USS_DECATUR_PPI_QA3.pdf

Solicitation #: N00024‐19‐R‐4455 Phone TPPC USS DECATUR ‐ TPPC‐DDG73‐SWRMC19‐CN01 Billy Castleberry, Contract Specialist, billy.castleberry@navy.mil 202‐781‐1248

Sheila Utz, Contracting Officer, sheila.utz1@navy.mil 202‐781‐2486

Q # Work Item No. Document Number/Title Document

Type Question Government Response 45 631-11-008 Machinery Space Bilge; repair and preserve Paragraph 3.2 states "Remove all existing insulation, lagging and sound dampening tiles located in

1.2.1.1. Remove all sound dampening tile studs, grinding flush with bilge surface".

Paragraph 3.13 states "Install new insulation, lagging and sound dampening tile on each surface where removed in 3.2, using 2.7 and 2.8 for guidance. Glue down each sound dampening tile".

*Contractor notes that there is no reference drawing for sound dampening tiles provided for WI 631-11- 008.

Can the customer provide the the applacable sound dampening tile Schedule / Drawing required to accomplish requirements of this specifcation?

Review refer to the reference provided in paragraph 2.7; 635-6221263 Rev T, Thrm & Acst Insul Arr Below 01 Level Fr 126-300 Zone 2.

46 N/A N/A The purpose of this amendment is to:

Section B: Update Note F Section C: Revise Statement of Work (SOW) paragraphs 1.8 and 1.11 Section J: Update attachments J-1, J-2, J-4, J-11, J-12, and J-14 Section L: Update Contract Specialist Point of Contact.

Will the government provide the updated J documents?

Documents provided by email in response to this request.

Pre‐Proposal Information (PPI) Question and Government Responses #3

NAVSEA POC

Name/Title/Email

To request references, drawings, RLARs, and Erratas being provided under this Solicitation Question & Answer Set, please contact Billy Castleberry, billy.castleberry@navy.mil, and Sheila Utz, sheila.utz1@navy.mil.

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

To request references, drawings, RLARs, and Erratas being provided under this Solicitation Question & Answer Set, please contact Billy Castleberry, billy.castleberry@navy.mil, and Sheila Utz, sheila.utz1@navy.mil.

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

47 N/A The current proposal due date of 22 April 2019 has resulted in a very compressed proposal development timeline when coupled with other waterfront solicitation's competing interests. In addition to this solicitation, bidders have received and are planning the USS Lake Champlain (CG-57) DSRA and the USS Cape St. George (CG-71) and Chosin (CG-65) MODPRD’s. This has saturated the waterfront with nearly 2,000 work items, and having three proposals for five ships due in quick succession is negatively affecting the responsiveness of the subcontractor and material vendor community who are already notifying us of delays in pricing, and several cases, No Bidding key elements of work packages.

The Contractor expects that we will continue to receive Amendments, Errata, and possible Addendums on all RFPs, further stressing the schedule for this proposal.

Question:

In order to depressurize the planning schedule and afford all contractors ample time to prepare/submit accurate proposals, and to allow for adequate time for subcontractor/vendor solicitations/evaluations/selections, request that the proposal due date be extended from 22 April 2019 at 10:00 pm, local time, Washington DC to 06 May 2019 at 10:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. A 14-day proposal due date extension, or roughly ~11 additional planning days.

Due to critical ship scheudle, the Navy does not intend to extend the proposal due date.

48 N/A RFP Page 17 of 23 Solicitation states, "Execution Scenario 2: Both the USS DECATUR (DDG 73) and USS STETHEM (DDG 63) availabilities together, utilizing concurrent “double” docking, if supported by the offerors’ available pier & dock facilities..."

*Contractor assumes that under Scenario 2, that a single Berthing Barge will be utilized to accommodate both crews for the duration of the avails.

Question:

Can the Customer confirm that a single Berthing Barge of adequate size and configuration to accommodate both vessels Ships Force duty sections will be provided for execution of Scenario 2?

A single barge will not be big enough for both crews. The local barge code is tracking for both ships to have a barge to themselves if the avails remain in homeport.