LCS SEC EAST II RFP Pre-Proposal Inquiry Responses 1.pdf
PDF 128 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00024-20-R-4408
About this file
This document contains pre-proposal questions and responses related to solicitation N00024-20-R-4408, which seeks multiple award contracts for Littoral Combat Ships sustainment execution on the East Coast. The Naval Sea Systems Command will award contracts by March 2021 to provide drydocking selected restricted availabilities, selected restricted availabilities, continuous maintenance availabilities, and unscheduled and emergent maintenance within the continental U.S. and overseas. The scope includes requirements for MAC I for availabilities above $15M, MAC II for availabilities between $5M-$15M, and MAC III which is set aside for small businesses and covers preventative maintenance, facility maintenance, and corrosion control within the continental U.S. The contracts have five one-year ordering periods. Offerors must request access to restricted technical attachments and confirm their status in the System for Award Management by September 8, 2020.
View the file
Other files
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Erica Fetter
Brian Romano
Question Date Question
Area Para. # Contractor Question Government Response
1 4-Sep-20 Section C
1.2.1.1
Given that the docking locations within the restricted area of Mayport are limited, can the restrictions for docking availabilities be removed. There are numerous docks outside of the Mayport area capable of docking LCS class vessels, and restricting the vessels to one port does not allow open competition or the best utilization of dry docks for NAVSEA and the Navy.
No. Section 1.2.1.1 adheres to the current Homeport policy
2 4-Sep-20 Section J
Attachment S-3
Please advise if the Offeror can revise the format for Parts I, II, and III in order to adequately address all parts while still meeting the three (3) page requirements.
No revision to the format.
3 4-Sep-20 Section J
Attachment S-3 Please confirm that the current 10pt font size can be used for the entire document.
No. Section L PROPOSAL OVERVIEW Para (4) To ensure that each Offerors’ proposal is uniformly formatted, the following rules apply for the preparation of proposals. The Proposals must be sized properly so when printed out onto 8-1/2" x 11" paper except the Price Proposals.
The proposals must be prepared using the Times New Roman typeface at a font size no smaller than 12-points. Margins shall be a minimum of one-inch top, bottom and both sides. Applies to
Attachment S-3
4 4-Sep-20 Section L
Para 5
Will government permit a Prime Offeror to satisfy the requirement for MSRA through a a first-tier subcontractor?
Section L, Item (5) states, “ To be eligible for a MAC I or MAC II and submit proposals at the IDIQ MAC Delivery Order level, the prospective MAC I or
II contractor must possess a Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA) as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of
Vessels (MARAV). However, prospective MAC I and II contractors can submit Volume V MSRA Equivalency (Applicable to Non-MSRA Holders Only) as a part of their proposal and receive a contract level award.”
No. The Prime Contractor MUST satisfy the requirement for MSRA
5 4-Sep-20 Section L
Para 5
If teaming partner possesses a MSRA, is a MSRA Equivalency inspection required?
MSRA Equivalency Inspections and Other Pre-award Surveys: The requirements are laid out in Attachment J-19. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the Contracting Officer no later than 1 week after the solicitation is posted on
FBO to schedule an on-site inspection. The on-site inspection will supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal
Yes, the Prime Contractor must satisfy the requirement for MSRA
6 7-Sep-20 Section J
Attachment J-12B
Will Government please verify and confirm that provided REV G is the most current revision for the paint schedule drawing. Please clarify if REV G is the revision to use for the Solicitation N00024-20-R-4408.
Confirmed, Rev G of Attachment J-12B is the most current
7 9-Sep-20 Section J
Attachment J-7
1.3.1.17 Please clarify if SKED is the preferred software.
Yes, SKED is the authoritative database for all PMS. Attachment J-7 is intended to be uploaded into SKED.
8 9-Sep-20 Section J
Attachment J-7
1.3.1.17 Can the Government please advise if a transition from SKED to Maximo is planned?
SKED is the Navy's program of record for maintenance planning. Currently, there are no plans to transition from SKED to MAXIMO.
erica.fetter@navy.mil brian.romano2@navy.mil
LCS SEC EAST II N00024-20-R-4408
NAVSEA POC:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .