AIMD Sect J Attachment 20- PPQ.doc

AIMD Section J

N00019-11-R-0024 Attachment 20 – Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Offerors should provide this questionnaire to their customers within 2 weeks of receipt and customers should complete and send the form to Mr. Bernard Gross at Bernard.gross@navy.mil no later than December 23. 2011.

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor:

b. Program Title:

c. Contract Number:

d. Type of Contract:

Percent Complete:

e. Award Fee (if applicable):

Percent of Award Fee Received:

Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

a. Name:

b. Agency:

c. Position:

d. Relation to Program:

e. Phone: Fax Number: Email Address:

f. Date Questionnaire Completed:

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

3a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

3a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

3b. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program:

(To electronically check box, double click and change Default Value to ‘checked.’)

a. FORMCHECKBOX Systems Integration

b. FORMCHECKBOX Teaming with the Government

c. FORMCHECKBOX Directed subcontracts

d. FORMCHECKBOX Timely delivery of material for installation

e. FORMCHECKBOX Reliability and Maintainability Program development, management, and control

f. FORMCHECKBOX Hazmat/Environmental Program Development, Control and Management

g. FORMCHECKBOX Quality Assurance Management

h. FORMCHECKBOX Development and support of software and supporting documentation

i. FORMCHECKBOX Avionics Systems Modification/Repair/Installation on aircraft

j. FORMCHECKBOX Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS)/Non-Developmental Items (NDI) usage

k. FORMCHECKBOX Avionics Systems Integration/Installation

l. FORMCHECKBOX Management of Government Furnished Property (GFP)

m. FORMCHECKBOX Aircraft Heavy Maintenance to include major aircraft repairs/modifications/inspections, engine, propeller and aircraft component overhaul, repair and configuration tracking

n. FORMCHECKBOX Aircraft Field Maintenance at multiple sites in support of flight operations

o. FORMCHECKBOX Aircraft Flight Operations on Military sites

p. FORMCHECKBOX Configuration Management and Control of Commercial Aircraft and Components

q. FORMCHECKBOX Engineering support for Field and Heavy Maintenance Activities supporting multiple aircraft sites

r. FORMCHECKBOX Flight Safety/Industrial Safety/Quality Assurance Management and Oversight of Field and Heavy Maintenance activities

s. FORMCHECKBOX Corporate Oversight and Management of Aviation Maintenance Programs to include use of subcontract(s) in support of aircraft operating out of multiple sites

t. FORMCHECKBOX Supply Support for Field and Heavy Maintenance activities supporting multiple aircraft sites

u. FORMCHECKBOX Operation, Development and Maintenance of Computerized Management Information Systems in support of Aircraft Field and Heavy Maintenance requirements at multiple sites

v. FORMCHECKBOX Management of Personnel performing aircraft maintenance at multiple sites to include training, recruitment and transfer of personnel between sites

w. FORMCHECKBOX Obtaining Customs Clearances for overseas shipment of parts and material

4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4.2 QUESTIONS

4.2.1. TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE (including Aviation Safety) a.. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated (select one):

FORMCHECKBOX

Exceptional FORMCHECKBOX Very Good FORMCHECKBOX Satisfactory FORMCHECKBOX Marginal FORMCHECKBOX Unsatisfactory

4.2.2: SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

a. What kind of performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these performance problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's performance is rated (select one):

FORMCHECKBOX

Exceptional FORMCHECKBOX Very Good FORMCHECKBOX Satisfactory FORMCHECKBOX Marginal FORMCHECKBOX Unsatisfactory

4.2.3. COST PERFORMANCE (including controlling material, labor, inventory, over & above costs.)

a. What kind of Cost problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. If the contractor experienced an overrun please provide the percentage.

c. What was the cause of these Cost problems or strengths?

d. If available, provide earned value cost performance measures including indices for cost efficiency (CPI) and schedule efficiency (SPI). Based on this information, please provide a narrative assessment of their performance.

e. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

f. Overall, the contractor's Cost performance is rated (select one):

FORMCHECKBOX

Exceptional FORMCHECKBOX Very Good FORMCHECKBOX Satisfactory FORMCHECKBOX Marginal FORMCHECKBOX Unsatisfactory

4.2.4

MANAGEMENT

4.2.4.1

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENSS

a. What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

4.2.4.2

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

a. What was the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran owned small business, women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals?

4.2.4.3

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGEMENT

a. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?

b. What were the contractor’s risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?

c. If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.

4.2.4.4 Overall Management Assessment

a. Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated (select one):

FORMCHECKBOX

Exceptional FORMCHECKBOX Very Good FORMCHECKBOX Satisfactory FORMCHECKBOX Marginal FORMCHECKBOX Unsatisfactory

4.2.5. OTHER. Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) key personnel related problems or strengths, (2) business relationship types of problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc., (3) Aviation and Industrial Safety related problems or strengths, (4) and information related to OSHA Violations.

4.3 SUMMARY: If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you award this contract to this contractor, given the choice? Pick one response:

FORMCHECKBOX

definitely would not

FORMCHECKBOX

probably would not

FORMCHECKBOX

might

FORMCHECKBOX

might not

FORMCHECKBOX

probably would

FORMCHECKBOX

definitely would

Please explain:

Printed Name (if e-mailed); Signed (if faxed or hand-carried) Date

COMPETITION SENSITIVE