USS_STETHEM_PPI_QA3.pdf

Solicitation #: N00024‐19‐R‐4455 Phone TPPC USS STETHEM ‐ TPPC‐DDG63‐SWRMC19‐CN01 Billy Castleberry, Contract Specialist, billy.castleberry@navy.mil 202‐781‐1248

Sheila Utz, Contracting Officer, sheila.utz1@navy.mil 202‐781‐2486

Q # Work Item No. Document Number/Title Document Type Question Government Response 44 N/A N/A Amendment 0001 Section J The purpose of this amendment is to:

Section B: Update Note F Section C: Revise Statement of Work (SOW) paragraphs 1.8 and 1.11 Section J: Update attachments J-1, J-2, J-4, J-11, J-12, and J-14 Section L: Update Contract Specialist Point of Contact.

Will th t id th d t d J d t ?

Documents provided.

45 N/A SOLICITATION NO. N00024-19-R-4455 The current proposal due date of 22 April 2019 has resulted in a very compressed proposal development timeline when coupled with other waterfront solicitation's competing interests. In addition to this solicitation, bidders have received and are planning the USS Lake Champlain (CG-57) DSRA and the USS Cape St. George (CG-71) and Chosin (CG-65) MODPRD’s. This has saturated the waterfront with nearly 2,000 work items, and having three proposals for five ships due in quick succession is negatively affecting the responsiveness of the subcontractor and material vendor community who are already notifying us of delays in pricing, and several cases, No Bidding key elements of work packages.

The Contractor expects that we will continue to receive Amendments, Errata, and possible Addendums on all RFPs, further stressing the schedule for this proposal.

Question:

In order to depressurize the planning schedule and afford all contractors ample time to prepare/submit accurate proposals, and to allow for adequate time for subcontractor/vendor solicitations/evaluations/selections, request that the proposal due date be extended from 22 April 2019 at 10:00 pm, local time, Washington DC to 06 May 2019 at 10:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. A 14-day proposal due date extension, or roughly ~11 additional planning days.

Due to critical ship schedule, the Navy does not intend to extend the proposal due date.

46 651-90-001 ShipAlt DDG51-71605, DDG Modifications to Galley;

accomplish

Attachment J-11 Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG63-SWRMC19-CN01 Paragraph 3.1 states, "Accomplish the requirements of 009-90 of 2.1."

Paragraph 3.1.1 states, "Provide the services of a qualified technical representative to provide on-site technical assistance and guidance for preliminary start up tests and testing of newly installed galley equipment"

Paragraph 3.3 states, "Accomplish the requirements of 2.2 through 2.23 and each applicable portion of

2.24 and 2.25, using material provided in 5.3.1 and guidance provided in 2.26 through 2.37".

*Contractor notes that various equipment is identified across reference 2.2 through 2.25 and are for a wide range of different Manufactures indicating that there may be more than One OEM required to accomplish the tasked identified in Paragraph 3.1 through 3.1.1.

*Contractor notes there isn't a name or point of contact information within the work item.

Will the Government issue an errata for the work item and provide the names of the OEM's including

Bidders are given the option to choose a qualified technical representative provided that the requirements of 009-90 are met.

Pre‐Proposal Information (PPI) Question and Government Responses #3

NAVSEA POC

Name/Title/Email

To request references, drawings, RLARs, and Erratas being provided under this Solicitation Question & Answer Set, please contact Billy Castleberry, billy.castleberry@navy.mil, and Sheila Utz, sheila.utz1@navy.mil.

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

To request references, drawings, RLARs, and Erratas being provided under this Solicitation Question & Answer Set, please contact Billy Castleberry, billy.castleberry@navy.mil, and Sheila Utz, sheila.utz1@navy.mil.

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

47 712-11-001 5 Inch 54 Caliber Gun Mount; repair Attachment J-11 Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG63-SWRMC19-CN01 Paragraph 3.1 states "Accomplish the requirements of 009-90 of 2.1 for the services of a qualified technical representative to provide on-site technical assistance, guidance, oversight, drawings and prints to support with maintenance and repairs for the equipment listed in 1.3 and located in 1.2".

*Contractor note upon soliciting OEM listed in 4.1 that the following issues exist with the specification as written,

1) References outlined in 2 are outdated; can current references be changed out to current references listed below?

(a) Reference 2.2 SW323-CS-MMO-010 Rev 4, Gun Mount, 5-Inch 54-Caliber, Mk 45 Mod 1 with Control System, Mk 31 Mod 5 should read SW323-F2-MMO-130, Gun Mount, 5-Inch, 54-Caliber, Mk45

MOD 2

(b) Reference 2.3 SW323-CS-MMO-140 Rev 4, Gun Mount, 5-Inch 54-Caliber, Mk 45 Mod 1 with Control System, Mk 31 Mod 5 is No longer applicable.

2) Material listed in paragraph 3.2 (spacer, sleeve) is an outdated material and part number.

(a) Material was changed to S/S so can OEM procure current material as outlined in recommended revised reference above for 2.2?

3) Paragraph 3.3 states, "Accomplish an operational test of the equipment listed in 1.3 and located in 1.2, using 2.5 for guidance. Allowable defects: None".

(a) List an entire gun testing requirement but does not cover proper testing of the heater elements and Reference 2.5 SW323-DD-MMD-01G/MK 45 MOD 1 Rev G, 5-Inch 54-Caliber Gun Mount Mark 45 Mod 1 Shipboard Installation Test Instructions should not be used for this test, recommend to use SW323-DB- TRS-260 Volume 2 4-3.11 Thru 4-3.12 so can the OEM quote the recommended reference change?

Work item paragraphs 2 (References), 3 (Requirements), and 5 (GFM) are updated.

48 N/A RFP Page 17 of 23 SOLICITATION NO. N00024-19-R-4455 Solicitation states, "Execution Scenario 2: Both the USS DECATUR (DDG 73) and USS STETHEM (DDG 63) availabilities together, utilizing concurrent “double” docking, if supported by the offerors’ available pier & dock facilities..."

*Contractor assumes that under Scenario 2, that a single Berthing Barge will be utilized to accommodate both crews for the duration of the avails.

Question:

Can the Customer confirm that a single Berthing Barge of adequate size and configuration to accommodate both vessels Ships Force duty sections will be provided for execution of Scenario 2?

The Government will provide the berthing barges.

49 495-90-001 (E2) ShipAlt DDG51-86574K, USW-DSS AN/UYQ-100(V)3 Infrastructure Hardware;

accomplish

Errata 2 revised reference 2.10 and identified “4720-DDG63-FY19 as Ship Alteration Material Summary (4720/3)”.

*Contractor notes that document identified as 4720-DDG63-FY19-A11 states, "NO DRAWINGS FOUND FOR DDG 63 ALT SA 86574 00 Abel B. Ortiz (202) 781-0530".

Can the Customer provide an accurate 4720/3 document that includes the "Kitted Material for ShipAlt 86574K" i d t d b 5 3?

Use latest revision of the 4720/3 A-7 dated 2/19/2019.

50 439-90-002 ShipAlt DDG51-77333K AWS CKT 3TV COTS Upgrade;

accomplish

Attachment J-11 Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG63-SWRMC19-CN01 Paragraph 3.1.1 states, "Accomplish the requirements of 009-78 of 2.1 for the removal of existing PCMS in way of each repair".

*Contractor notes that reference 2.2, drawing 184-8696450 Rev A, ShipAlt DDG-51-77333 Ckt 3tv Cots Upgrade Strlprovided Fdn Mod & MI, sheet 2, PCMS NOTES P1-P5 indicates that there is PCMS material that requires removal however does not provide the quantities to be removed.

Paragraph 3.4 states, "Accomplish the requirements of 009-78 of 2.1 for the installation of new PCMS in way of each removal in 3.1.1".

*Contractor notes that reference 2.18, 4720-DDG63-FY19, Ship Alteration Material Summary (4720/3) that there is no GFM kitted PCMS material listed within this document.

Paragraph 3.4.1 states, "Accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 5, Line 22, for each surface receiving PCMS material".

*Contractor notes that reference 2.7, LAR 77333/DDG63/1168745, PCMS Installation Instructions Not Include on SA Drawings implies however does not definitively state that there is no NSI 009-78 PCMS requirements.

Can the Customer provide clarification as to the disparities between prargraphs 3.1.1, 3.4 and 3.4.1 of

The Government finds no disperaties in the work item. In this case PCMS is to be treated as interference (SI 009-23 CAT I). All CAT II SIs are invoked to ensure that the work item is properly completeted in its entirety; including proper removal, handling and installation of PCMS.

Required replacement PCMS that was removed shall be provided by the government as GFM.

To request references, drawings, RLARs, and Erratas being provided under this Solicitation Question & Answer Set, please contact Billy Castleberry, billy.castleberry@navy.mil, and Sheila Utz, sheila.utz1@navy.mil.

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

51 992-11-015 Small Boat Storage and Repair Facility; provide Attachment J-11 Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG63-SWRMC19-CN01 Paragraph 3.1 states, "Provide a covered work area with a minimum of 900 square feet of space and fitted with 2 each boat cradles sufficient to support each RHIB listed in 1.3".

*Contractor has reviewed the RFP, specification, and all identified references noting that, the intent of this items work scope appears to be for out of home port (San Diego) bidders, noting in the port of San Diego all small boat repairs are accomplished at Naval Amphibious Base Coronado.

Is this work item to be priced only by OUT of homeport (San Diego) bidders and is it be accomplished only if the contract is awarded outside of San Diego?

This work item applies to all perspective bidders.