Att_L-4_Vol_3_PPQ-20160503.docm

Attachment L-4 Past Performance Questionnaire N00019-15-R-0079

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire return this form to Patrick Abell, Contract Specialist at Patrick.Abell@Navy.Mil and Noelle Reimers, PCO, at Noelle.Reimers@Navy.Mil or via fax to 301-995-1147 thereby allowing the customer approximately 2 weeks to complete their response.

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor:

b. Program Title:

c. Contract Number:

f. Period of Performance:

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

a. Name:

b. Agency:

c. Position:

d. Relation to Program:

e. Phone/Fax Number/Email Address:

f. Date Questionnaire Completed:

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

3a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

3b. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program

a. |_| I-level maintenance and repair

b. |_| Phase-In Plan and seamless transition of aircraft maintenance effort

c. |_| COMNAVFORINST 4790.2B

d. |_| Management of personnel performing I-level maintenance

e. |_| Quality control program in accordance with AS 9100C

f. |_| Property Management

g. |_| I-level maintenance and repair at multiple sites

h. |_| Cryogenics storage and distribution

i. |_| Maintenance and repair of Aircraft Life Support Systems (ALSS)

j. |_| Maintenance and repair of Avionics Systems

4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4.2 QUESTIONS

4.2.1. TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE

a. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated:

|_|Exceptional |_|Very Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

4.2.2 SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated:

|_|Exceptional |_|Very Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

4.2.3 MANAGEMENT

4.2.3.1 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENSS

What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

4.2.3.2 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGEMENT

a. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?

b. What were the contractor’s risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?

c. If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.

4.2.3.3 Overall Management Assessment

Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated:

|_|Exceptional |_|Very Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

4.2.4. OTHER. Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) problems or strengths with regard to key personnel and (2) the kind of business relationship problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc.

4.3 SUMMARY: If you had the option, knowing what you know today would you either:

|_| award or |_| not award this contract to this contractor, given a choice? Please explain.

Signature _____________________________________________ Date _____________ Please note that electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice as a signature. Signatures (electronic or hand written) verify that the signatory completed this form and agrees with the information contained within it.