N00024-17-R-4312_Exeuction_Planning_SOW_DRAFT.pdf

PDF 143 KB Posted

Attached to
LCS Execution Planning Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00024-17-R-4312
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to LCS Execution Planning, newest first.
File Type Posted
Enclosure_1_-_Bidders_Question_Response_Q_36.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-4312_A0004.pdf PDF
Enclosure_1_Final_Response_to_Industry_Questions_No28-35.pdf PDF
S-2_Workload_Estimate.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-4312_A0003.pdf PDF
Enclosure_1-_Bidders_Question_Response_Amendment_3_Qs_23-27.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-4312_A0002_Final.pdf PDF
Enclosure_1-_Bidders_Question_Response_final_Amend_2_Qs_8-22.pdf PDF
Enclosure_1-_Bidders_Question_Response_1-7.pdf PDF
S-3_Staffing_Plan.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-17-R-4312_A0001_Final.pdf PDF
S-8_Bidders_Questions_Form_final.doc DOC document
N00024-17-R-4312_Solicitation_and_Attachments.zip ZIP file
REQUEST_FOR_INFORMATION_N00024-17-R-4312.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-4312_LCS_Execution_Planning_Industry_Day_Q_and_A.pdf PDF
Execution_Planning_Industry_Day_Slides_FINAL.pdf PDF
Contractor_SignIn_Sheet.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_Welcome_Package.pdf PDF
Additional_Base_Access_Instructions.pdf PDF
SECNAV_5512.pdf PDF
Copy_of_SAMPLE.XLS XLS spreadsheet
SHVR_Template_SWRMC_2016_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
REQUEST_FOR_BASE_ACCESS_FORM_(18).doc DOC document
N00024-17-R-4312_SSQ_Response_2-5.docx DOCX document
N00024-17-R-4312_SSQ_Response_1.docx DOCX document
PWS_Sources_Sought_Execution_Planning_FBO.docx DOCX document
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N00024-17-R-4312

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

STATEMENT OF WORK

1.0 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION

This Single Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (SAIDIQ) vehicle applies to the maintenance and modernization of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Class. This Statement of Work (SOW) consists of Execution Planning efforts including, but not limited to Availability Assessment support, Availability Planning support, Availability Execution support, Integrated Logistics support, Special Projects, and Long Lead Time Material (LLTM) procurement and inventory in support of Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Availabilities, Continuous Maintenance Availabilities (CMAVs), Sustainment Availabilities, Continuous Maintenance (CM), Emergent Maintenance (EM), and Window of Opportunity (WOO).

These efforts are to support LCS Class ships homeported in San Diego, California and Mayport, Florida, Contiguous United States (CONUS), and Outside Contiguous United States (OCONUS) as specified in the delivery order (DO).

Unless specified otherwise in a DO request for proposal (RFP), all work will be performed at the Single Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (SAIDIQ) Contract holder’s facility.

1.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The Successful SAIDIQ Prime Contractor, under the direction of the Ordering Activity(s) established at contract award, but as an independent Contractor and not as an agent of the Government, shall provide the necessary Execution Planning functions for the accomplishment of work identified in each DO. Typical Execution Planning efforts consist of Availability Assessment, Availability Planning support, Availability Execution support, Integrated Logistics support, Special Projects, and Long Lead Time Material (LLTM) procurement and inventory in support of Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Availabilities, Continuous Maintenance Availabilities (CMAVs), Sustainment Availabilities, Continuous Maintenance (CM) and Emergent Maintenance (EM) Window of Opportunity (WOO).

The Prime Contractor shall be responsible for all work required under a DO, regardless of whether work items are performed with Prime or subcontracted resources. The Prime Contractor is responsible for all contracted and subcontracted labor, management, supervision, coordination, quality control, quality assurance, quality management necessary to perform the requirements of each planning DO. The Prime Contractor shall ensure adequate resources are dedicated to comply with the standards, guidelines and procedures as stated to satisfy the requirements of DOs.

In performing this contract, as tasked by individual DOs, the Prime Contractor shall:

a. Furnish the necessary resources including management, technical services, personnel, materials, equipment, supporting electronic information resources, and support services required to accomplish a full range of planning for repairs and alterations, assessments, analysis, and material inventory management for all equipment and systems onboard LCS Class ships.

b. Provide required reports and documentation, compatible with Windows 7/ Windows 10 as the standard Network Operating System and MS Office 2007, or later, as the standard Office Software. Required report formats will be approved by the Government prior to use. The use of web applications is required. Department of Defense (DoD) Common Access Card (CAC) and Public Key Infrastructure certification will be required for access to DoD web and other Navy Automated Information Systems (AIS) applications.

c. Accomplish planning using Navy AIS applications, to include, but not limited to the following:

1. Navy Maintenance Database (NMD)

2. Validating, Screening and Brokering (VSB)

3. Maintenance and Ship Work Planning (M&SWP)

4. Navy Data Environment (NDE)

5. Configuration Data Management Database- Open Architecture (CDMD-OA)

6. Corrosion Assessment Data Entry Tool (CADET)

7. Interactive Computer Aid Provisioning System (ICAPS)

d. Develop detailed work specifications utilizing the Master Specification Catalog (MSC) to include material requirements, work integration requirements, availability analysis, and Process Control Procedures (PCP) for all types of availabilities in the NMD, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD. The Contractor will be required to use Class Standard Work Templates (CSWT) to the maximum extent possible.

e. Access and utilize the Naval Ships Engineering Drawing Repository (NSEDR) and the Technical Data Management Information System (TDMIS) to obtain technical documentation required for all planning efforts. In the event of pro-longed disruption of these technical documentation services, the Contractor will be required to access and utilize the Combined Regional Technical Libraries (CORETL). The CORETL does not provide any proprietary or copy righted technical documentation. The Contractor will submit "Validated" copies of all related non-standard references acquired during the planning of each work specification to NSEDR for incorporation, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

f. Provide all data defined in CDRL Exhibit TBD, to the maximum extent possible, electronically via the Navy Maintenance Database (NMD). In situations where NMD capability cannot be used for data delivery, data shall be provided via email and/or Army Missile and Research, Development and Engineering Command (AMRDEC) distribution to the Government.

g. Invoke NAVSEA standard items, as specified in each Delivery Order (DO) issued. The fiscal year applicable to the standard items will be determined by the issue date of the DO. Whereas standard items are applicable to vessels undergoing planning, the Contractor shall review the standard items for applicability and propose changes/deviations to any standard item to the Government as specified in the DO.

h. Establish, document, implement, and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) as a means of ensuring that the services provided under this contract conform to the requirements specified in this SOW. The system shall, at a minimum, comply with the requirements of ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2008, Quality Management System-Requirements. The QMS shall be subject to periodic audits by the COR or a designated Government representative throughout the life of the contract.

i. Maintain the integrity of Mission Package integration areas IAW the LCS Interface Control Document.

j. For the purpose of this document, Long Lead Time Material (LLTM) is defined as material that takes greater than 6 months/180 days to have orders placed and delivered to support the In Yard Need Date (IYND).

1.2 DELIVERY ORDER REQUIREMENTS

DOs may provide more detailed requirements than those provided in the basic contract award. If a DO does not provide a specific requirement, the terms and conditions of the basic contract shall apply. Each DO RFP will include technical documents such as work specifications, standards, drawings, publications or other documents and statements of work to allow the Contractor to prepare proposals.

Whenever specifications, standards, drawings, publications or other documents are cited without issue number, revision, date or amendment number identified, the revision, date or amendment in effect as of the date of the DO shall apply. Wherever specific issue number, revision, date or amendment number for specifications, standards and publications are specified, the issue specified shall apply.

1.3 DESCRIPTION OF TASKS

1.3.1 AVAILABILITY PLANNING SUPPORT:

1. The Contractor shall manage, supervise and perform the maintenance and modernization planning process including:

a. Execution planning and material identification for CNO Availabilities, CMAVs, Inactivation CMAVs, sustainment Availabilities, phased modernization availabilities, Re-commissioning Availabilities, Continuous Maintenance (CM) Window of Opportunity (WOO), and Emergent Maintenance (EM) WOO utilizing Automated Work Requests / Work Notification (AWR / WN) and other detailed data provided by the Government.

b. Prepare availability work specification packages, develop work specifications and detailed cost estimates to the paragraph and trade level using the NMD. Accomplish the Availability Work Package Planning (also referred to as Execution Planning, Planning, Execution Planning and Availability Planning) and estimating functions as described in the revised LCS modernization milestones provided in Attachment TBD. Planning products shall be in the 4-E specification format, in accordance with CDRLs Exhibit

TBD.

c. All planning shall be coordinated with the Naval Supervising Authority (NSA).

d. The Contractor shall interpret the EM Priority Scheduling of “ASAP” for work specification development requirements of the JFMM Volume II, Chapter II, Part II, Appendix F; Planning Priority Matrix for EM Type Work as no more than twenty-four

(24) hours after Government notification.

e. The Contractor shall validate AWR/Job Sequence Number (JSN) candidates assigned in the NMD to the degree necessary to support continuous development of accurate work specifications. Continuously communicate with NSA and Type Commander (TYCOM) representatives to clarify AWR/WN technical scope and configuration details. The clarification period shall not exceed fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of the AWR/WN in the NMD application for planning.

2. The Contractor shall conduct continuous ship checks in support of TYCOM alteration and repair work specification development.

a. Ship checks shall be conducted on the vessel for which the work specification is being developed, unless written authorization is obtained from the Government to use another vessel of the same LCS Variant within the same homeport. Whenever possible, ship checks shall be conducted by Contractor personnel permanently assigned to LCS Class ship Fleet Concentrated Areas (FCAs). All travel requirements to support ship checks shall be specified in each individual DO.

b. The Contractor shall utilize the ship check templates provided in Attachment TBD, and others as they become available, to validate AWR/JSN scope, identify any conflicts between the technical references and existing shipboard physical configuration, and identify and incorporate environmental conditions. Results of ship checks shall be retained for future reference and auditing purposes. If a template does not exist to support the ship check of existing repairs, the Contractor shall create a new template and submit for Government approval prior to inclusion into Attachment TBD.

c. The Contractor shall annotate whether a ship check has been completed or provide specific justification of incomplete ship checks in Block 4 of the Standard Cost Estimate Form.

d. The Contractor shall provide a report to the Government summarizing all ship checks completed and specification changes made associated with ship check results, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

e. Any ship checks in support of program office or other sponsor modernization work specification development shall be specified in each individual Delivery Order (DO).

3. The Contractor shall accurately plan required maintenance actions, and provide revised or updated documentation reflecting the ship's changed configuration to the Government, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD, using drawing, field sketches, photographic products, test memoranda, installation procedures, and maintenance procedures. No technical documentation shall be created by the Contractor that will alter the original configuration of any individual ship without the written consent of the Government. The Contractor shall liaison with applicable Planning Yard, via the Government representative, for class design, specifications, material identification and material ordering.

4. The Contractor shall review approved Letters of Authorization (LOA) to identify all modernization planning requirements that impact the availability work package development and integration.

5. The Contractor shall continuously develop and submit to the Government for review and acceptance of work specifications for assigned AWR/WNs; including approved alterations, shipyard routines, shipyard services, repairs, and directive class maintenance plan tasks.

a. All Category I NAVSEA Standard Items are automatically invoked and shall be included in the estimating process unless they are specifically deleted from the index of each individual work specification package. The JFMM, Volume VII, Chapter 5 identifies those Category I Standard Items that have direct labor impact.

b. The Contractor shall incorporate Category II NAVSEA standard items, as required, in all cost estimates. Category II items that are included in the work specification shall be estimated at the paragraph and trade level.

c. When required by the technical scope of work specifications being developed, the

Contractor shall invoke NAVSEA Standard Item 009-09 Process Control Procedure (PCP) to provide and accomplish.

6. The Contractor shall coordinate and attend planning product development status review meetings with PMS 505, the NSA and TYCOM representatives, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD. Accomplish the work specification review process in accordance with the revised LCS modernization milestones to support DO planning milestones. The Contractor shall provide attend and actively participate in meetings maximizing the use of local personnel permanently assigned to LCS Class ship FCAs. All travel requirements to support meetings shall be specified in each individual DO.

7. The Contractor shall attend and actively participate in execution planning, knowledge sharing network, and lessons learned performance review meetings to ensure valid planning issues are addressed and incorporated into both work specifications being developed and Master Specification Catalog templates to support subsequent maintenance and modernization planning efforts. The Contractor shall support, attend, and actively participate in contract performance Quarterly Program Reviews (QPRs), in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

The Contractor shall actively participate in meetings maximizing the use of local personnel permanently assigned to LCS Class ship FCAs. All travel requirements to support meetings shall be specified in each individual DO.

8. The Contractor shall provide planning product development progress data for Execution

Planning Status Reports (CDRL TBD). Assist the NSA with naval message development in accordance with the JFMM.

9. The Contractor shall develop an availability schedule duration analysis through integration of

TYCOM repairs and alterations and incorporation of other maintenance or alteration information provided by the Government, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD. The analysis shall include:

a. Development of work schedules and critical path analysis to include testing and trial requirements.

b. Recommended schedule duration required for the authorized availability work package, including testing and trials.

c. Recommended changes in availability schedule duration.

d. Availability schedule duration analysis report, including supporting documentation.

10. The Contractor shall provide a final availability turn over report to the Government prior to publication of the work package in the NMD. Report shall include management assessment of planning effort, management information, financial information, work specification information, reference information, Government Furnished Material and/or Information, option item work specification information, work specification prorate information, lessons learned incorporated, Liaison Action Reports (LAR)/Reverse Liaison Action Reports (RLAR) incorporated, messing and berthing information, Alteration Installation Team (AIT) or third party maintenance provider information, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

11. The Contractor shall provide support to the NSA including development of new work specifications, incorporation of corrections to existing work specifications, providing additional specification, technical, and cost estimate scope details associated with availability work specifications, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

12. The Contractor shall continually measure physical progress to permit a direct comparison of completed work associated with all DO requirements, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit

13. The Contractor shall, for the purposes of feedback analysis, provide planning and execution data associated with planning products to the Master Specification Management Office using the JFMM as guidance, including:

a. Provide database and feedback analysis to include maintaining a database and feedback analysis system/process in support of availability planning programs/processes.

b. Review Condition Found Reports (CFR), and Request for Contract Change (RCC) made to work specifications during availability execution to determine the impact to the original work specifications developed.

c. Review CFRs to determine if, and to what extent, found condition represents a change to contract scope and identify changes that would have a direct impact on future specification use.

d. Identify CSWT and work specification changes using lessons learned during work specification development and execution for incorporation into future execution planning efforts. Identification of lessons learned are not limited to the work specifications developed for any single LCS variant. Identify lessons learned that may apply to both INDEPENDENCE and FREEDOM variants.

e. Collect, collate, and provide CSWT reuse data, to include repetitive repair scope changes to original CSWTs, historical advance growth trends, and repetitive work specifications produced that are candidates for CSWT development.

f. During the course of work specification development, review drawings, data, and other work products for technical accuracy and compliance. Notify the Government in writing of any errors found. For errors found in NAVSEA technical manuals, submit corrective recommendations through the NAVSEA Technical Manual Deficiency/Evaluation Report (TMDER) process.

g. Review approved LARs and RLARs written against SHIPALTS for incorporation on follow on installations specification development.

14. The Contractor shall accomplish additional CNO availability planning requirements, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD and as detailed in each DO. Planning requirements include, but are not limited to:

a. Prior to reuse, compare original CSWTs and Standard Work Templates (SWT) provided as Government Furnished Information (GFI) to the technical scope of current MSC templates. Determine if revisions to GFI CSWTs and SWTs are necessary due to changes in NAVSEA technical direction incorporated into MSC templates. Report all required changes to GFI CSWTs and SWTs to the Government, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit

b. Develop to the maximum extent possible work specifications using GFI CSWTs and SWTs without changes.

c. If a GFI CSWT is available, but must be altered to suit technical scope of work being planned, these changes shall be highlighted in both the work specification and corresponding Standard Cost Estimate Form (Attachment TBD).

d. During availability work package development, monitor the use of GFI CSWTs and

SWTs. Provide documentation of all GFI CSWT and SWT scope and cost estimate changes used for each work specification developed.

e. Provide documentation of all specifications developed without use of a GFI CSWT and/or SWT.

f. Maintain tracking by identifying man-hour and material cost variance associated with each GFI CSWT. Provide a cost variance report to the Government (CDRL TBD).

1.3.2 AVAILABILITY EXECUTION SUPPORT:

1. The Contractor shall provide post award availability execution support in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD. This support includes, but is not limited to:

a. Processing and creating RCCs to incorporate growth work, new work, descoping of requirements, and administrative requirements.

b. Receiving, validating, ship checking and answering CFRs.

c. Incorporating Engineering Service Requests (ESR), LAR and RLARs.

d. Estimating material cost associated with converting Government Furnished Material (GFM) to Contractor Furnished Material (CFM).

e. Determining duplication of requirements with existing RCCs, work specifications, drawings, or other technical requirements.

f. Developing inputs to Standard Cost Estimates.

g. Providing support to the NSA to include, but not limited to preparation of new work specifications, and/or modification of existing work specifications to add or delete requirements.

h. Whenever possible, the Contractor shall provide direct participation using local personnel permanently assigned to LCS CLASS FCAs. All travel requirements associated with availability execution support shall be specified in each individual DO.

1.3.3 INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SUPPORT (ILS):

1. The Contractor shall provide the necessary services and products to support Integrated Logistic Life Cycle, Integrated Logistic Review, Technical Management, and Configuration Management requirements for provisioning, technical manual requirements, configuration data management and other elements associated with maintenance and repairs work specification development, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD. Comply with the requirements of NAVSEA Standard Item 009-19: (Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD); provide).

a. The Contractor will be responsible for management, identification, and monitoring of all ship change ILS requirements for material, material cost, and delivery requirements necessary for repairs, TYCOM alterations and work specification planning for availability support to ensure proper execution of the work package.

b. In lieu of the report requirements identified in 009-19 the Contractor shall submit one legible copy, in electronic media, of the LLTM report to the Government. This report shall be submitted on a monthly basis until confirmation of material delivery to the NSA delivery point is provided, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

2. For ship alteration development tasked under this contract, the contractor shall develop or update, as necessary, proper provisioning, technical data and manuals, and maintenance requirements in coordination with the applicable ISEA. Completion of these efforts will be reported to the SPM via the preparation and submittal of the ILS Certification form in NDE.

The contractor shall work with the ISEA and SPM to ensure acceptable logistics products are developed, approved, and available to support required milestones.

3. The Contractor shall develop an ILS plan outlining processes, procedures, certifications and personnel required to support all material, parts, components and equipment that the Contractor identifies as LLTM, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

4. The Contractor shall provide for delivery, inspection, control and marking of technical data and materials, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

1.3.4 SHIP ASSESSMENTS

1. When tasked by the Government via DO, the contractor shall plan and execute Standard Work Templates (SWTs) for ship assessments during periods that the ship is available. This may be accomplished during or outside of CNO Repair and Alterations, CMAVs, PMAVs, WOOs, EMs or WOOs for the purposes of inspecting, assessing and reporting deficient materiel conditions of the ship in support of TYCOM, ISIC, Afloat Training Group, ISEA, TSRA or similar assessments and inspections of a ship. All assessment results, whether satisfactory or unsatisfactory, shall be documented using the OPNAV 4700 2-Kilo or Automated Work Request (AWR). The results will be submitted to the Government Port Engineer, Project Manager, and Surface Maintenance, Engineering, Planning, and Program (SURFMEPP) Detachment representative for review and inclusion in upcoming CNO Repair and Alteration, CM, EM, or WOO specification packages.

a. The Contractor shall provide qualified technical personnel and resources per the requirements of this section and the Standard Work Templates (SWTs) invoked for ship assessments. In conjunction with these inspections, the Contractor will integrate work requirements, set priorities, coordinate with the ship, and de-conflict all ship assessments as agreeable by the Government Maintenance Team.

b. Work products shall be completely and thoroughly checked and reviewed by the Contractor for technical accuracy and compliance with provisions of standard work specifications (SWTs) and assignments. The Government is the ultimate approval authority for review for 2-Kilos and Automated Work Request (AWR) provided by the Contractor. Any corrections found necessary due to error or omission by the Contractor, shall be promptly corrected by the Contractor as specified in the DO.

(i) All materiel condition assessments shall be executed using tasks residing in the Class Maintenance Plan (CMP). Scheduled assessment tasks have been validated by an approved Reliability Centered Maintenance analysis to be applicable and effective.

Scheduling of these tasks is based on the last accomplishment date and task periodicity.

These tasks are included in the ship’s Baseline Availability Work Package (BAWP) provided by SUBMEPP/SURFMEPP and are placed on the Current Ships Maintenance Project (CSMP) 140 days after the conclusion of the ship’s CNO availability. Scheduled tasks include, but are not limited to, coating and structural assessment of tank/voids, interior compartments, superstructure, masts, accommodation ladder structural assessments, compressed air system flask assessments, electrical switchboard and distribution IR surveys, dumbwaiter operational and structural assessments, cargo elevator operational and structural assessments, Scheduled tasks can also be pulled if circumstances warrant, and the last accomplished date will be properly updated.

Unscheduled assessments can be pulled from the CMP by the Government Maintenance Team if there is evidence of need (such as degraded performance, errors, or other indication of problems) or by the Regional Maintenance Center (RMC) in support of TYCOM endorsed assessment programs. The Government Maintenance Team shall validate, screen, and broker all CMP task 2-Kilos to the appropriate assessing activity.

(ii) Only procedures specified in the CMP task shall be used to execute assessments.

Information addressing assessment requirements found not to be included within the CMP task, such as local practices, In-Service Engineering Activity unique items, RMC practices, etc., shall be forwarded using the Feedback Report (FBR) process for review and approval as an acceptable addition to the CMP database. If not approved, these practices shall not be used by any activity.

(iii) The Government Maintenance Team will make the preliminary determination of the most appropriate source for all off-ship activity work for its assigned ships. Decisions made by the Port Engineer, with concurrence from the Maintenance Team, shall be in compliance with policies in this instruction, reference (a), and guidance provided by the cognizant RMC.

2. This item includes the ship assessment functions necessary to support work for LCS class ships whether in homeport or at sea or deployed in remote locations.

3. These ship assessment functions shall be accomplished per the direction of the ACO and the requirements of this contract. Contractors shall submit a cost report to the appropriate RMC listing each Standard Work Item (SWT) assigned for ship assessments, as specified in the DO. This report (CDRL TBD) shall be consistent with the cost elements used for the annual incurred cost submissions required by FAR 52.216-7 under this contract. Cost to be returned at the Standard Item 009-99 and OPNAV 4700 2K levels.

1.3.5 SPECIAL PROJECTS

1. The Contractor shall participate in special projects related to material identification and analysis, ship logistic studies, special material forecasts, special studies and analysis including cost and time studies.

2. The Contractor shall perform studies/analyses in support of ship Maintenance/Repair Programs, including future ship classes.

3. The Contractor shall furnish support for engineering and technical analyses related to concepts and designs, focusing on installation engineering, compatibility and operability, and interfaces.

4. The Contractor shall perform on-site analysis of technical problems and provide technical/special project reports. These analyses will include, but not be limited to, interference investigations and design reports to optimize current and planned Navy systems and initiatives, in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

5. The Contractor shall perform Return on Investment (ROI), and Business Case Analysis.

1.3.6 LONG LEAD TIME MATERIAL (LLTM) PLANNING SUPPORT

1. The Contractor and its subcontractors shall use DoD Supply systems as the first source(s) to identify and procure material. The prime Contractor and subcontractors shall prepare and submit transactions to the DoD Supply System via DLATS/DAAS in standard MILSTRIP/MILSTRAP format using Routing Identifier “NRP”. The method of submission of material requisitions to the DoD Supply systems is via NAVSUP’s One Touch Support (OTS). The prime Contractor and subcontractors shall determine if material supports the requisite timeframe(s) to successfully execute the performance of work, as defined in this contract, to meet cost and schedule goals.

2. The Contractor and subcontractors shall record all usage demand data including material procured outside the DoD supply system, during the period of performance of this contract.

Submissions of the MILSTRAP DHA and BHJ documents for material procured outside the DoD supply system shall be submitted monthly by maintenance availability and shall be in accordance with Attachment TBD “MILSTRAP DHA/BHJ Desk Guide for Demand Only Transaction Reporting dtd 12 May 2016”.

3. MILSTRAP DHA and BHJ demand submission data count information shall be provided quarterly by the prime Contractor for all prime and subcontractor data submissions in accordance with CDRL Exhibit TBD.

4. The Contractor shall coordinate with the Planning Yard (PY) for class design, specifications, material identification, and material ordering. This coordination shall include all material management issues such as obsolescence; and Command, Control, Communications, Computer, Combat Systems and Intelligence (C5I)/Software Support Activities’ installations.

5. Manage inventory levels and the replenishment of LCS unique shore-based inventory used during the execution of Contractor performed maintenance. Use of onboard spares by Contractor shall be limited to emergent, unplanned high priority maintenance requirements and shall require the permission of the ship’s Commanding Officer and the LCSRON. The Contractor shall replenish onboard spares 48 hours prior to any deployment.

6. Procurement includes identification and procurement services in support of initial and sustainment spares for loadout and facilities maintenance and management of these items in Realtime Outfitting Management Information System (ROMIS) or other approved management software. These include identification of potential sources, receiving and evaluating quotations, preparing, executing, and tracking purchase orders.

7. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing management, technical services, logistics support, warehousing, kitting, including the use of an approved inventory management control system, to accomplish execution planning material procurement and inventory control in support of assigned availabilities, as specified via DO.

8. The Contractor shall utilize the Navy and Defense Supply System, to the maximum extent possible, unless delivery does not support the start of an availability. When the Contractor must go outside of the Navy Supply System, the Contractor shall strive to establish long term dedicated vendor relationships to maximize cost savings of material purchases and maintain configuration control.

9. The Contractor shall provide a monthly report, including logistics and financial data of all material procured, purchase order status, delivery status, and identify any purchase orders that may not support material delivery by availability start date, as required in CDRL Exhibit

10. The Contractor shall procure LLTM to support CNO/CM/EM Availabilities as specified via

DO.

1.3.7 TRAVEL AND OTHER DIRECT COSTS

Travel and other direct costs such as reproduction costs, supplies, computer and telephone use associated with CNO/CM/EM Availability Planning support, as specified via DO. Other Direct Costs in this instance will include travel: both CONUS and OCONUS for ship check/ship assessment teams.

1.4 REFERENCES

In performing the requirements of this contract, the Contractor shall comply with the latest revisions of the references provided in Attachment TBD.

1.5 ACRONYMS

A list of acronyms referenced in this SOW is provided in Attachment TBD.

1.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

The Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) detailed in Attachment TBD will be used by the Government to evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this contract.

(End of SOW)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .