M67854-18-R-7600_Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

Attachment 5

RFP M67854-18-R-7600

23 February 2018

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions:

· Sections I through III to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.

· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

· Sections III through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: albert.whitley @usmc.mil on or before April 06, 2018.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

II. Current or Historical Contract Information Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.

Contract No

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

III. Assessor Information Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Quality of Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental safety, etc.)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of outstanding or unacceptable.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

2. Schedule Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Schedule of Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance

Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Timeliness in Meeting Milestones

Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of outstanding or unacceptable.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Management Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS— (timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT— (effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)

MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)

INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM MANGEMENT – (commitment and participation to the IPT process)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of outstanding or unacceptable.

4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Cost Control

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas

COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)

COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing PWS)

INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission

FORECASTING/MANAGEMENT/COST CONTROL

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of outstanding or unacceptable.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

VII. General Comments

Assessor’s Signature Date