M67854-18-R-7600_-_Attachment_5_-_Past_Performance_Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 6 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M67854-18-R-7600
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and information about a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a contractor requesting a reference and the agency providing that reference for a solicitation seeking ammunition support services. It requests information about the contractor and past contract, and evaluates performance across areas such as technical quality, program management, employee retention, small business participation, and cost. The federal contract opportunity notice indicates that solicitation M67854-18-R-7600 has been delayed until the third week of January 2018 for circumstances beyond the agency's control. The opportunity is a pre-solicitation through the United States Marine Corps seeking ammunition support services.
RFP Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Amendment 6 has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
M67854-18-R-7600 Attachment 5
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION M67854-18-R-7600
PM AMMUNITION SUPPORT SERVICES
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104 SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION – To be filled out by the contractor requesting a reference.
A. Contractor: ______________________________________________________________ B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________ C. Contract number: _______________________________________ D. Contract type: ______________________________ E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____ F. Contract Award Date:
G. Contract Completion Date:
H. Initial contract cost: $____________________________ I. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________ J. Statement of Recency to GCSS-MC PDSS Solicitation (See Section L for definitions):
K. Statement of Relevancy to GCSS-MC PDSS Solicitation (See Section L for definitions):
L. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION – To be completed by the reference.
Your assistance in providing valuable past performance references for the prospective Offeror is highly valued and appreciated. Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey.
A. Customer or agency name: ______________________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): ___________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________ B. Evaluator's title/position: _____________________________________________________________ C. Evaluator's e-mail and phone number: ______________________________________________________________ Number of months/years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE | PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| A | ACCEPTABLE – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor that resulted in an acceptable resolution or outcome. |
| N | NEUTRAL - Unable to provide a score. |
| U | UNACCEPTABLE – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Technical Quality Performance |
| A |
| N |
| U |
T1 Quality of operations & maintenance.
T2 Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
T3 Quality and integrity of technical data and/or report preparation and submission efforts
T4 Adequacy and effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5 Ability to implement current standard practices
T7 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
| Program Management |
| A |
| N |
| U |
P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P7. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P8. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P9. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
P10. Contractor’s ability to successfully meet the schedule requirements, develop accurate work schedules, and adhere to schedules.
P11. If encountered, contractor’s ability to overcome schedule difficulties.
P12. Contractor’s ability to provide logistical support for multiple scheduling priorities
| Employee Retention/Attraction |
| A |
| N |
| U |
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
| Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation |
| A |
| N |
| U |
S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan
S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.
| Cost Performance |
| A |
| N |
| U |
C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
2. Please provide written feedback on areas that were graded as Unsatisfactory (U)
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY – Please provide a written narrative on the contractor’s performance.
SECTION 6 – RECOMMENDATION: Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
SECTION 7 – ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
SECTION 8 – SIGNATURE/SUBMISSION
________________________________________________________________ Signature/Printed Name/Date of Person Completing Questionnaire Thank you once again for your assistance. The input provided will greatly aid in the evaluation of the prospective Offeror’s qualifications. Please do not hesitate to contact the following for any questions.
After Completion please E-mail this form to by 15 August 2018:
Mr. Clint Wells AND Ms. Suzanne Marie Blagg at Clinton.wells@usmc.mil and suzanne.blagg@usmc.mil Contracts Team - GCSS-MC Marine Corps Systems Command
Thank you for your assistance!
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .