Amendment_0002-Questions_and_Answers.pdf
PDF 12 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00024-16-R-6405
About this file
Bidders Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 51 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP N00024-16-R-6405—BIDDERS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Question 7. "This RFP was not issued via SEAPORT and, as such, the SEAPORT minimum limitations do not apply....." However, in the RFP N00024-16-R-6405 initially released on February 24, 2017, Page 118 of 152 there is a cite which states – HQ-L-2-0009 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (NAVSEA)(JUN 1999) - Offeror shall submit as part of its proposal a written proposed subcontracting plan in accordance with the clause entitled "SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN" (FAR 52.219-9). The plan shall include the congressionally mandated five percent (5%) goal for small disadvantaged business concerns or a detailed explanation as to why the goal cannot be included in the plan."
Does the government intend to remove this reference in a future Amendment?
ANSWER: No, the Government does not intend to remove HQ-L-2-0009 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (NAVSEA) (JUN 1999) in a future Amendment. Offerors are advised to follow the guidance under HQ-L-0009 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING
PLAN (NAVSEA) (JUN 1999).
Question 8: N00024-16-R-6405 Amendment 1, Attachment 9B cites SOW Element B.3.4 Support for Engineering Services. Within the Statement of Work (SOW) for Yorktown, Amendment 0001 to N00024-16-R-6405, Page 34 of 36 the SOW Paragraph Reference B.3.4 refers to ODC Support.
Will the government include a paragraph Support for Engineering Services in a future Amendment?
ANSWER: Attachment 9B, and the Statement of Work paragraph reference column B.3.4 is corrected to read ODC. In addition columns A.3.13 in Attachment 9A has been corrected and changed from ODC Support to ODC.
Question 9: N00024-16-R-6405, Amendment 0001, Page 36 of 36, Paragraph B.3.6.3 Work Hours. It is requested that the government consider including the following into this paragraph:
The contractor will be compensated for overtime when notified by the Government of the overtime requirement. Overtime costs will be considered unallowable, unless the request for overtime has been approved in advance by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR).
ANSWER: No, Overtime is not anticipated for Yorktown IMA
Question 10: N00024-16-R-6405, Page 96 of 152, FAR Clause 52.222-2 PAYMENT FOR
OVERTIME PREMIUMS (JUL 1990)
(a) The use of overtime is authorized under this contract if the overtime premium cost does not exceed 7% for Pearl Harbor and 0% for Yorktown or the overtime premium is paid for work --
Will the government consider use of Overtime for Yorktown not to exceed 5% in order to meet mission critical requirements as directed by the Commanding Officer with the prior COR approval?
RFP N00024-16-R-6405—BIDDERS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
ANSWER: No, Overtime is not anticipated for Yorktown IMA
Question 11: N00024-16-R-6405, Page 134 of 152,4.4 VOLUME II - TOTAL EVALUATED
COST, FACTOR 3
4.4.1 COST NARRATIVE, Offerors shall submit proposed pricing for Section B. Proposed Target Costs and Target Fees (including Min and
Max Fee, if applicable), Estimated Costs and Fixed Fees, or Estimated Costs must be provided for each applicable Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) identified in this solicitation. The Offeror shall comply with instructions contained herein for submittal of the Cost/Price Proposal.
Offerors shall not propose fees greater than specified in SECTION B. Contract award will be made at the proposed costs and fees of the successful Offeror using that Offeror's proposed Section B pricing.
Will the government provide either an excel spreadsheet or a word document of Schedule B?
ANSWER: See the conformed and Amendment 0002 copies to RFP N00024-16-R-6405
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .