provided in the table as well.

This plan should address elements such as the manufacturing plan, assembly, heat treating/coating and quality inspection plans for the items and address any use of subcontractors if applicable. The inspection plan should include descriptions of inspection styles and type of equipment that will be used. The plan shall include the identification of the work performer for each step. In addition, the Offeror shall address the nature, difficulties, uncertainties, and risks associated with performing the kind of work that will be required with producing these parts.

The drawings in Table 2, are provided as additional samples of the types of parts that could be procured under this contract. For these parts the Offeror shall provide a description of their company attributes that would make them successful in producing those items, including any risk areas and how they would be mitigated. Offerors shall NOT provide a detailed production plan for these items, as that information will not be evaluated.

Table 1: Task 1 - Production Hardware Sample Drawing List

Program Name: CKU-5 Part Description Dwg # Quantity Wire, Lock 11735367 1000 Pin 11744252 500 Head 11744255 500 Spring, Tang 512-174-0077 500 Tube, Igniter 512-174-0084 500 Setscrew, Torx Plus Drive 6783961 1000 Pin, Locking 512-174-0087 500 Retainer, Hex Head 512-174-0129 500 Cup, Nozzle 5184317 1000 Cup 5184352 1000 Head Screw MS 35266-79 500 Wire(Copper) MS20995-C32 500 Spring Pin MS171522 500 Set Screw(Nozzle) MS51963-34 6000 Cartridge Case, CCU-22 11740606 500 Housing, Firing Pin, CCU-22 5184326 500 Shear Pin, CCU-22 5184324 1000 Firing Pin, CCU-22 512-174-0073 1000 Sleeve, CCU-22 11740614 500

Seal, CCU-22 11740615 1000 Program Name: Stand, Test Mk 14 Mod 2

Stand Mk 14 Mod 2 8718067 10

Table 1: Task 2- Research and Development Hardware Sample Drawing List

Program Name: 2773 Press Die Set

Press Die Set with Vacuum & Heat Collar D-2773 (Dash -

3) 10

Program Name: CAT Cartridge Part Description Dwg # Quantity

Cartridge Final Machining 8395101 15 Cartridge, Welded 8395102 15 Front Bulkhead Cartridge 8395103 15 AFT Bulkhead Cartridge 8395104 15 Shim, Cartridge 8395105 15

Table 1: Task 4- Electronics Assembly Sample Drawing List

Program Name: CAT Electronics Part Description Dwg # Quantity CCA: Fabricated and Fully Assembled 8395287 40 CCA: Fabricated and Fully Assembled 8395288 40 CCA: Fabricated and Fully Assembled 8395289 40 CCA: Fabricated and Fully Assembled 8395290 40 Program Name: ECAPS Receiver Circuit Board Assembly

RECEIVER BOARD ASSEMBLY

SK-IH-12019

SK-IH-12018 1191

RECEIVER BOARD ASSEMBLY

SK-IH-12058

SK-IH-12104

SK-IH-12110

TRAINER RECEIVER CIRCUIT

BOARDS

SK-IH-12019-2 140

Table 1: Task 5- Rapid Prototyping Sample Drawing List

Program Name: 12977199 Body

BODY, MACHINED 12977199 1

Program Name: Bracket bracket_thin.stl NA 100 Program Name: 6914676 LPRT Part Description Dwg # Quantity

TOOL, LODGED PROJECTILE

REMOVAL 6914676 100

Table 1: Task 6- Advanced Machining Sample Drawing List

Program Name: Biconic Liner Part Description Dwg # Quantity Biconic Liner SK-IHX-001 30 Program Name: IDIQ-MD-0619 Part Description Dwg # Quantity IDIQ-MD-0619 Liner 9387148 55 Program Name: SK-IH11-025 Copper Liner

Copper Liner SK-IH11-025 10

Table 2: Task 1 - Production Hardware Sample Drawing List Program Name: CAT Mechanical Part Description Dwg # Quantity Flow Diverter 8395073 20 Expansion Foam, Outer Shell 8395083 20 Booster Pad 8395084 20 Cover Plate, Outer Shell 8395086 20 Initiator Mount, Outer Shell 8395087 20 Outer Shell, Final Machining 8395089 20 Expansion Foam, Cartridge 8395097 20 Cover Plate, Cartridge 8395098 20 Initiator Mount, Cartridge 8395099 20 Cartridge, Final Machining 8395101 20 Cartridge Locking Ring 8395106 20

5.900 O.D. CCA Ring Floating 8418602 20

C and C Interface Ring 8418914 20 Booster Ring 8395076 20 Program Name: M25A1 Part Description Dwg # Quantity Pin, Firing 8593864 200 Trunnion 8594482 200 Head 10521455 200 Guide Retainer Assembly 10521616 200 Sleeve Assembly 10521617 200 Pin, Shear 10521618 200

Body Assembly 10534179 200 Key 10534180 200 Piston 10534181 200 Piston, Unlocking 10534182 200 Ring 10534183 200 Spring, Piston Locking 10534184 200 Program Name: Shutter Assembly Part Description Dwg # Quantity Nut 5917873 110 Shutter 5917852 110 Shaft 5917859 110 Contact Mount Lower 5917849 110 Contact Mount Upper 5917850 110 Pin 5917861 110 Flat Flange Eyelet 5917866 110 Washer 5917874 110 Shunt 2 5917857 110 Shunt 1 5917856 110 Contact Finger 4 5917865 110 Contact Finger 3 5917864 110 Contact Finger 2 5917863 110 Contact Finger 1 5917862 110

Table 2: Task 2 - Research and Development Hardware Sample Drawing List

Program Name: Base Jaw Frame Part Description Dwg # Quantity

BASE, JAW FRAME 8500420 5

Program Name: Body, Wrench Rocket Part Description Dwg # Quantity

BODY, WRENCH, ROCKET 8500427 5

Program Name: Firing Pin Protrusion Post Part Description Dwg # Quantity Firing Pin, Protrusion Post 2004-Y-131 20 Program Name: Leak Tester M16 Thruster Part Description Dwg # Quantity Base 2012-Y-090-1 5 Clamp Base 2012-Y-090-2 5 Clamp Top 2012-Y-090-3 5 Piston Catch 2012-Y-090-4 5 Pusher 2012-Y-090-5 5 Misc COTS Parts from BOM - 5

Table 2: Task 4 - Electronics Assembly Sample Drawing List

Program Name: 011-26433_12 - MK15

MOD1 BATTERY CHARGER

INTERFACE REV1B ASSEMBLY

011-26433_12 PCB Data Package (20 June 2018) 011-26433_12 PCB 130

Program Name: 7263336-1 - MK55

EFCT TEST

7263336-1 7163336-1 100 Program Name: DTE304510-

2:RTSP_ITA

Part Description Dwg # Quantity

CCA: FULLY POPULATED AND

ASSEMBLED DTE304510_2 50

For Task Three: Inspection. The Offeror will be provided with a sample drawing package for the task area. These sample drawings will be generally representative of the types of products that will need to be inspected under that task area. They will not be the exact items that need inspection under this contract, but rather a representative group. The Offeror will provide the technical details of the end to end inspection plan for the drawing packages in Table 3 below. Sample quantities for each part are provided in Table 3 as well. This plan should address elements such as the type of equipment used, calibration requirements of the equipment, as well as the plans for tagged marking and organizing the items. It should address the detailed quality inspection plans for the items and address any use of subcontractors if applicable. The inspection plan should include descriptions of inspection styles and type of equipment that will be used. The plan shall include the identification of the work performer for each step. In addition, the Offeror shall address the nature, difficulties, uncertainties, and risks associated with performing the kind of work that will be required with inspecting these parts.

Table 3: Task 3- Inspection Sample Drawing List

Program Name: M25A1

Pin, Firing 8593864 200 Trunnion 8594482 200 Head 10521455 200 Guide Retainer Assembly 10521616 200 Sleeve Assembly 10521617 200 Pin, Shear 10521618 200 Body Assembly 10534179 200 Key 10534180 200 Piston 10534181 200 Piston, Unlocking 10534182 200 Ring 10534183 200 Spring, Piston Locking 10534184 200

SUB-FACTOR 2: FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT

The Offeror shall provide a detailed description of its facilities and equipment as applicable to the task(s) on which they are proposing. If applicable, the Offeror shall address the use of subcontracted facilities and/or equipment.

The Offeror shall provide information as to the location of their facility(ies). If it is anticipated that more than one facility will be utilized (i.e. East and West Coasts), then it shall be so indicated. The Offeror shall include the square footage dedicated for the efforts and they shall attest to the adequacy of these facilities to provide supportive documentation and drawings in accordance with the tasks in the SOW. If any of the listed facilities is contingent on this contract award, the Offeror shall so indicate that. The Offeror shall demonstrate their plan to ensure the facility(ies) are available at time of award and note any risks or perceived risks associated with the facility.

The Offeror shall provide a description of equipment necessary to comply with the applicable tasks in the SOW. Offeror shall provide information as to the specific equipment located in the facility(ies) which they plan to utilize in support of the task on which they are proposing. If any of the listed equipment is contingent on contract award, the Offeror shall demonstrated their plan to ensure the equipment will be available at or within 1 month of the time of contract award.

SUB-FACTOR 3: QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) PLAN (exempted from the page limit requirement for Volume I)

The Offeror shall provide a copy of the company’s Quality Assurance Plan. The plan should be in sufficient detail s to allow the Government to ascertain if the contractor's quality system meets the requirements of ANSI/ASQCQ9000 through Q9004 (needs to be in compliance) industry standards, or an equivalent quality system. Identify the quality and process controls that will be used to ensure that the end item will be in compliance with the applicable drawing, specifications, SOW and contract requirements. In the case of hardware manufacturing, describe the type of documentation that will be used to identify, record and disposition non-conforming material, in-process rejects and characteristic discrepancies.

The Offeror shall describe procedures for identification, control, correction, and resolution of deficiencies identified in components, assemblies, and the end item for both in-house, and subcontractor facilities. The description shall address the Offeror’s approach to conducting failure analysis including methodologies for root cause analysis and corrective action.

SUB-FACTOR 4: MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULE

The Offeror shall provide an organizational chart(s) that identifies management and the lead technical personnel for each functional area (e.g., engineering, manufacturing, QA, purchasing) that support the applicable task area(s) on which they are proposing and their level of involvement. The Offeror shall describe personnel resources available for the applicable task area(s) and provide a list including experience and skill level of all fundamental personnel which include the technical, management, and floor personnel that will be assigned to support the task area(s). The technical and management personnel shall possess at a minimum, three years of experience in their areas of responsibility. Floor personnel at a minimum shall be knowledgeable in reading and interpreting specification drawings or blueprints; demonstrate certification or equivalency of a machine level 1 of the National Institute of Metalworking Skills (NIMS); and Electronics technicians engaged in fabrication shall demonstrate familiarity with IPC-A-610 or IPC J-STD-001 standards. The Offeror shall describe the proposed plan for liaison with the Government, including schedule control processes that maintain visibility of the work progress and reporting of problems and schedule slippages. The Offerors shall also address any risks or perceived risks associated with management and schedule.

The Offeror shall provide a production schedule for manufacturing the parts marked in Table 1, for each Task area they are proposing

on. The schedule shall include at a minimum the following information:

a. Programming or Facility set up;

b. Tooling and test equipment designs/procurement;

c. In house First Article Testing;

d. Material acquisition, including long lead items;

e. Fabrication;

f. Inspection and testing;

g. Preparation and delivery of hardware.

Volume II: PAST PERFORMANCE (Factor 2) (No Page Limit)

Past performance information shall be provided for the Prime and all Subcontractors in order to develop an Offeror’s past performance rating.

Past performance information is one indicator of an Offeror’s (to include prime and subcontractors) ability to perform the Contract successfully. In the evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance, the Government reserves the right to use relevant performance within the past five years. Relevant and timely past performance information in the Product Deficiency Reporting and Evaluation Program (PDREP), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) (http://www.ppirs.gov/) including the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) will be considered during the evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance.

Using the Past Performance Matrix (as listed in Section J), the Offeror and all subcontractors shall provide a separate list of relevant contracts that were performed within the last five years. The list for the Prime shall contain no more than seven relevant contracts.

In addition, each subcontractor shall complete a separate matrix and provide no more than seven relevant contracts. The identified relevant contracts shall focus on performance that is relevant to the current solicitation requirement (i.e., Task Area 1: Production hardware; Task Area 2: Research and Development Hardware; Task Area 3: Inspection; Task Area 4: Electronics Assembly; Task Area 5: Rapid Prototyping; and Task Area 6: Advanced Machining support) cited in the Scope of this solicitation. Relevancy includes similarity of item, complexity and dollar value. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance. If the Offeror has no relevant past performance within the last five years or cannot provide a list of relevant contracts, then the Offeror must provide an explanation.

Past Performance Questionnaires (as listed in Section J) only apply to relevant contracts for which performance information is not available through PPIRS. The Offeror and subcontractors shall submit the Past Performance Questionnaire to all of their references listed on the Past Performance Matrix that have NO PPIRS or PDREP contracts, and shall request the references to complete the Past Performance Questionnaire and return it directly to:

Contracts Department 4081 North Jackson Road Building 841, Suite 106, Tracy Scott, Code 022TS Indian Head, MD 20640-5115

Past Performance Questionnaires may also be emailed to tracy.r.scott@navy.mil, which is the preferred method of delivery. All questionnaires must be received by the closing date and time of the solicitation.

The Government will review past performance information provided by the Offeror and available to the Government to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to the performance confidence assessment.

In order to facilitate the evaluation of Past Performance the Offeror must complete the required information below:

(a) Pursuant to FAR 42.1502, this contract is subject to DoD's Contractor Performance Assessment System (CPARS). CPARS is an automated centralized information system accessible via the Internet that maintains reports of contractor performance for each contract. CPARS is located at https://www.cpars.gov. Further information on CPARS is available at that web-site.

(b) Under CPARS, the Government will conduct annual evaluations of the contractor's performance. The contractor has fourteen (14) days after the Government's evaluation is completed to comment on the evaluation. Day 15 after the evaluation sent to the contractor the evaluation is available in PPIRS with or without the contractor comments.

The evaluation is marked “Pending”. Contractor may send comments on days 15-60 if not previously provided. If contractor sends comments, PPIRS is updated to reflect contractor comments and “Pending” marking removed. Day 61 evaluation sent to Assessing Official (AO) and contractor may no longer send comments. The opportunity to review and comment is limited to this time period and will not be extended. Failure to review the report at this time will not prevent the Government from using the report.

https://www.cpars.gov/

(c) The contractor may request a meeting to discuss the CPAR. The meeting is to be requested via e-mail to the CPARS Program Manager no later than seven days following receipt of the CPAR. A meeting will then be held during the contractor’s 60-day review period.

(d) The CPARS system requires the Government to assign the contractor a UserID and password in order to view and comment on the evaluation. Provide the name(s) of at least one individual (not more than two) that will be assigned as your Defense Contractor Representative for CPARS.

Name Phone E-mail Address (optional)

(e) Any changes in designated contractor personnel shall be the sole responsibility of the contractor to notify the contract specialist, AO and the CPARS Focal Point when changes occur.

Volume III - PRICE (Factor 3) (No Page Limit)

REMINDER: It is imperative that Offerors label all cost or price files with Volume III, company name and a unique identifying name which is reflective of the contents of the file.

This volume is the only volume that shall contain cost or price information. There is no limitation on the number of pages or print size for the cost proposal. All Attachments submitted under Volume III (Factor 3) shall be clearly identified.

The Price Volume shall include the completed RFP document. The Government will be establishing a Not To Exceed ceiling in Section B for each task area. The sample drawings identified in Tables 1-3 will be generally representative of the types of products that will be procured under that task area. They will not be the exact items procured under this contract. Offerors will provide a cost estimate in Attachment X for each of the drawings provided in the sample drawing package, listed in Tables 1 and 3, for each task area they are proposing on. The cost estimate will be for a lot of parts with the quantity specified in the tables. NO COSTING

INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR TABLE 2.

The Price Volume shall include any available pricing information to facilitate the price analysis that will be performed in evaluating the proposal (i.e., price breakdown, catalog pricing, past pricing history, etc.).

The price information shall include data regarding the general financial condition of the Offeror and specific plans for financing the proposed contract. The Government has no plans to provide any financial assistance.

The Price Volume shall also include all executed representation certifications.

Volume IV - SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (Factor 4) (No page limit) (For Other Than Small Businesses Only) Required for all Task Areas except Task Area 2:

There is a mandatory subcontracting goal of 5% for this requirement.

The Offeror shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR clause 52.219-9. This volume applies to other than small businesses only. The plan will be evaluated as either acceptable or unacceptable and will also be evaluated as part of the FAR Part 9.1 Responsibility Determination. The Government will only evaluate the plan submitted by the apparently successful Offeror. The evaluation will be performed by the Small Business Specialist and the Contract Specialist. The Government reserves the right pursuant to FAR 9.105-1(c)(3) and 19.705-3 to confer with the Offeror on elements of the Small Business Subcontracting Plan in order to determine Responsibility prior to award. These conversations will not constitute discussions as defined in FAR 15.306(c).

The Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be provided concurrent with submission of the Offeror’s proposal and will be incorporated into the task order. The individual plan shall contain the following:

A. Total Proposed Value of Offer B. Total Amount to be Subcontracted

C. Breakdown by Business Type ($ and %) D. Large Business/other than Small Business E. Small Business

• Small Disadvantaged Business

• HUBZone Small Business

• Women-Owned Small Business

• Veteran-Owned Small Business

• Service-Disabled Small Business

F. Major types of services/items to be subcontracted to small business and which type of small business.

If the Offeror cannot meet the goals, it shall provide an explanation as to why those goals cannot be met. The individual subcontracting plan will be evaluated as part of the FAR 9.1 Responsibility Determination.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SECTION M

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

General:

1. It is the intention of the Navy to award up to three (3) contracts for each specific task area of the Statement of Work (SOW) (Task Areas 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6) and up to five (5) contracts for Task Area 2 as a result of this Request for Proposal. Awards shall be for one (1) year base period and four (4) one-year option periods to assist the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division (NSWC IHEODTD) in support of a wide variety of military projects that require build-to-print fabrication of products via processes utilized by machine shops.

2. Awards will be made to the responsible Offerors whose proposals are the most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in this Section M. Offerors are required to follow specific instructions in submitting their proposal. Each Offeror’s submission will be screened upon receipt by the Contracting Officer or a designee of the Contracting Officer to ensure compliance with the RFP instructions and requirements. Elimination of an Offeror due to failure to comply with the submission requirements of the RFP is at the sole discretion of the Contracting Officer.

Task two of the applicable SOW is set-aside for small business. Only small business Offerors will be considered for this task. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not applicable to the tasks being set-aside for small businesses.

3. As a result of this solicitation, the Government intends to award multiple Contracts based on initial offers and without holding discussions, but reserves the right to hold discussions at the Government’s discretion; therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, in accordance with FAR 15.306 -- Exchanges With Offerors After Receipt of Proposals, may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. IAW FAR: “Clarifications are limited exchanges, between the Government and Offerors. If award will be made without conducting discussions, Offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of proposals (e.g., the relevance of an Offeror’s past performance information and adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond) or to resolve minor or clerical errors.” After evaluating all proposals, the Contracting Officer may determine that the number of most highly rated proposals that might otherwise be included in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals, pursuant to FAR 52.215-1(f) (4).

4. Under task #2 for Small Business Offerors: The Government will review the Offeror’s proposal to determine whether at least 50% of the cost of the contract performance incurred for personnel will be expended for employees of the Offeror, in accordance with FAR 52.219-14. Any proposal that does not on its face demonstrate that the Offeror’s personnel will be performing at least 50% of the contract work will be deemed to be technically unacceptable and therefore ineligible for award. The Government will not evaluate any proposal that it deems to be technically unacceptable for failure to comply with FAR 52.219-14.

5. For Other Than Small Business Offerors: There is a Small Business Subcontracting requirement of five percent (5%) of the overall total dollar amount of the cost/price proposal, at the first tier, as described herein. Offerors who are other than Small Businesses are required to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, as described in Section L that addresses this requirement. Offers from Small Business concerns must demonstrate that no single subcontractor will perform more than the Small Business Prime. Unlike small business set-asides task #2 requires the small business prime to perform at least 50% of the proposed effort, this solicitation is not reserved for small business and therefore the 50% rule does not apply, however no subcontractor can perform a greater amount of the effort than the prime.

6. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers. All non-cost factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price in importance; however, price becomes more of a deciding factor of importance when Offerors receive similar ratings for the other factors. Factors 1, 2, and 3 will be used for a tradeoff process.

Once all evaluations are complete and tabulated in accordance with the Source Selection Plan, the Government will evaluate the Offerors by comparing the tabulated ratings to the evaluated Price. Through this comparison, the Government will determine the Offerors whose proposals for the applicable SOW task areas on which they proposed represent the Best Value to the Government. After the Government makes contractual awards, individual delivery or task orders will, pursuant to FAR 15.101-2, be competed and awarded based on the Low Priced/Technically Acceptable approach, and pursuant to FAR 15.101-1.

Although it is the Government’s intent to compete all task and delivery orders (pursuant to FAR 16.505) among the Contractors awarded a contract, the Contracting Officer may determine that a sole source is appropriate in the following instances:

(1) The agency’s need for such services is of such urgency that providing a competitive opportunity would result in unacceptable delays;

(2) Only one Contractor is capable of providing such services or materials necessary at the level of quality required because the services ordered are unique or highly specialized;

(3) The order should be issued on a sole source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency as a logical follow on to a order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE EVALUATION FACTORS: The Government will consider the following factors when deciding which of the Offerors who comply with the instructions is the Best Value.

Volume I - Factor 1: Technical

Sub-Factor 1: Technical Approach/Production Plan Sub-Factor 2: Facilities and Equipment Sub-Factor 3: Quality Assurance (QA) Plan Sub-Factor 4: Management and Schedule

Volume II - Factor 2: Past Performance Volume III - Factor 3: Price

Volume IV – Factor 4: Small Business Subcontracting Plan (For Other Than Small Businesses Only).

This volume applies to other than small businesses only. The plan will be evaluated as either acceptable or unacceptable and will also be evaluated as part of the FAR Part 9.1 Responsibility Determination. The Government will only evaluate the plan submitted by the apparently successful Offeror. The evaluation will be performed by the Small Business Specialist and the Contract Specialist. The Government reserves the right pursuant to FAR 9.105(c)(3) and 19.705-3 to confer with the Offeror on elements of the Small Business Subcontracting Plan in order to determine Responsibility prior to award. These conversations will not constitute discussions as defined in FAR 15.306(c).

All non-priced factors, when combined, are approximately equal to Price in importance.

Technical Ratings:

Combined Technical/Risk Ratings:

RATING DESCRIPTION

Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Definitions Strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks are defined as follows:

Strength, an aspect of an offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness, a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001

Significant Weakness, is a flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency, a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See

FAR 15.001.

Risks, as it pertains to source selection, is…