L-2 RIS Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) CEMAT.docx

Carrier Engineering Maintenance Assist Team (CEMAT)

SOLICITATION NO. N00024-26-R-4114

ATTACHMENT L-2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror

SECTION A: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):

NAME OF OFFEROR:

CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:

PROJECT TITLE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE START DATE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE END DATE (including options):

CUSTOMER POINT OF CONTACT NAME:

POINT OF CONTACT TITLE:

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE:

POINT OF CONTACT MAILING ADDRESS:

POINT OF CONTACT EMAIL:

TYPE OF CONTRACT: (CPFF, CPIF, CPAF, FFP, ETC.):

AMOUNT OF CONTRACT ($USD):

DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES / SERVICES (Provide reason if terminated):

Instructions to Evaluator The Naval Sea Systems Command is procuring capability and capacity to the Ships’ Force for effective support of maintenance, repair and modernization efforts for the CVN 68/78 Class Aircraft Carriers and Surface Ships. Evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance is integral to our source selection process. Accordingly, we request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance; please see Section below for the identity of the Offeror and contract of interest.

Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes Source Selection Sensitive and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials.

Please forward the completed questionnaire no later than 10 August 2026 to:

Hand-written evaluations are acceptable. All evaluations must relate solely to the Offeror and the contract, task, or order identified in SECTION A.

For each of the criteria listed below, the evaluator must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box (double-clicking the box), as applicable. Please provide supporting comments for each rating. Please use your supporting comments to highlight the Offeror’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets if required. Your ratings and comments should reflect only “contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.

Please enter the requested information in SECTION B for the person primarily responsible for completing the questionnaire, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the point of contact identified above. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR

Section B: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Evaluator):

NAME:

TITLE:

AGENCY/CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION:

PHONE:

E-MAIL

Signature:

1. Quality Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to customer requirements, standards of good workmanship and safe practices.

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SUBSTANTIATING COMMENTS:

2. Schedule Performance Ability to develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules as well as the ability to adapt to changes in requirements and work schedules.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. Cost Performance Ability to accurately forecast and control costs throughout all phases of the contract.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4. Management Ability to overcome technical challenges by applying sound engineering principles, complete required engineering analyses, and develop adequate technical reports and plans.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

5. Small Business Subcontracting Compliance with subcontracting plan goals for Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Women-owned business concerns, etc. and monetary targets for such concerns.

Exceeded all statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had exceptional success with initiatives to assist, promote, and utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), HUBZone small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB) and service disabled veteran owned small business (SDVOSB). Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Went above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan and other small business requirements of the contract/order. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner. Did not have a history of three or more unjustified reduced or untimely payments to small business subcontractors within a 12-month period.

Met all of the statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had significant success with initiatives to assist, promote and utilize SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met or exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Endeavored to go above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner. Did not have a history of three or more unjustified reduced or untimely payments to small business subcontractors within a 12-month period.

Demonstrated a good faith effort to meet all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the various socio-economic categories for the current period. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met any other small business participation requirements included in the contract/order. Fulfilled the requirements of the subcontracting plan included in the contract/order. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner. Did not have a history of three or more unjustified reduced or untimely payments to small business subcontractors within a 12-month period.

Deficient in meeting key subcontracting plan elements. Deficient in complying with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner. Failed to satisfy one or more requirements of a corrective action plan currently in place; however, does show an interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level and has demonstrated a commitment to apply the necessary resources to do so. Required a corrective action plan. Did not have a history of three or more unjustified reduced or untimely payments to small business subcontractors within a 12-month period.

Noncompliant with FAR 52.219-8 and 52.219-9, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner. Showed little interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level or is generally uncooperative. Required a corrective action plan. Had a history of three or more unjustified reduced or untimely payments to small business subcontractors within a 12-month period.

6. Regulatory Compliance Follow laws (failure to report, late payments to subcontractors, human trafficking violations, tax delinquency, defective cost and pricing data) and regulations (complying to financial, environmental, safety, and labor regulations).

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104