USS_DECATUR_PPI_QA1.pdf

Solicitation #:N00024-19-R-4455 Phone

TPPC USS DECATUR - TPPC-DDG73-SWRMC19-CN01 Billy Castleberry, Contract Specialist, billy.castleberry@navy.mil 202-781-1248

Sheila Utz, Contracting Officer, sheila.utz1@navy.mil 202-781-2486

Q #

Work

Item Document Number/Title Document Type Question Government Response Solicitation ∆ 1 N/A RFP Pg. 128 of 198 SOLICITATION NO.

N00024-19-R-4455

On page 128 of the RFP the Contractor notes the Governments inclusion of, HQ C-2-0051 SPECIFICATIONS AND

STANDARDS (NAVSEA) (AUG 1994):

(a) Definitions.

(i) A "zero-tier reference" is a specification, standard, or drawing that is cited in the contract (including its attachments).

(ii) A "first-tier reference" is either: (1) a specification, standard, or drawing cited in a zero-tier reference, or (2) a specification cited in a first-tier drawing.

(b) Requirements.

All zero-tier and first-tier references, as defined above, are mandatory for use. All lower tier references shall be used for guidance only.

It is the Contractor's understanding that all required references listed in paragraph 2 of a zero-tier specification (work item) are “first-tier” references. However, when a zero-tier specification directs to use a first-tier reference as “guidance”, bidders should not estimate the reference and only use it to aid in the development of an estimate of references that are to be accomplished.

Please concur or advise on this interpretation.

Bidders are to estimate all requirements to complete the work item. If the second tier reference has work that needs to be estimated to accomplish all aspects of the basic work tem, then they must be estimated and completed.

Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Question and Government Responses #1

NAVSEA POC

Name/Title/Email

To request references, drawings, RLARs, and Erratas being provided under this Solicitation Question & Answer Set, please contact Billy Castleberry at billy.castleberry@navy.mil and Sheila Utz, sheila.utz1@navy.mil.

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors.

The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

2 DDG

73 &

DDG

63, 997-11-

Drydocking and Undocking; accomplish Attachment J-1

Specification Package

No. TPPC-DDG73-

SWRMC19-CN01 and

Attachment J-11

Specification Package

No. TPPC-DDG63-

SWRMC19-CN01

Work Item 997-11-001, Drydocking and Undocking; accomplish

DDG-63 (USS STETHEM), Paragraph 3.1.7 states, "Drydocking period shall not exceed 180 days unless directed otherwise by the SUPERVISOR at the Docking Conference".

DDG-73 (USS DECATUR), Paragraph 3.1.7 states, "Drydocking period shall not exceed 280 days unless directed otherwise by the SUPERVISOR at the Docking Conference".

Contractor notes that the Maximum docking durations for USS STETHEM and USS DECATUR are 180 days and 280 days respectively.

In accordance with RFP Execution Scenario 2 (USS STETHEM and USS DECATUR utilizing concurrent “double” docking), bidder requests that the Maximum docking durations for both USS STETHEM and USS DECATUR be changed to “Drydocking period shall not exceed 280 days” (Same Duration). RFP Execution Scenario 2 requires the

Docking and Undocking dates to be the same for both USS STETHEM and USS DECATUR.

In addition, the RFP provides the following Availability Start Dates:

USS STETHEM: 16 September 2019

USS DECATUR: 03 September 2019

In accordance with RFP Execution Scenario 2 (USS STETHEM and USS DECATUR utilizing concurrent “double” docking), bidder requests that the USS STETHEM and USS DECATUR Availability start dates be changed to 03

September 2019 (Same Date). RFP Execution Scenario 2 requires the Availability start dates to be the same to facilitate

Docking both vessels at the same time.

The Navy’s responses to these bidder’s questions are required as soon as possible to facilitate required proposal preparation/estimating efforts, subcontractor/vendor solicitations and facility planning efforts.

Please advise soonest!

DECATUR docking duration is not correct and should not exceed 180 days. WI is revised. 280 days does not support the availabity schedule.

Due to ship schedules, the start of availabity dates cannot be adjusted.

Errata 5

3 N/A RFP Page 109 of 198, Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

SOLICITATION NO.

N00024-19-R-4455

Paragraph 1.1 states, "Category I NAVSEA FY19 Standard Items through CHG 3 identified under Attachments J-1 and J-

11 are applicable to all items without further reference. Category II NAVSEA FY19 Standard Items through CHG 2 are applicable when invoked and/or referenced in individual work items specified in Attachments J-1 and J-11".

Contractor notes that utilizing NAVSEA FY19 Standard Items CHG 3 for Category and envoking NAVSEA FY19

Standard Items CHG 2 for Category II requirements appears to conflict with the with the typical application of NAVSEA

FY19 Standard Items

Contractor believes that the Category II NAVSEA FY19 Standard Items through CHG 2 is a typo and should state CHG

3.

Please provide the correct NAVSEA FY19 Standard Items Change applicable for this proposal?

All references to standard items need to be FY 19 Change 3.

4 426-80-

76853-DDG67-1118794 RLAR Document not provided on CD, please provide Document is now provided. Work item reference will corrected with Errata 6. Amendment

5 442-11-

SE313-T1-MMA-020 TECHNICAL MANUAL Document not provided on CD, please provide Document is now provided. Amendment

6 472-90-

7C521C102 Rev0/2 TEST PROCEDURE Document not provided on CD, please provide Document is now provided. Amendment

7 512-80-

64232-DDG73-1123582 LAR Document not provided on CD, please provide Reference was corrected and provided witrh Errata 2, Errata 2

8 512-80-

64232-DDG73-1123582 LAR Document not provided on CD, please provide Reference was deleted witrh Errata 2 Errata 2

9 512-90-

51221-3-064 Rev A/29 TEST PROCEDURE Document not provided on CD, please provide Document is now provided. Amendment

10 643-90-

51221-3-108 Rev A/8 TEST PROCEDURE Document not provided on CD, please provide Document is now provided. Amendment

11 651-90-

51221-3-029 Rev B/28 TEST PROCEDURE Document not provided on CD, please provide Document is now provided. Amendment

12 110-11-

Paragraph 3.5 states; "Accomplish the requirements of 009-11 of 2.1, for the insulation removed in 3.2, using 2.3 for guidance."

Contractor Question; There is no insulation being removed under paragraph 3.2, however there is in paragraph 3.1. Is the intent of paragraph 3.5 meant to reference the insulation being removed under Paragraph 3.1?

Please concur or advise.

3.2 referenced in 3.5 should be 3.1. WI corrected. Errata 5

13 980-90-

AN/STC-2 Integrated Voice Communication System (IVCS);

groom

Attachment J-1

Specification Package

No. TPPC-DDG73-

SWRMC19-CN01

Paragraph 3.6 states: Provide services for removal and installation of stuffing tubes, jack box studs and 4 square feet of

PCMS tile in location listed in 1.3.1 through 1.3.19.

*Contractor notes there are no references provided or quaunity that identifys how many Stuffing tubes and Studs to be removed or install.

Can the Customer provide a quantity of stuffing tubes and studs to be removed and installed?

Requirement is to provide services for removal and installation of 21 Stuffing

Tubes and 4 Studs. WI is corrected.

Errata 5

14 N/A Labor&Material Rates Attachment J-4 DDG73

DECATUR

Pricing_Spreadsheet &

Attachment J-14

DDG63 STETHEM

Pricing_Spreadsheet

Contractor notes that both the J-4 & J-14 Pricing Spreadsheets Tab labeled “Labor&Material Rates” the total line for

Column I, totaling # of Small Dollar Value Changes (SDVC) reads N/A and the sum of Price/Changes and Total SDVC

Price does not total and creating an erroneous, understated “New Work Evaluated Price” by not including the SDVC dollars.

Can the Customer provide revised J-4 DDG73 DECATUR & J-14 DDG63 STETHEM Pricing_Spreadsheets that correct the disparities identified above?

J-4 and J-14 Clarifications:

New Work is identified in row 34 (A34-L34). Cell I34 pertains to New Work and is not a total sum for SDVG. Cell L-34 is the total proposed price for new work only. SDVG is not applicale to new work and is not included in the total.

Cell D37, Proposed Labor and Material Burden Rate Price, sums cells L8-L34 and is the total price for Growth and New Work. This value carries forward to the Total Proposed_Evaluated Price tab.

Cell A39-D43 are for SEA 02 use only and are not used in the total proposed price for growth and new work.

However, the term SDVC is incorrect and is updated to reflect SDVG (Small

Dollar Value Growth)

Amendment

15 150-11-

Increase Deck Plate Thickness Modifications; accomplish Attachment J-11

Specification Package

No. TPPC-DDG63-

SWRMC19-CN01

Paragraph 1.3, identifies 90/10 CuNi deck drains.

Contractor typically upgrades material to 70/30 CuNi deck drains due to fact they are more readily available and the

90/10 cuni deck drains have a longer lead time and generally made on demand.

Can the Customer confirm that the 70/30 CuNi deck drains is an exceptable upgrade?

Concur 73/30 CuNi shouild be used. Corrected NSN 4510-01-573-7971. Errata 5

16 Variou s

RFP Section C - Descriptions and Specifications page 111 of

SOLICITATION NO.

N00024-19-R-4455

Paragraph 1 .8.1 states, "Government Furnished Material (GFM) cited in the solicitation will be available for pick up beginning at A-30 and throughout the avail. The contractor is to coordinate the pick-up of GFM with the Project Manager.

Contractor shall develop pick up schedule accordingly.

Transportations costs shall be included in the contract. Government property permanently removed from a vessel that requires a Property Administrator's disposition instructions shallbe properly prepared for shipment and be delivered as directed by the Property Administrator.

GFM will be listed in paragraph 5 of the Work Item(s)".

Question 1): Will all of the GFM be available for pick-up at A-30?

Question 2): For planning and scheduling will the Governemnt provide an address including city and state along with a point of contact with phone number?

Not all GFM will be available at A-30. For out of homeport offerors, KTR material will be delivered. For homeport offerors, material is required to be picked up by KTR at NAVSTA San Diego:

1. 3985 Cummings Road, Bldg-116, NAVSTA San Diego 92136.

2. 401 W. 8th Street (Bay Door #19E) National City, CA 91950.

Points of contact:

Fred Fomby, fred.fomby@navy.mil, 619-556-3375.

Jimmy Cubillo, jimmy.cubillo@navy.mil, 619-556-3368.

Geika Smith, geika.smith@navy.mil, 619-556-3420

Amendment

00001

17 259-10-

Number 2 Gas Turbine Mixing Room, Uptake and Boundary

Layer

Infra-Red Suppression System (BLISS) Cap; repair and preserve

Attachment J-1

Specification Package

No. TPPC-DDG73-

SWRMC19-CN01

Contractor notes the 1.1 Title states, "Number 2 Gas Turbine Mixing Room" however the locations listed in 1.2.1 through

1.2.4 do not match that identified in the title.

Contractor notes that the Attachment J-4 DDG73 DECATUR Pricing_Spreadsheet Work Item 259-10-001 is titled

"Number One Gas Turbine Mixing Room, Uptake and Boundary Layer Infra-Red Suppression System (BLISS) Cap;

repair".

Please provide an Errata correcting the specification as written to reflect the Attachment J-4 DDG73 DECATUR

Pricing_Spreadsheet to all bidders?

Title of work item should be Nr One not Nr 2. WI corrected. Errata 5

18 256-61-

Sea Water Service Valve and Piping; replace Attachment J-1

Specification Package

No. TPPC-DDG73-

SWRMC19-CN01

Paragraphs 1.3.9 through 1.3.13 identifies schedule 40 70/30 pipe.

The reference 2.12 drawing 802-5959353 Rev BK, shows the seawater piping sections to be replaced with all piping materials listed on this drawing identified as class 200 70/30 CuNi tubing.

Contractor notes recommends use class 200 tubing vice schedule 40 pipe that is not available.

Please provide clarification as to the dispairity between reference 2.12 and the specification as writtien?

Use what is stated in the drawing class 200 70/30 CuNi tubing. WI corrected. Errata 5

19 150-11-

Increase Deck Plate Thickness Modifications; accomplish Attachment J-1

Specification Package

No. TPPC-DDG73-

SWRMC19-CN01

Paragraph 3.4 states, "Remove and install new each decoy launcher foundation listed in 1.3.2 and located in 1.2.2 in accordance with 2.9 and 2.10".

*Contractor notes in order to accomplish paragraph 3.4 details from a 2nd Tier reference 4, drawing 180-6219046 Rev

R, of reference 2.9 is required, however was not identified to be accomplished or used as guidance in this Specification as written.

*Contractor notes that IAW 2nd Tier reference drawing 180-6219046 Rev R, GN 34, the decoy launcher foundations will require In-Place Macining and are identified as "CRITICAL ALIGNMENT" it is additionaly noted that there is no (V) (G)

Check Points requirements to ensure that there are no deviations of dimensions and clearances between each new foundation and the equipment removed in 3.4.

Please provide clarifiation as to the disparities identifined in the specification as written and will a Errata be issued to all bidders?

In order to accomplish the requirement in 3.4 everything in reference 2.9 needs to be completed and all its applicable references that apply. A (V) (G) is added to for the critical allignment check. WI corrected.

Errata 5.